Re: Tapestry 5.4 and java8

2014-03-26 Thread Howard Lewis Ship
Another option to accesspritected member is to add a new class is same
package withstatic  shim method

On Saturday, March 22, 2014, Kalle Korhonen kalle.o.korho...@gmail.com
wrote:

 On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 8:47 AM, Bob Harner 
 bobhar...@gmail.comjavascript:;
 wrote:

  True, but that particular visibility change will need to be repeated each
  time ASM is upgraded in Tapestry, if I'm understanding what you did.
 

 You cannot know that. It depends solely on how ASM is changed.

 Kalle



  On Mar 22, 2014 11:13 AM, Kalle Korhonen kalle.o.korho...@gmail.com
  wrote:
 
   On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 3:56 AM, Bob Harner bobhar...@gmail.com
 wrote:
  
Kalle,
I guess there would be another step?
7) Also made a single change
to ASM source, promoted visibility of AnnotationNode.accept from
  package
private to public so I didn't have change to plastic (to instantiate
AnnotationNode) ... Or is that what you meant by step 6?
   
  
   Yes, that's what's included in the step 6. Really, we can't describe
  exact
   steps to incorporate codebase with unknown future changes.
  
   Kalle
  
  
  
On Mar 21, 2014 12:40 PM, Kalle Korhonen 
 kalle.o.korho...@gmail.com
  
wrote:
   
 On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 3:57 AM, Bob Harner bobhar...@gmail.com
   wrote:

  Kalle, can you list the steps you went through to do this? I'd
 like
   to
  document the process, since it isn't simply a matter of
  incrementing
the
  version of a dependency.
 

 Sure. It was very simple actually:
 1) Have plastic module open on your favorite IDE
 2) Download an asm source release from
http://forge.ow2.org/projects/asm/
 3) untar the asm source, move the source tree (starting from org)
   next
to
 plastic/src/external/java
 4) delete the existing package
org.apache.tapestry5.internal.plastic.asm
 5) use the IDE to rename the org.objectweb.asm package to
 org.apache.tapestry5.internal.plastic.asm
 6) fix compilation errors

 Naturally, your IDE needs to be smart enough to refactor the
 package
names
 in the class files accordingly.

 Kalle



  On Mar 20, 2014 4:16 PM, Kalle Korhonen 
   kalle.o.korho...@gmail.com
  wrote:
 
   Sure, no problem. We still need it released but that might have
  to
wait
   till 5.4 GA release. Easy enough for those who need it to build
  it
   themselves though.
  
   Kalle
  
  
   On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 1:03 PM, Joachim Van der Auwera 
 li...@progs.be
   wrote:
  
THanks Kalle for doing this.
   
Kind regards,
Joachim
   
   
On 03/18/2014 08:32 PM, Joachim Van der Auwera wrote:
   
Java8 is now officially available.
ASM 5.0 has also been released (see
  http://forge.ow2.org/forum/
forum.php?forum_id=2302)
   
   



-- 
Howard M. Lewis Ship

Creator of Apache Tapestry

The source for Tapestry training, mentoring and support. Contact me to
learn how I can get you up and productive in Tapestry fast!

(971) 678-5210
http://howardlewisship.com


Re: Tapestry 5.4 and java8

2014-03-26 Thread Kalle Korhonen
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 8:04 AM, Howard Lewis Ship hls...@gmail.com wrote:

 Another option to accesspritected member is to add a new class is same
 package withstatic  shim method


Of course. But at that point, you could just as well fix it in Plastic and
access it properly, by instantiating the class first (it has a
corresponding, non-static public operation).

Kalle


 On Saturday, March 22, 2014, Kalle Korhonen kalle.o.korho...@gmail.com
 wrote:

  On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 8:47 AM, Bob Harner bobhar...@gmail.com
 javascript:;
  wrote:
 
   True, but that particular visibility change will need to be repeated
 each
   time ASM is upgraded in Tapestry, if I'm understanding what you did.
  
 
  You cannot know that. It depends solely on how ASM is changed.
 
