Http header injection in Storm UI responses

2018-06-19 Thread sunil yadav
Hi All,

Need some guidance on how I can add configure http headers to response from
Storm UI.

Use case:

we have a security scan running on our servers which keep scanning deployed
apps on different ports. One of the thing it keeps complaining is about
missing X-content-type-options header missing on port .

I was thinking of using UI filters config to use custom http filter but not
sure if it will be supported.

Any thoughts, ideas how to achieve this.

P.s. I am using storm 1.2.1

Thanks,
Sunil


Re: [DISCUSSION] Apache Storm and moving to the Attic

2023-02-01 Thread sunil yadav
One side note looking to see what folks are migrating or moved to if not
using Storm actively. Any cloud native DAG platform to recommend?

-Sunil

On Wed, Feb 1, 2023 at 6:12 PM Stephen Powis via user 
wrote:

> Ah Yea, also not opposed to the move to the attic if it's determined to be
> most appropriate, but I had a similar experience as Richard where I
> submitted some PRs, asked for comments/thoughts/review, and even offered to
> take over ownership of one of the sub modules and got no responses.
> Perhaps I just submitted under the wrong forum to get an answer, but
> definitely a bummer, and would love to see the project/community get
> revived.
>
> - Stephen
>
> On Wed, Feb 1, 2023 at 10:09 PM Richard Zowalla  wrote:
>
>> Hi Aaron,
>>
>> I am CC the users@ list as they weren't contained in the initial
>> proposal. Perhaps, there are people or institutions in the wild, who
>> want to volunteer or give it a try (still at the ASF level).
>>
>> Of course it shouldn't prevent a VOTE for moving to the attic, but an
>> additional try to get some more attention (if needed).
>>
>> Gruß
>> Richard
>>
>>
>> Am Dienstag, dem 31.01.2023 um 08:00 -0600 schrieb Aaron Niskode-
>> Dossett:
>> > Thank you to those who responded. Given that the low number of
>> > responses I
>> > am going to start a vote on moving to the attic tomorrow.
>> >
>> > One other note: A vote to move to the attic would not mean the end of
>> > Storm, the project can be forked by anyone who wants to continue the
>> > work
>> > (just as it can be forked today), it would just be outside of the
>> > ASF.
>> >
>> > On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 3:12 AM Richard Zowalla 
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hi all,
>> > >
>> > > I also experienced, that dev@ activity is quite low. I did provide
>> > > some
>> > > PRs and asked questions a few months ago and didn't get any
>> > > feedback,
>> > > although the PRs got merged in the end. I think, that we need some
>> > > sort
>> > > of community rebuilding / revival, if we want to maintain Storm in
>> > > a
>> > > sustainable way (like it is done for TomEE or OpenNLP).
>> > >
>> > > Nevertheless, as I am also a committer on StormCrawler, which
>> > > relies on
>> > > Storm (obviously) _and_ is used in our research work, I am also
>> > > happy
>> > > to jump in as a volunteer, if some ppl are needed.
>> > >
>> > > Gruß
>> > > Richard
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Am Mittwoch, dem 25.01.2023 um 22:00 + schrieb Bipin Prasad:
>> > > > I am volunteering to take on the role of PMC chairFor Storm. Not
>> > > > quite sure about the process.
>> > > > Thanks—Bipin Prasad
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > On Wednesday, January 25, 2023, 4:50 PM, Aaron Niskode-Dossett <
>> > > > doss...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > Hello Storm developer community,
>> > > >
>> > > > In the past year or so this project has slowed down and the
>> > > > Project
>> > > > Management Committee [PMC] has almost no active members.  The PMC
>> > > > chair
>> > > > resigned in 2022 with due notice and noone has since volunteered
>> > > > to
>> > > > assume
>> > > > those duties.  I myself am an inactive PMC member.
>> > > >
>> > > > This suggests to me that it's time to consider moving this
>> > > > project to
>> > > > the
>> > > > Attic [1].  I would view this as the natural culmination of a
>> > > > very
>> > > > successful Apache project and not as a mark of failure.  There
>> > > > are
>> > > > many,
>> > > > many successful and influential projects in the attic.
>> > > >
>> > > > The alternative to moving to the attic would be to reconstitute
>> > > > the
>> > > > PMC
>> > > > with *new members* of the development community willing to take
>> > > > on
>> > > > the
>> > > > responsibilities of the project and reporting to the Apache
>> > > > Software
>> > > > Foundation board.
>> > > >
>> > > > So, please respond to this thread if you are interested in that
>> > > > role.
>> > > > Please also respond if you believe moving to the attic is
>> > > > appropriate.  A
>> > > > vote on moving to the attic may be held on this list in the
>> > > > future.
>> > > >
>> > > > Thanks you for your time,
>> > > > Aaron
>> > > >
>>
> > > > [1]
>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://attic.apache.org/__;!!DCbAVzZNrAf4!FDOUbKYpvz6tgLpyOZoJcYfuR1asy2k3NEI5NZVLzpP4SjhO8CmSTJ1eT37qrLCn1LaATZs3gwa_5Q$
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>>
>>