Re: [dev] Sxmo presentation at AlpineConf (Sat May 15, 14:30 UTC)
On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 03:59:47PM +0200, Maarten van Gompel wrote: > I just wanted to drop a little announcement that this weekend on > AlpineConf 2021, we will present Sxmo, the simple X mobile environment. Sounds really cool. Will surely attend. Let's see if it makes into suckless ;) Hrtk
Re: [dev] [dwm][bug] Programs teleport tag on startup
On Sunday, January 17, 2021 11:36 PM, Eric Pruitt wrote: > On Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 10:58:10AM +0000, Hritik Vijay wrote: > > > > Are there window managers that do NOT behave this way with respect > > > to workspaces? > > > > I've seen i3 handle this case with a i3-exec binary. It basically > > launches the target application and signals the i3wm where it was > > executed. I guess something similar could be developed here. It could > > be used as a wrapper inside dmenu launcher. > > I can't find a binary named i3-exec in the i3 GitHub repository > (https://github.com/i3/i3) or in lists of files for the i3 Debian > package (https://packages.debian.org/bullseye/amd64/i3-wm/filelist). Apologies for the confusion. It is actually an i3 command which can be executed as `i3-msg exec` or simply `i3 exec` The wihack (“The wmii window hack”) suggested by Quentin Rameau appears to be something that does the same. Hritik
Re: [dev] [dwm][bug] Programs teleport tag on startup
On Sunday, January 17, 2021 11:55 AM, Eric Pruitt wrote: > On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 10:13:11PM -0800, Spenser Truex wrote: > > > To me this seems like undesirable behaviour, since after opening a > > program one has to wait for it to load before switching the current tag. Yes! I'd love this to be fixed as well > Are there window managers that > do NOT behave this way with respect to workspaces? I've seen i3 handle this case with a i3-exec binary. It basically launches the target application and signals the i3wm where it was executed. I guess something similar could be developed here. It could be used as a wrapper inside dmenu launcher. Hritik
[dev] [dwm] Why not a seperate declaration header file ?
Hi While editing my config.h file, my linter is going crazy because it cannot find the declarations of the identifiers used in config.h. I was wondering the rationale behind putting all the function declarations in the dwm.c file itself. Wouldn't it make more sense to put all of them in a dwm.h file and include it in dwm.c and config.h ? Hritik Vijay
