Re: New logo
Hi, the Logo already looks very good, my compliments for the designer. But I'd also love to see the Struts brand as a upper&lowercase written name. Regarding the logo usage within the website header, a white shadow (or another bright color) effect around the "badge" and brand name might emphasize it even better on a dark background. What do you think? cheers, Rainer Rainer Hermanns aixcept Willibrordstraße 82 52134 Herzogenrath - Germany w: http://aixcept.de/ t: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 11 f: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 13 m: +49 - 170 - 343 29 12 Am 21.03.2014 um 12:59 schrieb Lukasz Lenart : > She's working on new layout, first attempt: > > https://copy.com/Ly91R3KAkPCm > https://copy.com/9gghodFkEJmr > > About CamelCase - hm... good question, I also like that - will ask her ;-) > > 2014-03-19 16:32 GMT+01:00 Rene Gielen : >> By sudden I realized I forgot to comment so far - shame on me! >> >> Logo image idea / execution: fabulous >> Color scheme: 3rd ++, 2nd + >> Font: Yet undecided. My gut fav is 2nd, but I also agree with Lukasz >> that Aleo (1st) is classy. >> >> Is there a consensus about all uppercase writing? Am I too traditional >> by considering good'ol upper+lower as well? :) >> >> Anyway - great job, and a huge thanks to you guys! >> >> - René >> >> Am 07.03.14 15:53, schrieb Lukasz Lenart: >>> New colors https://copy.com/mewPAFa0GuQo and designer's answer: >>> >>> Several blue variants to be considered. As well as several fonts. >>> >>> I do not agree about the font - I like it very much, it is modern - >>> not all serifs are outdated. >>> >>> The font is called Aleo, you can read some here >>> http://fontfabric.com/aleo-free-font/ >>> >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org >> > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] [FAST TRACK] Struts 2.3.15.3
+1 GA, Thanks Lukasz Rainer Hermanns aixcept Willibrordstraße 82 52134 Herzogenrath - Germany w: http://aixcept.de/ t: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 11 f: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 13 m: +49 - 170 - 343 29 12 Am 15.10.2013 um 22:59 schrieb Lukasz Lenart : > The Struts 2.3.15.3 test build is now available. It includes the > latest security patch which fix possible vulnerability. > > For details and the rationale behind these changes, please consult the > corresponding security bulletins: > * https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WW/S2-018 > > Release notes: > * [https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WW/Version+Notes+2.3.15.3] > > Distribution: > * [http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.3.15.3/] > > Maven 2 staging repository: > * [https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestruts-179/] > > Once you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond > with a vote on its quality: > > [ ] Leave at test build > [ ] Alpha > [ ] Beta > [ ] General Availability (GA) > > Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC > members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least > three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s. > > This is a "fast-track" release vote. If we have a positive vote after > 24 hours (at least three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s), the > release may be submitted for mirroring and announced to the usual > channels. > > The website download link will include the mirroring timestamp > parameter [1], which limits the selection of mirrors to those that > have been refreshed since the indicated time and date. (After 24 > hours, we *must* remove the timestamp parameter from the website link, > to avoid unnecessary server load.) In the case of a fast-track > release, the email announcement will not link directly to > , but to , so that we can control use of > the timestamp parameter. > > [1] > http://apache.org/dev/mirrors.html#use|http://apache.org/dev/mirrors.html#use > > - The Apache Struts group. > > > Regards > -- > Łukasz > + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org >
Re: [VOTE] [FAST TRACK] Struts 2.3.15.2
+1 GA (binding) cheers, Rainer Rainer Hermanns aixcept Willibrordstraße 82 52134 Herzogenrath - Germany w: http://aixcept.de/ t: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 11 f: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 13 m: +49 - 170 - 343 29 12 Am 18.09.2013 um 11:07 schrieb Lukasz Lenart : > The Struts 2.3.15.2 test build is now available. It includes the > latest security patches which fix two possible vulnerabilities. > > For details and the rationale behind these changes, please consult the > corresponding security bulletins: > * https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WW/S2-018 > * https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WW/S2-019 > > Please note that currently these bulletins and the release notes are > only visible to logged-in users with the struts-committer role. This > is a needed requirement to control disclosure until the actual release > is announced. > > Release notes: > * [https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WW/Version+Notes+2.3.15.2] > > Distribution: > * [http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.3.15.2/] > > Maven 2 staging repository: > * [https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestruts-071/] > > Once you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond > with a vote on its quality: > > [ ] Leave at test build > [ ] Alpha > [ ] Beta > [ ] General Availability (GA) > > Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC > members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least > three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s. > > This is a "fast-track" release vote. If we have a positive vote after > 24 hours (at least three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s), the > release may be submitted for mirroring and announced to the usual > channels. > > The website download link will include the mirroring timestamp > parameter [1], which limits the selection of mirrors to those that > have been refreshed since the indicated time and date. (After 24 > hours, we *must* remove the timestamp parameter from the website link, > to avoid unnecessary server load.) In the case of a fast-track > release, the email announcement will not link directly to > , but to , so that we can control use of > the timestamp parameter. > > [1] > http://apache.org/dev/mirrors.html#use|http://apache.org/dev/mirrors.html#use > > - The Apache Struts group. > > > Regards > -- > Łukasz > + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org >
Re: [VOTE] [FAST TRACK] Struts 2.3.15.1
Great work, +1 GA cheers, Rainer Rainer Hermanns aixcept Willibrordstraße 82 52134 Herzogenrath - Germany w: http://aixcept.de/ t: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 11 f: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 13 m: +49 - 170 - 343 29 12 Am 15.07.2013 um 00:15 schrieb Rene Gielen : > The Struts 2.3.15.1 test build is now available. It includes the latest > security patches which fix two possible vulnerabilities. > > For details and the rationale behind these changes, please consult the > corresponding security bulletins: > * https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WW/S2-016 > * https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WW/S2-017 > > Please note that currently these bulletins and the release notes are > only visible to logged-in users with the struts-committer role. This is > a needed requirement to control disclosure until the actual release is > announced. > > Release notes: > * [https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WW/Version+Notes+2.3.15.1] > > Distribution: > * [http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.3.15.1/] > > Maven 2 staging repository: > * [https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestruts-143/] > > Once you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond > with a vote on its quality: > > [ ] Leave at test build > [ ] Alpha > [ ] Beta > [ ] General Availability (GA) > > Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC > members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least > three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s. > > This is a "fast-track" release vote. If we have a positive vote after 24 > hours (at least three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s), the release > may be submitted for mirroring and announced to the usual channels. > > The website download link will include the mirroring timestamp parameter > [1], which limits the selection of mirrors to those that have been > refreshed since the indicated time and date. (After 24 hours, we *must* > remove the timestamp parameter from the website link, to avoid > unnecessary server load.) In the case of a fast-track release, the email > announcement will not link directly to , but to > , so that we can control use of the timestamp parameter. > > [1] > <[http://apache.org/dev/mirrors.html#use|http://apache.org/dev/mirrors.html#use]> > > - The Apache Struts group. > > > -- > René Gielen > http://twitter.com/rgielen > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org >
Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.3.15
Thanks Lukasz, +1 GA (binding) cheers, Rainer Rainer Hermanns aixcept Willibrordstraße 82 52134 Herzogenrath - Germany w: http://aixcept.de/ t: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 11 f: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 13 m: +49 - 170 - 343 29 12 Am 19.06.2013 um 09:17 schrieb Lukasz Lenart : > 2013/6/19 Lukasz Lenart : >> The Struts 2.3.14 test build is now available. With this release: > > I meant 2.3.15 :-) > > > Regards > -- > Łukasz > + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.3.14.3 quality (fast track)
Great Work Lukasz, thanks! +1 GA cheers, Rainer Rainer Hermanns aixcept Willibrordstraße 82 52134 Herzogenrath - Germany w: http://aixcept.de/ t: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 11 f: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 13 m: +49 - 170 - 343 29 12 Am 03.06.2013 um 14:29 schrieb Lukasz Lenart : > The Struts 2.3.14.3 test build is now available. > > It includes the latest security patches which fix possible vulnerabilities: > * actions' names whitelisting was introduced to prevent OGNL > evaluation as a side effect of wildcard matching > * double evaluation of passed expression was removed from > OgnlTextParser which is used by TextParseUtil.translateVariables > > For details and the rationale behind these changes, please consult the > corresponding security bulletin: > * https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WW/S2-015 > > Please note that currently these bulletins and the release notes are > only visible to logged-in users with the struts-committer role. This is > a needed requirement to control disclosure until the actual release is > announced. > > Release notes: > * [https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/displa/WW/Version+Notes+2.3.14.3] > > Distribution: > * [http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.3.14.3/] > > Maven 2 staging repository: > * [https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/staging/] > > Once you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond > with a vote on its quality: > > [ ] Leave at test build > [ ] Alpha > [ ] Beta > [ ] General Availability (GA) > > Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC > members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least > three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s. > > This is a "fast-track" release vote. If we have a positive vote after > 24 hours (at least three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s), the > release may be submitted for mirroring and announced to the usual > channels. > > The website download link will include the mirroring timestamp > parameter [1], which limits the selection of mirrors to those that > have been refreshed since the indicated time and date. (After 24 > hours, we *must* remove the timestamp parameter from the website link, > to avoid unnecessary server load.) In the case of a fast-track > release, the email announcement will not link directly to > , but to , so that we can control use of > the timestamp parameter. > > [1] http://apache.org/dev/mirrors.html#use > > > Regards > -- > Łukasz > + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org >
Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.3.14
> [X] General Availability (GA) (binding) cheers, Rainer - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Formally end support for Struts 1
+1 (binding) cheers, Rainer Rainer Hermanns aixcept Willibrordstraße 82 52134 Herzogenrath - Germany w: http://aixcept.de/ t: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 11 f: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 13 m: +49 - 170 - 343 29 12
Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.3.12
Looks good to me, +1 GA (binding) Cheers, Rainer Rainer Hermanns aixcept Willibrordstraße 82 52134 Herzogenrath - Germany w: http://aixcept.de/ t: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 11 f: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 13 m: +49 - 170 - 343 29 12 Am 09.03.2013 um 10:56 schrieb Lukasz Lenart : > The Struts 2.3.12 test build is now available. With this release: > - expression support was added to validators' params, so you can > dynamically configure validators base on current action > - new plugin was introduced to support Tiles 3 (to keep support for > Tiles 2 which can be removed with the next major release) > - the Convention plugin was improved to support apps running on JBoss 5 > - XWork Logging layer was extended to support also SLF4J > - and many more... > > Release notes: > * [http://struts.apache.org/development/2.x/docs/version-notes-2312.html] > > Distribution: > * [http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.3.12/] > > Maven 2 staging repository: > * [https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/staging/] > > Once you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond > with a vote on its quality: > > [ ] Leave at test build > [ ] Alpha > [ ] Beta > [ ] General Availability (GA) > > Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC > members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least > three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s. > > The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, longer upon request. > A vote can be amended at any time to upgrade or downgrade the quality > of the release based on future experience. If an initial vote > designates the build as "Beta", the release will be submitted for > mirroring and announced to the user list. Once released as a public > beta, subsequent quality votes on a build may be held on the user > list. > > As always, the act of voting carries certain obligations. A binding > vote not only states an opinion, but means that the voter is agreeing > to help do the work. > > > Kind regards > -- > Łukasz > + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org >
Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.3.8
+1 GA (binding) Thanks Lukasz Rainer Hermanns aixcept Willibrordstraße 82 52134 Herzogenrath - Germany w: http://aixcept.de/ t: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 11 f: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 13 m: +49 - 170 - 343 29 12 Am 19.12.2012 um 16:14 schrieb Lukasz Lenart : > The Struts 2.3.8 test build is now available. The main goal of the > release is to improve the overall performance which was impacted by > FileManager refactoring in version 2.3.7. Current version should be > much more faster than version 2.3.4 (and far faster than 2.3.7 :-) > > Release notes: > * [https://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/version-notes-238.html] > > Distribution: > * [http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.3.8/] > > Maven 2 staging repository: > * [https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/staging/] > > Once you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond > with a vote on its quality: > > [ ] Leave at test build > [ ] Alpha > [ ] Beta > [ ] General Availability (GA) > > Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC > members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least > three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s. > > The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, longer upon request. > A vote can be amended at any time to upgrade or downgrade the quality > of the release based on future experience. If an initial vote > designates the build as "Beta", the release will be submitted for > mirroring and announced to the user list. Once released as a public > beta, subsequent quality votes on a build may be held on the user > list. > > As always, the act of voting carries certain obligations. A binding > vote not only states an opinion, but means that the voter is agreeing > to help do the work. > > > Kind regards > -- > Łukasz > + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org >
Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.3.4 Vote
+1 GA (binding) cheers, Rainer Rainer Hermanns aixcept Willibrordstraße 82 52134 Herzogenrath - Germany w: http://aixcept.de/ t: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 11 f: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 13 m: +49 - 170 - 343 29 12 Am 21.05.2012 um 07:48 schrieb Łukasz Lenart: > The Struts 2.3.4 test build is now available. > > Release notes: > * [https://cwiki.apache.org/WW/version-notes-234.html] > > Distribution: > * [http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.3.4/] > > Maven 2 staging repository: > * [https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/staging/] > > Once you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond > with a vote on its quality: > > [ ] Leave at test build > [ ] Alpha > [ ] Beta > [ ] General Availability (GA) > > Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC > members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least > three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s. > > The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, longer upon request. > A vote can be amended at any time to upgrade or downgrade the quality > of the release based on future experience. If an initial vote > designates the build as "Beta", the release will be submitted for > mirroring and announced to the user list. Once released as a public > beta, subsequent quality votes on a build may be held on the user > list. > > As always, the act of voting carries certain obligations. A binding > vote not only states an opinion, but means that the voter is agreeing > to help do the work. > > > Kind regards > -- > Łukasz http://www.lenart.org.pl/ > mobile +48 606 323 122, office +27 11 0838747 > Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/ > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org >
Re: com.opensymphony.xwork2.validator.metadata
Lukasz, these classes/files are a leftover from the early days of the validation annotations and an apt processor implementation in webwork, that was used to create the XML based validation configuration for those user still on Java 1.4. I think this code could be removed safely, cause Java5 is a requirement now. cheers, Rainer Rainer Hermanns aixcept Willibrordstraße 82 52134 Herzogenrath - Germany w: http://aixcept.de/ t: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 11 f: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 13 m: +49 - 170 - 343 29 12 Am 23.05.2012 um 10:16 schrieb Łukasz Lenart: > No one knows what is that ? I'm going to remove the package and classes. > > > Regards > -- > Łukasz http://www.lenart.org.pl/ > mobile +48 606 323 122, office +27 11 0838747 > Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/ > > 2012/4/23 Łukasz Lenart : >> Hi, >> >> What is that ? As I see all the classes in that package are unused. What was >> the purpose of this code ? >> >> >> Regards >> -- >> Lukasz >> >> >> -- >> Łukasz http://www.lenart.org.pl/ >> mobile +48 606 323 122, office +27 11 0838747 >> Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/ > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org >
Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.3.3 Vote
+1 GA cheers, Rainer Rainer Hermanns aixcept Willibrordstraße 82 52134 Herzogenrath - Germany w: http://aixcept.de/ t: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 11 f: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 13 m: +49 - 170 - 343 29 12 Am 27.04.2012 um 07:26 schrieb Łukasz Lenart: > The Struts 2.3.3 test build is now available. > > Release notes: > * [https://cwiki.apache.org/WW/version-notes-233.html] > > Distribution: > * [http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.3.3/] > > Maven 2 staging repository: > * [https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/staging/] > > Once you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond > with a vote on its quality: > > [ ] Leave at test build > [ ] Alpha > [ ] Beta > [ ] General Availability (GA) > > Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC > members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least > three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s. > > The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, longer upon request. > A vote can be amended at any time to upgrade or downgrade the quality > of the release based on future experience. If an initial vote > designates the build as "Beta", the release will be submitted for > mirroring and announced to the user list. Once released as a public > beta, subsequent quality votes on a build may be held on the user > list. > > As always, the act of voting carries certain obligations. A binding > vote not only states an opinion, but means that the voter is agreeing > to help do the work. > > > Kind regards > -- > Łukasz http://www.lenart.org.pl/ > mobile +48 606 323 122, office +27 11 0838747 > Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/ > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org >
Re: User Guide
Lukasz, WW Core should be renamed to S2 Core in legend instead. I still have the original Struts architecture PSD file. If that helps, let me know. cheers, Rainer Rainer Hermanns aixcept Willibrordstraße 82 52134 Herzogenrath - Germany w: http://aixcept.de/ t: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 11 f: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 13 m: +49 - 170 - 343 29 12 Am 10.04.2012 um 10:43 schrieb Christian Grobmeier: > 2012/4/9 Łukasz Lenart : >> W dniu 9 kwietnia 2012 11:42 użytkownik Łukasz Lenart >> napisał: >>> Working on that already :-) >> >> First draft >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/13859/s2-architecture.svg > > > +1 > thats a great image! > >> >> Regards >> -- >> Łukasz http://www.lenart.org.pl/ >> mobile +48 606 323 122, office +27 11 0838747 >> Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/ >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org >> > > > > -- > http://www.grobmeier.de > https://www.timeandbill.de > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org >
Re: [VOTE] Struts Master 9
+1 GA, cheers, Rainer Rainer Hermanns aixcept Willibrordstraße 82 52134 Herzogenrath - Germany w: http://aixcept.de/ t: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 11 f: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 13 m: +49 - 170 - 343 29 12 Am 06.03.2012 um 16:08 schrieb Łukasz Lenart: > The Struts Master 9 test build is now available as a Maven artifact. > > https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/staging/org/apache/struts/struts-master/9/ > or here > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestruts-090/ > > Release notes: > * uses the latest Apache Parent version 10 which include new version of > plugins > > If you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond with > a vote on its quality: > > [ ] Leave at test build > [ ] Alpha > [ ] Beta > [ ] General Availability (GA) > > Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC > members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least > three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s. > > The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, longer upon request. > > > Kind regards > -- > Łukasz http://www.lenart.org.pl/ > mobile +48 606 323 122, office +27 11 0838747 > Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/ > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org >
Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.3.1.2 Vote (fast track)
Thanks Maurizio for fixing this. Tested with my deployed apps, works fine so far. [X ] General Availability (GA) (binding) cheers, Rainer Rainer Hermanns aixcept Willibrordstraße 82 52134 Herzogenrath - Germany w: http://aixcept.de/ t: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 11 f: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 13 m: +49 - 170 - 343 29 12 Am 21.01.2012 um 00:25 schrieb Maurizio Cucchiara: > The Struts 2.3.1.2 test build is now available. This release solves > very important security vulnerabilities. > > Release notes: > * [https://cwiki.apache.org/WW/version-notes-2312.html] > > Distribution: > * [http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.3.1.2/] > > Maven 2 staging repository: > * [https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestruts-117/] > > Once you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond > with a vote on its quality: > [ ] Leave at test build > [ ] Alpha > [ ] Beta > [ ] General Availability (GA) > > Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC > members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least > three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s. > This is a "fast-track" release vote. If we have a positive vote after > 24 hours (at least three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s), the > release may be submitted for mirroring and announced to the usual > channels. > > > Twitter :http://www.twitter.com/m_cucchiara > G+ :https://plus.google.com/107903711540963855921 > Linkedin:http://www.linkedin.com/in/mauriziocucchiara > > Maurizio Cucchiara > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org >
Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.3.1.1 Vote (fast track)
Sorry, I've no time to test the short track release this time. Could someone step in? cheers, Rainer Rainer Hermanns aixcept Willibrordstraße 82 52134 Herzogenrath - Germany w: http://aixcept.de/ t: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 11 f: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 13 m: +49 - 170 - 343 29 12 Am 26.12.2011 um 13:09 schrieb Łukasz Lenart: > The Struts 2.3.1.1 test build is now available. This release solves > very important security vulnerabilities. > > Release notes: > * [https://cwiki.apache.org/WW/version-notes-2311.html] > > Distribution: > * [http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.3.1.1/] > > Maven 2 staging repository: > * [https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestruts-385/] > > Once you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond > with a vote on its quality: > [ ] Leave at test build > [ ] Alpha > [ ] Beta > [ ] General Availability (GA) > > Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC > members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least > three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s. > This is a "fast-track" release vote. If we have a positive vote after > 24 hours (at least three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s), the > release may be submitted for mirroring and announced to the usual > channels. > > Kind regards > -- > Łukasz > + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ > Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/ > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org >
Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.3.1 Vote
All tests in current projects passed. +1 binding [ ] Leave at test build [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta [x] General Availability (GA) cheers, Rainer Rainer Hermanns aixcept Willibrordstraße 82 52134 Herzogenrath - Germany w: http://aixcept.de/ t: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 11 f: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 13 m: +49 - 170 - 343 29 12
Re: [VOTE] Move CDI plugin from sandbox to trunk
+1 (binding) Thanks for bringing this up again :) cheers, Rainer Am 12.09.2011 um 15:15 schrieb Łukasz Lenart: > Hi all, > > CDI plugin was developed sometime ago by Rene and it was used with > success, so it's the time to move it from sandbox to trunk. It's a new > Vote, the previous one was cancelled. > I'm waiting 72 hours for your votes! > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WW-3617 > http://struts.1045723.n5.nabble.com/Re-jira-Commented-WW-3474-JSR-330-javax-inject-implementation-in-Struts2-td4357886.html > http://struts.1045723.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-Move-CDI-plugin-from-sandbox-to-trunk-td4638486.html > > > Regards > -- > Łukasz > + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ > Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/ > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org > Rainer Hermanns aixcept Willibrordstraße 82 52134 Herzogenrath - Germany w: http://aixcept.de/ t: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 11 f: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 13 m: +49 - 170 - 343 29 12
Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.2.3.1
+1 GA thanks Maurizio and Lukasz, cheers, Rainer Am 06.09.2011 um 10:47 schrieb Maurizio Cucchiara: > The Struts 2.2.3.1 test build is now available. It includes the latest > security patch which fixes a vulnerability that allows to evaluate the > user input as an OGNL expression when there's a conversion error. > > Release notes: > * [https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WW/Version+Notes+2.2.3.1] > > Distribution: > * [http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.2.3.1/] > > Maven 2 staging repository: > * [https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestruts-031/] > > Once you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond > with a vote on its quality: > > [ ] Leave at test build > [ ] Alpha > [ ] Beta > [ ] General Availability (GA) > > Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC > members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least > three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s. > > The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, longer upon request. > A vote can be amended at any time to upgrade or downgrade the quality > of the release based on future experience. If an initial vote > designates the build as "Beta", the release will be submitted for > mirroring and announced to the user list. Once released as a public > beta, subsequent quality votes on a build may be held on the user > list. > > As always, the act of voting carries certain obligations. A binding > vote not only states an opinion, but means that the voter is agreeing > to help do the work > > Thank in advance > > Maurizio Cucchiara > > --------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org > Rainer Hermanns aixcept Willibrordstraße 82 52134 Herzogenrath - Germany w: http://aixcept.de/ t: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 11 f: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 13 m: +49 - 170 - 343 29 12
Re: [VOTE] Move CDI plugin from sandbox to trunk
+1 great to see this pushed :) cheers, Rainer Am 27.07.2011 um 13:41 schrieb Łukasz Lenart: > Hi all, > > CDI plugin was developed sometime ago by Rene and it was used with > success, so it's the time to move it from sandbox to trunk. > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WW-3617 > http://struts.1045723.n5.nabble.com/Re-jira-Commented-WW-3474-JSR-330-javax-inject-implementation-in-Struts2-td4357886.html > > > Regards > -- > Łukasz > + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ > Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/ > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org > Rainer Hermanns aixcept Willibrordstraße 82 52134 Herzogenrath - Germany w: http://aixcept.de/ t: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 11 f: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 13 m: +49 - 170 - 343 29 12
Re: [VOTE] Replacing the existing Portlet Plugin
+1 Binding Am 10.06.2011 um 11:18 schrieb Johannes Geppert: > After the passed Vote [1] to move the portlet plugin from sandbox to regular > code base, we need a second Vote to replace the existing portlet plugin > version with this new version. > > [1] > http://struts.1045723.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-Promote-JSR286-Portlet-Plugin-from-sandbox-to-regular-code-base-td4439671.html > > - > web: http://www.jgeppert.com > twitter: http://twitter.com/jogep > -- > View this message in context: > http://struts.1045723.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-Replacing-the-existing-Portlet-Plugin-tp4475639p4475639.html > Sent from the Struts - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org > Rainer Hermanns aixcept Willibrordstraße 82 52134 Herzogenrath - Germany w: http://aixcept.de/ t: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 11 f: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 13 m: +49 - 170 - 343 29 12
Re: [VOTE] Promote JSR286 Portlet Plugin from sandbox to regular code base
Good job guys, +1 binding, cheers, Rainer Am 30.05.2011 um 17:41 schrieb Rene Gielen: > The code in sandbox was developed for replacing the current portlet > plugin. If the vote passes, the code will be moved to the regular code > base, which is a requirement before we can think about adding it to the > next Struts 2 release. > > (Johannes, I hope you don't mind that I jumped in here to push this as a > formally corrected vote based on your original one) > > -- > René Gielen > http://twitter.com/rgielen > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org > Rainer Hermanns aixcept Willibrordstraße 82 52134 Herzogenrath - Germany w: http://aixcept.de/ t: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 11 f: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 13 m: +49 - 170 - 343 29 12
Re: [VOTE] Release Struts 2.2.3
The things I could test with my running S2 apps work fine. Therefore, +1 GA (binding) cheers, Rainer Am 27.04.2011 um 22:29 schrieb Rene Gielen: > I would have wanted to spend a little more time on testing it, but from > what I can say it looks good, and Matt's performance issue seems to be > non-blocking - nevertheless we should keep an eye on it. > > Hopefully more PMC members find some time to test the build the next > couple of days? > > +1 GA (binding) > > - René > > On 08.04.11 12:23, Lukasz Lenart wrote: >> The Struts 2.2.3 test build is now available. >> >> Release notes: >> * [https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WW/Version+Notes+2.2.3] >> >> Distribution: >> * [http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.2.3/] >> >> Maven 2 staging repository: >> * [https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestruts-069/] >> >> Once you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond >> with a vote on its quality: >> >> [ ] Leave at test build >> [ ] Alpha >> [ ] Beta >> [ ] General Availability (GA) >> >> Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC >> members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least >> three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s. >> >> The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, longer upon request. >> A vote can be amended at any time to upgrade or downgrade the quality >> of the release based on future experience. If an initial vote >> designates the build as "Beta", the release will be submitted for >> mirroring and announced to the user list. Once released as a public >> beta, subsequent quality votes on a build may be held on the user >> list. >> >> As always, the act of voting carries certain obligations. A binding >> vote not only states an opinion, but means that the voter is agreeing >> to help do the work >> >> >> Kind regards >> -- >> Łukasz >> + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ >> Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/ >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org >> > > -- > René Gielen > IT-Neering.net > Saarstrasse 100, 52062 Aachen, Germany > Tel: +49-(0)241-4010770 > Fax: +49-(0)241-4010771 > Cel: +49-(0)163-2844164 > http://twitter.com/rgielen > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org > Rainer Hermanns aixcept Willibrordstraße 82 52134 Herzogenrath - Germany w: http://aixcept.de/ t: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 11 f: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 13 m: +49 - 170 - 343 29 12
Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.2.1.1
+1 GA Am 14.12.2010 um 13:20 schrieb Lukasz Lenart: > The Struts 2.2.1.1 test build is now available. It includes the latest > security patch regarding unblocked access to Dynamic Method Invocation > mechanism in REST plugin. > > Release notes: > * [https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WW/Version+Notes+2.2.1.1] > > Distribution: > * [http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.2.1.1/] > > Maven 2 staging repository: > * [https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestruts-016/] > > Once you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond > with a vote on its quality: > > [ ] Leave at test build > [ ] Alpha > [ ] Beta > [ ] General Availability (GA) > > Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC > members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least > three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s. > > The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, longer upon request. > A vote can be amended at any time to upgrade or downgrade the quality > of the release based on future experience. If an initial vote > designates the build as "Beta", the release will be submitted for > mirroring and announced to the user list. Once released as a public > beta, subsequent quality votes on a build may be held on the user > list. > > As always, the act of voting carries certain obligations. A binding > vote not only states an opinion, but means that the voter is agreeing > to help do the work > > > Kind regards > -- > Łukasz > + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ > Kapituła Javarsovia http://javarsovia.pl > > --------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org > Rainer Hermanns aixcept Willibrordstraße 82 52134 Herzogenrath - Germany w: http://aixcept.de/ t: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 11 f: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 13 m: +49 - 170 - 343 29 12
Re: [VOTE] Struts Master 8 Vote
