Re: Please reply ASAP : Regarding incubator systemml/breast_cancer project
Hi Aishwarya, Yes, it is quite strange that Jupyter isn't running on the PySpark kernel even though it's being started in that manner. The good news is that we do use this everyday, so once we find the root issue with your Jupyter, it should work great! Let's try temporarily removing all of the existing Jupyter/IPython settings & kernels and basically start fresh. Assuming you are on OS X / macOS or Linux, can you do the following? (Please double check the exact paths, as I'm typing on a phone.) * Stop Jupyter, and make sure that it is not running. * Temporarily remove the Jupyter kernels. First, you will need to see where they are installed, and then just rename that path. `jupyter kernelspec list` # look at paths above. For example, on macOS, it may be located at ~/Library/Jupyter/kernels, and thus to move it, you would use the following. Update this as needed for the exact paths listed above `mv ~/Library/Jupyter/kernels ~/Library/Jupyter_OLD/kernels` * Temporarily remove the Jupyter & IPython settings: `mv ~/.jupyter ~/.jupyter_OLD` `mv ~/.ipython ~/.ipython_OLD` * Make sure Jupyter is up to date: `pip3 install -U ipython jupyter` After that, please ensure that Jupyter is not running, then start it in the context of PySpark as sent previously. Once Jupyter is started this time, there should only be one kernel listed, and `sc` should be available. Can you try that? -- Mike Dusenberry GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry Sent from my iPhone. > On Apr 26, 2017, at 2:13 AM, Aishwarya Chaurasia> wrote: > > Hi sir, > The sc NameError persists. > > (1) There is only one jupyter server running. And that was started with the > pyspark command in the previous mail. > (2) Two kernels are appearing in the change kernel option - Python3 and > Python2. Tried with both of them and the result is the same. > > How is jupyter not being able to run on the pyspark kernel when we have > started the notebook with the pyspark command only? > > Is it possible to create a .py file of MachineLearning.ipynb like was done > with preprocessing.ipynb with explicitly creating a SparkContext() ? > >> On 25-Apr-2017 11:57 PM, wrote: >> >> Hi Aishwarya, >> >> Unfortunately this mailing list removes all images, so I can't view your >> screenshot. I'm assuming that it is the same issue with the missing >> SparkContext `sc` object, but please let me know if it is a different >> issue. This sounds like it could be an issue with multiple kernels >> installed in Jupyter. When you start the notebook, can you see if there >> are multiple kernels listed in the "Kernel" -> "Change Kernel" menu? If >> so, please try one of the other kernels to see if Jupyter is starting by >> default with a non-spark kernel. Also, is it possible that you have more >> than one instance of the Jupyter server running? I.e. for this scenario, >> we start Jupyter itself directly via pyspark using the command sent >> previously, whereas usually Jupyter can just be started with `jupyter >> notebook`. In the latter case, PySpark (and thus `sc`) would *not* be >> available (unless you've set up special PySpark kernels separately). In >> summary, can you (1) check for other kernels via the menus, and (2) check >> for other running Jupyter servers that are non-PySpark? >> >> As for the other inquiry, great question! When training models, it's >> quite useful to track the loss and other metrics (i.e. accuracy) from >> *both* the training and validation sets. The reasoning is that it allows >> for a more holistic view of the overall learning process, such as >> evaluating whether any overfitting or underfitting is occurring. For >> example, say that you train a model and achieve an accuracy of 80% on the >> validation set. Is this good? Is this the best that can be done? Without >> also tracking performance on the training set, it can be difficult to make >> these decisions. Say that you then measure the performance on the training >> set and find that the model achieves 100% accuracy on that data. That >> might be a good indication that your model is overfitting the training set, >> and that a combination of more data, regularization, and a smaller model >> may be helpful in raising the generalization performance, i.e. the >> performance on the validation set and future real examples on which you >> wish to make predictions. If on the other hand, the model achieved an 82% >> on the training set, this could be a good indication that the model is >> underfitting, and that a combination of a more expressive model and better >> data could be helpful. In summary, tracking performance on both the >> training and validation datasets can be useful for determining ways in >> which to improve the overall learning process. >> >> >> - Mike >> >> -- >> >> Mike Dusenberry >> GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw >> LinkedIn:
Re: Please reply ASAP : Regarding incubator systemml/breast_cancer project
Hi sir, The sc NameError persists. (1) There is only one jupyter server running. And that was started with the pyspark command in the previous mail. (2) Two kernels are appearing in the change kernel option - Python3 and Python2. Tried with both of them and the result is the same. How is jupyter not being able to run on the pyspark kernel when we have started the notebook with the pyspark command only? Is it possible to create a .py file of MachineLearning.ipynb like was done with preprocessing.ipynb with explicitly creating a SparkContext() ? On 25-Apr-2017 11:57 PM,wrote: > Hi Aishwarya, > > Unfortunately this mailing list removes all images, so I can't view your > screenshot. I'm assuming that it is the same issue with the missing > SparkContext `sc` object, but please let me know if it is a different > issue. This sounds like it could be an issue with multiple kernels > installed in Jupyter. When you start the notebook, can you see if there > are multiple kernels listed in the "Kernel" -> "Change Kernel" menu? If > so, please try one of the other kernels to see if Jupyter is starting by > default with a non-spark kernel. Also, is it possible that you have more > than one instance of the Jupyter server running? I.e. for this scenario, > we start Jupyter itself directly via pyspark using the command sent > previously, whereas usually Jupyter can just be started with `jupyter > notebook`. In the latter case, PySpark (and thus `sc`) would *not* be > available (unless you've set up special PySpark kernels separately). In > summary, can you (1) check for other kernels via the menus, and (2) check > for other running Jupyter servers that are non-PySpark? > > As for the other inquiry, great question! When training models, it's > quite useful to track the loss and other metrics (i.e. accuracy) from > *both* the training and validation sets. The reasoning is that it allows > for a more holistic view of the overall learning process, such as > evaluating whether any overfitting or underfitting is occurring. For > example, say that you train a model and achieve an accuracy of 80% on the > validation set. Is this good? Is this the best that can be done? Without > also tracking performance on the training set, it can be difficult to make > these decisions. Say that you then measure the performance on the training > set and find that the model achieves 100% accuracy on that data. That > might be a good indication that your model is overfitting the training set, > and that a combination of more data, regularization, and a smaller model > may be helpful in raising the generalization performance, i.e. the > performance on the validation set and future real examples on which you > wish to make predictions. If on the other hand, the model achieved an 82% > on the training set, this could be a good indication that the model is > underfitting, and that a combination of a more expressive model and better > data could be helpful. In summary, tracking performance on both the > training and validation datasets can be useful for determining ways in > which to improve the overall learning process. > > > - Mike > > -- > > Mike Dusenberry > GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw > LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry > > Sent from my iPhone. > > > > On Apr 25, 2017, at 8:47 AM, Aishwarya Chaurasia < > aishwarya2...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > We had another query, sir. We read the entire MachineLearning.ipynb code. > > in it the training samples and the validation samples have both been > > evaluated separately and their respective losses and accuracies obtained. > > Why are the training samples being evaluated again if they were used to > > train the model in the first place? Shouldn't only the validation data > > frames be evaluated to find out the loss and accuracy? > > > > Thank you > > > > On 25-Apr-2017 4:00 PM, "Aishwarya Chaurasia" > > wrote: > > > >> Hello sir, > >> > >> The NameError is occuring again sir. Why does it keep resurfacing? > >> > >> Attaching the screenshot of the error. > >> > >>> On 25-Apr-2017 2:50 AM, wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi Aishwarya, > >>> > >>> For the error message, that just means that the SystemML jar isn't > being > >>> found. Can you add a `--driver-class-path $SYSTEMML_HOME/target/ > SystemML.jar` > >>> to the invocation of Jupyter? I.e. `PYSPARK_PYTHON=python3 > >>> PYSPARK_DRIVER_PYTHON=jupyter PYSPARK_DRIVER_PYTHON_OPTS="notebook" > >>> pyspark --jars $SYSTEMML_HOME/target/SystemML.jar --driver-class-path > >>> $SYSTEMML_HOME/target/SystemML.jar`. There was a PySpark bug that was > >>> supposed to have been fixed in Spark 2.x, but it's possible that it is > >>> still an issue. > >>> > >>> As for the output, the notebook will create SystemML `Matrix` objects > for > >>> all of the weights and biases of the trained models. To save, please > >>> convert each one to a DataFrame, i.e. `Wc1.toDF()` and
Re: Please reply ASAP : Regarding incubator systemml/breast_cancer project
Hi Aishwarya, Unfortunately this mailing list removes all images, so I can't view your screenshot. I'm assuming that it is the same issue with the missing SparkContext `sc` object, but please let me know if it is a different issue. This sounds like it could be an issue with multiple kernels installed in Jupyter. When you start the notebook, can you see if there are multiple kernels listed in the "Kernel" -> "Change Kernel" menu? If so, please try one of the other kernels to see if Jupyter is starting by default with a non-spark kernel. Also, is it possible that you have more than one instance of the Jupyter server running? I.e. for this scenario, we start Jupyter itself directly via pyspark using the command sent previously, whereas usually Jupyter can just be started with `jupyter notebook`. In the latter case, PySpark (and thus `sc`) would *not* be available (unless you've set up special PySpark kernels separately). In summary, can you (1) check for other kernels via the menus, and (2) check for other running Jupyter servers that are non-PySpark? As for the other inquiry, great question! When training models, it's quite useful to track the loss and other metrics (i.e. accuracy) from *both* the training and validation sets. The reasoning is that it allows for a more holistic view of the overall learning process, such as evaluating whether any overfitting or underfitting is occurring. For example, say that you train a model and achieve an accuracy of 80% on the validation set. Is this good? Is this the best that can be done? Without also tracking performance on the training set, it can be difficult to make these decisions. Say that you then measure the performance on the training set and find that the model achieves 100% accuracy on that data. That might be a good indication that your model is overfitting the training set, and that a combination of more data, regularization, and a smaller model may be helpful in raising the generalization performance, i.e. the performance on the validation set and future real examples on which you wish to make predictions. If on the other hand, the model achieved an 82% on the training set, this could be a good indication that the model is underfitting, and that a combination of a more expressive model and better data could be helpful. In summary, tracking performance on both the training and validation datasets can be useful for determining ways in which to improve the overall learning process. - Mike -- Mike Dusenberry GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry Sent from my iPhone. > On Apr 25, 2017, at 8:47 AM, Aishwarya Chaurasia> wrote: > > We had another query, sir. We read the entire MachineLearning.ipynb code. > in it the training samples and the validation samples have both been > evaluated separately and their respective losses and accuracies obtained. > Why are the training samples being evaluated again if they were used to > train the model in the first place? Shouldn't only the validation data > frames be evaluated to find out the loss and accuracy? > > Thank you > > On 25-Apr-2017 4:00 PM, "Aishwarya Chaurasia" > wrote: > >> Hello sir, >> >> The NameError is occuring again sir. Why does it keep resurfacing? >> >> Attaching the screenshot of the error. >> >>> On 25-Apr-2017 2:50 AM, wrote: >>> >>> Hi Aishwarya, >>> >>> For the error message, that just means that the SystemML jar isn't being >>> found. Can you add a `--driver-class-path >>> $SYSTEMML_HOME/target/SystemML.jar` >>> to the invocation of Jupyter? I.e. `PYSPARK_PYTHON=python3 >>> PYSPARK_DRIVER_PYTHON=jupyter PYSPARK_DRIVER_PYTHON_OPTS="notebook" >>> pyspark --jars $SYSTEMML_HOME/target/SystemML.jar --driver-class-path >>> $SYSTEMML_HOME/target/SystemML.jar`. There was a PySpark bug that was >>> supposed to have been fixed in Spark 2.x, but it's possible that it is >>> still an issue. >>> >>> As for the output, the notebook will create SystemML `Matrix` objects for >>> all of the weights and biases of the trained models. To save, please >>> convert each one to a DataFrame, i.e. `Wc1.toDF()` and repeated for each >>> matrix, and then simply save the DataFrames. This could be done all at >>> once like this for a SystemML Matrix object `Wc1`: >>> `Wc1.toDf().write.save("path/to/save/Wc1.parquet", format="parquet")`. >>> Just repeat for each matrix returned by the "Train" code for the >>> algorithms. At that point, you will have a set of saved DataFrames >>> representing a trained SystemML model, and these can be used in downstream >>> classification tasks in a similar manner to the "Eval" sections. >>> >>> -Mike >>> >>> -- >>> >>> Mike Dusenberry >>> GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw >>> LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone. >>> >>> On Apr 24, 2017, at 3:07 AM, Aishwarya Chaurasia
