DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38529] New: - [TagLib] Patch for BaseHandlerTag to use LoopTag rather then LoopTagSupport to verify JSLT
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38529. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38529 Summary: [TagLib] Patch for BaseHandlerTag to use LoopTag rather then LoopTagSupport to verify JSLT Product: Struts Version: 1.2.8 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Keywords: PatchAvailable Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Taglibs AssignedTo: dev@struts.apache.org ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The BaseHandlerTag uses LoopTagSupport class when verifing JSLT is avaiable when indexed is true. It should use the interface LoopTag when verifing -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38529] - [TagLib] Patch for BaseHandlerTag to use LoopTag rather then LoopTagSupport to verify JSLT
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38529. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38529 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-06 13:59 --- Created an attachment (id=17602) -- (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17602action=view) Paatch to use LoopTag Interface -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project struts-taglib (in module struts) failed
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project struts-taglib has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affects 9 projects, and has been outstanding for 3 runs. The current state of this project is 'Failed', with reason 'Build Failed'. For reference only, the following projects are affected by this: - jakarta-tomcat-5 : Servlet 2.4 and JSP 2.0 Reference Implementation - jakarta-velocity-tools : Velocity-Tools project - portals-bridges-frameworks : Support for JSR168 compliant Portlet development - portals-bridges-struts : Support for JSR168 compliant Portlet development - portals-bridges-velocity : Support for JSR168 compliant Portlet development - smartfrog-tomcat : Smartfrog: Application Deployment from HP Laboratories - struts-el : Model 2 Model-View-Controller framework for Servlets and JSP - struts-sslext : The Struts SSL Extension for HTTP/HTTPS switching - struts-taglib : Model 2 Model-View-Controller framework for Servlets and JSP Full details are available at: http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/struts/struts-taglib/index.html That said, some information snippets are provided here. The following annotations (debug/informational/warning/error messages) were provided: -DEBUG- Sole output [struts-taglib-06022006.jar] identifier set to project name -DEBUG- Dependency on xdoclet exists, no need to add for property maven.jar.xdoclet. -DEBUG- Dependency on xdoclet exists, no need to add for property maven.jar.xdoclet-web-module. -DEBUG- Dependency on xdoclet exists, no need to add for property maven.jar.xdoclet-ejb-module. -DEBUG- Dependency on xdoclet exists, no need to add for property maven.jar.xdoclet-apache-module. -DEBUG- Dependency on xdoclet exists, no need to add for property maven.jar.xdoclet-xdoclet-module. -DEBUG- Dependency on jakarta-servletapi-4 exists, no need to add for property maven.jar.servlet-api. -DEBUG- Dependency on xdoclet exists, no need to add for property maven.jar.xdoclet-hibernate-module. -DEBUG- Dependency on xdoclet exists, no need to add for property maven.jar.xdoclet-jdo-module. -DEBUG- Dependency on xdoclet exists, no need to add for property maven.jar.xdoclet-jmx-module. -DEBUG- Dependency on xdoclet exists, no need to add for property maven.jar.xdoclet-portlet-module. -DEBUG- (Gump generated) Maven Properties in: /usr/local/gump/public/workspace/struts/taglib/build.properties -INFO- Failed with reason build failed -DEBUG- Maven POM in: /usr/local/gump/public/workspace/struts/taglib/project.xml -DEBUG- Maven project properties in: /usr/local/gump/public/workspace/struts/taglib/project.properties -INFO- Failed to extract fallback artifacts from Gump Repository The following work was performed: http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/struts/struts-taglib/gump_work/build_struts_struts-taglib.html Work Name: build_struts_struts-taglib (Type: Build) Work ended in a state of : Failed Elapsed: 7 secs Command Line: maven --offline jar [Working Directory: /usr/local/gump/public/workspace/struts/taglib] CLASSPATH:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project struts-taglib (in module struts) failed
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project struts-taglib has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affects 9 projects, and has been outstanding for 3 runs. The current state of this project is 'Failed', with reason 'Build Failed'. For reference only, the following projects are affected by this: - jakarta-tomcat-5 : Servlet 2.4 and JSP 2.0 Reference Implementation - jakarta-velocity-tools : Velocity-Tools project - portals-bridges-frameworks : Support for JSR168 compliant Portlet development - portals-bridges-struts : Support for JSR168 compliant Portlet development - portals-bridges-velocity : Support for JSR168 compliant Portlet development - smartfrog-tomcat : Smartfrog: Application Deployment from HP Laboratories - struts-el : Model 2 Model-View-Controller framework for Servlets and JSP - struts-sslext : The Struts SSL Extension for HTTP/HTTPS switching - struts-taglib : Model 2 Model-View-Controller framework for Servlets and JSP Full details are available at: http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/struts/struts-taglib/index.html That said, some information snippets are provided here. The following annotations (debug/informational/warning/error messages) were provided: -DEBUG- Sole output [struts-taglib-06022006.jar] identifier set to project name -DEBUG- Dependency on xdoclet exists, no need to add for