Re: [dev] [sbase] [patch] Add hostname
I guess usage should be eprintf(usage: %s [name]\n, argv0); Could use puts(buf); instead of printf(%s\n, buf); -Truls
Re: [dev] [sbase] [patch] Add hostname
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 09:41:10AM +0200, Truls Becken wrote: I guess usage should be eprintf(usage: %s [name]\n, argv0); Yeah I fixed that in my repo but forgot to resend. Could use puts(buf); instead of printf(%s\n, buf); Sure yeah.
[dev] [sbase] [patch v2] Add hostname
Updated usage and used puts() instead of printf().
From 2d49326020e6a788b9c0f190bd007d2baed89e19 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: sin s...@2f30.org
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 17:22:46 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Add hostname(1)
---
Makefile | 1 +
hostname.c | 33 +
2 files changed, 34 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 hostname.c
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index 3c613b0..d347aa5 100644
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ SRC = \
fold.c \
grep.c \
head.c \
+ hostname.c \
id.c \
kill.c \
ln.c \
diff --git a/hostname.c b/hostname.c
new file mode 100644
index 000..787d302
--- /dev/null
+++ b/hostname.c
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+/* See LICENSE file for copyright and license details. */
+#include unistd.h
+#include stdio.h
+#include string.h
+#include util.h
+
+static void
+usage(void)
+{
+ eprintf(usage: %s [name]\n, argv0);
+}
+
+int
+main(int argc, char *argv[])
+{
+ char buf[BUFSIZ];
+
+ ARGBEGIN {
+ default:
+ usage();
+ } ARGEND;
+
+ if (argc 1) {
+ if (gethostname(buf, sizeof(buf)) 0)
+ eprintf(gethostname:);
+ puts(buf);
+ } else {
+ if (sethostname(argv[0], strlen(argv[0])) 0)
+ eprintf(sethostname:);
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
--
1.8.2.3
Re: [dev] [dwm] multiple monitors, default window placement
On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 10:15:43PM +0200, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
Hi Martin,
On 29 July 2013 09:50, Martin Kopta mar...@kopta.eu wrote:
On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 06:59:34PM +0200, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
Do you experience this with vanilla dwm from git? If not, then it
might help to see your rules declaration of config.h.
Yes, I use newest vanilla dwm from git without any patches. My rules are
empty:
static const Rule rules[] = { { 0 } };
Full config.h at pastebin [1]. Thank you for your time!
This looks fine. Please also let me know if you use classic multiheads
or Xinerama, and if the latter one, let me know the xrandr output.
Best regards,
Anselm
I use xrandr to make my setup. My current output of xrandr is:
Screen 0: minimum 320 x 200, current 3286 x 1080, maximum 32767 x 32767
LVDS1 connected 1366x768+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 293mm x
165mm
1366x768 60.0*+
1024x768 60.0
800x60060.3 56.2
640x48059.9
VGA1 connected 1920x1080+1366+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis)
531mm x 299mm
1920x1080 60.0*+
1600x1200 60.0
1680x1050 60.0
1280x1024 75.0 60.0
1440x900 75.0 59.9
1280x960 60.0
1280x800 59.8
1152x864 75.0
1024x768 75.1 70.1 60.0
832x62474.6
800x60072.2 75.0 60.3 56.2
640x48072.8 75.0 66.7 60.0
720x40070.1
HDMI1 disconnected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis)
DP1 disconnected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis)
Used command is:
static const char *mon3[] = { xrandr, --output, LVDS1, --auto,
--left-of, VGA1, --output, VGA1, --auto, NULL };
{ MODKEY, XK_F3, spawn, {.v = mon3 }
},
Currently, my primary output is LVDS1. If I move my mouse to VGA1 screen and
even ensure by MOD+. (twice) it is actually selected and create new windows
(st), it is created on LVDS1 instead of VGA1. Of course, I can change my
primary output from LVDS1 to VGA1 using xrandr --primary, but then I have the
opposite problem in some cases.
Best regards,
Martin Kopta
[dev][dwm][patch] dwm toggleignore patch
Hello, suckless community!
I have created a patch for the current dwm (commit
6af273771cb0e28e4394c78ab0322f77025a57f3).
It excludes (and toggles back again) currently focused window from
MODKEY+j, MODKEY+k change focus cycle.
How do I use it: I open many terminals and actively work in 2 or 3 of them.
The rest shows some useful info, docs, etc. I exclude them and my windows
switching cycle became much shorter, only between my main 2 windows. When I
need to focus the ignored window, I alsays can do it with a mouse.