Re: Please reply ASAP : Regarding incubator systemml/breast_cancer project
We had another query, sir. We read the entire MachineLearning.ipynb code. in it the training samples and the validation samples have both been evaluated separately and their respective losses and accuracies obtained. Why are the training samples being evaluated again if they were used to train the model in the first place? Shouldn't only the validation data frames be evaluated to find out the loss and accuracy? Thank you On 25-Apr-2017 4:00 PM, "Aishwarya Chaurasia"wrote: > Hello sir, > > The NameError is occuring again sir. Why does it keep resurfacing? > > Attaching the screenshot of the error. > > On 25-Apr-2017 2:50 AM, wrote: > >> Hi Aishwarya, >> >> For the error message, that just means that the SystemML jar isn't being >> found. Can you add a `--driver-class-path >> $SYSTEMML_HOME/target/SystemML.jar` >> to the invocation of Jupyter? I.e. `PYSPARK_PYTHON=python3 >> PYSPARK_DRIVER_PYTHON=jupyter PYSPARK_DRIVER_PYTHON_OPTS="notebook" >> pyspark --jars $SYSTEMML_HOME/target/SystemML.jar --driver-class-path >> $SYSTEMML_HOME/target/SystemML.jar`. There was a PySpark bug that was >> supposed to have been fixed in Spark 2.x, but it's possible that it is >> still an issue. >> >> As for the output, the notebook will create SystemML `Matrix` objects for >> all of the weights and biases of the trained models. To save, please >> convert each one to a DataFrame, i.e. `Wc1.toDF()` and repeated for each >> matrix, and then simply save the DataFrames. This could be done all at >> once like this for a SystemML Matrix object `Wc1`: >> `Wc1.toDf().write.save("path/to/save/Wc1.parquet", format="parquet")`. >> Just repeat for each matrix returned by the "Train" code for the >> algorithms. At that point, you will have a set of saved DataFrames >> representing a trained SystemML model, and these can be used in downstream >> classification tasks in a similar manner to the "Eval" sections. >> >> -Mike >> >> -- >> >> Mike Dusenberry >> GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw >> LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry >> >> Sent from my iPhone. >> >> >> > On Apr 24, 2017, at 3:07 AM, Aishwarya Chaurasia < >> aishwarya2...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > Further more : >> > What is the output of MachineLearning.ipynb you're obtaining sir? >> > We are actually nearing our deadline for our problem. >> > Thanks a lot. >> > >> > On 24-Apr-2017 2:58 PM, "Aishwarya Chaurasia" >> > wrote: >> > >> > Hello sir, >> > >> > Thanks a lot for replying sir. But unfortunately it did not work. >> Although >> > the NameError did not appear this time but another error came about : >> > >> > https://paste.fedoraproject.org/paste/TUMtSIb88Q73FYekwJmM7V >> > 5M1UNdIGYhyRLivL9gydE= >> > >> > This error was obtained after executing the second block of code of >> > MachineLearning.py in terminal. ( ml = MLContext(sc) ) >> > >> > We have installed the bleeding-edge version of systemml only and the >> > installation was done correctly. We are in a fix now. :/ >> > Kindly look into the matter asap >> > >> > On 24-Apr-2017 12:15 PM, "Mike Dusenberry" >> wrote: >> > >> > Hi Aishwarya, >> > >> > Glad to hear that the preprocessing stage was successful! As for the >> > `MachineLearning.ipynb` notebook, here is a general guide: >> > >> > >> > - The `MachineLearning.ipynb` notebook essentially (1) loads in the >> > training and validation DataFrames from the preprocessing step, (2) >> > converts them to normalized & one-hot encoded SystemML matrices for >> > consumption by the ML algorithms, and (3) explores training a couple >> of >> > models. >> > - To run, you'll need to start Jupyter in the context of PySpark via >> > `PYSPARK_PYTHON=python3 PYSPARK_DRIVER_PYTHON=jupyter >> > PYSPARK_DRIVER_PYTHON_OPTS="notebook" pyspark --jars >> > $SYSTEMML_HOME/target/SystemML.jar`. Note that if you have installed >> > SystemML with pip from PyPy (`pip3 install systemml`), this will >> install >> > our 0.13 release, and the `--jars $SYSTEMML_HOME/target/SystemML.jar` >> > will >> > not be necessary. If you instead have installed a bleeding-edge >> version >> > of >> > SystemML locally (git clone locally, maven build, `pip3 install -e >> > src/main/python` as listed in `projects/breast_cancer/README.md`), >> the >> > `--jars $SYSTEMML_HOME/target/SystemML.jar` part *is* necessary. We >> are >> > about to release 0.14, and for this project, I *would* recommend >> using a >> > bleeding edge install. >> > - Once Jupyter has been started in the context of PySpark, the `sc` >> > SparkContext object should be available. Please let me know if you >> > continue to see this issue. >> > - The "Read in train & val data" section simply reads in the training >> > and validation data generated in the preprocessing stage. Be sure >> that >> > the >> > `size` setting is the same as the preprocessing size. The percentage >> `p` >>
Re: Please reply ASAP : Regarding incubator systemml/breast_cancer project
Hello sir, The NameError is occuring again sir. Why does it keep resurfacing? Attaching the screenshot of the error. On 25-Apr-2017 2:50 AM,wrote: > Hi Aishwarya, > > For the error message, that just means that the SystemML jar isn't being > found. Can you add a `--driver-class-path $SYSTEMML_HOME/target/SystemML.jar` > to the invocation of Jupyter? I.e. `PYSPARK_PYTHON=python3 > PYSPARK_DRIVER_PYTHON=jupyter PYSPARK_DRIVER_PYTHON_OPTS="notebook" > pyspark --jars $SYSTEMML_HOME/target/SystemML.jar --driver-class-path > $SYSTEMML_HOME/target/SystemML.jar`. There was a PySpark bug that was > supposed to have been fixed in Spark 2.x, but it's possible that it is > still an issue. > > As for the output, the notebook will create SystemML `Matrix` objects for > all of the weights and biases of the trained models. To save, please > convert each one to a DataFrame, i.e. `Wc1.toDF()` and repeated for each > matrix, and then simply save the DataFrames. This could be done all at > once like this for a SystemML Matrix object `Wc1`: > `Wc1.toDf().write.save("path/to/save/Wc1.parquet", format="parquet")`. > Just repeat for each matrix returned by the "Train" code for the > algorithms. At that point, you will have a set of saved DataFrames > representing a trained SystemML model, and these can be used in downstream > classification tasks in a similar manner to the "Eval" sections. > > -Mike > > -- > > Mike Dusenberry > GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw > LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry > > Sent from my iPhone. > > > > On Apr 24, 2017, at 3:07 AM, Aishwarya Chaurasia < > aishwarya2...