  Kalle
 
 
 
   On Mar 22, 2014 11:13 AM, Kalle Korhonen kalle.o.korho...@gmail.com
 
   wrote:
  
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 3:56 AM, Bob Harner bobhar...@gmail.com
  wrote:
   
 Kalle,
 I guess there would be another step?
 7) Also made a single change
 to ASM source, promoted visibility of AnnotationNode.accept from
   package
 private to public so I didn't have change to plastic (to
 instantiate
 AnnotationNode) ... Or is that what you meant by step 6?

   
Yes, that's what's included in the step 6. Really, we can't describe
   exact
steps to incorporate codebase with unknown future changes.
   
Kalle
   
   
   
 On Mar 21, 2014 12:40 PM, Kalle Korhonen 
  kalle.o.korho...@gmail.com
   
 wrote:

  On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 3:57 AM, Bob Harner bobhar...@gmail.com
 
wrote:
 
   Kalle, can you list the steps you went through to do this? I'd
  like
to
   document the process, since it isn't simply a matter of
   incrementing
 the
   version of a dependency.
  
 
  Sure. It was very simple actually:
  1) Have plastic module open on your favorite IDE
  2) Download an asm source release from
 http://forge.ow2.org/projects/asm/
  3) untar the asm source, move the source tree (starting from
 org)
next
 to
  plastic/src/external/java
  4) delete the existing package
 org.apache.tapestry5.internal.plastic.asm
  5) use the IDE to rename the org.objectweb.asm package to
  org.apache.tapestry5.internal.plastic.asm
  6) fix compilation errors
 
  Naturally, your IDE needs to be smart enough to refactor the
  package
 names
  in the class files accordingly.
 
  Kalle
 
 
 
   On Mar 20, 2014 4:16 PM, Kalle Korhonen 
kalle.o.korho...@gmail.com
   wrote:
  
Sure, no problem. We still need it released but that might
 have
   to
 wait
till 5.4 GA release. Easy enough for those who need it to
 build
   it
themselves though.
   
Kalle
   
   
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 1:03 PM, Joachim Van der Auwera 
  li...@progs.be
wrote:
   
 THanks Kalle for doing this.

 Kind regards,
 Joachim


 On 03/18/2014 08:32 PM, Joachim Van der Auwera wrote:

 Java8 is now officially available.
 ASM 5.0 has also been released (see
   http://forge.ow2.org/forum/
 forum.php?forum_id=2302)





 --
 Howard M. Lewis Ship

 Creator of Apache Tapestry

 The source for Tapestry training, mentoring and support. Contact me to
 learn how I can get you up and productive in Tapestry fast!

 (971) 678-5210
 http://howardlewisship.com



Re: Discussion on AJAX requests need even more than a context?

2014-03-26 Thread Geoff Callender
Maybe L (which contains F) just needs to use:

@Persist(cookie) 
private String filterValue

Downsides might be it's not bookmarkable, and the client-side state persists 
beyond the page.

On 26/03/2014, at 11:47 AM, Geoff Callender wrote:

 Sorry, but I've read the solution below 10 times now and it hurts my head 
 every time! :-) I don't see how it gets around the problem that when E is 
 AJAX-submitted, the server-side elements can find ways to prod L to refresh 
 but they cannot tell L the current value of F. The server-side doesn't know 
 the current value of F, unless we make the server-side stateful (no thank 
 you), or we somehow include the value of F in every request.
 
 What I'm aiming for is a solution which works declaratively. You know, where 
 you don't see the plumbing. Just like @ActivationRequestParameter, but at the 
 component level.
 
 On 21/03/2014, at 2:35 AM, Lance Java wrote:
 
 I'm imagining the pub sub would work like...
 
 public class L {
 @Inject
 private Publisher publisher;
 
 @Inject
 private Block someBlock;
 
 /**
  * Fired when the select menu changes
  */
 public Object onFilterChange(Entity entity) {
   publisher.publish(changeEntity, entity);
   return someBlock;
 }
 }
 
 public class E {
 @Inject
 private AjaxResponseRenderer ajaxResponseRenderer;
 
 @Inject
 private Zone someZone;
 
 @Property
 private Entity entity;
 
 @Subscribe(topic=changeEntity)
 void subscribeChangeEntity(Entity entity) {
this.entity = entity;
ajaxResponseRenderer.addRender(someZone;
 }
 }
 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tapestry.apache.org