Re: [dev] unsubscribe

2010-07-20 Thread Alexander Surma

Chill dude

On 7/20/10 15:01 , Val Polyakov wrote:

Excuse me for living and forgetting to append +unsubscribe

Fsck off...


People never learn...

- Original message -















Re: [dev] [surf] segfault

2010-04-02 Thread Alexander Surma
Cannot reproduce, sorry. Works over here



[dev] [surf] GZip compression

2010-03-25 Thread Alexander Surma
Hi,

I don't want this in the sunday-release, or anything, I just noticed,
that gzip-compressed pages are not supported (e.g.
http://www.lenovo.de)

Is that a surf or a webkit issue?! Fixable?

Surma



Re: [dev] terminal that accepts any size

2010-03-20 Thread Alexander Surma
Well, resizehints are exactly that, hints. Not an obligation.
It's usually the job of the window manager to respect (or not to
respect) those hints - it's not
something that has to be changed in the implementation of the terminal emulator.

Surma

On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 5:48 PM, Jonas Bernoulli jo...@bernoulli.cc wrote:
 On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 17:12, pancake panc...@youterm.com wrote:
 ??? Size of what?

 Are you talking about resizehints?

 Yes.





Re: [dev] terminal that accepts any size

2010-03-20 Thread Alexander Surma
I can't speak for wmii, but if you make dwm ignore resizehints xterm
behaves exactly like that.
If you insist on keeping resizehints enabled, I don't believe you'll
find a terminal which works like that out of the box.

Suma

On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 6:34 PM, Jonas Bernoulli jo...@bernoulli.cc wrote:
 On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 18:04, Alexander Surma
 alexander.su...@googlemail.com wrote:
 Well, resizehints are exactly that, hints. Not an obligation.
 It's usually the job of the window manager to respect (or not to
 respect) those hints - it's not
 something that has to be changed in the implementation of the terminal 
 emulator.

 Let me rephrase: Does anyone know of a terminal that instead of
 setting resize hints
 (that would cause wmii to draw thicker boarders around the window [1])
 does not set
 any resize hints but instead adds some extra space (in the background
 color) on the
 right and/or lower sides (or equally on all) (which does not have any
 (truncated) text
 on it) if the window size set by the window manager does set the
 window to a size
 which match a multitude of the font being used?

 [1] and which is worse often draws a thinner boarder, like in of size 0px.





Re: [dev] [dwm] Issue with openoffice fullscreen presentation

2010-03-11 Thread Alexander Surma
Isn't OOo just java too?
So you *might* get that fixxed with the grey-windows-in-java-workarounds:

either:
wmname LG3D; unset AWT_TOOLKIT
or:
export AWT_TOOLKIT=MToolkit

Surma

On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 11:37 AM, Jakub Lach jakub_l...@mailplus.pl wrote:
 11 march 2010 10:25 Anselm R Garbe ans...@garbe.us

 Most likely openoffice requires a reparenting WM.

 I'd say file a bug report @openoffice.org.

 Cheers,
 Anselm



 I'm using OOo_DEV300_m71 (3.3) and have no such problem.

 regards,
 -Jakub Lach





Re: [dev] [dwm] Java Swing sucks, any solutions?

2010-02-05 Thread Alexander Surma
 I'm forced to use jmeter for the next two weeks at work.  It's a swing
 app.  Swing and dwm don't seem to wrk at all.
Doesn't the good ol' ``export AWT_TOOKIT=MToolkit'' work for ya?
If not, define not working.

Surma



Re: [dev] include files should never include include files?

2010-01-16 Thread Alexander Surma
Of course you did not run into problems. You just wasted your precious
processor time on including and parsing header files which you could
have easily prevented
by following that rule.
You might  however run into problems when breaking this rule and no
#ifdef-guards are present.

I'm not sure about C++, but I'd say the rule applys as well. You never
compile a header
on it's own so you should put all the includes into the C files from
the beginning.

Surma

On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 4:41 PM, Joseph Xu joseph...@gmail.com wrote:
 A little off topic maybe, hope I'll be forgiven ...

 I'm reading Rob Pike's C programming style guide
 (http://www.quut.com/c/pikestyle.html), and the last rule says:

 --

 Simple rule: include files should never include include files.  If
 instead they state (in comments or implicitly) what files they need to
 have included first, the problem of deciding which files to include is
 pushed to the user (programmer) but in a way that's easy to handle and
 that, by construction, avoids multiple inclusions.  Multiple inclusions
 are a bane of systems programming.  It's not rare to have files included
 five or more times to compile a single C source file.  The Unix
 /usr/include/sys stuff is terrible this way.

      There's a little dance involving #ifdef's that can prevent a file
 being read twice, but it's usually done wrong in practice - the #ifdef's
 are in the file itself, not the file that includes it.  The result is
 often thousands of needless lines of code passing through the lexical
 analyzer, which is (in good compilers) the most expensive phase.

      Just follow the simple rule.