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Further more : > > What is the output of MachineLearning.ipynb you're obtaining sir? > > We are actually nearing our deadline for our problem. > > Thanks a lot. > > > > On 24-Apr-2017 2:58 PM, "Aishwarya Chaurasia" > > wrote: > > > > Hello sir, > > > > Thanks a lot for replying sir. But unfortunately it did not work. > Although > > the NameError did not appear this time but another error came about : > > > > https://paste.fedoraproject.org/paste/TUMtSIb88Q73FYekwJmM7V > > 5M1UNdIGYhyRLivL9gydE= > > > > This error was obtained after executing the second block of code of > > MachineLearning.py in terminal. ( ml = MLContext(sc) ) > > > > We have installed the bleeding-edge version of systemml only and the > > installation was done correctly. We are in a fix now. :/ > > Kindly look into the matter asap > > > > On 24-Apr-2017 12:15 PM, "Mike Dusenberry" > wrote: > > > > Hi Aishwarya, > > > > Glad to hear that the preprocessing stage was successful! As for the > > `MachineLearning.ipynb` notebook, here is a general guide: > > > > > > - The `MachineLearning.ipynb` notebook essentially (1) loads in the > > training and validation DataFrames from the preprocessing step, (2) > > converts them to normalized & one-hot encoded SystemML matrices for > > consumption by the ML algorithms, and (3) explores training a couple of > > models. > > - To run, you'll need to start Jupyter in the context of PySpark via > > `PYSPARK_PYTHON=python3 PYSPARK_DRIVER_PYTHON=jupyter > > PYSPARK_DRIVER_PYTHON_OPTS="notebook" pyspark --jars > > $SYSTEMML_HOME/target/SystemML.jar`. Note that if you have installed > > SystemML with pip from PyPy (`pip3 install systemml`), this will > install > > our 0.13 release, and the `--jars $SYSTEMML_HOME/target/SystemML.jar` > > will > > not be necessary. If you instead have installed a bleeding-edge > version > > of > > SystemML locally (git clone locally, maven build, `pip3 install -e > > src/main/python` as listed in `projects/breast_cancer/README.md`), the > > `--jars $SYSTEMML_HOME/target/SystemML.jar` part *is* necessary. We > are > > about to release 0.14, and for this project, I *would* recommend using > a > > bleeding edge install. > > - Once Jupyter has been started in the context of PySpark, the `sc` > > SparkContext object should be available. Please let me know if you > > continue to see this issue. > > - The "Read in train & val data" section simply reads in the training > > and validation data generated in the preprocessing stage. Be sure that > > the > > `size` setting is the same as the preprocessing size. The percentage > `p` > > setting determines whether the full or sampled DataFrames are loaded. > If > > you set `p = 1`, the full DataFrames will be used. If you instead > would > > prefer to use the smaller sampled DataFrames while getting started, > > please > > set it to the same value as used in the preprocessing to generate the > > smaller sampled DataFrames. > > - The `Extract X & Y matrices` section splits each of the train and > > validation DataFrames into effectively X & Y matrices (still as > DataFrame > > types), with X containing the images, and Y containing the labels. > > - The `Convert to SystemML Matrices`
Re: Please reply ASAP : Regarding incubator systemml/breast_cancer project
Hello sir, Thanks a lot for replying sir. But unfortunately it did not work. Although the NameError did not appear this time but another error came about : https://paste.fedoraproject.org/paste/TUMtSIb88Q73FYekwJmM7V5M1UNdIG YhyRLivL9gydE= This error was obtained after executing the second block of code of MachineLearning.py in terminal. ( ml = MLContext(sc) ) We have installed the bleeding-edge version of systemml only and the installation was done correctly. We are in a fix now. :/ Kindly look into the matter asap On 24-Apr-2017 12:15 PM, "Mike Dusenberry"wrote: Hi Aishwarya, Glad to hear that the preprocessing stage was successful! As for the `MachineLearning.ipynb` notebook, here is a general guide: - The `MachineLearning.ipynb` notebook essentially (1) loads in the training and validation DataFrames from the preprocessing step, (2) converts them to normalized & one-hot encoded SystemML matrices for consumption by the ML algorithms, and (3) explores training a couple of models. - To run, you'll need to start Jupyter in the context of PySpark via `PYSPARK_PYTHON=python3 PYSPARK_DRIVER_PYTHON=jupyter PYSPARK_DRIVER_PYTHON_OPTS="notebook" pyspark --jars $SYSTEMML_HOME/target/SystemML.jar`. Note that if you have installed SystemML with pip from PyPy (`pip3 install systemml`), this will install our 0.13 release, and the `--jars $SYSTEMML_HOME/target/SystemML.jar` will not be necessary. If you instead have installed a bleeding-edge version of SystemML locally (git clone locally, maven build, `pip3 install -e src/main/python` as listed in `projects/breast_cancer/README.md`), the `--jars $SYSTEMML_HOME/target/SystemML.jar` part *is* necessary. We are about to release 0.14, and for this project, I *would* recommend using a bleeding edge install. - Once Jupyter has been started in the context of PySpark, the `sc` SparkContext object should be available. Please let me know if you continue to see this issue. - The "Read in train & val data" section simply reads in the training and validation data generated in the preprocessing stage. Be sure that the `size` setting is the same as the preprocessing size. The percentage `p` setting determines whether the full or sampled DataFrames are loaded. If you set `p = 1`, the full DataFrames will be used. If you instead would prefer to use the smaller sampled DataFrames while getting started, please set it to the same value as used in the preprocessing to generate the smaller sampled DataFrames. - The `Extract X & Y matrices` section splits each of the train and validation DataFrames into effectively X & Y matrices (still as DataFrame types), with X containing the images, and Y containing the labels. - The `Convert to SystemML Matrices` section passes the X & Y DataFrames into a SystemML script that performs some normalization of the images & one-hot encoding of the labels, and then returns SystemML `Matrix` types. These are now ready to be passed into the subsequent algorithms. - The "Trigger Caching" and "Save Matrices" are experimental features, and not necessary to execute. - Next comes the two algorithms being explored in this notebook. The "Softmax Classifier" is just a multi-class logistic regression model, and is simply there to serve as a baseline comparison with the subsequent convolutional neural net model. You may wish to simply skip this softmax model and move to the latter convnet model further down in the notebook. - The actual softmax model is located at [ https://github.com/apache/incubator-systemml/blob/ master/projects/breast_cancer/softmax_clf.dml], and the notebook calls functions from