+1 GA Am 09.12.2010 um 09:47 schrieb Lukasz Lenart: > The Struts Master 8 test build is now available as a Maven artifact. > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestruts-006/ > > Release notes: > * Use the latest Apache 8 Parent to solve the problem with missing > signatures after uploading artifact to Nexus - here [1] is a thread you can > follow the whole discussion about that > [1] > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-repository/201012.mbox/%3caanlktimvsfawy_gv_jh0z9fhvufpmwj7=gmko6q7f...@mail.gmail.com%3e > > If you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond with > a vote on its quality: > > [ ] Leave at test build > [ ] Alpha > [ ] Beta > [ ] General Availability (GA) > > Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC > members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least > three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s. > > The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, longer upon request. > > > Regards > -- > Łukasz > + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ Rainer Hermanns aixcept Willibrordstraße 82 52134 Herzogenrath - Germany w: http://aixcept.de/ t: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 11 f: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 13 m: +49 - 170 - 343 29 12
Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.2.1 Vote
oh :) Enjoy and have fun cheers, Rainer Am 06.08.2010 um 08:19 schrieb Lukasz Lenart: > Sure, as soon I will be back from vacation ;-) > > > Kind regards > -- > Łukasz > + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ > Kapituła Javarsovia 2010 http://javarsovia.pl > > > 2010/8/6 Rainer Hermanns : >> Lukasz, >> >> I think we have the required votes now to push out the release to the public >> or do you want to fix the minor reported issue with the javaassist dep first >> and call a new vote? >> >> Binding GA: >> Rene Gielen +1 >> Lukasz Lenart +1 >> Rainer Hermanns +1 >> >> Non-Binding GA: >> Philip Luppens +1 >> Allen Lee +1 >> >> Cheers, >> Rainer >> >> Am 21.07.2010 um 16:44 schrieb Lukasz Lenart: >> >>> 2010/7/17 Lukasz Lenart : >>>> [ ] Leave at test build >>>> [ ] Alpha >>>> [ ] Beta >>>> [x] General Availability (GA) >>> >>> +1 (binding) >>> >>> >>> Regards >>> -- >>> Łukasz >>> + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ >>> Kapituła Javarsovia 2010 http://javarsovia.pl >>> >>> - >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org >>> >> >> Rainer Hermanns >> aixcept >> Willibrordstraße 82 >> 52134 Herzogenrath - Germany >> w: http://aixcept.de/ >> t: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 11 >> f: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 13 >> m: +49 - 170 - 343 29 12 >> >> > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.2.1 Vote
Lukasz, I think we have the required votes now to push out the release to the public or do you want to fix the minor reported issue with the javaassist dep first and call a new vote? Binding GA: Rene Gielen +1 Lukasz Lenart +1 Rainer Hermanns +1 Non-Binding GA: Philip Luppens +1 Allen Lee +1 Cheers, Rainer Am 21.07.2010 um 16:44 schrieb Lukasz Lenart: > 2010/7/17 Lukasz Lenart : >> [ ] Leave at test build >> [ ] Alpha >> [ ] Beta >> [x] General Availability (GA) > > +1 (binding) > > > Regards > -- > Łukasz > + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ > Kapituła Javarsovia 2010 http://javarsovia.pl > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org > Rainer Hermanns aixcept Willibrordstraße 82 52134 Herzogenrath - Germany w: http://aixcept.de/ t: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 11 f: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 13 m: +49 - 170 - 343 29 12
Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.2.1 Vote
Sorry, just came back from vacation... +1 GA binding, @Lukasz thanks for all your efforts getting the release out of the door. Cheers, Rainer Am 17.07.2010 um 23:15 schrieb Lukasz Lenart: > The Struts 2.2.1 test build is now available. It's the same as 2.2.0 > but dedicated application for JBoss was included and all old examples > depend on Javassist library. Also new patch regarding FreeMarker > caching was applied. > > Release notes: > * [https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WW/Version+Notes+2.2.1] > > Distribution: > * [http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.2.1/] > > Maven 2 staging repository: > * [https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestruts-014//] > > Once you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond > with a vote on its quality: > > [ ] Leave at test build > [ ] Alpha > [ ] Beta > [ ] General Availability (GA) > > Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC > members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least > three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s. > > The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, longer upon request. > A vote can be amended at any time to upgrade or downgrade the quality > of the release based on future experience. If an initial vote > designates the build as "Beta", the release will be submitted for > mirroring and announced to the user list. Once released as a public > beta, subsequent quality votes on a build may be held on the user > list. > > As always, the act of voting carries certain obligations. A binding > vote not only states an opinion, but means that the voter is agreeing > to help do the work > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org > Rainer Hermanns aixcept Willibrordstraße 82 52134 Herzogenrath - Germany w: http://aixcept.de/ t: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 11 f: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 13 m: +49 - 170 - 343 29 12
Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.2.0 Vote
Hey guys, release looks good to me, my apps are working as expected... +1 GA Great work, thanks, Rainer Am 29.06.2010 um 11:18 schrieb Lukasz Lenart: > The Struts 2.2.0 test build is now available. > > Release notes: > * [https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WW/Version+Notes+2.2.0] > > Distribution: > * [https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestruts-021/] > > Maven 2 staging repository: > * [https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestruts-021/] > > Once you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond > with a vote on its quality: > > [ ] Leave at test build > [ ] Alpha > [ ] Beta > [ ] General Availability (GA) > > Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC > members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least > three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s. > > The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, longer upon request. > A vote can be amended at any time to upgrade or downgrade the quality > of the release based on future experience. If an initial vote > designates the build as "Beta", the release will be submitted for > mirroring and announced to the user list. Once released as a public > beta, subsequent quality votes on a build may be held on the user > list. > > As always, the act of voting carries certain obligations. A binding > vote not only states an opinion, but means that the voter is agreeing > to help do the work > > > Kind regards > -- > Łukasz > + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ > Kapituła Javarsovia 2010 http://javarsovia.pl > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Struts Master 7 Vote
+1 GA Am 31.05.2010 um 15:23 schrieb Lukasz Lenart: > The Struts Master 7 test build is now available as a Maven artifact. > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestruts-018/ > > Release notes: > * The main change is to allow to use the Nexus to make a Maven release > of Struts project > > If you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond with > a vote on its quality: > > [ ] Leave at test build > [ ] Alpha > [ ] Beta > [ ] General Availability (GA) > > Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC > members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least > three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s. > > The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, longer upon request. > > > Regards > -- > Łukasz > + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ > Kapituła Javarsovia 2010 http://javarsovia.pl > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org > Rainer Hermanns aixcept Willibrordstraße 82 52134 Herzogenrath - Germany w: http://aixcept.de/ t: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 11 f: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 13 m: +49 - 170 - 343 29 12
Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.1.8 Vote
+1 GA, cheers, Rainer > The Struts 2.1.8 test build is now available. > > Release notes: > * [http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WW/Version+Notes+2.1.8] > > Distribution: > * [http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.8/] > > Maven 2 staging repository: > * [http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.8/m2-staging-repository/] > > Once you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond > with a vote on its quality: > > [ ] Leave at test build > [ ] Alpha > [ ] Beta > [ ] General Availability (GA) > > Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC > members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least > three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s. > > The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, longer upon request. > A vote can be amended at any time to upgrade or downgrade the quality > of the release based on future experience. If an initial vote > designates the build as "Beta", the release will be submitted for > mirroring and announced to the user list. Once released as a public > beta, subsequent quality votes on a build may be held on the user > list. > > As always, the act of voting carries certain obligations. A binding > vote not only states an opinion, but means that the voter is agreeing > to help do the work > > In addition to the normal info above, I also want to add that I made > the distro available for easy testing through the struts zone. If you > point your browser here - > > http://struts.zones.apache.org/ > > You can test our reference apps on both tomcat and jetty. > > Thanks for your help! > > -Wes > > -- > Wes Wannemacher > > Head Engineer, WanTii, Inc. > Need Training? Struts, Spring, Maven, Tomcat... > Ask me for a quote! > > --------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org > > -- Rainer Hermanns aixcept Willibrordstraße 82 52134 Herzogenrath - Germany w: http://aixcept.de/ t: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 11 f: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 13 m: +49 - 170 - 343 29 12 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
XWork 2.1.6 released
Hi, finally done, XWork 2.1.6 is on its way to the mirrors and should be available soon... A couple of issues were resolved, that hopefully stabilize the upcoming Struts2.1.X release. I'm all for starting the incubation process as soon as possible to get XWork into Apache. If there is anything I can do right now to get things started, please let me know. thanks, Rainer -- Rainer Hermanns aixcept Willibrordstraße 82 52134 Herzogenrath - Germany w: http://aixcept.de/ t: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 11 f: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 13 m: +49 - 170 - 343 29 12 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
Re: XWork Release
Sorry, for the delay... Working on it, should be out very soon... We should urgently think about moving over xwork into struts codebase. cheers, Rainer > Anyone heard from Rainer? I'm hoping to see an xwork release pretty > soon so that we can get 2.1.8 out... I'll have some cycles to do the > release myself if we can get xwork out pretty quick. > > -Wes > > -- > Wes Wannemacher > > Head Engineer, WanTii, Inc. > Need Training? Struts, Spring, Maven, Tomcat... > Ask me for a quote! > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org > > -- Rainer Hermanns aixcept Willibrordstraße 82 52134 Herzogenrath - Germany w: http://aixcept.de/ t: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 11 f: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 13 m: +49 - 170 - 343 29 12 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
Re: 2.1.8?
Hi, I hope I get some time tomorrow to release xwork 2.1.6. Stay tuned :) If someone got some minutes, there are some minor issues open in xwork and any help with those would be great. Rainer > I can do it, no problem, except people.apache.org is still down, so I > wouldn't expect any movement until infra gets that figured out. > > http://monitoring.apache.org/status/ > > In addition to xwork 2.1.6, I'd also like to get struts-master > released so that we aren't sitting on changes up there as well. > > -Wes > > On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 1:04 PM, Musachy Barroso wrote: >> yup. when xwork is released, and if nobody messed anything up >> (/rolls_eyes), then we can build 2.1.8. @Wes, are you going to take >> care of 2.1.8? >> >> musachy >> >> On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 9:42 AM, Andreas Joseph >> Krogh wrote: >>> I know I'm nagging... >>> >>> Now how about that 2.1.8-GA? >>> Any issues left to be resolved or are we waiting for the xwork-2.1.6 >>> "again"? >>> >>> -- >>> Andreas Joseph Krogh >>> Senior Software Developer / CTO >>> +-+ >>> OfficeNet AS | The most difficult thing in the world is to | >>> Rosenholmveien 25 | know how to do a thing and to watch | >>> 1414 Trollåsen | somebody else doing it wrong, without | >>> NORWAY | comment. | >>> | | >>> Tlf: +47 24 15 38 90 | | >>> Fax: +47 24 15 38 91 | | >>> Mobile: +47 909 56 963 | | >>> +-+ >>> >>> - >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org >>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org >> >> > > > > -- > Wes Wannemacher > > Head Engineer, WanTii, Inc. > Need Training? Struts, Spring, Maven, Tomcat... > Ask me for a quote! > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org > > -- Rainer Hermanns aixcept Willibrordstraße 82 52134 Herzogenrath - Germany w: http://aixcept.de/ t: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 11 f: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 13 m: +49 - 170 - 343 29 12 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
Re: Let's kill xwork (was Re: 2.1.8 release?)
Oki, I'll prepare another xwork release during the week :)
cheers,
Rainer
> I am terrible sorry, but I messed up something on xwork trying to make
> convention work with jboss 5. I had to rollback my last change to
> UrlSet. We will have to re-build xwork as I don't have any way to hack
> it from convention.
>
> musachy
>
> On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 4:04 AM, Rainer Hermanns
> wrote:
>> Finally done, xwork 2.1.5 is on its way to the mirrors...
>> Let's get the S2.1 release out of the door...
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Rainer
>>
>>
>>> it looks better this time ;)
>>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 11:04 PM, Dale Newfield
>>> wrote:
>>>> Clearly my attempt at clarification has failed (by 1 character!), as
>>>> it's
>>>> needed much restating to be precise (and accurate :-). Let me try
>>>> this
>>>> again:
>>>>
>>>> Struts 2.{0,1} branch depends upon external xwork with (mostly)
>>>> non-matching
>>>> version numbers
>>>>
>>>> Struts 2.1.8 (assuming GA) will depend upon external xwork 2.1.5
>>>>
>>>> Struts 2.2.x is proposed to depend upon a forked, internal jar named
>>>> struts2-xwork that will get generated as another artifact within the
>>>> struts2
>>>> release, and thus will share version numbers with struts2.2 releases.
>>>>
>>>> Struts 3.x is proposed to not depend upon any xwork component, as the
>>>> two
>>>> codebases will be merged into one.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Is there any dissent from this plan?
>>>>
>>>> -Dale
>>>>
>>>> -
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
>>>
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Rainer Hermanns
>> aixcept
>> Willibrordstraße 82
>> 52134 Herzogenrath - Germany
>> w: http://aixcept.de/
>> t: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 11
>> f: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 13
>> m: +49 - 170 - 343 29 12
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
>
>
--
Rainer Hermanns
aixcept
Willibrordstraße 82
52134 Herzogenrath - Germany
w: http://aixcept.de/
t: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 11
f: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 13
m: +49 - 170 - 343 29 12
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Embedded JSP Plugin
+1 as stated previously, cheers, Rainer > I propose we move the Embedded JSP Plugin to trunk, and label it as > "experimental". If you haven't been following up, this is the plugin: > > http://cwiki.apache.org/S2PLUGINS/embedded-jsp-plugin.html > > Here is my +1. > > musachy > -- > "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org > > -- Rainer Hermanns aixcept Willibrordstraße 82 52134 Herzogenrath - Germany w: http://aixcept.de/ t: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 11 f: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 13 m: +49 - 170 - 343 29 12 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
Re: [Embedded JSP Plugin] Vote
+1 My tests were very impressive, great work, this is really awesome. Cheers, Rainer Von meinem iPhone gesendet Am 16.08.2009 um 20:10 schrieb Musachy Barroso : I propose we move the Embedded JSP Plugin to trunk, and label it as "experimental". If you haven't been following up, this is the plugin: http://cwiki.apache.org/S2PLUGINS/embedded-jsp-plugin.html Here is my +1. musachy -- "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
Re: profiling
You are right, the builtin profiling support is not what someone will use to satisfy professional requirements. However, for some it might be quite useful as it is now. What I would suggest, is to get the profiling interceptor out of the default stack configurations and leave it as a plugin interceptor. cheers, Rainer > Although the idea of builtin profiling sounds good in theory, how > useful is this thing nowadays? Profilers are very good and there are > many free ones, including one distributed with Sun's JDK. I would say > we get rid of this builtin profiling, is anyone using this at all? > > musachy > -- > "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org > > -- Rainer Hermanns aixcept Willibrordstraße 82 52134 Herzogenrath - Germany w: http://aixcept.de/ t: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 11 f: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 13 m: +49 - 170 - 343 29 12 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
Re: Let's kill xwork (was Re: 2.1.8 release?)
Finally done, xwork 2.1.5 is on its way to the mirrors...
Let's get the S2.1 release out of the door...
Cheers,
Rainer
> it looks better this time ;)
>
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 11:04 PM, Dale Newfield wrote:
>> Clearly my attempt at clarification has failed (by 1 character!), as
>> it's
>> needed much restating to be precise (and accurate :-). Let me try this
>> again:
>>
>> Struts 2.{0,1} branch depends upon external xwork with (mostly)
>> non-matching
>> version numbers
>>
>> Struts 2.1.8 (assuming GA) will depend upon external xwork 2.1.5
>>
>> Struts 2.2.x is proposed to depend upon a forked, internal jar named
>> struts2-xwork that will get generated as another artifact within the
>> struts2
>> release, and thus will share version numbers with struts2.2 releases.
>>
>> Struts 3.x is proposed to not depend upon any xwork component, as the
>> two
>> codebases will be merged into one.
>>
>>
>> Is there any dissent from this plan?
>>
>> -Dale
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
>
>
--
Rainer Hermanns
aixcept
Willibrordstraße 82
52134 Herzogenrath - Germany
w: http://aixcept.de/
t: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 11
f: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 13
m: +49 - 170 - 343 29 12
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
Re: Let's kill xwork (was Re: 2.1.8 release?)
