Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Superset (incubating) 0.37.0 based on Superset 0.37.0rc4

[Bogdan Kyryliuk]

+1 approve (binding)

On Sat, Aug 1, 2020 at 9:53 AM Ville Brofeldt 
wrote:

> Hello Superset Community,
>
> With no new regressions or critical bugs having been brought to our
> attention in the 0.37
> branch during the last week, this is a call for the vote to release Apache
> Superset
> (incubating) version 0.37.0 based on 0.37.0rc4.
>
> New cherries since 0.37.0rc3:
> - fix: excel sheet upload is not working (#10450) (@pphszx)
> - feat: support non-numeric columns in pivot table (#10389) (@villebro)
> - fix(dashboard): chart rerender when switching tabs (#10432) (@ktmud)
> - fix: incorrect filter operator emitted by Filter Box (#10421) (@villebro)
> - fix: bump pivot-table and rose (#10400) (@villebro)
> - fix: treemap template literal (#10382) (@villebro)
> - fix: group by with timestamp granularity (#10344) (@dpgaspar)
> - fix: modified by column on charts and dashboards (#10340) (@dpgaspar)
>
> The release candidate:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/superset/0.37.0rc4/
>
> Git tag for the release:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-superset/tree/0.37.0rc4
>
> The Change Log for the release:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-superset/blob/0.37.0rc4/CHANGELOG.md
>
> The Updating instructions for the release:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-superset/blob/0.37.0rc4/UPDATING.md
>
> public keys are available at:
>
> https://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/superset/KEYS
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until the necessary number
> of votes are reached.
>
> Please vote accordingly:
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>
> Thanks,
> The Apache Superset (Incubating) Team



-- 
Best regards,
Bogdan Kyryliuk.

Re: Giving our PMs and contributors triage rights on GitHub

[Bogdan Kyryliuk]

I like the idea. It definitely be helpful to get community help on triaging
the issues

On Sat, Aug 15, 2020, 8:39 AM Junlin Chen  wrote:

> humbly asking +1. Currently, we PMs at Preset are tracking Github issues
> Projects, Milestone and Link PR manually which is extremely inefficient. By
> doing so, we are not able to provide status updates timely to
> the community.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 3:52 PM Evan Rusackas  wrote:
>
> > An emphatic +1 from me! The issues could gain a huge boost from the added
> > human curation, whether it's adding sensible labels, running Project
> kanban
> > boards, linking issues to PRs (and other relevant issues), and more. It
> > could not only bring some order to the chaos, but help those in the
> > community reporting issues feel like they’re being heard.
> >
> > Evan Rusackas
> > ( he | him )
> > Frontend Lead
> > Preset | preset.io
> > On Aug 13, 2020, 9:28 AM -0700, Maxime Beauchemin <
> > maximebeauche...@gmail.com>, wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > It just came to my attention that GitHub added a new "triage" access
> > level
> > > at the repo level.
> > >
> https://github.blog/changelog/2019-05-23-triage-and-maintain-roles-beta/
> > >
> > > In the past, we've identified that it was impossible for non-committers
> > > (especially our PMs and contributors-that-are-not-yet-committers) to
> help
> > > us triage issues, apply labels, assign reviews, close and reopen issues
> > as
> > > needed. It's really clear to me that we really need all the help we can
> > get
> > > in this area, and that not being able to involve more people into this
> > > process hurts us, and is a clear operational downside of using the ASF
> > > infra.
> > >
> > > I'd like to build a case for this to become allowed by ASF infra. But
> > > first, I'd love to see some +1s, and a list of GitHub handles for
> people
> > in
> > > our community who could make use of this feature.
> > >
> > > More technically, I think the way to make that easy and painless would
> be
> > > to add a new entry to the `.asf.yaml` file that would enable
> maintainers
> > to
> > > assign the "triage" role to whoever they see fit. For reference, here's
> > > more context on that piece of automation I'd like to latch this onto
> > here:
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INFRA/git+-+.asf.yaml+features
> > >
> > > FYI, xposting this to general@incubator for their attention.
> > >
> > > Max
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] SIP-53 Proposal to create a Superset public roadmap #10894