property maven.jar.xdoclet. -DEBUG- Dependency on xdoclet exists, no need to add for property maven.jar.xdoclet-web-module. -DEBUG- Dependency on xdoclet exists, no need to add for property maven.jar.xdoclet-ejb-module. -DEBUG- Dependency on xdoclet exists, no need to add for property maven.jar.xdoclet-apache-module. -DEBUG- Dependency on xdoclet exists, no need to add for property maven.jar.xdoclet-xdoclet-module. -DEBUG- Dependency on jakarta-servletapi-4 exists, no need to add for property maven.jar.servlet-api. -DEBUG- Dependency on xdoclet exists, no need to add for property maven.jar.xdoclet-hibernate-module. -DEBUG- Dependency on xdoclet exists, no need to add for property maven.jar.xdoclet-jdo-module. -DEBUG- Dependency on xdoclet exists, no need to add for property maven.jar.xdoclet-jmx-module. -DEBUG- Dependency on xdoclet exists, no need to add for property maven.jar.xdoclet-portlet-module. -DEBUG- (Gump generated) Maven Properties in: /usr/local/gump/public/workspace/struts/taglib/build.properties -INFO- Failed with reason build failed -DEBUG- Maven POM in: /usr/local/gump/public/workspace/struts/taglib/project.xml -DEBUG- Maven project properties in: /usr/local/gump/public/workspace/struts/taglib/project.properties -INFO- Failed to extract fallback artifacts from Gump Repository The following work was performed: http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/struts/struts-taglib/gump_work/build_struts_struts-taglib.html Work Name: build_struts_struts-taglib (Type: Build) Work ended in a state of : Failed Elapsed: 7 secs Command Line: maven --offline jar [Working Directory: /usr/local/gump/public/workspace/struts/taglib] CLASSPATH:
Re: [OT] ASF legal
On 2/6/06, Laurie Harper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The reason they do that is they want to be absolutely safe, which I understand. But since it doesn't work that way round here, I thought I'd see if I could get an IAAL (as opposed to an IANAL :-) opinion on why it's not needed. We can exercise some discretion as to minor patches, but for larger contributions, especially for anything that could stand alone, nowadays, ASF PMCs can and do ask for CLAs. It's just a matter of degree. I very much doubt that anyone on legal-discuss@ is going to say that it's wrong to require a CLA for everything that goes into the codebase. -Ted. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38482] - [shale] clay enhancement - reusable clay components
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38482. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38482 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #17578|0 |1 is obsolete|| -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38482] - [shale] clay enhancement - reusable clay components
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38482. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38482 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #17579|0 |1 is obsolete|| -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38482] - [shale] clay enhancement - reusable clay components
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38482. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38482 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #17580|0 |1 is obsolete|| -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38482] - [shale] clay enhancement - reusable clay components
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38482. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38482 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-06 16:45 --- Created an attachment (id=17603) -- (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17603action=view) core library does not depend on myfaces implementation -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38482] - [shale] clay enhancement - reusable clay components
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38482. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38482 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-06 16:46 --- Created an attachment (id=17604) -- (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17604action=view) skin -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38482] - [shale] clay enhancement - reusable clay components
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38482. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38482 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-06 16:46 --- Created an attachment (id=17605) -- (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17605action=view) web app -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38482] - [shale] clay enhancement - reusable clay components
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38482. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38482 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-06 16:47 --- Created an attachment (id=17606) -- (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17606action=view) dependencies -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38482] - [shale] clay enhancement - reusable clay components
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38482. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38482 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-06 16:49 --- No longer dependent on myfaces. Includes almost all of the same functionality except for data scrolling. Example web app shown working with sun reference impl. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
svn commit: r375303 - /struts/shale/trunk/tiger/src/test/org/apache/shale/tiger/faces/faces-config.xml