Hi folks, I really like he idea of bringing xwork into ASF. I'll post my comments about this topic tomorrow, was too busy to reply yet. The long awaited xwork release will happen definitely this weekend. Musachy, are you done with your changes? cheers, Rainer > On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 10:03 AM, Dale Newfield wrote: >> struts-2.1.8: still waiting on xwork-2.1.8 > > struts-2.1.8: waiting on xwork-2.1.5 > > -- > "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org > > -- Rainer Hermanns aixcept Willibrordstraße 82 52134 Herzogenrath - Germany w: http://aixcept.de/ t: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 11 f: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 13 m: +49 - 170 - 343 29 12 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
Re: Struts Annotations 1.0.5 Release Vote
+1 GA Cheers, Rainer Von meinem iPhone gesendet Am 12.08.2009 um 19:29 schrieb Wes Wannemacher : The Struts Annotations 1.0.5 test build is now available as a Maven artifact. Functionality was added, but Struts releases do not currently use the new features. The test build is available in the Struts snapshot repository located here - http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/struts-annotations-1.0.5/m2-staging-repository/ If you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond with a vote on its quality: [ ] Leave at test build [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta [ ] General Availability (GA) Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s. The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, longer upon request. -Wes -- Wes Wannemacher Head Engineer, WanTii, Inc. Need Training? Struts, Spring, Maven, Tomcat... Ask me for a quote! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
Re: Missing class
Yes, it should be in sync... Rainer > I found one think in struts2-core pom.xml - unpack goal use > xwork-core-2.1.4 but the whole project depend on xwork-2.1.5-SNAPSHOT. > > Shouldn't it be in sync? > > > Regards > -- > Lukasz > http://www.lenart.org.pl/ > http://dailylog.lenart.org.pl/ > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org > > -- Rainer Hermanns aixcept Willibrordstraße 82 52134 Herzogenrath - Germany w: http://aixcept.de/ t: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 11 f: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 13 m: +49 - 170 - 343 29 12 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
Re: ognl 2.7.3 performance
Musachy, thanks! I'll wait for the TextProvider problem to be fixed and then fire up the release process. I start a new gig next week, so this will most likely happen until/over the weekend. Rainer > showcase seems fine. Rainer, whenever you can, get us an xwork release :) > > musachy > > On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Musachy Barroso > wrote: >> I am done with the changes in xwork. Whoever can give a hand testing >> what is in trunk, this is a good time to jump in :). If everything is >> ok, we can release xwork and then do the 2.1.8 release. >> >> musachy >> >> On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Musachy Barroso >> wrote: >>> Due to this fix: http://jira.opensymphony.com/browse/OGNL-141 >>> >>> Ognl 2.7.3 performance is a lot better than 2.6.11, on my rough test, >>> the avg time spent in OgnlRuntime.invokeMethod(...) dropped from >>> 630,726 ms (2.6.11) to 117,108 (2.7.3) ms, (100 threads, 2s ramp-up >>> period, 100 iterations) . If we are not going to use the new bycode >>> stuff, then the upgrade doesn't seem that risky. Should we upgrade, do >>> some testing, and release 2.1.8 (delay release a bit), or leave that >>> for 2.1.9? With the bytecode stuff out the way I am inclined to just >>> upgrade to 2.7.3 at once, and upgrade freemarker also. >>> >>> musachy >>> >>> -- >>> "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd >> > > > > -- > "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org > > -- Rainer Hermanns aixcept Willibrordstraße 82 52134 Herzogenrath - Germany w: http://aixcept.de/ t: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 11 f: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 13 m: +49 - 170 - 343 29 12 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
Re: Struts2 jQuery Plugin - Logo
Don, nope, that fault we did once before in webwork and early s2 releases :) The jQuery plugin should be/get one of the core plugins, not part of the struts2-core artifact. Rainer > On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 9:29 PM, Rainer Hermanns > wrote: >> I'm really happy, that Johannes implemented this plugin and it is now >> ready to use and I will definitely use it. >> If we bring it into Struts2 core, I'm also willing to support this >> plugin >> and help to maintain and extend the functionality. > > Just to clarify, what you really mean is bring the plugin into Struts > trunk? I'm guessing you don't mean you want to include the code in > the struts2-core artifact... > > Don > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org > > -- Rainer Hermanns aixcept Willibrordstraße 82 52134 Herzogenrath - Germany w: http://aixcept.de/ t: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 11 f: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 13 m: +49 - 170 - 343 29 12 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
Re: about json plugin...again
+1, let's get it in. Granted rights for the ASF should be fine. Rainer > We have talked like 276 times about bringing the json plugin in, the > reason we were not able to do it before was because one of the main > contributors is not a struts committer and didn't have a CLA in file > either. I asked him to attach the code to a jira ticket and grant ASF > all the rights, so now we should be good to go. Should I go ahead and > bring it into the sandbox, or do we need anything else? (we had > reached a consensus do do this some time ago) > > musachy > -- > "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org > > -- Rainer Hermanns aixcept Willibrordstraße 82 52134 Herzogenrath - Germany w: http://aixcept.de/ t: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 11 f: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 13 m: +49 - 170 - 343 29 12 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
Re: Struts2 jQuery Plugin - Logo
Hi, the implementation looks really awesome and I'd really like to see this plugin in the core of Struts2. When we talked about the simple ajax tags we want to build, we were already talking about jQuery as the foundation. I'm really happy, that Johannes implemented this plugin and it is now ready to use and I will definitely use it. If we bring it into Struts2 core, I'm also willing to support this plugin and help to maintain and extend the functionality. > I would like for us to define some strategy for this, and don't let > drag for months. Do we all agree that bringing this into the sandbox > is a good idea then? Here is my +1, but maybe we should call a formal vote on this? cheers, Rainer -- Rainer Hermanns aixcept Willibrordstraße 82 52134 Herzogenrath - Germany w: http://aixcept.de/ t: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 11 f: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 13 m: +49 - 170 - 343 29 12 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
Re: ognl 2.7.3 performance
+1, both make sense to wait for, cause the performance improvement will satisfy lots of our users... That's the reason, why xwork is not yet released :) cheers, Rainer > Sounds good. It gives rainer some more time to get xwork released. > > On 7/18/09, Dale Newfield wrote: >> Musachy Barroso wrote: >>> With the bytecode stuff out the way I am inclined to just >>> upgrade to 2.7.3 at once, and upgrade freemarker also. >> >> +1 >> >> -Dale >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org >> >> > > > -- > Wes Wannemacher > Author - Struts 2 In Practice > Includes coverage of Struts 2.1, Spring, JPA, JQuery, Sitemesh and more > http://www.manning.com/wannemacher > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org > > -- Rainer Hermanns aixcept Willibrordstraße 82 52134 Herzogenrath - Germany w: http://aixcept.de/ t: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 11 f: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 13 m: +49 - 170 - 343 29 12 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
Re: Struts 2.1.7 Vote
;>> The Struts 2.1.7 test build is now available. >>>> >>>> Release notes: >>>> * [http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WW/Version+Notes+2.1.7] >>>> >>>> Distribution: >>>> * [http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.7/] >>>> >>>> Maven 2 staging repository: >>>> * >>>> [http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.7/m2-staging-repository/] >>>> >>>> Once you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond >>>> with a vote on its quality: >>>> >>>> [ ] Leave at test build >>>> [ ] Alpha >>>> [ ] Beta >>>> [ ] General Availability (GA) >>>> >>>> Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC >>>> members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least >>>> three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s. >>>> >>>> The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, longer upon request. >>>> A vote can be amended at any time to upgrade or downgrade the quality >>>> of the release based on future experience. If an initial vote >>>> designates the build as "Beta", the release will be submitted for >>>> mirroring and announced to the user list. Once released as a public >>>> beta, subsequent quality votes on a build may be held on the user >>>> list. >>>> >>>> As always, the act of voting carries certain obligations. A binding >>>> vote not only states an opinion, but means that the voter is agreeing >>>> to help do the work >>>> >>>> In addition to the normal info above, I also want to add that I made >>>> the distro available for easy testing through the struts zone. If you >>>> point your browser here - >>>> >>>> http://struts.zones.apache.org/ >>>> >>>> You can test our reference apps on both tomcat and jetty. >>>> >>>> Thanks for your help! >>>> >>>> -Wes >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Wes Wannemacher >>>> Author - Struts 2 In Practice >>>> Includes coverage of Struts 2.1, Spring, JPA, JQuery, Sitemesh and >>>> more >>>> http://www.manning.com/wannemacher >>>> >>>> - >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org >>>> >>>> >>>> - >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd >>> >>> - >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org >>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Wes Wannemacher >> Author - Struts 2 In Practice >> Includes coverage of Struts 2.1, Spring, JPA, JQuery, Sitemesh and more >> http://www.manning.com/wannemacher >> > > > > -- > Wes Wannemacher > Author - Struts 2 In Practice > Includes coverage of Struts 2.1, Spring, JPA, JQuery, Sitemesh and more > http://www.manning.com/wannemacher > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org > > -- Rainer Hermanns aixcept Willibrordstraße 82 52134 Herzogenrath - Germany w: http://aixcept.de/ t: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 11 f: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 13 m: +49 - 170 - 343 29 12 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
RE: Struts 2.1.7 Vote
Al, Sitemesh 2.4.2 was released via the OpenSymphony maven repository. So, this is an official release, but it was never announced on the OpenSymphony site, but on Joe Walnes blog [1]. I did the maven repository push from the tagged sources for Sitemesh, so this shouldn't require further explanations. Regarding some of the other jars, some updates should be useful: commons-collections-3.2.1 - works without problems for me commons-lang-2.4 - no problems encountered as well commons-logging-1.0x - using 1.1.1 for a long time now with s2 apps without problems freemarker-2.3.15 - Sound like a good improvement, but we need to test this properly. cheers, Rainer [1] http://joewalnes.com/2009/04/17/running-sitemesh-on-appengine/ > A few things I've noticed (not hugely important, but may raise some end > user questions); > > ** Upgrade issues ** > > My project uses -codebehind-plugin, -core, -rest-plugin, -sitemesh-plugin. > After the upgrading just the jars I get; > > Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: > org.apache.struts2.rest.handler.MultipartFormDataHandler from; > > struts2-rest-plugin-2.1.7.jar!/struts-plugin.xml:39:163 > > Does the rest plugin config file need updating to handle the new pluggable > infrastructore for the Multipart Request handler (as mentioned in the > release notes)? > > > ** Out of date jars (newer versions may have bug fixes which would be > useful) ** > > antlr-2.7.2 (latest in 2.x branch is 2.7.7, latest is 3.1.3) > commons-collections-3.2 (latest is 3.2.1 which is just 3.2 repackage with > OSGi meta data so may not be useful). > commons-io-1.3.2 (There is a 1.4, but I'm not sure of API compatibility). > commons-lang-2.3 (latest is 2.4, I've been using 2.4 with s2.1.6 without > problems) > commons-logging-1.0x (Latest is 1.1.1, I've been using 1.1.1 with s2.1.6 > without problems) > freemarker-2.3.13 (Latest is 2.3.15) > > > ** Apparently unreleased jars (might need a note to explain where they've > come from) ** > > sitemesh-2.4.2 (latest from sitmesh site is 2.4.1) > > > Hope this is useful, > > Al. > > -- > > * Written an Android App? - List it at http://andappstore.com/ * > > == > Funky Android Limited is registered in England & Wales with the > company number 6741909. The registered head office is Kemp House, > 152-160 City Road, London, EC1V 2NX, UK. > > The views expressed in this email are those of the author and not > necessarily those of Funky Android Limited, it's associates, or it's > subsidiaries. > > > -Original Message- > From: Wes Wannemacher [mailto:w...@wantii.com] > Sent: 22 June 2009 22:51 > To: Struts Developers List > Subject: Struts 2.1.7 Vote > > The Struts 2.1.7 test build is now available. > > Release notes: > * [http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WW/Version+Notes+2.1.7] > > Distribution: > * [http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.7/] > > Maven 2 staging repository: > * [http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.7/m2-staging-repository/] > > Once you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond > with a vote on its quality: > > [ ] Leave at test build > [ ] Alpha > [ ] Beta > [ ] General Availability (GA) > > Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC > members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least > three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s. > > The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, longer upon request. > A vote can be amended at any time to upgrade or downgrade the quality > of the release based on future experience. If an initial vote > designates the build as "Beta", the release will be submitted for > mirroring and announced to the user list. Once released as a public > beta, subsequent quality votes on a build may be held on the user > list. > > As always, the act of voting carries certain obligations. A binding > vote not only states an opinion, but means that the voter is agreeing > to help do the work > > In addition to the normal info above, I also want to add that I made > the distro available for easy testing through the struts zone. If you > point your browser here - > > http://struts.zones.apache.org/ > > You can test our reference apps on both tomcat and jetty. > > Thanks for your help! > > -Wes > > -- > Wes Wannemacher > Author - Struts 2 In Practice > Includes coverage of Struts 2.1, Spring, JPA, JQuery, Sitemesh and more > http://www.manning.com/wannemacher > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail
Re: changing assembly while confluence issues are sorted out
Wes, really a good suggestion :) I'm +1 for it... We need to get 2.1.7 out of the door... cheers, Rainer > Hey all, > > I've been waiting around to see if the autoexport and snippet > weirdness would go away, but it seems to persist. I have found though > that you can do a manual export from cwiki and get a decent copy of > the docs. Does anyone have a problem with me changing the build and > release process to include a manual step (log into cwiki and export > everything)? I don't want this to be a permanent thing, but just until > the http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/ area doesn't have any more ugly > error messages. When those issues are resolved, we'll just switch it > back. > > -Wes > > -- > Wes Wannemacher > Author - Struts 2 In Practice > Includes coverage of Struts 2.1, Spring, JPA, JQuery, Sitemesh and more > http://www.manning.com/wannemacher > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org > > -- Rainer Hermanns aixcept Willibrordstraße 82 52134 Herzogenrath - Germany w: http://aixcept.de/ t: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 11 f: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 13 m: +49 - 170 - 343 29 12 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
Re: XWork again
Wes, XWork 2.1.4 is out and on its way to the mirrors. Since we had a lot of troubles with the empty "xwork-mock-plugin", I disabled it for now. Hudson should work now properly. So, the release process for S2.1 can be fired up :) cheers, Rainer > That'd be great, thanks for the update! > > -Wes > > On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 6:44 AM, Rainer Hermanns > wrote: >> Wes, >> >> working on it now... Maybe it's out this evening... >> >> later, >> Rainer >> >>> Are we getting closer to an XWork release? I don't mean to pester, but >>> if there are any outstanding issues I'll try to help. We are sitting >>> on enough bug fixes that people are filing issues not realizing that >>> we have them already fixed. Anyhow, if there is a way to help, let me >>> know. >>> >>> -Wes >>> >>> -- >>> Wes Wannemacher >>> Author - Struts 2 In Practice >>> Includes coverage of Struts 2.1, Spring, JPA, JQuery, Sitemesh and more >>> http://www.manning.com/wannemacher >>> >>> - >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Rainer Hermanns >> aixcept >> Willibrordstraße 82 >> 52134 Herzogenrath - Germany >> w: http://aixcept.de/ >> t: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 11 >> f: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 13 >> m: +49 - 170 - 343 29 12 >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org >> >> > > > > -- > Wes Wannemacher > Author - Struts 2 In Practice > Includes coverage of Struts 2.1, Spring, JPA, JQuery, Sitemesh and more > http://www.manning.com/wannemacher > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org > > -- Rainer Hermanns aixcept Willibrordstraße 82 52134 Herzogenrath - Germany w: http://aixcept.de/ t: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 11 f: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 13 m: +49 - 170 - 343 29 12 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
Re: XWork again
Wes, working on it now... Maybe it's out this evening... later, Rainer > Are we getting closer to an XWork release? I don't mean to pester, but > if there are any outstanding issues I'll try to help. We are sitting > on enough bug fixes that people are filing issues not realizing that > we have them already fixed. Anyhow, if there is a way to help, let me > know. > > -Wes > > -- > Wes Wannemacher > Author - Struts 2 In Practice > Includes coverage of Struts 2.1, Spring, JPA, JQuery, Sitemesh and more > http://www.manning.com/wannemacher > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org > > -- Rainer Hermanns aixcept Willibrordstraße 82 52134 Herzogenrath - Germany w: http://aixcept.de/ t: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 11 f: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 13 m: +49 - 170 - 343 29 12 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
Re: Struts 2.1.7 / Xwork 2.1.4
Wes, I'd like to figure out the ci problems tommorow and get out 2.1.4 asap. Cheers, Rainer Von meinem iPhone gesendet Am 11.05.2009 um 17:17 schrieb Wes Wannemacher : Rainer (or anyone) - Any word on xwork 2.1.4? Can we shoot for a Struts 2.1.7 release this week? -Wes -- Wes Wannemacher Author - Struts 2 In Practice Includes coverage of Struts 2.1, Spring, JPA, JQuery, Sitemesh and more http://www.manning.com/wannemacher - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
Re: Now that struts-master is done, going to start 2.1.7 release
Wes, yes, we now have multiple artifacts in XWork. The former xwork-VERSION.jar file has been renamed to xwork-core-VERSION.jar. Maybe this simple change would fix the break, I'll have a look at this later today. So, I think changeing the struts pom.xml should solve the problem. later, Rainer > Rainer, > > I was just fiddling around in my own copy of the source and it looks > like you are breaking down the xwork build into multiple artifacts. I > like it, but it seems like the struts build gets broken by this... I > think I only noticed because I just blew away my .m2/repository (I'm > fiddling around with nexus at the same time) and I don't think that an > xwork-2.1.4-SNAPSHOT jar file gets installed into the repo. I am not > sure if I should change the struts pom.xml or if I should fiddle with > the xwork build to get this going. If you don't have time, let me know > which direction you planned to go with this and I'll take care of it. > > -Wes > > On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 12:21 PM, Rainer Hermanns > wrote: >> Yep, agreed... >> I just commited some more fixes for XWork 2.1.4. >> There are just two more left for now (Haven't checked Struts2 Jira for >> others yet). >> >> If someone likes to address the one or the other, you're welcome :) >> >> thanks, >> Rainer >> >>> I am +1 for waiting, so far the biggest problem with convention has >>> been to get the classpath scanner to work right in different >>> containers, and this would fix it for weblogic. >>> >>> musachy >>> >>> On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 12:06 PM, Rainer Hermanns >>> wrote: >>>> I just committed your patch for XW-693, thanks! >>>> Wes, if we wait for the xwork-2.1.4 release next week we >>>> can commit WW-3110 as well for 2.1.7. >>>> >>>> cheers, >>>> Rainer >>>> >>>>> Plese, consider commiting: >>>>> >>>>> * emptyOption attribute ignored in select tag (Java Templates) >>>>> ww-3103 >>>>> (patch attached to issue) >>>>> >>>>> And these two issues (one for struts 2 and the other for xwork) to >>>>> enable deployment in weblogic: >>>>> >>>>> * Use new constructor of XWork class UrlSet to specify ClassLoader >>>>> protocols. (Allows WebLogic deployment) ww-3110 >>>>> * New constructor for UrlSet with custom ClassLoader protocols. >>>>> (Allows >>>>> WebLogic deployment)xw-693 >>>>> >>>>> Thanks in advance. >>>>> >>>>> Wes Wannemacher wrote: >>>>>> Unless anyone has anything they want to commit first... >>>>>> >>>>>> I'll give it a couple of hours while I read the docs on releasing. >>>>>> >>>>>> -Wes >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> - >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Rainer Hermanns >>>> aixcept >>>> Willibrordstraße 82 >>>> 52134 Herzogenrath - Germany >>>> w: http://aixcept.de/ >>>> t: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 11 >>>> f: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 13 >>>> m: +49 - 170 - 343 29 12 >>>> >>>> - >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd >>> >>> - >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Rainer Hermanns >> aixcept >> Willibrordstraße 82 >> 52134 Herzogenrath - Germany >> w: http://aixcept.de/ >> t: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 11 >> f: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 13 >> m: +49 - 170 - 343 29 12 >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org >> >> > > > > -- > Wes Wannemacher > Author - Struts 2 In Practice > Includes coverage of Struts 2.1, Spring, JPA, JQuery, Sitemesh and more > http://www.manning.com/wannemacher > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org > > -- Rainer Hermanns aixcept Willibrordstraße 82 52134 Herzogenrath - Germany w: http://aixcept.de/ t: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 11 f: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 13 m: +49 - 170 - 343 29 12 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
