Re: [dev] Links on tutorial page

2012-02-25 Thread hiro
> https://github.com/kaihendry/Kai-s--HOME/blob/master/.xinitrc

Yet an other bash user on suckless



Re: [dev] Links on tutorial page

2012-02-25 Thread Kai Hendry
Oops, I've moved my homedir over to
https://github.com/kaihendry/Kai-s--HOME/blob/master/.xinitrc

Not sure if it's a good example. Lot of crap there tbh.



Re: [dev] Links on tutorial page

2012-02-25 Thread Connor Lane Smith
Hey,

On 25 February 2012 23:29, Jason Ryan  wrote:
> Is there any reason the links to the xinitrc example point to something called
> "webconverger"?

Link rot. That used to point, as you might expect, to a .xinitrc.

Thanks,
cls



Re: [dev] smessage

2012-02-25 Thread Bartosz Pranczke
Hi Florian,
yes, I have deleted -Werror and then it works without any problem.
I use most current version of ArchLinux x64 with libx11 1.4.99.1-1.


On 18:55 Thu 23 Feb , Florian Limberger wrote:
> Hi Bartosz,
> 
> On 23.02.2012 13:30, Bartosz Pranczke wrote:
> > I have a warning preventing this from compile.
> >
> > cc -Wall -Wextra -Werror -std=c99 -pedantic  -I/usr/X11R6/include
> > -D_BSD_SOURCE -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=2 -DNAME=\"smessage\"
> > -DVERSION=\"ALPHA\" -c smessage.c
> > smessage.c: In function ‘handlekey’:
> > smessage.c:568:2: error: ‘XKeycodeToKeysym’ is deprecated (declared at
> > /usr/include/X11/Xlib.h:1695) [-Werror=deprecated-declarations]
> 
> Delete -Werror to make it compile anyway, but this warning is new to
> me. And honestly, I don't think it makes sense, since if the want you
> to use XKB, you won't be using Xlib anyway.
> 
> But it clearly shows that i should make a release option in the
> makefile, which is not that picky.
> 
> Out of couriousity, what system do you use? I hacked on slackware,
> where I didn't got that warning.
> 
> -flo



[dev] Links on tutorial page

2012-02-25 Thread Jason Ryan
Is there any reason the links to the xinitrc example point to something called
"webconverger"?

http://dwm.suckless.org/tutorial

/J

-- 

http://jasonwryan.com/  [GnuPG Key: B1BD4E40]





Re:[dev] dwm: strange statusbar behaviour

2012-02-25 Thread Jamie Bragg
I would bet that both X and dwm are rendering for the broken screen as well
as the external one. Using xrandr to turn off the broken screen should fix
that.
 On Feb 25, 2012 1:19 PM, "Swiatoslaw Gal" 
wrote:

> Dear gals and guys,
>
> I have an old thinkpad tablet, which I use as a desktop (the screen
> got broken and I detached it).  It starts, by default, in 1024x768
> mode, and then dwm and its statusbar work fine.  If I correct
> the resolution to the monitor specification (eg. 1280x1024) either
> by xrandr, or tweaking xorg.conf, there is something strange.
>
> When I click on tags in the statusbar the highlight changes, but
> the tags stay the same.  Contrary, if I use alt-# I switch tags,
> but with no effect on the status bar.  Also, no little squares
> indicating windows in tags are shown in the statusbar.  As if
> it was referring to a missing laptop display!?
>
> Alt-b hides only (right) half of the statusbar.
>
> Going down to 1024x768 cancels all those weird effects.
>
> Any idea?
>
> Sincerely,
> s.
>
>


[dev] dwm: strange statusbar behaviour

2012-02-25 Thread Swiatoslaw Gal
Dear gals and guys,

I have an old thinkpad tablet, which I use as a desktop (the screen
got broken and I detached it).  It starts, by default, in 1024x768
mode, and then dwm and its statusbar work fine.  If I correct
the resolution to the monitor specification (eg. 1280x1024) either
by xrandr, or tweaking xorg.conf, there is something strange.

When I click on tags in the statusbar the highlight changes, but
the tags stay the same.  Contrary, if I use alt-# I switch tags,
but with no effect on the status bar.  Also, no little squares
indicating windows in tags are shown in the statusbar.  As if
it was referring to a missing laptop display!?

Alt-b hides only (right) half of the statusbar.

Going down to 1024x768 cancels all those weird effects.

Any idea?

Sincerely,
s.