[Bogdan Kyryliuk]

+1

On Mon, Oct 12, 2020, 11:41 AM Maxime Beauchemin 
wrote:

> I'm kicking off the VOTE thread.
>
> There's been very little conversation on the GitHub issue, so let's assume
> there's no objection to move forward with this.
>
> Consider this a +1 from me.
>
> Max
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 1:56 PM Bence Orlai  wrote:
>
> > Hello Everyone -
> >
> > Please discuss & subscribe here:
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-superset/issues/10894
> >
>

Re: [DISCUSS] SIP-54 Proposal to improve export/import of objects

[Bogdan Kyryliuk]

+1 (binding)

On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 12:35 PM Ville Brofeldt 
wrote:

> +1 (binding) Ville
>
> On Tue, Oct 6, 2020 at 4:03 AM Beto Dealmeida
> 
> wrote:
>
> > Hi, all.
> >
> > I created a new SIP for improving the export/import functionality in
> > Superset
> >
> > Please discuss & subscribe here:
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-superset/issues/11167
> >
> > Thank you,
> > --Beto
> >
>


-- 
Best regards,
Bogdan Kyryliuk.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Superset (incubating) 0.38.0 based on Superset 0.38.0rc1

[Bogdan Kyryliuk]

Could we 2 more prs / bug fixes in this release ?
* https://github.com/apache/incubator-superset/pull/11199 [ in review ]
* https://github.com/apache/incubator-superset/pull/11412 [ merged ]

On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 8:13 AM William Barrett  wrote:

> +1 binding
>
> Will Barrett
> Staff Software Engineer
> Preset, Inc. | https://preset.io
> On Oct 28, 2020, 7:22 AM -0700, daniel gaspar ,
> wrote:
> > Hello Superset Community,
> >
> > This is a call for the vote to release Apache Superset
> > (incubating) version 0.38.0.
> >
> > The release candidate:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/superset/0.38.0rc1/
> >
> > Git tag for the release:
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-superset/tree/0.38.0rc1
> >
> > The Change Log for the release:
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-superset/blob/0.38.0rc1/CHANGELOG.md
> >
> > The Updating instructions for the release:
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-superset/blob/0.38.0rc1/UPDATING.md
> >
> > public keys are available at:
> >
> > https://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/superset/KEYS
> >
> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until the necessary number
> > of votes are reached.
> >
> > Please vote accordingly:
> >
> > [ ] +1 approve
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> >
> > Thanks,
> > The Apache Superset (Incubating) Team
>


-- 
Best regards,
Bogdan Kyryliuk.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Superset (incubating) 0.38.0 based on Superset 0.38.0rc1

[Bogdan Kyryliuk]

Gotcha, sorry - I did not know that it is not a good place for the
discussion. Will start using labels, it was rather a question - not a
statement that those PRs need to be included.

On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 12:37 PM Maxime Beauchemin  wrote:

> @Bogdan Kyryliuk   Let's label issues and PRs
> that you'd like to be considered as blockers/cherries for 0.38 with the
> `v0.38` label.
>
> Once we have the whole list as part of the release review process we can
> make the call on whether we should release 0.38.0 and fast follow with
> 0.38.1, or whether we need an RC2 here.
>
> In the past we've had early "-1" that holds up the release and holds up
> the testing as they would rather wait for RC2 to test, but that puts strain
> on the release manager  since it tends to lead to many RCs
>
> SO, let's list out and label issues, and we can look at the whole list at
> the end of the voting period and make a call on an RC2 vs fast-follow a
> micro
>
> Max
>
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 11:20 AM Craig Rueda  wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 7:22 AM daniel gaspar 
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Hello Superset Community,
>> >
>> > This is a call for the vote to release Apache Superset
>> > (incubating) version 0.38.0.
>> >
>> > The release candidate:
>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/superset/0.38.0rc1/
>> >
>> > Git tag for the release:
>> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-superset/tree/0.38.0rc1
>> >
>> > The Change Log for the release:
>> >
>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-superset/blob/0.38.0rc1/CHANGELOG.md
>> >
>> > The Updating instructions for the release:
>> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-superset/blob/0.38.0rc1/UPDATING.md
>> >
>> > public keys are available at:
>> >
>> > https://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/superset/KEYS
>> >
>> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until the necessary
>> number
>> > of votes are reached.
>> >
>> > Please vote accordingly:
>> >
>> > [ ] +1 approve
>> > [ ] +0 no opinion
>> > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > The Apache Superset (Incubating) Team
>> >
>>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Superset (incubating) 0.38.0 based on Superset 0.38.0rc4

[Bogdan Kyryliuk]

+1 (binding)

On Tue, Nov 17, 2020, 9:54 AM Maxime Beauchemin  wrote:

> +1
>
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2020, 6:29 AM daniel gaspar 
> wrote:
>
> > Hello Superset Community,
> >
> > This is a call for the vote to release Apache Superset
> > (incubating) version 0.38.0. RC3 was cancelled due to licensing issues
> for
> > two fonts, related thread:
> >
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r44d302317412ac2f56c66da46ba96e2df72de258232fe91628f6099c%40%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
> >
> > The release candidate:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/superset/0.38.0rc4/
> >
> > Git tag for the release:
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-superset/tree/0.38.0rc4
> >
> > The Change Log for the release:
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-superset/blob/0.38.0rc4/CHANGELOG.md
> >
> > The Updating instructions for the release:
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-superset/blob/0.38.0rc4/UPDATING.md
> >
> > public keys are available at:
> >
> > https://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/superset/KEYS
> >
> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until the necessary number
> > of votes are reached.
> >
> > Please vote accordingly:
> >
> > [ ] +1 approve
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> >
> > Thanks,
> > The Apache Superset (Incubating) Team
> > --
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Superset 1.0.0 based on Superset 1.0.0rc4

[Bogdan Kyryliuk]

+1 (binding)

On Sat, Jan 16, 2021, 8:09 PM Evan Rusackas  wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> And I’m stked! This is the culmination of a TON of hard work.
> Thanks to all involved!
>
> Evan Rusackas
> ( he | him )
> Frontend Lead
> Preset | preset.io
> On Jan 16, 2021, 4:53 PM -0800, Maxime Beauchemin , wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > On Sat, Jan 16, 2021, 7:32 AM Eugenia Moreno  wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 2:28 AM Ville Brofeldt <
> ville.v.brofe...@gmail.com
> > > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hello Superset Community,
> > > >
> > > > This is a call for the vote to release Apache Superset version 1.0.0.
> > > > All reported critical bugs in 1.0.0rc3 have been addressed.
> > > > The full list of PRs added since 1.0.0rc3 are as follows:
> > > > - Fix 500 error when loading dashboards with slice having deleted
> dataset
> > > > (#12535) (@bechob)
> > > > - fix: case expression should not have double quotes (#12562)
> > > > (@betodealmeida)
> > > > - fix: height on grid results (#12558) (@betodealmeida)
> > > > - fix(viz): missing groupby and broken adhoc metrics for boxplot
> (#12556)
> > > > (@ktmud)
> > > > - fix: Add MAX_SQL_ROW value to LIMIT_DROPDOWN (#12555) (@hug)
> > > > - fix: Popover closes on change of dropdowns values (#12410) (@geido)
> > > >
> > > > The release candidate:
> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/superset/1.0.0rc4/
> > > >
> > > > Git tag for the release:
> > > > https://github.com/apache/superset/tree/1.0.0rc4
> > > >
> > > > The Change Log for the release:
> > > > https://github.com/apache/superset/blob/1.0.0rc4/CHANGELOG.md
> > > >
> > > > The Updating instructions for the release:
> > > > https://github.com/apache/superset/blob/1.0.0rc4/UPDATING.md
> > > >
> > > > public keys are available at:
> > > >
> > > > https://www.apache.org/dist/superset/KEYS
> > > >
> > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until the necessary
> number
> > > > of votes are reached.
> > > >
> > > > Please vote accordingly:
> > > >
> > > > [ ] +1 approve
> > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > The Apache Superset Team
> > > > --
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Eugenia Moreno 
> > > *Customer Engagement*
> > > *Preset.io* 
> > > Book Time with me 
> > > C: 617-633-7641
> > >
>