Re: Now that struts-master is done, going to start 2.1.7 release
Yep, agreed... I just commited some more fixes for XWork 2.1.4. There are just two more left for now (Haven't checked Struts2 Jira for others yet). If someone likes to address the one or the other, you're welcome :) thanks, Rainer > I am +1 for waiting, so far the biggest problem with convention has > been to get the classpath scanner to work right in different > containers, and this would fix it for weblogic. > > musachy > > On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 12:06 PM, Rainer Hermanns > wrote: >> I just committed your patch for XW-693, thanks! >> Wes, if we wait for the xwork-2.1.4 release next week we >> can commit WW-3110 as well for 2.1.7. >> >> cheers, >> Rainer >> >>> Plese, consider commiting: >>> >>> * emptyOption attribute ignored in select tag (Java Templates) ww-3103 >>> (patch attached to issue) >>> >>> And these two issues (one for struts 2 and the other for xwork) to >>> enable deployment in weblogic: >>> >>> * Use new constructor of XWork class UrlSet to specify ClassLoader >>> protocols. (Allows WebLogic deployment) ww-3110 >>> * New constructor for UrlSet with custom ClassLoader protocols. (Allows >>> WebLogic deployment)xw-693 >>> >>> Thanks in advance. >>> >>> Wes Wannemacher wrote: >>>> Unless anyone has anything they want to commit first... >>>> >>>> I'll give it a couple of hours while I read the docs on releasing. >>>> >>>> -Wes >>>> >>> >>> - >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Rainer Hermanns >> aixcept >> Willibrordstraße 82 >> 52134 Herzogenrath - Germany >> w: http://aixcept.de/ >> t: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 11 >> f: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 13 >> m: +49 - 170 - 343 29 12 >> >> ----- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org >> >> > > > > -- > "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org > > -- Rainer Hermanns aixcept Willibrordstraße 82 52134 Herzogenrath - Germany w: http://aixcept.de/ t: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 11 f: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 13 m: +49 - 170 - 343 29 12 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
Re: Now that struts-master is done, going to start 2.1.7 release
I just committed your patch for XW-693, thanks! Wes, if we wait for the xwork-2.1.4 release next week we can commit WW-3110 as well for 2.1.7. cheers, Rainer > Plese, consider commiting: > > * emptyOption attribute ignored in select tag (Java Templates) ww-3103 > (patch attached to issue) > > And these two issues (one for struts 2 and the other for xwork) to > enable deployment in weblogic: > > * Use new constructor of XWork class UrlSet to specify ClassLoader > protocols. (Allows WebLogic deployment) ww-3110 > * New constructor for UrlSet with custom ClassLoader protocols. (Allows > WebLogic deployment)xw-693 > > Thanks in advance. > > Wes Wannemacher wrote: >> Unless anyone has anything they want to commit first... >> >> I'll give it a couple of hours while I read the docs on releasing. >> >> -Wes >> > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org > > -- Rainer Hermanns aixcept Willibrordstraße 82 52134 Herzogenrath - Germany w: http://aixcept.de/ t: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 11 f: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 13 m: +49 - 170 - 343 29 12 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
Re: Now that struts-master is done, going to start 2.1.7 release
Wes, thanks for taking action. I'd like to commit a change to the sitemesh-plugin and upgrade the dependency to 2.4.2 to be GAE compliant. This needs to be tested first in showcase, but then I'd be done for the 2.1.7 release. Regarding the xwork patches for WebLogic support I'd be open as well, but won't have time before middle of next week to do another xwork release. Let me know what you think. cheers, Rainer > Unless anyone has anything they want to commit first... > > I'll give it a couple of hours while I read the docs on releasing. > > -Wes > > -- > Wes Wannemacher > Author - Struts 2 In Practice > Includes coverage of Struts 2.1, Spring, JPA, JQuery, Sitemesh and more > http://www.manning.com/wannemacher > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org > > -- Rainer Hermanns aixcept Willibrordstraße 82 52134 Herzogenrath - Germany w: http://aixcept.de/ t: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 11 f: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 13 m: +49 - 170 - 343 29 12 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] - Struts Master Archetype 5
I meant +1 GA of course > +1 GA > > On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 4:08 AM, Rainer Hermanns > wrote: >> This one seems trivial to test, but as far as I can see, >> everything looks okay so far. >> All PMC members and known developers seem to be in. >> What role should be used for emeritus PMC members, Committer? >> If yes, I vote with +1. >> >> cheers, >> Rainer >> >>> The Struts Master 5 test build is now available as a Maven >>> artifact. It is a dependency of Struts 2.1.7. >>> >>> If you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond with >>> a vote on its quality: >>> >>> [ ] Leave at test build >>> [ ] Alpha >>> [ ] Beta >>> [ ] General Availability (GA) >>> >>> >>> Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC >>> members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least >>> three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s. >>> >>> The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, longer upon request. >>> >>> -Wes >>> >>> -- >>> Wes Wannemacher >>> Author - Struts 2 In Practice >>> Includes coverage of Struts 2.1, Spring, JPA, JQuery, Sitemesh and more >>> http://www.manning.com/wannemacher >>> >>> - >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Rainer Hermanns >> aixcept >> Willibrordstraße 82 >> 52134 Herzogenrath - Germany >> w: http://aixcept.de/ >> t: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 11 >> f: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 13 >> m: +49 - 170 - 343 29 12 >> >> ----- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org >> >> > > > > -- > "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org > > -- Rainer Hermanns aixcept Willibrordstraße 82 52134 Herzogenrath - Germany w: http://aixcept.de/ t: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 11 f: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 13 m: +49 - 170 - 343 29 12 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] - Struts Master Archetype 5
This one seems trivial to test, but as far as I can see, everything looks okay so far. All PMC members and known developers seem to be in. What role should be used for emeritus PMC members, Committer? If yes, I vote with +1. cheers, Rainer > The Struts Master 5 test build is now available as a Maven > artifact. It is a dependency of Struts 2.1.7. > > If you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond with > a vote on its quality: > > [ ] Leave at test build > [ ] Alpha > [ ] Beta > [ ] General Availability (GA) > > > Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC > members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least > three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s. > > The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, longer upon request. > > -Wes > > -- > Wes Wannemacher > Author - Struts 2 In Practice > Includes coverage of Struts 2.1, Spring, JPA, JQuery, Sitemesh and more > http://www.manning.com/wannemacher > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org > > -- Rainer Hermanns aixcept Willibrordstraße 82 52134 Herzogenrath - Germany w: http://aixcept.de/ t: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 11 f: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 13 m: +49 - 170 - 343 29 12 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
XWork 2.1.3 released
Hi, I just released XWork 2.1.3... So, as soon as the maven repositories are mirrored, we could start with the Struts 2.1.7 release. cheers, Rainer -- Rainer Hermanns aixcept Willibrordstraße 82 52134 Herzogenrath - Germany w: http://aixcept.de/ t: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 11 f: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 13 m: +49 - 170 - 343 29 12 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
Re: Moving struts assembly to a profile
Wes, +42, please do so... that was disturbing me as well a lot :) The build takes currently "forever", just to download all the docs. Thanks, Rainer > Hey guys, > > Unless someone can raise a decent reason not to do it, I'd like to > move the assembly in the struts2 build into it's own profile. I don't > mind Hudson and Bamboo creating the zips through the assembly module, > but I like to keep up-to-date and running mvn clean install -Pall on > my machine takes an extra ten minutes. Moving it into a profile will > still leave it available, but you'll have to do 'mvn -Pall,assembly > install' to build. 'mvn -Pall install' will build everything it builds > now, except the assembly. > > Anyone have a problem with that? > > -Wes > > -- > Wes Wannemacher > Author - Struts 2 In Practice > Includes coverage of Struts 2.1, Spring, JPA, JQuery, Sitemesh and more > http://www.manning.com/wannemacher > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org > > -- Rainer Hermanns aixcept Willibrordstraße 82 52134 Herzogenrath - Germany w: http://aixcept.de/ t: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 11 f: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 13 m: +49 - 170 - 343 29 12 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Move OSGi and OVal plugins to trunk
+1 both plugins look very good so far. cheers, Rainer > As I mentioned the other day, I think the OSGi and OVal plugins are > ready for early adopters (under the "experimental" label). Also note > that the OSGi plugin is more than one artifact, it includes the plugin > itself, a demo bundle, and an admin bundle (and a future osgi-showcase > app under /apps). These 2 bundles would go into a new /bundles dir > under trunk. > > here is my +1 > > regards > musachy > > -- > "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org > > -- Rainer Hermanns aixcept Willibrordstraße 82 52134 Herzogenrath - Germany w: http://aixcept.de/ t: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 11 f: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 13 m: +49 - 170 - 343 29 12 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
Re: getting ready for 2.1.7
Musachy, yes... at the beginning of next week I've time to work on the remaining xwork issues and trigger the release. I hope this would match your plan. cheers, Rainer > I think it is time for cleaning up some 2.1.7 bugs and get a release > out. We will need to release xwork first, Rene or Rainer, any free > time on your hands? Is anyone working on something that needs more > time? > > musachy > -- > "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org > > -- Rainer Hermanns aixcept Willibrordstraße 82 52134 Herzogenrath - Germany w: http://aixcept.de/ t: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 11 f: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 13 m: +49 - 170 - 343 29 12 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.1.6 Quality
+1 GA Great job Musachy, thanks! cheers, Rainer > The Struts 2.1.6 test build is now available. > > Release notes: > * [http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/version-notes-216.html] > > Distribution: > * [http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.6/] > > Maven 2 staging repository: > * [http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.6/m2-staging-repository/] > > Once you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond > with a vote on its quality: > > [ ] Leave at test build > [ ] Alpha > [ ] Beta > [ ] General Availability (GA) > > Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC > members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least > three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s. > > The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, longer upon request. > A vote can be amended at any time to upgrade or downgrade the quality > of the release based on future experience. If an initial vote > designates the build as "Beta", the release will be submitted for > mirroring and announced to the user list. Once released as a public > beta, subsequent quality votes on a build may be held on the user > list. > > As always, the act of voting carries certain obligations. A binding > vote not only states an opinion, but means that the voter is agreeing > to help do the work > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org > > -- Rainer Hermanns aixcept Willibrordstraße 82 52134 Herzogenrath - Germany w: http://aixcept.de/ t: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 11 f: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 13 m: +49 - 170 - 343 29 12 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Struts Annotations 1.0.4
+1 GA cheers, Rainer > The Struts Annotations 1.0.4 test build is now available as a Maven > artifact. It is a dependency of Struts 2.1.3. > > If you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond with > a vote on its quality: > > [ ] Leave at test build > [ ] Alpha > [ ] Beta > [ ] General Availability (GA) > > Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC > members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least > three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s. > > The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, longer upon request. > > musachy > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org > > -- Rainer Hermanns aixcept Willibrordstraße 82 52134 Herzogenrath - Germany w: http://aixcept.de/ t: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 11 f: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 13 m: +49 - 170 - 343 29 12 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] java tags proposal
+1 cheers, Rainer > yes ;) > > On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 1:46 PM, Martin Cooper wrote: >> Is this intended to be a [VOTE] thread? >> >> -- >> Martin Cooper >> >> >> On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 10:24 AM, Musachy Barroso >> wrote: >> >>> As mentioned on the other thread I's like to propose to move the java >>> tags out of the sandbox into the core plugins bundled with the >>> distribution, so they will be part of the 2.1 release. >>> >>> here is +1 >>> >>> musachy >>> -- >>> "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd >>> >>> - >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org >>> >>> >> > > > > -- > "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org > > -- Rainer Hermanns aixcept Willibrordstraße 82 52134 Herzogenrath - Germany w: http://aixcept.de/ t: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 11 f: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 13 m: +49 - 170 - 343 29 12 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
Re: beta testers needed for java templates
This looks pretty good now. +1 to add this to the core set of plugins! Do we need a formal vote on this? cheers, Rainer > +1 for getting it out of the sandbox. Unfortunately I haven't had any time > to benchmark yet. > > On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 3:39 PM, Musachy Barroso > wrote: > >> I committed a bunch of fixes, it is starting to shape up. Has anyone >> benchmark it so far? >> >> //with convention out of the sandbox, soon I will be pushing to get this >> out :) >> musachy >> >> On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 11:52 AM, Nuwan Chandrasoma >> wrote: >> > Thanks, >> > >> > --- On Thu, 12/18/08, Musachy Barroso wrote: >> > From: Musachy Barroso >> > Subject: Re: beta testers needed for java templates >> > To: "Struts Developers List" , >> nuwan...@yahoo.com >> > Date: Thursday, December 18, 2008, 6:45 AM >> > >> > Fixed, as well as div,form and submit tags. svn it up. >> > >> > musachy >> > >> > On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 3:12 AM, Nuwan Chandrasoma >> >> > wrote: >> >> Hi All, >> >> any idea why i get this error?. i am using 2.1.3-SNAPSHOT. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Nuwan >> >> >> >> >> >>Struts has detected an unhandled exception: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>Messages: >> >> >> >>Unable to find handlers for tag a-closeUnable to find >> handlers >> > for tag a-close - [unknown location] >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>File: >> >>org/apache/jasper/servlet/JspServletWrapper.java >> >> >> >> >> >>Line number: >> >>402 >> >> >> >> --- On Tue, 12/16/08, Musachy Barroso wrote: >> >> From: Musachy Barroso >> >> Subject: beta testers needed for java templates >> >> To: "Struts Developers List" >> >> Date: Tuesday, December 16, 2008, 10:14 AM >> >> >> >> Hi all, >> >> >> >> anyone up for beta testing the java templates? These are the steps to >> try >> > them >> >> >> >> 1.Check out src from >> >> >> > >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/struts/sandbox/trunk/struts2-javatemplates-plugin >> >> 2. Build them and install them >> >> 3. Add them to your web app >> >> >> >> org.apache.struts >> >> struts2-javatemplates-plugin >> >> 2.1.3-SNAPSHOT >> >> >> >> 4. Set this in your struts.xml: >> >> > > value="java" >> >> /> >> >> > > /> >> >> 5. ... >> >> 6. Profit! >> >> >> >> Couldn't avoid the South Park reference :). The supported tags are: >> >> >> > >> text,select,form,a,checkbox,file,password,label,reset,submit,textarea,actionerror,token,actionmessage,head,hidden,fielderror,div >> >> >> >> On my very superficial benchmarking, they are around 30% faster than >> >> the regular tags. Feedback always welcome. >> >> >> >> musachy >> >> -- >> >> "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd >> >> >> >> - >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd >> > >> > - >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org >> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org >> >> > -- Rainer Hermanns aixcept Willibrordstraße 82 52134 Herzogenrath - Germany w: http://aixcept.de/ t: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 11 f: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 13 m: +49 - 170 - 343 29 12 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
Re: Convention plugin recap - proposal
+1 thanks a lot for taking care :) cheers, Rainer > The Multiple Unknown Handlers patch was merged into xwork and struts > trunks. Now we can move convention plugin out of the sanbox. Last call > for objections :) (2.1 build coming soon) > > musachy > > On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 5:06 PM, Musachy Barroso > wrote: >> I updated the patch to use a 2.1 dtd, instead of 2.0, and removed the >> annoying empty lines from the diff. Crucible seems to have a bug, and >> even >> when I uncheck files from the "Patch" section, it keeps them in the >> review >> (take note Don :) ) >> >> http://fisheye6.atlassian.com/cru/DEMO-21 >> >> musachy >> >> On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 2:42 PM, wrote: >>> >>> On our super long convention thread, we got to the agreement that in >>> order >>> to move convention out of the sandbox, there should be a way to run >>> both >>> plugins side by side, so backward compatibility could be possible. The >>> remaining issue to make that happen was to implement "multiple unknown >>> handler", for which I uploaded a new patch here (against trunk): >>> >>> http://jira.opensymphony.com/browse/XW-640 >>> (http://fisheye6.atlassian.com/cru/DEMO-19) >>> >>> that creates an extension point for unknown handlers manager, instead >>> of >>> some ugly static classes I wrote before. We also agreed to include >>> convention after 2.1 was released, but based on how long releases >>> take(hoping to change that soon), I propose that we move convention out >>> of >>> trunk for the next 2.1 release so it will be available when 2.1 goes >>> GA, and >>> not 1 or 2 years after that. >>> >>> @Rainer, @Rene: could you guys take a look at the new patch? That thing >>> was a pain to merge being so old, the new one should merge fine. >>> >>> regards >>> musachy >> >> >> -- >> "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd >> > > > > -- > "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org > > -- Rainer Hermanns aixcept Willibrordstraße 82 52134 Herzogenrath - Germany w: http://aixcept.de/ t: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 11 f: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 13 m: +49 - 170 - 343 29 12 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
Re: Struts 2.1 plans
Musachy,
I'm available for releases as well (especially XWork) and soon will have
more spare time
I'd like to spent on xw/s2.
cheers,
Rainer
On Tue, 2 Dec 2008 10:12:39 -0500, "Musachy Barroso" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I want to fix the problem with the empty spaces in the param names,
> and then head to xwork and see if there are any blocking bugs open,
> and try to help there. I am trying to get Rene to do the xwork
> release, and me and Wes will step thru the Struts release, so there is
> more people involved with the process, and we don't stall in the
> future because there is only one person doing releases.