that file. - The softmax sanity check just ensures that the model is able to completely overfit when given a tiny sample size. This should yield ~100% training accuracy if the sample size in this section is small enough. This is just a check to ensure that nothing else is wrong with the math or the data. - The softmax "Train" section will train a softmax model and return the weights (`W`) and biases (`b`) of the model as SystemML `Matrix` objects. Please adjust the hyperparameters in this section to your problem. - The softmax "Eval" section takes the trained weights and biases and evaluates the training and validation performance. - The next model is a LeNet-like convnet model. The actual model is located at [ https://github.com/apache/incubator-systemml/blob/ master/projects/breast_cancer/convnet.dml], and the notebook simply calls functions from that file. - Once again, there is an initial sanity check for the ability to overfit on a small amount of data. - The "Hyperparameter Search" contains a script to sample different hyperparams for the convnet, and save the hyperparams + validation accuracy of each set after a single epoch of
Re: Regarding incubator systemml/breast_cancer project
Hi Aishwarya, Glad to hear that the preprocessing stage was successful! As for the `MachineLearning.ipynb` notebook, here is a general guide: - The `MachineLearning.ipynb` notebook essentially (1) loads in the training and validation DataFrames from the preprocessing step, (2) converts them to normalized & one-hot encoded SystemML matrices for consumption by the ML algorithms, and (3) explores training a couple of models. - To run, you'll need to start Jupyter in the context of PySpark via `PYSPARK_PYTHON=python3 PYSPARK_DRIVER_PYTHON=jupyter PYSPARK_DRIVER_PYTHON_OPTS="notebook" pyspark --jars $SYSTEMML_HOME/target/SystemML.jar`. Note that if you have installed SystemML with pip from PyPy (`pip3 install systemml`), this will install our 0.13 release, and the `--jars $SYSTEMML_HOME/target/SystemML.jar` will not be necessary. If you instead have installed a bleeding-edge version of SystemML locally (git clone locally, maven build, `pip3 install -e src/main/python` as listed in `projects/breast_cancer/README.md`), the `--jars $SYSTEMML_HOME/target/SystemML.jar` part *is* necessary. We are about to release 0.14, and for this project, I *would* recommend using a bleeding edge install. - Once Jupyter has been started in the context of PySpark, the `sc` SparkContext object should be available. Please let me know if you continue to see this issue. - The "Read in train & val data" section simply reads in the training and validation data generated in the preprocessing stage. Be sure that the `size` setting is the same as the preprocessing size. The percentage `p` setting determines whether the full or sampled DataFrames are loaded. If you set `p = 1`, the full DataFrames will be used. If you instead would prefer to use the smaller sampled DataFrames while getting started, please set it to the same value as used in the preprocessing to generate the smaller sampled DataFrames. - The `Extract X & Y matrices` section splits each of the train and validation DataFrames into effectively X & Y matrices (still as DataFrame types), with X containing the images, and Y containing the labels. - The `Convert to SystemML Matrices` section passes the X & Y DataFrames into a SystemML script that performs some normalization of the images & one-hot encoding of the labels, and then returns SystemML `Matrix` types. These are now ready to be passed into the subsequent algorithms. - The "Trigger Caching" and "Save Matrices" are experimental features, and not necessary to execute. - Next comes the two algorithms being explored in this notebook. The "Softmax Classifier" is just a multi-class logistic regression model, and is simply there to serve as a baseline comparison with the subsequent convolutional neural net model. You may wish to simply skip this softmax model and move to the latter convnet model further down in the notebook. - The actual softmax model is located at [ https://github.com/apache/incubator-systemml/blob/master/projects/breast_cancer/softmax_clf.dml], and the notebook calls functions from that file. - The softmax sanity check just ensures that the model is able to completely overfit when given a tiny sample size. This should yield ~100% training accuracy if the sample size in this section is small enough. This is just a check to ensure that nothing else is wrong with the math or the data. - The softmax "Train" section will train a softmax model and return the weights (`W`) and biases (`b`) of the model as SystemML `Matrix` objects. Please adjust the hyperparameters in this section to your problem. - The softmax "Eval" section takes the trained weights and biases and evaluates the training and validation performance. - The next model is a LeNet-like convnet model. The actual model is located at [ https://github.com/apache/incubator-systemml/blob/master/projects/breast_cancer/convnet.dml], and the notebook simply calls functions from that file. - Once again, there is an initial sanity check for the ability to overfit on a small amount of data. - The "Hyperparameter Search" contains a script to sample different hyperparams for the convnet, and save the hyperparams + validation accuracy of each set after a single epoch of training. These string files will be saved to HDFS. Please feel free to adjust the range of the hyperparameters for your problem. Please also feel free to try using the `parfor` (parallel for-loop) instead of the while loop to speed up this section. Note that this is still a work in progress. The hyperparameter tuning in this section makes use of random search (as opposed to grid search), which has been promoted by Bengio et al. to speed up the search time. - The "Train" section trains the convnet and returns the weights and biases as SystemML `Matrix` types. In this
Re: Please reply asap : Regarding incubator systemml/breast_cancer project
Hey, Thank you so much for your help sir. We were finally able to run preprocess.py without any errors. And the results obtained were satisfactory i.e we got five set of data frames like you said we would. But alas! when we tried to run MachineLearning.ipynb the same NameError came : https://paste.fedoraproject.org/paste/l3LFJreg~vnYEDTSTQH7 3l5M1UNdIGYhyRLivL9gydE= Could you guide us again as to how to proceed now? Also, could you please provide an overview of the process MachineLearning.ipynb is following to train the samples. Also we have tried all possible solutions to remove the name sc error. It would be really kind of you if you looked into the matter asap. Thanks a lot! On 22-Apr-2017 5:19 PM, "Aishwarya Chaurasia"wrote: > Hey, > > Thank you so much for your help sir. We were finally able to run > preprocess.py without any errors. And the results obtained were > satisfactory i.e we got five set of data frames like you said we would. > > But alas! when we tried to run MachineLearning.ipynb the same NameError > came : https://paste.fedoraproject.org/paste/l3LFJreg~vnYEDTSTQH7 > 3l5M1UNdIGYhyRLivL9gydE= > > Could you guide us again as to how to proceed now? > Also, could you please provide an overview of the process > MachineLearning.ipynb is following to train the samples. > > Thanks a lot! > > On 20-Apr-2017 12:16 AM, wrote: > >> Hi Aishwarya, >> >> Looks like you've just encountered an out of memory error on one of the >> executors. Therefore, you just need to adjust the `spark.executor.memory` >> and `spark.driver.memory` settings with higher amounts of RAM. What is >> your current setup? I.e. are you using a cluster of machines, or a single >> machine? We generally use a large driver on one machine, and then a single >> large executor on each other machine. I would give a sizable amount of >> memory to the driver, and about half the possible memory on the executors >> so that the Python processes have enough memory as well. PySpark has JVM >> and Python components, and the Spark memory settings only pertain to the >> JVM side, thus the need to save about half the executor memory for the >> Python side. >> >> Thanks! >> >> - Mike >> >> -- >> >> Mike Dusenberry >> GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw >> LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry >> >> Sent from my iPhone. >> >> >> > On Apr 19, 2017, at 5:53 AM, Aishwarya Chaurasia < >> aishwarya2...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > Hello sir, >> > >> > We also wanted to ensure that the spark-submit command we're using is >> the >> > correct one for running 'preprocess.py'. >> > Command : /home/new/sparks/bin/spark-submit preprocess.py >> > >> > >> > Thank you. >> > Aishwarya Chaurasia. >> > >> > On 19-Apr-2017 3:55 PM, "Aishwarya Chaurasia" >> > wrote: >> > >> > Hello sir, >> > On running the file preprocess.py we are getting the following error : >> > >> > https://paste.fedoraproject.org/paste/IAvqiiyJChSC0V9eeETe2F5M1UNdIG >> > YhyRLivL9gydE= >> > >> > Can you please help us by looking into the error and kindly tell us the >> > solution for it. >> > Thanks a lot. >> > Aishwarya Chaurasia >> > >> > >> >> On 19-Apr-2017 12:43 AM, wrote: >> >> >> >> Hi Aishwarya, >> >> >> >> Certainly, here is some more detailed information about`preprocess.py`: >> >> >> >> * The preprocessing Python script is located at >> >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-systemml/blob/master/ >> >> projects/breast_cancer/preprocess.py. Note that this is different >> than >> >> the library module at https://github.com/apache/incu >> >> bator-systemml/blob/master/projects/breast_cancer/breastc >> >> ancer/preprocessing.py. >> >> * This script is used to preprocess a set of histology slide images, >> >> which are `.svs` files in our case, and `.tiff` files in your case. >> >> * Lines 63-79 contain "settings" such as the output image sizes, >> folder >> >> paths, etc. Of particular interest, line 72 has the folder path for >> the >> >> original slide images that should be commonly accessible from all >> machines >> >> being used, and lines 74-79 contain the names of the output DataFrames >> that >> >> will be saved. >> >> * Line 82 performs the actual preprocessing and creates a Spark >> >> DataFrame with the following columns: slide number, tumor score, >> molecular >> >> score, sample. The "sample" in this case is the actual small, >> chopped-up >> >> section of the image that has been extracted and flattened into a row >> >> Vector. For test images without labels (`training=false`), only the >> slide >> >> number and sample will be contained in the DataFrame (i.e. no labels). >> >> This calls the `preprocess(...)` function located on line 371 of >> >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-systemml/blob/master/ >> >> projects/breast_cancer/breastcancer/preprocessing.py, which is a >> >> different file. >> >> * Line 87 simply saves the above DataFrame to HDFS with the
Re: Regarding incubator systemml/breast_cancer project
Hey, Thank you so much for your help sir. We were finally able to run preprocess.py without any errors. And the results obtained were satisfactory i.e we got five set of data frames like you said we would. But alas! when we tried to run MachineLearning.ipynb the same NameError came : https://paste.fedoraproject.org/paste/l3LFJreg~ vnYEDTSTQH73l5M1UNdIGYhyRLivL9gydE= Could you guide us again as to how to proceed now? Also, could you please provide an overview of the process MachineLearning.ipynb is following to train the samples. Thanks a lot! On 20-Apr-2017 12:16 AM,wrote: > Hi Aishwarya, > > Looks like you've just encountered an out of memory error on one of the > executors. Therefore, you just need to adjust the `spark.executor.memory` > and `spark.driver.memory` settings with higher amounts of RAM. What is > your current setup? I.e. are you using a cluster of machines, or a single > machine? We generally use a large driver on one machine, and then a single > large executor on each other machine. I would give a sizable amount of > memory to the driver, and about half the possible memory on the executors > so that the Python processes have enough memory as well. PySpark has JVM > and Python components, and the Spark memory settings only pertain to the > JVM side, thus the need to save about half the executor memory for the > Python side. > > Thanks! > > - Mike > > -- > > Mike Dusenberry > GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw > LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry > > Sent from my iPhone. > > > > On Apr 19, 2017, at 5:53 AM, Aishwarya Chaurasia < > aishwarya2...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hello sir, > > > > We also wanted to ensure that the spark-submit command we're using is the > > correct one for running 'preprocess.py'. > > Command : /home/new/sparks/bin/spark-submit preprocess.py > > > > > > Thank you. > > Aishwarya Chaurasia. > > > > On 19-Apr-2017 3:55 PM, "Aishwarya Chaurasia" > > wrote: > > > > Hello sir, > > On running the file preprocess.py we are getting the following error : > > > > https://paste.fedoraproject.org/paste/IAvqiiyJChSC0V9eeETe2F5M1UNdIG > > YhyRLivL9gydE= > > > > Can you please help us by looking into the error and kindly tell us the > > solution for it. > > Thanks a lot. > > Aishwarya Chaurasia > > > > > >> On 19-Apr-2017 12:43 AM, wrote: > >> > >> Hi Aishwarya, > >> > >> Certainly, here is some more detailed information about`preprocess.py`: > >> > >> * The preprocessing Python script is located at > >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-systemml/blob/master/ > >> projects/breast_cancer/preprocess.py. Note that this is different than > >> the library module at https://github.com/apache/incu > >> bator-systemml/blob/master/projects/breast_cancer/breastc > >> ancer/preprocessing.py. > >> * This script is used to preprocess a set of histology slide images, > >> which are `.svs` files in our case, and `.tiff` files in your case. > >> * Lines 63-79 contain "settings" such as the output image sizes, folder > >> paths, etc. Of particular interest, line 72 has the folder path for the > >> original slide images that should be commonly accessible from all > machines > >> being used, and lines 74-79 contain the names of the output DataFrames > that > >> will be saved. > >> * Line 82 performs the actual preprocessing and creates a Spark > >> DataFrame with the following columns: slide number, tumor score, > molecular > >> score, sample. The "sample" in this case is the actual small, > chopped-up > >> section of the image that has been extracted and flattened into a row > >> Vector. For test images without labels (`training=false`), only the > slide > >> number and sample will be contained in the DataFrame (i.e. no labels). > >> This calls the `preprocess(...)