Re: [dev] [ANNOUNCE] dvtm-0.11

2014-03-18 Thread Marc André Tanner
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 09:53:14AM -0400, Bryan Bennett wrote:
 I'm currently playing with the tagging branch and I've managed to reduce the
 tagging code to two modfiers. I'm using Ctrl+A + {1,2,3,4} for view,
 Ctrl+A + {!,@,#,$} for tag (so it mirrors dwm's keybinds a bit). I'm also
 using Ctrl+S + {1,2,3,4} for toggletag and Ctrl+S + {!,@,#,$} for toggleview.

I personally find MOD+[Function-key] much nicer to use than your special 
characters. 

 This replicates tmux pretty well for me, so I'm a pretty happy camper with
 regards to this portion.

Good for you.

 However, I've noticed that screen drawing seems...
 wonky. (particularly with vim) I have installed the 'new' terminfo (not sure
 if it changed; didn't think to check till now...) to no avail. Was some of the
 redrawing logic that was changed in 0.11 changed in rebasing tagging
 onto master?

Could be the case, as I said it wasn't really tested. That being said what
artifacts do you encounter? Upon a ~10 second test I didn't notice something
completely broken. Just to make sure it doesn't happen with the master branch,
right?

 I'm also not 100% clear on what toggleview should actually DO.

Well it does the same thing as in dwm. I think your confusing it with toggletag.

I thought there was a wiki page about the tagging concept but upon a quick 
search
I didn't find it... 

 'view' brings a tag into view (and discards any other tags from the view)

displays all windows with a given tag

 'tag' sends a client to a tag (much like send to dekstop does in most wms)

applies a given tag to the focused window

 'toggletag' brings a tag into your current view.

No, it adds/removes a given tag to/from the focused window

 'toggleview' doesn't seem to do...anything.

adds/removes all windows with a given tag to/from the view

Hope that helps.

-- 
 Marc André Tanner  http://www.brain-dump.org/  GPG key: CF7D56C0



Re: [dev] [ANNOUNCE] dvtm-0.11

2014-03-18 Thread Bryan Bennett
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Marc André Tanner m...@brain-dump.org wrote:
 I personally find MOD+[Function-key] much nicer to use than your special 
 characters.
Makes sense, but I just wanted a shifted modifier (like
MOD+shift+number in dwm).
To each their own here.

  Just to make sure it doesn't happen with the master branch, right?
Haven't been able to test master today, but I'll do so when I get home
this evening. I
don't recall having issues with redrawing while using master, however.

Regarding your explanation of the functions, I'll keep that in mind in
further testing.
What you explained is largely what I expected to happen, but the
behavior didn't seem
consistent with expectations. I'll look over the code tonight when
testing and hopefully
that will help me out a bit. (It seems that so far things are working
as expected upon
initial retry of the build. Not sure what could have caused this confusion.)

I just tried tagging out again and I was unable to 100% replicate the
redrawing problems.
It seems to be related to some strange behavior immediately after
spawning st within
dwm. More investigation seems necessary.

Thanks for the help. I'll send more information if/when I get it.



Re: [dev] [ANNOUNCE] dvtm-0.11

2014-03-17 Thread Marc André Tanner
On Sat, Mar 08, 2014 at 10:07:40PM +0100, Sanel Zukan wrote:
 On 03/08/14,Marc André Tanner wrote:
   * the lock functionality (MOD-X) has been removed, use a session 
 management tool like abduco to detach from your controlling 
 terminal and logout properly using the existing system mechanism.
 
 I'm quite sad to see this. I used lock functionality a lot

In what circumstances? Surely your system provides better screen
lock functionality (for example slock).

 although I prefer UNIX philosophy, I find it overused sometimes.
 dvtm + dtach + abduco + what-else-in-future = no wonder why Screen
 will be still around. At least in my toolbox ;)

It is just abduco + dvtm, but since abduco defaults to dvtm when given
no other command to execute this is simplified further. Otherwise
just write a shell script (or use screen if it works for you...)

Cheers,
Marc

-- 
 Marc André Tanner  http://www.brain-dump.org/  GPG key: CF7D56C0



Re: [dev] [ANNOUNCE] dvtm-0.11

2014-03-17 Thread Marc André Tanner
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 09:27:55AM -0400, Bryan Bennett wrote:
 This latest work on dvtm is great, particularly the scrollback changes.
 I really appreciate the effort put into it. Looking at the git
 repository, I noticed the tagging branch and got quite excited. Is
 there a plan to update this branch to the 0.11 release? 

I just rebased it on top of master. However I haven't really tested it.

 development of this feature stopped or delayed? Was it just lack of
 time/interest, or is it considered feature creep to have tags here?

The problem is that it introduces quite a few new keybindings which 
probably aren't that intuitive (multiple modifier keys etc). See also the
last part of this mail:

  http://lists.suckless.org/dev/1312/18805.html

Furthermore the current functionality with minimized windows is sufficient
for my needs. However feel free to try the tagging branch and come up
with better keybindings...
 
Marc 

-- 
 Marc André Tanner  http://www.brain-dump.org/  GPG key: CF7D56C0



Re: [dev] [ANNOUNCE] dvtm-0.11

2014-03-17 Thread Bryan Bennett
I'm currently playing with the tagging branch and I've managed to reduce the
tagging code to two modfiers. I'm using Ctrl+A + {1,2,3,4} for view,
Ctrl+A + {!,@,#,$} for tag (so it mirrors dwm's keybinds a bit). I'm also
using Ctrl+S + {1,2,3,4} for toggletag and Ctrl+S + {!,@,#,$} for toggleview.
This replicates tmux pretty well for me, so I'm a pretty happy camper with
regards to this portion. However, I've noticed that screen drawing seems...
wonky. (particularly with vim) I have installed the 'new' terminfo (not sure
if it changed; didn't think to check till now...) to no avail. Was some of the
redrawing logic that was changed in 0.11 changed in rebasing tagging
onto master?

I'm also not 100% clear on what toggleview should actually DO.
'view' brings a tag into view (and discards any other tags from the view)
'tag' sends a client to a tag (much like send to dekstop does in most wms)
'toggletag' brings a tag into your current view.
'toggleview' doesn't seem to do...anything.



Re: [dev] [ANNOUNCE] dvtm-0.11

2014-03-14 Thread Bryan Bennett
This latest work on dvtm is great, particularly the scrollback changes.
I really appreciate the effort put into it. Looking at the git
repository, I noticed the tagging branch and got quite excited. Is
there a plan to update this branch to the 0.11 release? Why was
development of this feature stopped or delayed? Was it just lack of
time/interest, or is it considered feature creep to have tags here?

Thanks again,
Bryan



Re: [dev] [ANNOUNCE] dvtm-0.11

2014-03-08 Thread Sanel Zukan
On 03/08/14,Marc André Tanner wrote:
 I just released dvtm-0.11, the dwm counterpart for your ssh and
 framebuffer console sessions

Awesome!

  * the lock functionality (MOD-X) has been removed, use a session 
management tool like abduco to detach from your controlling 
terminal and logout properly using the existing system mechanism.

I'm quite sad to see this. I used lock functionality a lot and,
although I prefer UNIX philosophy, I find it overused sometimes.
dvtm + dtach + abduco + what-else-in-future = no wonder why Screen
will be still around. At least in my toolbox ;)

 Cheers,
 Marc

Best.