>
> I think we can merge the changes from the branch back into trunk, but
> I am waiting on Rene's confirmation on that. I still think we should
> get Convention out for 2.1 but I am giving up on that hope.
>
> regards
> musachy
>
> On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 10:01 AM, James Holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> Yes, see the Struts home page for the following info:
>>
>> =
>> The latest release of Struts 2 is Struts 2.1.2, which was promoted to
> "Beta"
>> on 26 March 2008. For the latest production release ("General
>> Availability"), see Struts 2.0.14.
>> =
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 9:58 AM, Wes Wannemacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Was 2.1.2 a BETA?
>>>
>>> -Wes
>>>
>>> On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 9:53 AM, James Holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> wrote:
>>> > It looks like we're almost there! Musachy is killing it!
>>> >
>>> > From what I can tell the only real outstanding issue left for the
> 2.1.3
>>> > release is:
>>> >
>>> > https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-2197
>>> >
>>> > That said, what is the plan to get 2.1 to GA? Are we going to close
> out
>>> the
>>> > last 2 or 3 2.1.3 bugs and make an attempt at GA?
>>> >
>>> > James
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Wesley Wannemacher
>>> President, Head Engineer/Consultant
>>> WanTii, Inc.
>>> http://www.wantii.com
>>>
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.0.14 Quality
+1 GA cheers, Rainer > The Struts 2.0.14 test build is now available. > > Release notes: > > * http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/release-notes-2014.html > > Distribution: > > * http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.0.14/ > > Maven 2 staging repository: > > * > http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.0.14/m2-staging-repository/ > > Once you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond with > a vote on its quality: > > [ ] Leave at test build > [ ] Alpha > [ ] Beta > [ ] General Availability (GA) > > Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC > members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least > three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s. > > The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, longer upon request. A > vote can be amended at any time to upgrade or downgrade the quality of > the release based on future experience. If an initial vote designates > the build as "Beta", the release will be submitted for mirroring and > announced to the user list. Once released as a public beta, subsequent > quality votes on a build may be held on the user list. > > As always, the act of voting carries certain obligations. A binding vote > not only states an opinion, but means that the voter is agreeing to help > do the work. > > > > > ----- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Rainer Hermanns aixcept Willibrordstraße 82 52134 Herzogenrath - Germany w: http://aixcept.de/ t: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 11 f: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 13 m: +49 - 170 - 343 29 12 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Drop J4 support, was: Re: release process
I'd vote with +1 for dropping j4-support in Struts 2.1.X
but with -1 for Struts 2.0.X because of known users using
previous 2.0.X backported releases and that are waiting for
another stable GA release for their production systems.
just my 0.02€,
cheers,
Rainer
> Yes, my thoughts were on that direction, drop out direct support and
> document what needs to be done, for those that still need it.
>
> musachy
>
> On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 12:35 PM, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>> --- On Sun, 11/16/08, Musachy Barroso wrote:
>> > I know someone already asked this but, shouldn't we drop
>> > the jdk4 support already?
>>
>> +1, but I'll add a wiki page giving a brief overview of the retro
>> process
>> ("Run this batch file, loser!")
>>
>> Dave
>>
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
>
--
Rainer Hermanns
aixcept
Willibrordstraße 82
52134 Herzogenrath - Germany
w: http://aixcept.de/
t: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 11
f: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 13
m: +49 - 170 - 343 29 12
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Struts2 and production apps
Musachy, it is already documented here: http://wiki.opensymphony.com/display/XW/Creating+a+distribution The document task could easily be upgraded to the same static export mechanism as we use at Struts. Thanks, Rainer > I agree with Rainer, commit rights to xwork have been granted to S2 > committers on-demand (like me), where the project is, I don't think > matters > much. I am set on getting periodic S2 builds out, and then I will try to > do > the same with XWork, first I need to get Rainer and Rene to document the > process ;), hint hint. > musachy > > On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 6:31 PM, Rainer Hermanns > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > >> It is not true, that there are no releases of XWork. >> True is, that the releases are not that frequent as required. >> Currently only Musachy and me are working on XWork and applying patches. >> Both of us are Struts2 core developers and PMC members, so you can be >> sure >> that there will be XWork releases as required. >> But please keep in mind, that we are all working on XWork and Struts2 in >> our spare time free of charge. >> There will be soon new release managers for XWork, so that one can step >> in >> as required and releases should come out more regular. >> However, this still requires time of the developers after, before or >> beside their daytime jobs. >> >> It would be of great help, if more users would test the nightly and >> alpha/beta builds of S2/XWork and give their vivid feedback on the dev >> or >> user list or even in Jira. I am pretty sure your mentioned problem with >> websphere would have been solved before a release. >> We need your feedback to make XWork and Struts2 better and to meet your >> needs. Patches are also very welcome and maybe you are interested in >> getting involved. >> >> I wouldn't have a problem to move over XWork to the ASF and I am pretty >> sure some other XWork developers would vote +1 for this step, but just >> bringing over a project to the ASF without new volunteer developers >> wouldn't solve the mentioned issue. >> >> So, if I could see a better future for XWork at Apache, I'd love to go >> this way, but this is not a task for two or three developers, but for a >> larger community. If some developers would like to participate either at >> OpenSymphony or in/after an incubation to ASF let me and others know, >> you >> are welcome and your help would be much appreciated. >> >> >> cheers, >> Rainer >> >> >> >> > I count not help myself not to ask the queston and still wonder why it >> was >> > decided to build struts 2 on XWork instead of directing the effort to >> come >> > up with struts 2 using something home grown technologies like Command >> > chains ( that is currently used in struts 1.3 +). It makes u wonder >> what >> > happens if XWORK for some reason or other goes out of commission and >> there >> > are no releases. I do not see how struts 2 and xwork can be considered >> a >> > merge to create a new framework (struts 2) while xwork is an >> independant >> > and fully functional framework (when there is a merge, the merge >> results >> > in 1 new entity with merging old entities are gone) >> > >> > I have been an avid user of struts 1 for past few years and have >> switched >> > to struts 2 to keep up with struts hype but I have not been able to >> run >> > any project in my case on Websphere (except 2.0.11) with any struts 2 >> > release. Struts 1 used to run like charm. >> > >> > regards, >> > >> > >> > - Original Message >> > From: Rene Gielen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> > To: Struts Developers List >> > Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2008 4:22:01 AM >> > Subject: Re: Struts2 and production apps >> > >> > I totally agree that this is currently a very bad situation. Jeromy's >> tip >> > for static resources is a working fix for the 2.0.12 issue, as well as >> an >> > uprgade to 2.0.13 testing version would be (this was no GA release). >> > Please note that we fixed the static resource bug immediately when it >> was >> > reported, and triggered the 2.0.13 build - but since there is still >> the >> > conversion message issue, it will not become GA. >> > >> > For the needed 2.0.14, we are simply waiting on XWork to be released, >> > because the said conversion error problem is not a Struts issue. The >> bug >>
Re: Struts2 and production apps
Great news, thanks for your interest! Your patches and feedback have been very helpful in the past, I'm looking forward to get more :) You'll receive a private message soon... cheers, Rainer > On Sun, 2008-11-16 at 00:31 +0100, Rainer Hermanns wrote: > [snip] >> I wouldn't have a problem to move over XWork to the ASF and I am pretty >> sure some other XWork developers would vote +1 for this step, but just >> bringing over a project to the ASF without new volunteer developers >> wouldn't solve the mentioned issue. >> >> So, if I could see a better future for XWork at Apache, I'd love to go >> this way, but this is not a task for two or three developers, but for a >> larger community. If some developers would like to participate either at >> OpenSymphony or in/after an incubation to ASF let me and others know, >> you >> are welcome and your help would be much appreciated. >> > > > Rainer, I've been working off of trunk for both xwork and s2 for the > examples in my upcoming book. I've worked with the xwork codebase and > posted a few patches. As you mentioned, we all have day jobs, and right > now, I've got a night-job too (the book), but I'd like to be able to > make patches/changes to xwork when I come across things. I am not > suggesting that my patches take too long to make their way in (since you > and Musachy have been keeping up enough to keep me happy), but if you > want some more help, I wouldn't mind. > > -Wes > > > ----- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Rainer Hermanns aixcept Willibrordstraße 82 52134 Herzogenrath - Germany w: http://aixcept.de/ t: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 11 f: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 13 m: +49 - 170 - 343 29 12 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Convention plugin recap - proposal
Musachy, I'll have a look in the next couple of days. I'll contact you on IRC during the week. cheers, Rainer > On our super long convention thread, we got to the agreement that in order > to move convention out of the sandbox, there should be a way to run both > plugins side by side, so backward compatibility could be possible. The > remaining issue to make that happen was to implement "multiple unknown > handler", for which I uploaded a new patch here (against trunk): > > http://jira.opensymphony.com/browse/XW-640 > (http://fisheye6.atlassian.com/cru/DEMO-19) > > that creates an extension point for unknown handlers manager, instead of > some ugly static classes I wrote before. We also agreed to include > convention after 2.1 was released, but based on how long releases > take(hoping to change that soon), I propose that we move convention out of > trunk for the next 2.1 release so it will be available when 2.1 goes GA, > and not 1 or 2 years after that. > > @Rainer, @Rene: could you guys take a look at the new patch? That thing > was > a pain to merge being so old, the new one should merge fine. > > regards > musachy > -- Rainer Hermanns aixcept Willibrordstraße 82 52134 Herzogenrath - Germany w: http://aixcept.de/ t: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 11 f: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 13 m: +49 - 170 - 343 29 12 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Struts2 and production apps
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > ______ > Looking for the perfect gift? Give the gift of Flickr! > > http://www.flickr.com/gift/ > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Rainer Hermanns aixcept Willibrordstraße 82 52134 Herzogenrath - Germany w: http://aixcept.de/ t: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 11 f: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 13 m: +49 - 170 - 343 29 12 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Struts2 and production apps
Hi, xwork 2.0.7 is released and you can kick off the S2.0.14 release process. I'd love to get more S2 developers into the XWork development process. So, are there any S2 (or other interested) developers not yet involved in XWork who'd like commit access? Please contact me by mail and I'll add you. Regarding current production apps, I'd go with 2.1.X from trunk for development projects with a target release in 1-3 months and 2.0.14 (yet to be released) for production ready apps. I have several projects running based on S2 2.1.X in production use, but with some patches applied. These patches will soon be added to XWork 2.1.X and go into the S2 2.1.X codebase. As soon as my current project is finished in early December I will have much more time to work on XWork and S2.1.X again. Thanks, Rainer > I totally agree that this is currently a very bad situation. Jeromy's > tip for static resources is a working fix for the 2.0.12 issue, as well > as an uprgade to 2.0.13 testing version would be (this was no GA > release). Please note that we fixed the static resource bug immediately > when it was reported, and triggered the 2.0.13 build - but since there > is still the conversion message issue, it will not become GA. > > For the needed 2.0.14, we are simply waiting on XWork to be released, > because the said conversion error problem is not a Struts issue. The bug > was fixed in XWork code immediately after reporting, but XWork has it's > own release cycle. That's why it is not in our hand to get out a Struts > 2.0.14 release candidate, which technically will be nothing more than a > 2.0.13 with a current XWork build. > > I really hope that we will be getting a XWork release this weekend, and > as soon as it is published, be sure that a 2.0.14 build will pushed out > right away. And to all those out there using production apps, please > feel invited to participate on the QA review and voting process for new > releases with reporting integration test results, because that helps us > to hunt down the real world issues before we consider a build GA. > > - René > > Jeromy Evans schrieb: >> Koen Serry wrote: >>> * 2.0.12: yes great GA, ah no it doesn't do static resources, so all >>> client >>> side validations won't work >>> >> >> Just a tip, if you're releasing a production app, you shouldn't be >> serving static resources from the struts2 dispatcher. Extract them and >> the problem is avoided. >> >> http://struts.apache.org/2.0.12/docs/performance-tuning.html >> http://cwiki.apache.org/S2WIKI/creating-a-custom-dojo-profile-for-struts-20x.html >> >> >> >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Rainer Hermanns aixcept Willibrordstraße 82 52134 Herzogenrath - Germany w: http://aixcept.de/ t: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 11 f: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 13 m: +49 - 170 - 343 29 12 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.0.12 Quality
Great news, thanks Rene :) [+1] General Availability (GA) cheers, Rainer > The Struts 2.0.12 test build is now available. > > Release notes: > > * http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/release-notes-2012.html > > Distribution: > > * http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.0.12/ > > Maven 2 staging repository: > > * http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.0.12/m2-staging-repository/ > > Once you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond with a > vote on its quality: > > [ ] Leave at test build > [ ] Alpha > [ ] Beta > [ ] General Availability (GA) > > Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC members > are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least three binding > +1s and more +1s than -1s. > > The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, longer upon request. A > vote can be amended at any time to upgrade or downgrade the quality of the > release based on future experience. If an initial vote designates the > build as "Beta", the release will be submitted for mirroring and announced > to the user list. Once released as a public beta, subsequent quality votes > on a build may be held on the user list. > > As always, the act of voting carries certain obligations. A binding vote > not only states an opinion, but means that the voter is agreeing to help > do the work. > > > > > ----- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Rainer Hermanns aixcept Mariahilfstrasse 9 52062 Aachen - Germany w: http://aixcept.de/ t: +49-241-4012247 m: +49-170-3432912 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 2.1 builds
Musachy, if the latest XWork changes are tested and the various security applied fixes do work, I'd be happy to fire up the XWork release process until the weekend. Let me know, if something else needs to be done. cheers, Rainer > From the ones scheduled for 2.1.3 there are still some minor ones in > there, > and other that are on hold for different reasons. I will start playing > with > the release process over the weekend. We also need an xwork release right? > > musachy > > On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 9:56 PM, Jeromy Evans < > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Musachy Barroso wrote: >> >>> Do we have any pending blocking tickets for a 2.1 builds? or are we >>> just >>> missing free time from our build masters? It would be nice to get 2.1 >>> rolling. I was looking at: >>> >>> >>> http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/creating-and-signing-a-struts-21x-distribution.html >>> >>> and I have to say that it looks very scary for the uninitiated (me). Is >>> there anything we can do to make that process easier? >>> >>> musachy >>> >>> >> >> I'll try to dedicate some time to closing 2.1 issues this Friday (my >> time). >> I thought the remaining issues were generally dojo related but haven't >> looked lately. It seems there's been quite a lot of take-up of 2.1.2 so >> there may be a few new issues. >> >> Regarding the build process, last time I attempted to follow what Don >> had >> done and managed to get to step 6 myself (with -DdryRun=true), although >> I >> skipped the "clobbling a j4 release" notes. It took ages and sucked all >> enthusiasm out of me. Don mentioned it's much faster to build it from a >> US-based server. >> I can't see how to make it less scary for the uninitiated - other than >> for >> the CI system to pump out the artefacts ready for release so it's just >> an >> administrative decision to release them. >> >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > > > -- > "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd > -- Rainer Hermanns aixcept Mariahilfstrasse 9 52062 Aachen - Germany w: http://aixcept.de/ t: +49-241-4012247 m: +49-170-3432912 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Release Struts 2 Starter Maven Archetype v2.0.11.2