Re: [DISCUSS] Ephemeral environments via AWS ECS for Superset PRs

[Bogdan Kyryliuk]

+1 binding, this will make testing so much easier, thanks !

On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 10:58 AM Erik Ritter 
wrote:

> +1 binding, thanks for sponsoring this and pushing it forward!
>
> Erik
>
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 10:52 AM William Barrett  wrote:
>
> > +1 binding
> >
> > Will Barrett
> > Staff Software Engineer
> > Preset, Inc. | https://preset.io
> > On Feb 18, 2021, 10:47 AM -0800, Rob DiCiuccio , wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > This is a call for consensus for establishing the ability to create
> > > ephemeral test environments in the context of a Superset PR. This is
> > > required for an Apache INFRA request to add AWS account secrets to the
> > > Superset repository.
> > >
> > > PR with full details: https://github.com/apache/superset/pull/13189
> > >
> > > Please respond to this thread using VOTE semantics (below), or any
> > > questions that can't be addressed directly on the PR.
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 approve
> > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> > >
> > > Thank you!
> > > --
> > >
> > > *Rob DiCiuccio* (he/him)
> > > Director of Engineering
> > > Preset | https://preset.io
> >
>


-- 
Best regards,
Bogdan Kyryliuk.

Re: [VOTE][SIP-59] Proposal for Database migration standards

[Bogdan Kyryliuk]

+1, binding

On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 5:22 PM Srinivasa Kadamati  wrote:

> +1
>
> On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 8:16 PM Beto Dealmeida
>  wrote:
>
> > +1, binding
> >
> > On 3/15/21 5:00 PM, Craig Rueda wrote:
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 4:46 PM Rob DiCiuccio  wrote:
> > >
> > >> Superset Community,
> > >>
> > >> This is a call to vote for SIP-59: Proposal for Database migration
> > >> standards
> > >>
> > >> Further details here: https://github.com/apache/superset/issues/13351
> > >>
> > >> The vote will be open for at least 1 week or until the necessary
> number
> > of
> > >> votes are reached.
> > >>
> > >> Please vote accordingly:
> > >> [ ] +1 approve
> > >> [ ] +0 no opinion
> > >> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> > >>
> > >> Thank you!
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >>
> > >> *Rob DiCiuccio* (he/him)
> > >> Director of Engineering
> > >> Preset | https://preset.io
> > >>
> >
>


-- 
Best regards,
Bogdan Kyryliuk.

Re: [VOTE][SIP-46]: Proposal for strict pylint enforcement

[Bogdan Kyryliuk]

+1 binding

On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 9:29 AM Erik Ritter  wrote:

> +1 binding
>
> Erik
>
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 7:18 AM William Barrett  wrote:
>
> > +1 binding
> >
> > Will Barrett
> > Staff Software Engineer
> > Preset, Inc. | https://preset.io
> > On Apr 21, 2021, 11:21 PM -0700, Furkan KAMACI ,
> > wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > +1 (non-binding).
> > >
> > > Kind Regards,
> > > Furkan KAMACI
> > >
> > > On 22 Apr 2021 Thu at 07:30 Rob DiCiuccio  wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 binding
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 1:20 PM John Bodley 
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hello Superset Community,
> > > > >
> > > > > This is a (very belated) call to vote for SIP-46: Proposal for
> strict
> > > > > pylint enforcement <https://github.com/apache/superset/issues/9953
> >.
> > > > >
> > > > > The vote will be open for at least 1 week or until the necessary
> > number
> > > > of
> > > > > votes are reached.
> > > > >
> > > > > Please vote accordingly:
> > > > > [ ] +1 approve
> > > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > > > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks
> > > > > -John
> > > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > *Rob DiCiuccio* (he/him)
> > > > Director of Engineering
> > > > Preset | https://preset.io
> > > >
> >
>


-- 
Best regards,
Bogdan Kyryliuk.

Re: [VOTE][SIP-79] Guidelines for Superset PMC Membership

[Bogdan Kyryliuk]

+1 binding

On Fri, Jan 28, 2022, 2:50 PM Tai Dupree  wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 2:29 PM Grace Guo 
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > - grace
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 5:57 PM  wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > >
> > > Kind regards
> > > Adam Dobrawy
> > >
> > > śr., 26 sty 2022 o 18:01 Evan Rusackas  napisał(a):
> > >
> > > > Hello everyone,
> > > >
> > > > Thank you for all the prior discussion on the proposal. Some
> > adjustments
> > > > and clarifications have been made accordingly. I’d like to hereby
> call
> > > for
> > > > a vote on SIP-79, Guidelines for Superset PMC membership. The
> proposal
> > is
> > > > available here:
> > > >
> > > > https://github.com/apache/superset/issues/18031
> > > >
> > > > The vote will be open for at least 1 week or until the necessary
> number
> > > of
> > > > votes are reached.
> > > >
> > > > Please vote accordingly:
> > > > [ ] +1 approve
> > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> > > >
> > > > Many thanks,
> > > >
> > > > Evan Rusackas
> > > > Preset | preset.io
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> -Tai Dupree
>

Re: [VOTE] [SIP-92] Proposal for restructuring the Python code base

[Bogdan Kyryliuk]

+1

On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 7:15 PM Pankaj soni 
wrote:

> +1
>
>
> On Wed, 10 May, 2023, 03:53 John Bodley, 
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Following up from the corresponding DISCUSS email I sent way back in
> > January (apologies for the delay), I was hoping to call a vote on
> [SIP-92]
> > Proposal for restructuring the Python code base
> > <https://github.com/apache/superset/issues/20630> which should
> indirectly
> > help both with the quality and developer experience initiatives.
> >
> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until the necessary number
> > of votes are reached. Please vote accordingly:
> >
> > [ ] +1 approve
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> >
> >
> > Thanks
> > -John
> >
>


-- 
Best regards,
Bogdan Kyryliuk.

Re: [VOTE][SIP-97] Import Option to Overwrite Cascading Assets of Existing Item

[Bogdan Kyryliuk]

+1 (binding)

On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 10:14 AM Ville Brofeldt 
wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> Ville
>
> > On Aug 11, 2023, at 9:32 AM, Evan Rusackas 
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi everyone, and Happy Friday!
> >
> > Following the DISCUSS email sent on 6/27 [1], it seems there has been a
> lot of positive sentiment and healthy discussion on the proposal. I’m now
> calling for a vote on [SIP-97] Import Option to Overwrite Cascading Assets
> of Existing Item [2].
> >
> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until the necessary number
> > of votes are reached. Please vote accordingly:
> >
> > [ ] +1 approve
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> >
> > Links:
> > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/xnhmj0s6h4nzrscxy7x7w3656z5pt028
> > [2] https://github.com/apache/superset/issues/24660
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Evan Rusackas
> > Preset | preset.io
> > Apache Superset PMC
>
>

-- 
Best regards,
Bogdan Kyryliuk.