Author: craigmcc Date: Mon Feb 6 08:11:49 2006 New Revision: 375303 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=375303view=rev Log: Add an empty META-INF/faces-config.xml resource for the component library JAR that is built up in the Tiger Extensions unit tests. This is now needed to trigger scanning the JAR for classes with Tiger Extensions annotations. Added: struts/shale/trunk/tiger/src/test/org/apache/shale/tiger/faces/faces-config.xml (with props) Added: struts/shale/trunk/tiger/src/test/org/apache/shale/tiger/faces/faces-config.xml URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/struts/shale/trunk/tiger/src/test/org/apache/shale/tiger/faces/faces-config.xml?rev=375303view=auto == --- struts/shale/trunk/tiger/src/test/org/apache/shale/tiger/faces/faces-config.xml (added) +++ struts/shale/trunk/tiger/src/test/org/apache/shale/tiger/faces/faces-config.xml Mon Feb 6 08:11:49 2006 @@ -0,0 +1,38 @@ +?xml version=1.0? + + +!DOCTYPE faces-config PUBLIC + -//Sun Microsystems, Inc.//DTD JavaServer Faces Config 1.1//EN + http://java.sun.com/dtd/web-facesconfig_1_1.dtd; + + +!-- + + Copyright 2006 The Apache Software Foundation. + + Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the License); + you may not use this file except in compliance with the License. + You may obtain a copy of the License at + + http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 + + Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software + distributed under the License is distributed on an AS IS BASIS, + WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. + See the License for the specific language governing permissions and + limitations under the License. + + $Id$ + +-- + + +!-- === MARKER CONFIGURATION RESOURCE = -- + + +faces-config + + !-- Empty configuration resource to flag the containing JAR file + as having classes to be analyzed for annotations -- + +/faces-config Propchange: struts/shale/trunk/tiger/src/test/org/apache/shale/tiger/faces/faces-config.xml -- svn:eol-style = native Propchange: struts/shale/trunk/tiger/src/test/org/apache/shale/tiger/faces/faces-config.xml -- svn:keywords = Date Author Id Revision HeadURL - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38534] New: - DOS attack, application hack
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38534. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38534 Summary: DOS attack, application hack Product: Struts Version: 1.2.7 Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P5 Component: Action AssignedTo: dev@struts.apache.org ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] in ActionForm the method getMultipartRequestHandler() is public and gives access to the request, the implementation CommonsMultipartRequestHandler gives access to servletContext, and BeanUtils 1.7 gives the posibility to set an attribute in context. In othwer words the following html code hacks an application made with struts 1.2.7 and 1.2.8 and bean utils 1.7 form method=post enctype=multipart/form-data action=http://whateverdotcom/x.do; input type=hidden name=multipartRequestHandler.servlet.servletContext.attribute(org.apache.struts.action.MODULE) value=exe/ input type=submit/ /form It was tested against 1.2.7 and beanutils 1.7 . The source code of 1.2.8 shows no change. An work arround is to use a prior 1.7 beanutils -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38535] New: - AbstractFacesBean: using own convenience accessors
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38535. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38535 Summary: AbstractFacesBean: using own convenience accessors Product: Struts Version: Unknown Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: Shale AssignedTo: dev@struts.apache.org ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] AbstractFacesBean is now some convenience accessors (like getFacesContext()) instead of FacesCxt.getcurrentInstance() -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38535] - AbstractFacesBean: using own convenience accessors
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38535. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38535 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-06 18:57 --- Created an attachment (id=17607) -- (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17607action=view) the patch -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38536] New: - UseCases (remoting): Refactored Business.java
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38536. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38536 Summary: UseCases (remoting): Refactored Business.java Product: Struts Version: Unknown Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: Shale AssignedTo: dev@struts.apache.org ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Since Business.java is an AbstractFacesBean, I refactored the clazz to use its own convenience accessors (like getFacesContext() -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38536] - UseCases (remoting): Refactored Business.java
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38536. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38536 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-06 18:58 --- Created an attachment (id=17608) -- (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17608action=view) the patch -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[shale] additional use case
Hello, I have some code that I believe might be helpful in showcasing the strengths of shale and clay. You can grab the code from http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38482. It demonstrates usage of shale remoting for static resources and contains examples of some clay component trees that are reusable. I have tested it with both the sun reference impl and myfaces, IE and firefox, on tomcat. Please let me know what you think. Thanks, Ryan
Re: [shale] additional use case