+1 > The Struts 2 Starter Maven Archetype v2.0.11.2 is available for review. > > Staging repository: > http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/struts-archetypes/2.0.11.2/starter-m2-staging-repository > > Instructions for use: > - http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/ready-set-go.html > - http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/struts-maven-archetypes.html > > (...adjust version and remote repo as necessary.) > > Once you have had a chance to review this build, please vote: > > [ ] +1 Release it and update the docs! > [ ] +/- 0 > [ ] -1 This should not be released because... > > -- > Wendy > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Rainer Hermanns aixcept Mariahilfstrasse 9 52062 Aachen - Germany w: http://aixcept.de/ t: +49-241-4012247 m: +49-170-3432912 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.0.11.2 Quality (fast track) - UPDATE / SERIOUS ISSUE
Rene, I could release xwork 2.0.6 either today or tomorrow. 2.0.11.3 sounds good to me as well, but why not release 2.0.12 with some additional patches, like the freemarker lib update. Since it took that long to get out the fast track release, another 3 days for voting wouldn't be an issue for me... What do you think? cheers, Rainer > 2.0.11.3 sounds fine to me. Are there that many commits on the 2.0.x > branch that we aren't ready to release? > > Don > > On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 10:07 AM, Rene Gielen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> Some might have noticed that there was still no official announcement >> for 2.0.11.2 availability. Until Saturday, there was an issue with the >> gpg signature of the maven artifacts [1], which needed a pom fix [2] and >> a redeployment of the files to sync with the official maven >> repositories. Since Saturday, correctly signed artifacts should be >> distributed. >> >> Just before I wanted to get the announcement out on Sunday, a possibly >> blocking issue for 2.0.11.2 users under Websphere 6 was reported [3]. It >> turned out that the issue was already known and fixed for Struts 2.1.x / >> XWork 2.1.x, but the critical patch already applied in XWork2 trunk was >> not in the 2.0 branch, causing 2.0.5 to break in a Websphere >> environment. The fix is applied now [4], but it looks like this is to >> late for the 2.0.11.2 release. >> >> The cleanest solution is to release a XWork 2.0.6 including the fix, and >> a Struts 2.0.12.3 release still under fast track conditions. Do we have >> better / faster options? Comments highly appreciated... >> >> [1] http://people.apache.org/~henkp/repo/ >> [2] http://people.apache.org/~henkp/repo/faq.html >> [3] https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-2709 >> [4] http://jira.opensymphony.com/browse/XW-651 >> >> Rene Gielen schrieb: >>> +1 GA binding >>> >>> * Rene Gielen >>> * Rainer Hermanns >>> * Musachy Barroso >>> >>> +1 GA supporting >>> >>> * Dave Newton >>> >>> Struts 2.0.11.2 is now rated at GA, and I proceeded to copying the >>> files for mirroring. After veryfing, I'll post the announcement. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Rene >>> >>> - >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Rainer Hermanns aixcept Mariahilfstrasse 9 52062 Aachen - Germany w: http://aixcept.de/ t: +49-241-4012247 m: +49-170-3432912 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.0.11.2 Quality (fast track)
Al, yes.. it was not yet officially announced, because of the missing Struts2 release. The release is available here [1] since 06/13/2008. As soon as this release is out, xwork will be annonced as well. cheers, Rainer [1] http://release.opensymphony.com/xwork/2.0.5/ > Is there any reason XWork 2.0.5 isn't available for download from > http://www.opensymphony.com/xwork/download.action? > > Is the 2.0.5 jar included in 2.0.11.2 an officially released version? > > Al. > > Rene Gielen wrote: >> The Struts 2.0.11.2 security release test build is now available. >> >> Release notes: >> >> * http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WW/Release+Notes+2.0.11.2 >> >> Distribution: >> >> * http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.0.11.2/ >> >> Maven 2 staging repository: >> >> * http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.0.11.2/m2-staging-repository/ >> >> Once you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond with >> a vote on its quality: >> >> [ ] Leave at test build >> [ ] Alpha >> [ ] Beta >> [ ] General Availability (GA) >> >> Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC >> members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least >> three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s. >> >> This is a "fast-track" release vote. If we have a positive vote after 24 >> hours (at least three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s), the release >> may be submitted for mirroring and announced to the usual channels. >> >> The website download link will include the mirroring timestamp parameter >> [1], which limits the selection of mirrors to those that have been >> refreshed since the indicated time and date. (After 24 hours, we *must* >> remove the timestamp parameter from the website link, to avoid >> unnecessary server load.) In the case of a fast-track release, the email >> announcement will not link directly to , but to >> , so that we can control use of the timestamp parameter. >> >> [1] <http://apache.org/dev/mirrors.html#use> >> >> >> ----- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Rainer Hermanns aixcept Mariahilfstrasse 9 52062 Aachen - Germany w: http://aixcept.de/ t: +49-241-4012247 m: +49-170-3432912 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.0.11.2 Quality (fast track)
+1 GA > +1 GA > > Rene Gielen schrieb: >> The Struts 2.0.11.2 security release test build is now available. >> >> Release notes: >> >> * http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WW/Release+Notes+2.0.11.2 >> >> Distribution: >> >> * http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.0.11.2/ >> >> Maven 2 staging repository: >> >> * http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.0.11.2/m2-staging-repository/ >> >> Once you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond with >> a vote on its quality: >> >> [ ] Leave at test build >> [ ] Alpha >> [ ] Beta >> [ ] General Availability (GA) >> >> Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC >> members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least >> three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s. >> >> This is a "fast-track" release vote. If we have a positive vote after 24 >> hours (at least three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s), the release >> may be submitted for mirroring and announced to the usual channels. >> >> The website download link will include the mirroring timestamp parameter >> [1], which limits the selection of mirrors to those that have been >> refreshed since the indicated time and date. (After 24 hours, we *must* >> remove the timestamp parameter from the website link, to avoid >> unnecessary server load.) In the case of a fast-track release, the email >> announcement will not link directly to , but to >> , so that we can control use of the timestamp parameter. >> >> [1] <http://apache.org/dev/mirrors.html#use> >> >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Rainer Hermanns aixcept Mariahilfstrasse 9 52062 Aachen - Germany w: http://aixcept.de/ t: +49-241-4012247 m: +49-170-3432912 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [S2] trunk build broken since last fix (again)
Don, I have a "workaround" fix for the failing build, that I justed commited, but this needs to be reviewed again... o fixing build by commenting "old" constructor in StrutsSpringObjectFactory o adding missing param to struts-plugin.xml in portlet-plugin cheers, Rainer > On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 6:44 AM, Rainer Hermanns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> Don, >> >> your latest change broke the build as well: >> http://opensource.bamboo.atlassian.com/build/viewBuildResults.action?buildKey=STRUTS-MAIN&buildNumber=846 > > Work on it now. > >> Btw why are there no more notification mails to our lists with build >> failure notifications? > > Dunno, it still seems to be configured correctly. Maybe it is getting > stuck in a spam filter or in the moderation queue? Does anyone have > the appropriate access? > > Don > >> >> cheers, >> Rainer >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> the current build from trunk is broken. There are failing tests: >>> http://opensource.bamboo.atlassian.com/browse/STRUTS-MAIN-843 >>> >>> @James Holmes: Since you commited the latest fixes, could you please >>> have a look at the failing unit tests, thanks :) >>> >>> cheers, >>> Rainer >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Rainer Hermanns >>> aixcept >>> Mariahilfstraße 9 >>> 52062 Aachen - Germany >>> w: http://aixcept.de/ >>> t: +49-241-4012247 >>> m: +49-170-3432912 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> - >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Rainer Hermanns >> aixcept >> Mariahilfstrasse 9 >> 52062 Aachen - Germany >> w: http://aixcept.de/ >> t: +49-241-4012247 >> m: +49-170-3432912 >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Rainer Hermanns aixcept Mariahilfstrasse 9 52062 Aachen - Germany w: http://aixcept.de/ t: +49-241-4012247 m: +49-170-3432912 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Need verification of complex patch
Kristin,
could you please attach this as unified patch to the related Jira issue?
I'll look into this during the week and apply the patch, if everything
is working properly.
It would be very helpful, if you have a unit test available, that verifies
the correct behaviour.
thanks,
Rainer
> I have a patch for http://jira.opensymphony.com/browse/XW-604 and
> another issue that i am experiencing. The patch somewhat changes the
> behaviour of the exception flow and I would like a small review:
>
> Problem I am fixing:
> DefaultActionInvocation.invoke() invokes entire interceptor chain and
> calls invokeActionOnly with the full chain on the stack.
> invokeActionOnly returns success.
> executeResult is invoked and throws an exception (in XW-604 it is
> "beforeResult" that throws an exception but with the same effect.)
> Call stack unwinds to ExceptionMappingInterceptor.
> When ExceptionMappingInterceptor completes, executed is actually FALSE
> in the DefaultActionInvocation, meaning that executeResult will be
> invoked *again* (with exception again).
> The stacktrace that flows to the top is actually from the last
> exception, and the symptom is that there are no interceptors on the
> stacktrace.
>
> My patch is really very simple, i just moved executed=true to the top of
> the block, like this:
>
> // this is needed because the result will be executed,
> then control will return to the Interceptor, which will
> // return above and flow through again
> if (!executed) {
> executed = true; // Flag as executed, no matter what
> happens below. // THIS IS THE PATCH. Used to be at the bottom of the if
> block.
>
> if (preResultListeners != null) {
> for (Iterator iterator =
> preResultListeners.iterator();
> iterator.hasNext();) {
> PreResultListener listener =
> (PreResultListener) iterator.next();
>
> String
> _profileKey="preResultListener: ";
> try {
>
> UtilTimerStack.push(_profileKey);
>
> listener.beforeResult(this, resultCode);
> }
> finally {
>
> UtilTimerStack.pop(_profileKey);
> }
> }
> }
>
> // now execute the result, if we're supposed to
> if (proxy.getExecuteResult()) {
>executeResult();
> }
> }
>
>
>
>
> I believe there are no thread safety issues here.
>
> Comments ?
>
> Kristian Rosenvold
>
--
Rainer Hermanns
aixcept
Mariahilfstrasse 9
52062 Aachen - Germany
w: http://aixcept.de/
t: +49-241-4012247
m: +49-170-3432912
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [S2] trunk build broken since last fix (again)
Don, your latest change broke the build as well: http://opensource.bamboo.atlassian.com/build/viewBuildResults.action?buildKey=STRUTS-MAIN&buildNumber=846 Btw why are there no more notification mails to our lists with build failure notifications? cheers, Rainer > Hi, > > the current build from trunk is broken. There are failing tests: > http://opensource.bamboo.atlassian.com/browse/STRUTS-MAIN-843 > > @James Holmes: Since you commited the latest fixes, could you please > have a look at the failing unit tests, thanks :) > > cheers, > Rainer > > > > > Rainer Hermanns > aixcept > Mariahilfstraße 9 > 52062 Aachen - Germany > w: http://aixcept.de/ > t: +49-241-4012247 > m: +49-170-3432912 > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Rainer Hermanns aixcept Mariahilfstrasse 9 52062 Aachen - Germany w: http://aixcept.de/ t: +49-241-4012247 m: +49-170-3432912 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [S2] trunk build broken since last fix
Thanks a lot :) cheers, Rainer > My apologies. I forgot to check in some files this weekend. It should be > resolved now. > > On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 12:32 PM, Rainer Hermanns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> the current build from trunk is broken. There are failing tests: >> http://opensource.bamboo.atlassian.com/browse/STRUTS-MAIN-843 >> >> @James Holmes: Since you commited the latest fixes, could you please >> have a >> look at the failing unit tests, thanks :) >> >> cheers, >> Rainer >> >> >> >> >> Rainer Hermanns >> aixcept >> Mariahilfstraße 9 >> 52062 Aachen - Germany >> w: http://aixcept.de/ >> t: +49-241-4012247 >> m: +49-170-3432912 >> >> >> >> >> ----- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > -- Rainer Hermanns aixcept Mariahilfstrasse 9 52062 Aachen - Germany w: http://aixcept.de/ t: +49-241-4012247 m: +49-170-3432912 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[S2] trunk build broken since last fix
Hi, the current build from trunk is broken. There are failing tests: http://opensource.bamboo.atlassian.com/browse/STRUTS-MAIN-843 @James Holmes: Since you commited the latest fixes, could you please have a look at the failing unit tests, thanks :) cheers, Rainer Rainer Hermanns aixcept Mariahilfstraße 9 52062 Aachen - Germany w: http://aixcept.de/ t: +49-241-4012247 m: +49-170-3432912 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
JavaOne Meetup anywhere?
Hey, who is going to attend CommunityOne/JavaOne this year? Are there already plans for a meet up somewhere? I think it would be nice, if we could organize something downtown San Francisco... I'll be in SF together with René and Ian from Monday the 5th. Proposals welcome :) cheers, Rainer - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: svn
SVN is up again... > afaik yes... > Unfortunately there was no announcement of the svn availability yet... >> Is svn commit still disabled? I am getting >> >> "svn: MKACTIVITY of >> '/repos/asf/!svn/act/9de4d09a-1901-0010-a45f-0549854646f5': 403 >> Forbidden (https://svn.apache.org)" >> >> while trying to commit to the sandbox. >> musachy >> -- >> "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > > > -- > Rainer Hermanns > aixcept > Mariahilfstrasse 9 > 52062 Aachen - Germany > w: http://aixcept.de/ > t: +49-241-4012247 > m: +49-170-3432912 > > ----- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Rainer Hermanns aixcept Mariahilfstrasse 9 52062 Aachen - Germany w: http://aixcept.de/ t: +49-241-4012247 m: +49-170-3432912 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: svn
afaik yes... Unfortunately there was no announcement of the svn availability yet... > Is svn commit still disabled? I am getting > > "svn: MKACTIVITY of > '/repos/asf/!svn/act/9de4d09a-1901-0010-a45f-0549854646f5': 403 > Forbidden (https://svn.apache.org)" > > while trying to commit to the sandbox. > musachy > -- > "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Rainer Hermanns aixcept Mariahilfstrasse 9 52062 Aachen - Germany w: http://aixcept.de/ t: +49-241-4012247 m: +49-170-3432912 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [s2] A thought - next generation OSGi-based?
Don, this sounds like a really good idea. I currently have the problem to upgrade several apps from different S2/WW versions to the latest release and your suggestion sounds like an ideal way to do such migrations. I'm curious about your plans and would like to hear more details. Maybe we should discuss these ideas in more detail at JavaOne? cheers, Rainer > As I learn more and more about OSGi, I wonder if it might be the > solution to several big problems we seem to have at the moment: poor > reloadability and the lack of a solid API. With OSGi, you can drop > bundles in and out of the system at runtime, even running multiple > versions of the same bundle side-by-side, but the feature I'm most > interested in right now is how it would allow us to put in a proper > API while maintaining full backwards-compatibility. > > Evolving a web framework is hard because apps tend to be written on a > specific version, and to migrate them to new versions has two > problems: development may not be continuously funded and the upgrade > may require too many changes to the application. On the other hand, > if you don't evolve your web framework, you quickly go out-of-date and > lose interest from new developers. In our case, despite being a > relatively new framework, we have legacy code around from 2004 that we > can't just remove, yet we want to provide an attractive, modern, clean > framework for new development. > > The specific issue it hand that I've been thinking about is how to get > a proper API into Struts 2 yet keep backwards compatibility, and I > think OSGi might provide a solution. What about this: > 1. Struts 2 and its plugins remain the way they are now - 100% > backwards-compatibility > 2. An OSGi plugin provides the platform for the next generation of Struts > 2 > 3. A new API bundle is created, implemented by the underlying Struts > 2 framework > 4. Old apps can continue to write and deploy code against Struts 2, > yet new development can start to use the new API > 5. Later, when we want to write API version 2, we create a new bundle > that runs side-by-side the old bundle, both implemented by Struts 2 > > Basically, OSGi would allow us to write a clean layer on top of a > framework, much like how Grails builds on Spring, but we get, as a > side benefit, all the architectural advantages of OSGi for free. > Furthermore, if we do it right, users don't have to know or care that > OSGi is under the hood - all they know is they write a jar, drop it in > a directory or upload it via a form and they just installed part of > their application at runtime. > > Don > > ----- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Rainer Hermanns aixcept Mariahilfstrasse 9 52062 Aachen - Germany w: http://aixcept.de/ t: +49-241-4012247 m: +49-170-3432912 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [s2] Test build of 2.1.1 available
Don,
I just tried the all.zip bundle and I see that some of the new plugins
are missing:
struts2-dojo-plugin-2.1.1.jar
struts2-dwr-plugin-2.1.1.jar
struts2-junit-plugin-2.1.1.jar
struts2-spring-plugin-2.1.1.jar
struts2-testng-plugin-2.1.1.jar
I added the missing jars to the assembly config and tested locally
against 2.1.2-SNAPSHOT.
