Re: [dev] [st] wide characters getting cropped

2021-10-29 Thread Страхиња Радић
On 21/10/29 12:18, Dmytro Kolomoiets wrote:
> Страхиња Радић, do you have a cleaned up version of the patch
> which applies to latest st tree without rejecting hunks?

No, but it shouldn't be too hard to make given the PR. I have applied it to my
fork of st (https://git.sr.ht/~strahinja/st).


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: [dev] [st] wide characters getting cropped

2021-10-29 Thread Dmytro Kolomoiets
> https://github.com/LukeSmithxyz/st/pull/224

Страхиња Радић, do you have a cleaned up version of the patch
which applies to latest st tree without rejecting hunks?


On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 at 23:12, NRK  wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 09:38:41AM +0200, Hiltjo Posthuma wrote:
> > Its a longstanding myth st has input latency issues.
> > The common quoted benchmark is wrong.
>
> If we're thinking about the same benchmark then it's also outdated.
> But regardless I didn't base my decision on that. Sometimes ago (9-10
> months) I was testing out a whole bunch of different terminals, some of
> the worst offenders when it comes to latency was Alacritty and Termite
> IIRC.
>
> ST, in my expereince, has been the 2nd most responsive terminal and
> quite close to XTerm. But still not as responsive and thus overtime I
> have switched over to it.
>
> It would be interesting to see someone doing a proper benchmark with all
> latest terminal versions, since I don't have any data to back up what I
> am saying :) So take it as you may.
>
> - NRK
>