Just bind toggleignore() in your config.h. Here is mine:
{ MODKEY|ShiftMask, XK_i, toggleignore, {0} },
Maybe, some of you also will find this patch useful. ; )
Patch is in the attachment.
dwm-6af2737-toggleignore.diff
Description: Binary data
Re: [dev][dwm][patch] dwm toggleignore patch
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Nikolay Vasylchyshyn vasylchyshy...@gmail.com wrote: […] Maybe, some of you also will find this patch useful. ; ) Seems potentially very useful. One thing you might want to do is add a set of colours for the ignored windows. static const char ignoredbordercolor[] = #[…]; static const char ignoredbgcolor[] = #[…]; static const char ignoredfgcolor[] = #[…]; -- __ Raphaël Proust
[dev] [PATCH] Add -g (geometry) option to tabbed.
Signed-off-by: Thorsten Glaser t.gla...@tarent.de
---
LICENSE | 1 +
tabbed.1 | 5 +
tabbed.c | 8
3 files changed, 14 insertions(+)
diff --git a/LICENSE b/LICENSE
index add8a53..b8dc9ea 100644
--- a/LICENSE
+++ b/LICENSE
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ MIT/X Consortium License
© 2009-2011 Enno Boland g s01 de
© 2011 Connor Lane Smith c...@lubutu.com
© 2012 Christoph Lohmann 2...@r-36.net
+© 2013 Thorsten “mirabilos” Glaser t.gla...@tarent.de
Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a
copy of this software and associated documentation files (the Software),
diff --git a/tabbed.1 b/tabbed.1
index d3ef06a..a315136 100644
--- a/tabbed.1
+++ b/tabbed.1
@@ -8,6 +8,8 @@ tabbed \- generic tabbed interface
.RB [ \-h ]
.RB [ \-s ]
.RB [ \-v ]
+.RB [ \-g
+.IR geometry ]
.RB [ \-n
.IR name ]
.RB [ \-p
@@ -34,6 +36,9 @@ detaches tabbed from the terminal and prints its XID to
stdout.
fill up tabbed again by spawning the provided command, when the last tab is
closed. Mutually exclusive with -c.
.TP
+.BI \-g geometry
+specifies the preferred size and position of the parent window.
+.TP
.B \-h
will print the usage of tabbed.
.TP
diff --git a/tabbed.c b/tabbed.c
index ba1df21..64dcd2a 100644
--- a/tabbed.c
+++ b/tabbed.c
@@ -160,6 +160,7 @@ static int (*xerrorxlib)(Display *, XErrorEvent *);
static char winid[64];
static char **cmd = NULL;
static char *wmname = tabbed;
+static const char *geometry = NULL;
char *argv0;
@@ -890,6 +891,10 @@ setup(void) {
ww = 800;
wh = 600;
+ if (geometry)
+ XParseGeometry(geometry, wx, wy,
+ (unsigned *)ww, (unsigned *)wh);
+
dc.norm[ColBG] = getcolor(normbgcolor);
dc.norm[ColFG] = getcolor(normfgcolor);
dc.sel[ColBG] = getcolor(selbgcolor);
@@ -1125,6 +1130,9 @@ main(int argc, char *argv[]) {
case 'f':
fillagain = True;
break;
+ case 'g':
+ geometry = EARGF(usage());
+ break;
case 'n':
wmname = EARGF(usage());
break;
--
1.8.4.rc3
[dev] smdev (suckless mdev)
Hi all, I've hacked together smdev[1]. It is basically mdev with a config.def.h. It does not currently support all of mdev's features. What do you guys think? Thanks, sin [1] http://git.2f30.org/smdev
Re: [dev][dwm][patch] dwm toggleignore patch
Raphaël, thank you for the idea with colors. Will play with it in my spare time during the week. Seems potentially very useful. I'm very glad to read this. : ) Sorry for html emails. This one in plain text. 2013/8/20 Nikolay Vasylchyshyn vasylchyshy...@gmail.com: Raphaël, thank you for the idea with colors. Will play with it in my spare time during the week. Seems potentially very useful. I'm very glad to read this. : ) 2013/8/20 Raphaël Proust raphla...@gmail.com On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Nikolay Vasylchyshyn vasylchyshy...@gmail.com wrote: […] Maybe, some of you also will find this patch useful. ; ) Seems potentially very useful. One thing you might want to do is add a set of colours for the ignored windows. static const char ignoredbordercolor[] = #[…]; static const char ignoredbgcolor[] = #[…]; static const char ignoredfgcolor[] = #[…]; -- __ Raphaël Proust
Re: [dev][dwm][patch] dwm toggleignore patch
Nikolay Vasylchyshyn wrote: Seems potentially very useful. I'm very glad to read this. : ) I object. This new feature is already nearly there. If you have two active windows, in which you are working, just zoom them to the top of the client stack. Then you can easily switch between them with MODKEY+j and MODKEY+k. If you have three windows, in one third of the possibilities of switching from any of client 1, 2 or 3 to one of the remaining two clients you have to press one more key without your patch: MODKEY+j+j instead of MODKEY+k and the other way around. So during a prolonged work session you can save 1/3 * 1/3 = 1/9 of the keypresses with three actively used clients. The setup takes some key presses with your patch too and managing (remembering and getting the right key combinations into muscle memory) the additional state of every client in your brain also takes some more time. So at least for my workflow (which is not that static) this patch is not useful. --Markus
Re: [dev][dwm][patch] dwm toggleignore patch