So I need to revoke my suggestion to publish 2.1.1 as a beta build.
May be we could get out 2.1.2 before JavaOne instead?
cheers,
Rainer
On Apr 17, 2008, at 5:12 PM, Don Brown wrote:
The test build of Struts 2.1.1 is available.
No determination as to the quality ('alpha,' 'beta,' or 'GA') of
Struts 2.1.1 has been made, and at this time it is simply a "test
build". We welcome any comments you may have, and will take all
feedback into account if a quality vote is called for this build.
Release notes:
* http://struts.apache.org/2.0.11.1/docs/version-notes-211.html
Distribution:
* http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.1/
Maven 2 staging repository:
* http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.1/m2-staging-repository/
We appreciate the time and effort everyone has put toward contributing
code and documentation, posting to the mailing lists, and logging
issues.
Don
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [s2] Test build of 2.1.1 available
Don,
I tested the current build successfully on my current applications.
I'd suggest to call a vote for a beta release.
With a broader audience we could quickly clean up existing and coming
issues and target a GA release within the next weeks.
Before a GA release some issues in XWork need to be resolved, but these
are already scheduled for the time after JavaOne.
cheers,
Rainer
> The test build of Struts 2.1.1 is available.
>
> No determination as to the quality ('alpha,' 'beta,' or 'GA') of
> Struts 2.1.1 has been made, and at this time it is simply a "test
> build". We welcome any comments you may have, and will take all
> feedback into account if a quality vote is called for this build.
>
> Release notes:
> * http://struts.apache.org/2.0.11.1/docs/version-notes-211.html
>
> Distribution:
> * http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.1/
>
> Maven 2 staging repository:
> * http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.1/m2-staging-repository/
>
> We appreciate the time and effort everyone has put toward contributing
> code and documentation, posting to the mailing lists, and logging
> issues.
>
> Don
>
> -----
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
--
Rainer Hermanns
aixcept
Mariahilfstrasse 9
52062 Aachen - Germany
w: http://aixcept.de/
t: +49-241-4012247
m: +49-170-3432912
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 2.1 build
done
>
> probably worth it.
>
> Otherwise
>
> people should
>
>
> org.apache.struts
> struts2-core
> .
>
>
> freemarker
> freemarker
>
>
>
>
>
> org.freemarker
> freemarker
> 2.3.12
>
>
>
> Al Sutton wrote:
>>
>> As a side note there is a new freemarker version out (2.3.12,
>> changenotes
>> at
>> http://www.freemarker.org/docs/versions_2_3_12.html), is it worth
>> bumping
>> the version in the core pom?
>>
>> Al.
>> - Original Message -
>> From: "Jeromy Evans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: "Struts Developers List"
>> Sent: Friday, April 04, 2008 9:35 AM
>> Subject: Re: 2.1 build
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Is the release of struts-annotations-1.0.3 a blocker? It's not in
>>> central
>>> yet.
>>> struts-annotations dependencies:
>>> ./core/pom.xml:425: 1.0.3-20080216.121126-3
>>> ./plugins/dojo/pom.xml:261: 1.0.3-20080123.123514-2
>>> ../maven/struts-annotations/pom.xml: 1.0.4-SNAPSHOT
>>>
>>> Jeromy Evans wrote:
>>>> Ted, I tried to get you started with a dryRun of release:prepare but
>>>> I'm
>>>> still missing xwork.jar:2.1.1. The mvn output is at
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~jeromy/buildlog1.txt
>>>>
>>>> Other details:
>>>>
>>>> * JIRA: No open issues except the omnibus ticket
>>>> (https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-2421)
>>>> * Release Notes: reasonably up-to-date:
>>>> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WW/Version+Notes+2.1.1
>>>>
>>>> > svn co https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/struts/struts2/trunk
>>>> STRUTS_2.1.1
>>>>> svn info: Revision: 644624
>>>>
>>>> * check pom.xml repositories (I'm not sure values should be here)
>>>> > find . -name "pom.xml" -exec grep -i -H -n '' {}
>>>> ./pom.xml:72
>>>> scp://people.apache.org/www/people.apache.org/builds/struts/${pom.version}/m2-staging-repository
>>>> ./apps/pom.xml:73 http://repository.codehaus.org
>>>>
>>>> > find . -name "pom.xml" -exec grep -i -H -n '' {}
>>>> ./pom.xml
>>>> scp://people.apache.org/www/people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository
>>>>
>>>> * change mvn settings.xml to a clean localRepository and dryRun
>>>> release:prepare
>>>>
>>>>> mvn release:prepare -P release,all,alljars,j4,pre-assembly
>>>>> -DdryRun=true
>>>>
>>>> The mvn output is at http://people.apache.org/~jeromy/buildlog1.txt
>>>> That's as far as I got because I shouldn't have to
>>>> install:install-file
>>>> xwork-2.1.1 into my localRepository, so I guess I have to wait a
>>>> little
>>>> longer for it to replicate?
>>>>
>>>> regards,
>>>> Jeromy Evans
>>>>
>>>> Ted Husted wrote:
>>>>> I'm still heads-down, but I could run a build through the gauntlet.
>>>>> Can anyone confirm that everything else we want to do is done, and
>>>>> we're at the tag and roll point?
>>>>>
>>>>> -Ted.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 7:21 AM, Rainer Hermanns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Ted, others,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> xwork 2.1.1 is out and should be in the repos shortly.
>>>>>> So we should be ready for a Struts 2.1.1 release build now.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> thanks for waiting,
>>>>>> Rainer
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Apr 1, 2008, at 12:24 AM, Ted Husted wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And, if we're ready to roll a Struts after that, I'd be happy to
>>>>>>> step
>>>>>>> through the process Wednesday night.
>>>>>>>
>>&
Re: 2.1 build
I am working on this update right now.
cheers,
Rainer
>
> probably worth it.
>
> Otherwise
>
> people should
>
>
> org.apache.struts
> struts2-core
> .
>
>
> freemarker
> freemarker
>
>
>
>
>
> org.freemarker
> freemarker
> 2.3.12
>
>
>
> Al Sutton wrote:
>>
>> As a side note there is a new freemarker version out (2.3.12,
>> changenotes
>> at
>> http://www.freemarker.org/docs/versions_2_3_12.html), is it worth
>> bumping
>> the version in the core pom?
>>
>> Al.
>> - Original Message -
>> From: "Jeromy Evans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: "Struts Developers List"
>> Sent: Friday, April 04, 2008 9:35 AM
>> Subject: Re: 2.1 build
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Is the release of struts-annotations-1.0.3 a blocker? It's not in
>>> central
>>> yet.
>>> struts-annotations dependencies:
>>> ./core/pom.xml:425: 1.0.3-20080216.121126-3
>>> ./plugins/dojo/pom.xml:261: 1.0.3-20080123.123514-2
>>> ../maven/struts-annotations/pom.xml: 1.0.4-SNAPSHOT
>>>
>>> Jeromy Evans wrote:
>>>> Ted, I tried to get you started with a dryRun of release:prepare but
>>>> I'm
>>>> still missing xwork.jar:2.1.1. The mvn output is at
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~jeromy/buildlog1.txt
>>>>
>>>> Other details:
>>>>
>>>> * JIRA: No open issues except the omnibus ticket
>>>> (https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-2421)
>>>> * Release Notes: reasonably up-to-date:
>>>> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WW/Version+Notes+2.1.1
>>>>
>>>> > svn co https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/struts/struts2/trunk
>>>> STRUTS_2.1.1
>>>>> svn info: Revision: 644624
>>>>
>>>> * check pom.xml repositories (I'm not sure values should be here)
>>>> > find . -name "pom.xml" -exec grep -i -H -n '' {}
>>>> ./pom.xml:72
>>>> scp://people.apache.org/www/people.apache.org/builds/struts/${pom.version}/m2-staging-repository
>>>> ./apps/pom.xml:73 http://repository.codehaus.org
>>>>
>>>> > find . -name "pom.xml" -exec grep -i -H -n '' {}
>>>> ./pom.xml
>>>> scp://people.apache.org/www/people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository
>>>>
>>>> * change mvn settings.xml to a clean localRepository and dryRun
>>>> release:prepare
>>>>
>>>>> mvn release:prepare -P release,all,alljars,j4,pre-assembly
>>>>> -DdryRun=true
>>>>
>>>> The mvn output is at http://people.apache.org/~jeromy/buildlog1.txt
>>>> That's as far as I got because I shouldn't have to
>>>> install:install-file
>>>> xwork-2.1.1 into my localRepository, so I guess I have to wait a
>>>> little
>>>> longer for it to replicate?
>>>>
>>>> regards,
>>>> Jeromy Evans
>>>>
>>>> Ted Husted wrote:
>>>>> I'm still heads-down, but I could run a build through the gauntlet.
>>>>> Can anyone confirm that everything else we want to do is done, and
>>>>> we're at the tag and roll point?
>>>>>
>>>>> -Ted.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 7:21 AM, Rainer Hermanns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Ted, others,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> xwork 2.1.1 is out and should be in the repos shortly.
>>>>>> So we should be ready for a Struts 2.1.1 release build now.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> thanks for waiting,
>>>>>> Rainer
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Apr 1, 2008, at 12:24 AM, Ted Husted wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And, if we're ready to roll a Struts after that, I'd be happy to
>>>>>>> step
>>>>>>> through the pr
RE: Dojo plugin update using 1.1.0 framework
ojo-plugin-update-using-1.1.0-framework > -tp16442992p16491430.html >> >> Sent from the Struts - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> - >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> - >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > >> > >> > >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/Dojo-plugin-update-using-1.1.0-framework > -tp16442992p16508212.html >> Sent from the Struts - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Rainer Hermanns aixcept Mariahilfstrasse 9 52062 Aachen - Germany w: http://aixcept.de/ t: +49-241-4012247 m: +49-170-3432912 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 2.1 build
Jeromy,
that's strange... XWork 2.1.1 jars are all available from the central
repository.
See here: http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/com/opensymphony/xwork/2.1.1/
cheers,
Rainer
> Ted, I tried to get you started with a dryRun of release:prepare but I'm
> still missing xwork.jar:2.1.1. The mvn output is at
> http://people.apache.org/~jeromy/buildlog1.txt
>
> Other details:
>
> * JIRA: No open issues except the omnibus ticket
> (https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-2421)
> * Release Notes: reasonably up-to-date:
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WW/Version+Notes+2.1.1
>
> > svn co https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/struts/struts2/trunk
> STRUTS_2.1.1
>> svn info: Revision: 644624
>
> * check pom.xml repositories (I'm not sure values should be here)
> > find . -name "pom.xml" -exec grep -i -H -n '' {}
> ./pom.xml:72
> scp://people.apache.org/www/people.apache.org/builds/struts/${pom.version}/m2-staging-repository
> ./apps/pom.xml:73 http://repository.codehaus.org
>
> > find . -name "pom.xml" -exec grep -i -H -n '' {}
> ./pom.xml
> scp://people.apache.org/www/people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository
>
> * change mvn settings.xml to a clean localRepository and dryRun
> release:prepare
>
>> mvn release:prepare -P release,all,alljars,j4,pre-assembly -DdryRun=true
>
> The mvn output is at http://people.apache.org/~jeromy/buildlog1.txt
> That's as far as I got because I shouldn't have to install:install-file
> xwork-2.1.1 into my localRepository, so I guess I have to wait a little
> longer for it to replicate?
>
> regards,
> Jeromy Evans
>
> Ted Husted wrote:
>> I'm still heads-down, but I could run a build through the gauntlet.
>> Can anyone confirm that everything else we want to do is done, and
>> we're at the tag and roll point?
>>
>> -Ted.
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 7:21 AM, Rainer Hermanns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Ted, others,
>>>
>>> xwork 2.1.1 is out and should be in the repos shortly.
>>> So we should be ready for a Struts 2.1.1 release build now.
>>>
>>> thanks for waiting,
>>> Rainer
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Apr 1, 2008, at 12:24 AM, Ted Husted wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> And, if we're ready to roll a Struts after that, I'd be happy to step
>>>> through the process Wednesday night.
>>>>
>>>> -Ted.
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 4:05 PM, Rainer Hermanns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Sorry, but I have to delay the xwork release until tomorrow.
>>>>> cheers,
>>>>> Rainer
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hey there,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am working on the open issues for xwork 2.1.1 over the weekend,
>>>>>> so that the release could be out on monday.
>>>>>> Since lots of fixes and changes were done affecting S2.1 core
>>>>>> features, testing S2.1 with latest xwork snapshots would help to get
>>>>>> both codebases stablelized.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please report xwork errors to XWork Jira [1].
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ted, if you have some time next week for getting out the release,
>>>>>> that would be awesome.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> cheers,
>>>>>> Rainer
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [1] http://jira.opensymphony.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I will help testing it (I don't have any application on production
>>>>>>> tho). Ted if you could do it, it would be great, I think it is
>>>>>>> about
>>>>>>> time we get a build out there.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> regards
>>>>>>> musachy
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 6:38 AM, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>>>>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>>> Is there much to do beside tag it, build it, and sign it? I could
>>>>>>>>
>>> help
>>>
>>>>>>>> with that much, so long as other people are testing it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>&g
Re: 2.1 build
Ted, others, xwork 2.1.1 is out and should be in the repos shortly. So we should be ready for a Struts 2.1.1 release build now. thanks for waiting, Rainer On Apr 1, 2008, at 12:24 AM, Ted Husted wrote: And, if we're ready to roll a Struts after that, I'd be happy to step through the process Wednesday night. -Ted. On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 4:05 PM, Rainer Hermanns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Sorry, but I have to delay the xwork release until tomorrow. cheers, Rainer Hey there, I am working on the open issues for xwork 2.1.1 over the weekend, so that the release could be out on monday. Since lots of fixes and changes were done affecting S2.1 core features, testing S2.1 with latest xwork snapshots would help to get both codebases stablelized. Please report xwork errors to XWork Jira [1]. Ted, if you have some time next week for getting out the release, that would be awesome. cheers, Rainer [1] http://jira.opensymphony.com I will help testing it (I don't have any application on production tho). Ted if you could do it, it would be great, I think it is about time we get a build out there. regards musachy On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 6:38 AM, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Is there much to do beside tag it, build it, and sign it? I could help with that much, so long as other people are testing it. -Ted. On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 5:35 AM, Pedro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: good question . . . Musachy Barroso wrote: Hi all, Any news on the 2.1 build? Is anyone looking into it? regards musachy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Rainer Hermanns aixcept Mariahilfstrasse 9 52062 Aachen - Germany w: http://aixcept.de/ t: +49-241-4012247 m: +49-170-3432912 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Rainer Hermanns aixcept Mariahilfstrasse 9 52062 Aachen - Germany w: http://aixcept.de/ t: +49-241-4012247 m: +49-170-3432912 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- HTH, Ted http://husted.com/ted/blog/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Publish Struts Annotations 1.0.3
Hi, just to make sure, is it correct that the Struts Annotations 1.0.3 release never made it to the central repo and is still within the staging directory? cheers, Rainer On Feb 17, 2008, at 9:34 AM, Don Brown wrote: The test build of Struts Annotations 1.0.3 is available. Maven 2 staging repository: * http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/struts-annotations/1.0.3/m2-staging-repository/ Once you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond with a vote on whether to publish it or not: [ ] +1 Publish to the Maven 2 repository [ ] -1 Don't publish, because Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s. The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, longer upon request. Don - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