` function located on line 371 of > >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-systemml/blob/master/ > >> projects/breast_cancer/breastcancer/preprocessing.py, which is a > >> different file. > >> * Line 87 simply saves the above DataFrame to HDFS with the name from > >> line 74. > >> * Line 93 splits the above DataFrame row-wise into separate "training" > >> and "validation" DataFrames, based on the split percentage from line 70 > >> (`train_frac`). This is performed so that downstream machine learning > >> tasks can learn from the training set, and validate performance and > >> hyperparameter choices on the validation set. These DataFrames will > start > >> with the same columns as the above DataFrame. If `add_row_indices` from > >> line 69 is true, then an additional row index column (`__INDEX`) will be > >> pretended. This is useful for SystemML in downstream machine learning > >> tasks as it gives the DataFrame row numbers like a real matrix would > have, > >> and SystemML is built to operate on matrices. > >> * Lines 97 & 98 simply save the training and validation DataFrames > using > >> the names defined on lines 76 & 78. > >> *
Re: Regarding incubator systemml/breast_cancer project
Hi Aishwarya, Looks like you've just encountered an out of memory error on one of the executors. Therefore, you just need to adjust the `spark.executor.memory` and `spark.driver.memory` settings with higher amounts of RAM. What is your current setup? I.e. are you using a cluster of machines, or a single machine? We generally use a large driver on one machine, and then a single large executor on each other machine. I would give a sizable amount of memory to the driver, and about half the possible memory on the executors so that the Python processes have enough memory as well. PySpark has JVM and Python components, and the Spark memory settings only pertain to the JVM side, thus the need to save about half the executor memory for the Python side. Thanks! - Mike -- Mike Dusenberry GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry Sent from my iPhone. > On Apr 19, 2017, at 5:53 AM, Aishwarya Chaurasia> wrote: > > Hello sir, > > We also wanted to ensure that the spark-submit command we're using is the > correct one for running 'preprocess.py'. > Command : /home/new/sparks/bin/spark-submit preprocess.py > > > Thank you. > Aishwarya Chaurasia. > > On 19-Apr-2017 3:55 PM, "Aishwarya Chaurasia" > wrote: > > Hello sir, > On running the file preprocess.py we are getting the following error : > > https://paste.fedoraproject.org/paste/IAvqiiyJChSC0V9eeETe2F5M1UNdIG > YhyRLivL9gydE= > > Can you please help us by looking into the error and kindly tell us the > solution for it. > Thanks a lot. > Aishwarya Chaurasia > > >> On 19-Apr-2017 12:43 AM, wrote: >> >> Hi Aishwarya, >> >> Certainly, here is some more detailed information about`preprocess.py`: >> >> * The preprocessing Python script is located at >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-systemml/blob/master/ >> projects/breast_cancer/preprocess.py. Note that this is different than >> the library module at https://github.com/apache/incu >> bator-systemml/blob/master/projects/breast_cancer/breastc >> ancer/preprocessing.py. >> * This script is used to preprocess a set of histology slide images, >> which are `.svs` files in our case, and `.tiff` files in your case. >> * Lines 63-79 contain "settings" such as the output image sizes, folder >> paths, etc. Of particular interest, line 72 has the folder path for the >> original slide images that should be commonly accessible from all machines >> being used, and lines 74-79 contain the names of the output DataFrames that >> will be saved. >> * Line 82 performs the actual preprocessing and creates a Spark >> DataFrame with the following columns: slide number, tumor score, molecular >> score, sample. The "sample" in this case is the actual small, chopped-up >> section of the image that has been extracted and flattened into a row >> Vector. For test images without labels (`training=false`), only the slide >> number and sample will be contained in the DataFrame (i.e. no labels). >> This calls the `preprocess(...)` function located on line 371 of >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-systemml/blob/master/ >> projects/breast_cancer/breastcancer/preprocessing.py, which is a >> different file. >> * Line 87 simply saves the above DataFrame to HDFS with the name from >> line 74. >> * Line 93 splits the above DataFrame row-wise into separate "training" >> and "validation" DataFrames, based on the split percentage from line 70 >> (`train_frac`). This is performed so that downstream machine learning >> tasks can learn from the training set, and validate performance and >> hyperparameter choices on the validation set. These DataFrames will start >> with the same columns as the above DataFrame. If `add_row_indices` from >> line 69 is true, then an additional row index column (`__INDEX`) will be >> pretended. This is useful for SystemML in downstream machine learning >> tasks as it gives the DataFrame row numbers like a real matrix would have, >> and SystemML is built to operate on matrices. >> * Lines 97 & 98 simply save the training and validation DataFrames using >> the names defined on lines 76 & 78. >> * Lines 103-137 create smaller train and validation DataFrames by taking >> small row-wise samples of the full train and validation DataFrames. The >> percentage of the sample is defined on line 111 (`p=0.01` for a 1% >> sample). This is generally useful for quicker downstream tasks without >> having to load in the larger DataFrames, assuming you have a large amount >> of data. For us, we have ~7TB of data, so having 1% sampled DataFrames is >> useful for quicker downstream tests. Once again, the same columns from the >> larger train and validation DataFrames will be used. >> * Lines 146 & 147 simply save these sampled train and validation >> DataFrames. >> >> As a summary, after running `preprocess.py`, you will be left with the >> following saved DataFrames in HDFS: >> * Full
Re: Regarding incubator systemml/breast_cancer project