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Markus Teich markus.te...@stusta.mhn.de wrote: Nikolay Vasylchyshyn wrote: Seems potentially very useful. I'm very glad to read this. : ) I object. This new feature is already nearly there. If you have two active windows, in which you are working, just zoom them to the top of the client stack. Then you can easily switch between them with MODKEY+j and MODKEY+k. If you have three windows, in one third of the possibilities of switching from any of client 1, 2 or 3 to one of the remaining two clients you have to press one more key without your patch: MODKEY+j+j instead of MODKEY+k and the other way around. So during a prolonged work session you can save 1/3 * 1/3 = 1/9 of the keypresses with three actively used clients. I end up spending quite some keypresses getting the right order for my windows. Especially when I bring together several tags and end up with difficult to predict interleaving of windows. The setup takes some key presses with your patch too and managing (remembering and getting the right key combinations into muscle memory) the additional state of every client in your brain also takes some more time. Hence the idea of adding different colours. The state need not be stored in your brain. So at least for my workflow (which is not that static) this patch is not useful. Probably not to be included in the main branch anyway, but it'd still make a good addition to the patch section of the wiki. -- __ Raphaël Proust
Re: [dev][dwm][patch] dwm toggleignore patch
Am 2013-08-20 16:36, schrieb Raphaël Proust: On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Markus Teich markus.te...@stusta.mhn.de wrote: Nikolay Vasylchyshyn wrote: Seems potentially very useful. I'm very glad to read this. : ) I object. This new feature is already nearly there. If you have two active windows, in which you are working, just zoom them to the top of the client stack. Then you can easily switch between them with MODKEY+j and MODKEY+k. If you have three windows, in one third of the possibilities of switching from any of client 1, 2 or 3 to one of the remaining two clients you have to press one more key without your patch: MODKEY+j+j instead of MODKEY+k and the other way around. So during a prolonged work session you can save 1/3 * 1/3 = 1/9 of the keypresses with three actively used clients. I end up spending quite some keypresses getting the right order for my windows. Especially when I bring together several tags and end up with difficult to predict interleaving of windows. If you use some clients (i assume you use them on top of the client stack/list as i do), this happens automatically as you zoom needed clients into the master area during work. The setup takes some key presses with your patch too and managing (remembering and getting the right key combinations into muscle memory) the additional state of every client in your brain also takes some more time. Hence the idea of adding different colours. The state need not be stored in your brain. It still takes time getting used to this additional way of achieving client selection. Also i forgot to mention, that it seems unintuitive to me, that i have to use the mouse to unignore a client, although the rest of dwm's functions (appart from moving/resizing floatign windows) can be accessed just by the keyboard. --Markus
Re: [dev][dwm][patch] dwm toggleignore patch
About remembering window state. There is and indicator. It is shown under the floating/fixed indicator. It's not so useful, because it is seen (or hidden) only for focused window. The idea with custom border color is much superior, because you can see all ignored windows at once. I object. This new feature is already nearly there. If you have two active windows, in which you are working, just zoom them to the top of the client stack. Then you can easily switch between them with MODKEY+j and MODKEY+k. Recently I have changed my habit of using dwm. I have switched from tiled layout to floating. And zoom doesn't work with floating windows nor floating layout. Zoom works great. But... I like to have some terminal windows to show different info I'm interested in right now. And when I use zoom, windows switch their positions and I have to adapt to new windows layout. Which means to remember new positions. So, I have to look on the terminal window and understand again which command it is running. Sorry for my english. Maybe it is not so clear as I would like it to be. 2013/8/20 Raphaël Proust raphla...@gmail.com: On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Markus Teich markus.te...