From: Ryan Wynn [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hello, I have some code that I believe might be helpful in showcasing the strengths of shale and clay. You can grab the code from http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38482. It demonstrates usage of shale remoting for static resources and contains examples of some clay component trees that are reusable. I have tested it with both the sun reference impl and myfaces, IE and firefox, on tomcat. Please let me know what you think. Ryan, I think this is a very interesting example. At minimum, I'd like to see this become a Clay usecase example project in it's own. I think that this belongs outside of the Clay baseline. Having said that, I'm looking for a Struts PMC member to give us direction. Craig, What are your thoughts? Thanks, Ryan Gary
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38542] New: - [shale] clay not handling binding attribute correctly
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38542. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38542 Summary: [shale] clay not handling binding attribute correctly Product: Struts Version: Nightly Build Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Shale AssignedTo: dev@struts.apache.org ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] clay is only respecting the binding attribute on a component definition during the restore view phase. the binding is not being established upon creation of the component. If initially the binding expression returns a component, use that component instead of creating one. If the binding expression returns null, then create the component and set it into the binding expression. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [shale] additional use case
On 2/6/06, Gary VanMatre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Ryan Wynn [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hello, I have some code that I believe might be helpful in showcasing the strengths of shale and clay. You can grab the code from http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38482. It demonstrates usage of shale remoting for static resources and contains examples of some clay component trees that are reusable. I have tested it with both the sun reference impl and myfaces, IE and firefox, on tomcat. Please let me know what you think. Ryan, I think this is a very interesting example. At minimum, I'd like to see this become a Clay usecase example project in it's own. I think that this belongs outside of the Clay baseline. Having said that, I'm looking for a Struts PMC member to give us direction. Craig, What are your thoughts? I'll take a look at this tonight. I have no problem with setting up more examples ... indeed, that's part of the reason I refactored the build artifacts a bit, so the download would not get bloated by multiple copies of the dependencies. For a contribution this big, we'll also need to make sure that Ryan (and any other authors) fill out and submit an Individual Contributor License Agreement (ICLA) [1], unless this would be covered by a Corporate CLA from his employer already. Thanks, Ryan Gary Craig [1] http://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.txt
Re: [shale] additional use case
On 2/6/06, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 2/6/06, Gary VanMatre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Ryan Wynn [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hello, I have some code that I believe might be helpful in showcasing the strengths of shale and clay. You can grab the code from http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38482. It demonstrates usage of shale remoting for static resources and contains examples of some clay component trees that are reusable. I have tested it with both the sun reference impl and myfaces, IE and firefox, on tomcat. Please let me know what you think. Ryan, I think this is a very interesting example. At minimum, I'd like to see this become a Clay usecase example project in it's own. I think that this belongs outside of the Clay baseline. Having said that, I'm looking for a Struts PMC member to give us direction. Craig, What are your thoughts? I'll take a look at this tonight. I have no problem with setting up more examples ... indeed, that's part of the reason I refactored the build artifacts a bit, so the download would not get bloated by multiple copies of the dependencies. For a contribution this big, we'll also need to make sure that Ryan (and any other authors) fill out and submit an Individual Contributor License Agreement (ICLA) [1], unless this would be covered by a Corporate CLA from his employer already. Actually, an ICLA would still be needed. The ICLA is always needed, whereas the CCLA is only needed if the employer feels they need to have one. -- Martin Cooper Thanks, Ryan Gary Craig [1] http://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.txt
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38374] - Validation always skipped with Globals.CANCEL_KEY
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38374. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38374 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-07 03:15 --- For the sake of aggregating ideas, I am including a link to the CancellableFormController class in the Spring Framework. While we did not go ahead with the idea that the action should implement an specific interface to be cancellable, if we ever switch our minds, this is a reference: http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/springframework/spring/src/org/springframework/web/servlet/mvc/CancellableFormController.java?rev=1.5view=auto -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
svn commit: r375458 - in /struts/shale/trunk/test-framework/src/java/org/apache/shale/test/mock: MockExternalContext.java MockViewHandler.java
Author: craigmcc
Date: Mon Feb 6 19:45:21 2006
New Revision: 375458
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=375458view=rev
Log:
Implement some more methods that will be needed when you actually call
renderers in a test case.