 --

 This is a little surprising to me as I'm used to putting includes in
 include files all the time. I do use #ifdef header guards, and I've
 never really had any problems violating this rule. So my first question
 is, has anybody actually ran into problems due to violating this rule?
 And secondly, does this rule apply to C++? For example, if I'm defining
 a class that std::vector members, I ordinarily add a #includevector in
 the header.


 Thanks for the advice.

 Joseph





Re: [dev] stali and the shipped compilers

2010-01-14 Thread Alexander Surma
The configurations of the compilers can usually be extracted from the
executable with ``gfortran -v''

Surma

On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 9:42 PM, pancake panc...@youterm.com wrote:
 I would prefer to drop gcc, glibc and all the shit from gnu.

 Tcc and dietlibc are usable solutions and maybe the code is not the best one
 but at least is sane.

 Current toolchain is just to get a working version. I know that anselm is
 really busy these days, like me.. This is the reason why some of those
 projects are a bit stopped.

 Is there any minimal and complete fortran implementation?

 On Jan 14, 2010, at 9:02 PM, Jimmy Tang jt...@tchpc.tcd.ie wrote:

 Hi All,

 I've been looking at the shipped compilers in the stali repo, I was
 just wondering how the compilers were configured. I'm interested in
 enabling gfortran for my own uses and testing.

 Thanks,
 Jimmy

 --
 Jimmy Tang
 Trinity Centre for High Performance Computing,
 Lloyd Building, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland.
 http://www.tchpc.tcd.ie/ | http://www.tchpc.tcd.ie/~jtang





Re: [dev] slock - cannot log in

2009-12-17 Thread Alexander Surma
 No. A screen locker locks the system completely (apart from remote logins).
That's how it's supposed to be at least. I've encountered a lot
screenlockers which let me switch to console anytime.

regarding the problem: That's why I leave ssh running - X locks up (or
at least takes no input) and I can restart X from remote. Let's hope
you have ssh running, too. (btw: Telnet will also do the job ^^)

Surma



Re: [dev] [surf] some potential bugs and some user questions

2009-12-14 Thread Alexander Surma
 1- for some reason surf stalls for a couple of seconds on a new page,
 I just hit ctrl-g suckless.org enter and it stalled for 11sec!
Can't confirm that.

 2- Download seems to be broken. (in tip and 0.3 from hg) I get
 (unknown:27178): GLib-GIO-CRITICAL **: g_output_stream_write_all:
 assertion `G_IS_OUTPUT_STREAM (stream)' failed
 console message: �...@1: Refused to set unsafe header Connection
Confirm

 3- ~.surf/dj was created as a file not a dir (tip)
I sent a patch for that to the mailinglist a few days back. Just
append a '/' in the config.h to the dldir path.

 5- I don't fully undestand the Copy URI why it isn't putting the URL
 in the clipboard?
Confirm



Re: [dev] sup - the minimalistic sudo

2009-12-14 Thread Alexander Surma
 I know that there's a really-cool mail client called 'sup'.. so if you have
 any other
 proposal for the name? 's'? 'sp'? 'sudor'?

smudo? a jungled-up acronym for minimal super do? Kind of a german
insider, but it has a nice ring to it ;)

I like sup alot, btw.



Re: [dev] suckless password manager

2009-12-10 Thread Alexander Surma
Actually, I think passwordmanagers are not secure. All your passwords are
just as strong as your PM encryption.
I have an mnemoc/algorithm which enables me to generate a quite strong
password (without penpaper)  which depends on the name of the webpage
and/or username I use there.

On Dec 10, 2009 11:55 PM, anonymous aim0s...@lavabit.com wrote:

On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 11:14:15PM +0100, Nibble wrote:  Hi,   It is just
a little toy, but ma...
It can't work with X, but use of GPG instead of creating new encryption
scheme is interesting. So the only thing to implement is secure use of
X11 clipboard and integration with GPG or some PGP library.

And what password managers do suckless developers use? Not using any
doesn't seem secure, I don't think someone can lots of good passwords.


Re: [dev] [dmenu] Vertical bug

2009-12-03 Thread Alexander Surma
I can almost confirm this. It seems like -l values 6 are ignored and 6 ist
used. Values6 are correctlz uses.

On Dec 2, 2009 8:50 PM, Tadeusz Sośnierz tadzi...@gmail.com wrote:

Hello,
Looks like dmenu (in tip) ignores the -l argument, assuming 10 anyway.
Regards,
Ted


[dev] [surf] PATCH for default directory path - really uncritical

2009-11-25 Thread Alexander Surma
Hi,

I just figured out how buildpath() worked and that as a consequence
the default value of dldir is useless.
It causes buildpath() so create a file rather than a directory. So
here's a one-line patch.

Surma



[dev] [surf] PATCH surppress error message when _SURF_URI is empty

2009-11-25 Thread Alexander Surma
Another small patch for supressing an error in dmenu's output when
_SURF_URI is not set
(as it happens when surf just started).
This is probably not the nice way to do it, but liek this I didn't
have to touch the code.

Surma


empty-url.patch
Description: Binary data