@stusta.mhn.de wrote: Nikolay Vasylchyshyn wrote: Seems potentially very useful. I'm very glad to read this. : ) I object. This new feature is already nearly there. If you have two active windows, in which you are working, just zoom them to the top of the client stack. Then you can easily switch between them with MODKEY+j and MODKEY+k. If you have three windows, in one third of the possibilities of switching from any of client 1, 2 or 3 to one of the remaining two clients you have to press one more key without your patch: MODKEY+j+j instead of MODKEY+k and the other way around. So during a prolonged work session you can save 1/3 * 1/3 = 1/9 of the keypresses with three actively used clients. I end up spending quite some keypresses getting the right order for my windows. Especially when I bring together several tags and end up with difficult to predict interleaving of windows. The setup takes some key presses with your patch too and managing (remembering and getting the right key combinations into muscle memory) the additional state of every client in your brain also takes some more time. Hence the idea of adding different colours. The state need not be stored in your brain. So at least for my workflow (which is not that static) this patch is not useful. Probably not to be included in the main branch anyway, but it'd still make a good addition to the patch section of the wiki. -- __ Raphaël Proust
Re: [dev][dwm][patch] dwm toggleignore patch
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Markus Teich markus.te...@stusta.mhn.de wrote: Am 2013-08-20 16:36, schrieb Raphaël Proust: On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Markus Teich markus.te...@stusta.mhn.de wrote: Nikolay Vasylchyshyn wrote: […] […] […] If you use some clients (i assume you use them on top of the client stack/list as i do), this happens automatically as you zoom needed clients into the master area during work. Most of the time it's okay, but there are the odd cases when I have been spawning a few clients on several less important tags and they jump in front of the clients that are on important tags when I merge the tags in the same view. I have to refocus the important windows (the one I keep on the important tags. Actually it could be useful to have a de-focus feature that would push the client down the whole stack… I might give that a shot some time. […] […] It still takes time getting used to this additional way of achieving client selection. Yes. But for those that have a workflow that would benefit from this new way, it'd probably be time well spent. It took me some time to get use to dwm in the frist place. Also i forgot to mention, that it seems unintuitive to me, that i have to use the mouse to unignore a client, although the rest of dwm's functions (appart from moving/resizing floatign windows) can be accessed just by the keyboard. Maybe Mod+Shift+i could unignore all window / reignore all previously ignored… I use the mouse a lot. Maybe even more than Mod+j/k. Mostly because I use applications that are sensitive to the position of the mouse (Acme and Firefox) so that wouldn't be a problem. The feature's usefulness is highly workflow dependent. But I think it has its place in with the patches on the website. -- __ Raphaël Proust
Re: [dev] [PATCH] Add -g (geometry) option to tabbed.
Greetings. Thanks for the hint, but you didn’t do it right. The geometry string al‐ lows to specify negative positions too and a negative zero too. Addi‐ tionally this now fixates the geometry of tabbed. Sincerely, Christoph Lohmann
Re: [dev] smdev (suckless mdev)
Greetings. On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 18:46:45 +0200 sin s...@2f30.org wrote: Hi all, I've hacked together smdev[1]. It is basically mdev with a config.def.h. It does not currently support all of mdev's features. What do you guys think? If it supports all the execution properties of mdev it would be perfect for me to import it into nldev and make an nldevd, which would be the true replacement for udevd. Try to cache the result of regcomp(). This will speed up things in large trees. For being a competitor. When designing any replacement for udevd, keep in mind that due to that permission misdesign in Linux your daemon has to manage some 10 thousand devices in a huge server in under a minute. This can’t be done linearly and is why udevd keeps a queue of worker processes. Sincerely, Christoph Lohmann
Re: [dev] [PATCH] Add -g (geometry) option to tabbed.
Christoph Lohmann dixit: Thanks for the hint, but you didn’t do it right. The geometry string al‐ lows to specify negative positions too and a negative zero too. Addi‐ Hrm, ok ☹ back to the drawing board, then (unless you’ve got a hint – I’ve not done any X11 programming previously). tionally this now fixates the geometry of tabbed. I do not quite understand this? It sets a different geometry at start if one’s given, no change otherwise, AIUI. bye, //mirabilos -- 22:59⎜Vutral glaub ich termkit is kompliziert | glabe nicht das man damit schneller arbeitet | reizüberflutung │ wie windows │ alles evil zuviel bilder │ wie ein spiel | 23:00⎜Vutral die meisten raffen auch nicht mehr von windows | 23:01⎜Vutral bilderbücher sind ja auch nich wirklich verbreitet als erwachsenen literatur ‣ who needs GUIs thus?
