Re: [dev] [sbase] Split libutil
> having external programs link against libutil.a is a PITA because musl/glibc > also have a libutil.a in the library directory. IMHO the name could be changed > to something less general. If you have musl/glibc libutil.a in sbase directory, you've got a real problem indeed, but unrelated to this discussion. sbase Makefile tells c99 to link against libutil.a, not to link against util library in the library search path so no, there's no “PITA” because the issue you're suggesting can't happen.
Re: [dev] [sbase] Split libutil
Hi, having external programs link against libutil.a is a PITA because musl/glibc also have a libutil.a in the library directory. IMHO the name could be changed to something less general. On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 09:12:43PM +0200, Hiltjo Posthuma wrote: > On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 08:18:43PM +0300, Adrian Grigore wrote: > > Is there any interest in splitting llibutil from sbase in smaller libraries? > No, why? -- Nero signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [dev] [sbase] Split libutil
I was thinking it maybe has a generic name and could be splitted in smaller, more specific, libraries? On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 10:14 PM Hiltjo Posthuma wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 08:18:43PM +0300, Adrian Grigore wrote: > > Is there any interest in splitting llibutil from sbase in smaller libraries? > > -- > > Thanks, > > Adi > > > > No, why? > > -- > Kind regards, > Hiltjo > -- Thanks, Adi
