Re: Remove file update checks in production?
Yes, please. It caused a lot of problems when running Tapestry in OSGi where a bundle can be reloaded at runtime. On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 12:29 AM, Howard Lewis Ship wrote: > I'm starting to wonder whether Tapestry should, in production mode, > not even check for file changes. All the related code could be > converted to no-ops and placeholders, and the portion of the code that > even has to decide when to check for file changes could be removed. > > -- > Howard M. Lewis Ship > > Creator of Apache Tapestry > > The source for Tapestry training, mentoring and support. Contact me to > learn how I can get you up and productive in Tapestry fast! > > (971) 678-5210 > http://howardlewisship.com > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tapestry.apache.org > > -- Best regards, Igor Drobiazko http://tapestry5.de
Re: Remove file update checks in production?
Does it mean that reloading of classes , templates and catalog will be supported in development mode only? What would be the impact on classes that get register as an UpdateListener in productionMode? François 2011/2/15 Christophe Cordenier > +1 > > 2011/2/15 Kalle Korhonen > > > +1 > > > > Kalle > > > > On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 3:29 PM, Howard Lewis Ship > > wrote: > > > I'm starting to wonder whether Tapestry should, in production mode, > > > not even check for file changes. All the related code could be > > > converted to no-ops and placeholders, and the portion of the code that > > > even has to decide when to check for file changes could be removed. > > > > > > -- > > > Howard M. Lewis Ship > > > > > > Creator of Apache Tapestry > > > > > > The source for Tapestry training, mentoring and support. Contact me to > > > learn how I can get you up and productive in Tapestry fast! > > > > > > (971) 678-5210 > > > http://howardlewisship.com > > > > > > - > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tapestry.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tapestry.apache.org > > > > > > > -- > Regards, > Christophe Cordenier. > > Committer on Apache Tapestry 5 > Co-creator of wooki @wookicentral.com >
Re: JPA/HIbernate/ORM
@Kalle: looks like Tynamo JPA integration only support a single persistence unit per application? RIght? Am I missing something? On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Kalle Korhonen wrote: > On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 2:24 AM, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo > wrote: > > On Fri, 11 Feb 2011 07:05:00 -0200, Igor Drobiazko > > wrote: > >> since our last 5.3/5.4 discussion I've been thinking about JPA > integration > >> and came to the conclusion that Tapestry must have a built-in support > for > >> JPA. Even though I personally still prefer Hibernate, I'm pretty sure > JPA > >> is the future and we need to support it out of the box. > > JPA 2 has most (if not all) the features Hibernate has that JPA 1 didn't. > I > > haven't used JPA yet, but I agree that it's the future. > > Currently, Tynamo offers modules both for JPA1 and JPA2. Igor would > need to work carefully to move the common logic to the orm module, but > certainly it'd be better for code reusability. What would make this > package orm specific? Not absolutely sure it needs to be, I know that > Alex Kotchnev is at least thinking about making a tapestry-jdo module. > > Kalle > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tapestry.apache.org > > -- Best regards, Igor Drobiazko http://tapestry5.de
[Tapestry Wiki] Update of "tiash" by tiash
Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Tapestry Wiki" for change notification. The "tiash" page has been changed by tiash. http://wiki.apache.org/tapestry/tiash -- New page: ##language:english == Your Name == Email: <> ... CategoryHomepage - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: JPA/HIbernate/ORM
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 1:07 AM, Igor Drobiazko wrote: > @Kalle: looks like Tynamo JPA integration only support a single persistence > unit per application? RIght? Am I missing something? At the moment, yes. Kalle > On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Kalle Korhonen > wrote: > >> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 2:24 AM, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo >> wrote: >> > On Fri, 11 Feb 2011 07:05:00 -0200, Igor Drobiazko >> > wrote: >> >> since our last 5.3/5.4 discussion I've been thinking about JPA >> integration >> >> and came to the conclusion that Tapestry must have a built-in support >> for >> >> JPA. Even though I personally still prefer Hibernate, I'm pretty sure >> JPA >> >> is the future and we need to support it out of the box. >> > JPA 2 has most (if not all) the features Hibernate has that JPA 1 didn't. >> I >> > haven't used JPA yet, but I agree that it's the future. >> >> Currently, Tynamo offers modules both for JPA1 and JPA2. Igor would >> need to work carefully to move the common logic to the orm module, but >> certainly it'd be better for code reusability. What would make this >> package orm specific? Not absolutely sure it needs to be, I know that >> Alex Kotchnev is at least thinking about making a tapestry-jdo module. >> >> Kalle >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tapestry.apache.org >> >> > > > -- > Best regards, > > Igor Drobiazko > http://tapestry5.de > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: Remove file update checks in production?
As I see it, in production, there will be no file update checks, and so UpdateListeners will never be notified. It's possible that a few related service implementations, in production mode, will be replaced with do-nothing place holders. 2011/2/15 François Facon : > Does it mean that reloading of classes , templates and catalog will be > supported in development mode only? > What would be the impact on classes that get register as an UpdateListener > in productionMode? > > François > > 2011/2/15 Christophe Cordenier > >> +1 >> >> 2011/2/15 Kalle Korhonen >> >> > +1 >> > >> > Kalle >> > >> > On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 3:29 PM, Howard Lewis Ship >> > wrote: >> > > I'm starting to wonder whether Tapestry should, in production mode, >> > > not even check for file changes. All the related code could be >> > > converted to no-ops and placeholders, and the portion of the code that >> > > even has to decide when to check for file changes could be removed. >> > > >> > > -- >> > > Howard M. Lewis Ship >> > > >> > > Creator of Apache Tapestry >> > > >> > > The source for Tapestry training, mentoring and support. Contact me to >> > > learn how I can get you up and productive in Tapestry fast! >> > > >> > > (971) 678-5210 >> > > http://howardlewisship.com >> > > >> > > - >> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org >> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tapestry.apache.org >> > > >> > > >> > >> > - >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org >> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tapestry.apache.org >> > >> > >> >> >> -- >> Regards, >> Christophe Cordenier. >> >> Committer on Apache Tapestry 5 >> Co-creator of wooki @wookicentral.com >> > -- Howard M. Lewis Ship Creator of Apache Tapestry The source for Tapestry training, mentoring and support. Contact me to learn how I can get you up and productive in Tapestry fast! (971) 678-5210 http://howardlewisship.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tapestry.apache.org