Hi Aishwarya, Certainly, here is some more detailed information about`preprocess.py`: * The preprocessing Python script is located at https://github.com/apache/incubator-systemml/blob/master/projects/breast_cancer/preprocess.py. Note that this is different than the library module at https://github.com/apache/incubator-systemml/blob/master/projects/breast_cancer/breastcancer/preprocessing.py. * This script is used to preprocess a set of histology slide images, which are `.svs` files in our case, and `.tiff` files in your case. * Lines 63-79 contain "settings" such as the output image sizes, folder paths, etc. Of particular interest, line 72 has the folder path for the original slide images that should be commonly accessible from all machines being used, and lines 74-79 contain the names of the output DataFrames that will be saved. * Line 82 performs the actual preprocessing and creates a Spark DataFrame with the following columns: slide number, tumor score, molecular score, sample. The "sample" in this case is the actual small, chopped-up section of the image that has been extracted and flattened into a row Vector. For test images without labels (`training=false`), only the slide number and sample will be contained in the DataFrame (i.e. no labels). This calls the `preprocess(...)` function located on line 371 of https://github.com/apache/incubator-systemml/blob/master/projects/breast_cancer/breastcancer/preprocessing.py, which is a different file. * Line 87 simply saves the above DataFrame to HDFS with the name from line 74. * Line 93 splits the above DataFrame row-wise into separate "training" and "validation" DataFrames, based on the split percentage from line 70 (`train_frac`). This is performed so that downstream machine learning tasks can learn from the training set, and validate performance and hyperparameter choices on the validation set. These DataFrames will start with the same columns as the above DataFrame. If `add_row_indices` from line 69 is true, then an additional row index column (`__INDEX`) will be pretended. This is useful for SystemML in downstream machine learning tasks as it gives the DataFrame row numbers like a real matrix would have, and SystemML is built to operate on matrices. * Lines 97 & 98 simply save the training and validation DataFrames using the names defined on lines 76 & 78. * Lines 103-137 create smaller train and validation DataFrames by taking small row-wise samples of the full train and validation DataFrames. The percentage of the sample is defined on line 111 (`p=0.01` for a 1% sample). This is generally useful for quicker downstream tasks without having to load in the larger DataFrames, assuming you have a large amount of data. For us, we have ~7TB of data, so having 1% sampled DataFrames is useful for quicker downstream tests. Once again, the same columns from the larger train and validation DataFrames will be used. * Lines 146 & 147 simply save these sampled train and validation DataFrames. As a summary, after running `preprocess.py`, you will be left with the following saved DataFrames in HDFS: * Full DataFrame * Training DataFrame * Validation DataFrame * Sampled training DataFrame * Sampled validation DataFrame As for visualization, you may visualize a "sample" (i.e. small, chopped-up section of original image) from a DataFrame by using the `breastcancer.visualization.visualize_sample(...)` function. You will need to do this after creating the DataFrames. Here is a snippet to visualize the first row sample in a DataFrame, where `df` is one of the DataFrames from above: ``` from breastcancer.visualization import visualize_sample visualize_sample(df.first().sample) ``` Please let me know if you have any additional questions. Thanks! - Mike -- Mike Dusenberry GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry Sent from my iPhone. > On Apr 15, 2017, at 4:38 AM, Aishwarya Chaurasia> wrote: > > Hello sir, > Can you please elaborate more on what output we would be getting because we > tried executing the preprocess.py file using spark submit it keeps on > adding the tiles in rdd and while running the visualisation.py file it > isn't showing any output. Can you please help us out asap stating the > output we will be getting and the sequence of execution of files. > Thank you. > >> On 07-Apr-2017 5:54 AM, wrote: >> >> Hi Aishwarya, >> >> Thanks for sharing more info on the issue! >> >> To facilitate easier usage, I've updated the preprocessing code by pulling >> out most of the logic into a `breastcancer/preprocessing.py` module, >> leaving just the execution in the `Preprocessing.ipynb` notebook. There is >> also a `preprocess.py` script with the same contents as the notebook for >> use with `spark-submit`. The choice of the notebook or the script is just >> a matter of convenience, as they
Re: Regarding incubator systemml/breast_cancer project
Hi Aishwarya, Thanks for sharing more info on the issue! To facilitate easier usage, I've updated the preprocessing code by pulling out most of the logic into a `breastcancer/preprocessing.py` module, leaving just the execution in the `Preprocessing.ipynb` notebook. There is also a `preprocess.py` script with the same contents as the notebook for use with `spark-submit`. The choice of the notebook or the script is just a matter of convenience, as they both import from the same `breastcancer/preprocessing.py` package. As part of the updates, I've added an explicit SparkSession parameter (`spark`) to the `preprocess(...)` function, and updated the body to use this SparkSession object rather than the older SparkContext `sc` object. Previously, the `preprocess(...)` function accessed the `sc` object that was pulled in from the enclosing scope, which would work while all of the code was colocated within the notebook, but not if the code was extracted and imported. The explicit parameter now allows for the code to be imported. Can you please try again with the latest updates? We are currently using Spark 2.x with Python 3. If you use the notebook, the pyspark kernel should have a `spark` object available that can be supplied to the functions (as is done now in the notebook), and if you use the `preprocess.py` script with `spark-submit`, the `spark` object will be created explicitly by the script. For a bit of context to others, Aishwarya initially reached out to find out if our breast cancer project could be applied to TIFF images, rather than the SVS images we are currently using (the answer is "yes" so long as they are "generic tiled TIFF images, according to the OpenSlide documentation), and then followed up with Spark issues related to the preprocessing code. This conversation has been promptly moved to the mailing list so that others in the community can benefit. Thanks! -Mike -- Mike Dusenberry GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry Sent from my iPhone. > On Apr 6, 2017, at 5:09 AM, Aishwarya Chaurasia> wrote: > > Hey, > > The object sc is already defined in pyspark and yet this name error keeps > occurring. We are using spark 2.* > > Here is the link to error that we are getting : > https://paste.fedoraproject.org/paste/89iQODxzpNZVbSfgwocH8l5M1UNdIGYhyRLivL9gydE=
Regarding incubator systemml/breast_cancer project
Hey, The object sc is already defined in pyspark and yet this name error keeps occurring. We are using spark 2.* Here is the link to error that we are getting : https://paste.fedoraproject.org/paste/89iQODxzpNZVbSfgwocH8l5M1UNdIGYhyRLivL9gydE=