Modified:
struts/shale/trunk/test-framework/src/java/org/apache/shale/test/mock/MockExternalContext.java
struts/shale/trunk/test-framework/src/java/org/apache/shale/test/mock/MockViewHandler.java
Modified:
struts/shale/trunk/test-framework/src/java/org/apache/shale/test/mock/MockExternalContext.java
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/struts/shale/trunk/test-framework/src/java/org/apache/shale/test/mock/MockExternalContext.java?rev=375458r1=375457r2=375458view=diff
==
---
struts/shale/trunk/test-framework/src/java/org/apache/shale/test/mock/MockExternalContext.java
(original)
+++
struts/shale/trunk/test-framework/src/java/org/apache/shale/test/mock/MockExternalContext.java
Mon Feb 6 19:45:21 2006
@@ -115,7 +115,7 @@
public String encodeActionURL(String sb) {
-throw new UnsupportedOperationException();
+return sb;
}
@@ -129,7 +129,7 @@
public String encodeResourceURL(String sb) {
-throw new UnsupportedOperationException();
+return sb;
}
Modified:
struts/shale/trunk/test-framework/src/java/org/apache/shale/test/mock/MockViewHandler.java
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/struts/shale/trunk/test-framework/src/java/org/apache/shale/test/mock/MockViewHandler.java?rev=375458r1=375457r2=375458view=diff
==
---
struts/shale/trunk/test-framework/src/java/org/apache/shale/test/mock/MockViewHandler.java
(original)
+++
struts/shale/trunk/test-framework/src/java/org/apache/shale/test/mock/MockViewHandler.java
Mon Feb 6 19:45:21 2006
@@ -107,14 +107,16 @@
public String getActionURL(FacesContext context, String viewId) {
-throw new UnsupportedOperationException();
+return FacesContext.getCurrentInstance().getExternalContext().
+getRequestContextPath() + viewId;
}
public String getResourceURL(FacesContext context, String path) {
-throw new UnsupportedOperationException();
+return FacesContext.getCurrentInstance().getExternalContext().
+getRequestContextPath() + path;
}
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Checkstyle (was svn commit: r360442 [1/3] )
On 2/5/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The long lines are a problem. Not fixing them is one thing, but it
wants to make this change, which *creates* a line longer than 80
characters:
-protected String processorClass =
-org.apache.struts.chain.ComposableRequestProcessor;
+protected String processorClass =
org.apache.struts.chain.ComposableRequestProcessor;
From the sf.net forum:
Preferences-printer-wrapping-wrap after assignments (make sure
this is checked)
I'm not using the GUI, but that was enough of a hint, and r375446
seems to have helped.
But Jalopy is still insisting on long lines for method declarations,
such as (in ActionForm):
public ActionErrors validate(ActionMapping mapping, ServletRequest
request) {
and for method calls (in ActionRedirect):
result.append(parameterString=).append(getParameterString()).append(]);
(though that one could just as well be split into two lines.)
It also makes this change:
-} else {
+}
+else {
which causes Checkstyle to complain that '} should be on the same line'.
Patches for the config file (build/jalopy_struts.xml) are welcome!
I'm testing with 'maven jalopy' in struts-action. Since it was
already reformatted, it's easy to see (with 'svn diff') where Jalopy
is making changes that it shouldn't.
Thanks,
Wendy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
