Re: The app URI scheme -> IANA
It seems getting a provisional allocation with IANA will take just some days - so I am not sure why this was never done to start with. Thanks Andy, who helped fix this quickly in Jena - for working with the current Jena release I let the Taverna Language part that parses RDF/XML use a fake file:/// URI reference instead. https://github.com/apache/incubator-taverna-language/pull/37/files It's not ideal as it has to translate back and forward to match up again with the RO manifest. Let's try to check if we can catch up with Jena when we ship Taverna Language next - I think it's due a release as well to include some recent pull requests. Yes, no-one should use RDF/XML today.. but that's what COMBINE archives mandate: http://co.mbine.org/specifications/omex.version-1.pdf#subsection.4 2014-06-26T10:29:00Z https://github.com/apache/incubator-taverna-language/blob/master/taverna-scufl2-wfbundle/src/test/resources/org/apache/taverna/scufl2/rdfxml/example/workflowBundle.rdf#L23 :) On 18 January 2018 at 14:59, Andy Seaborne <a...@apache.org> wrote: > Jena doesn't enforce IANA registration. > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1462 > > only applied to RDF/XML. > > Workaround 1: don't use RDF/XML! > > Workaround 2: > > Turn off IANA scheme registration checking on: > > IRIFactory.iriImplementation() > > which was the (incorrectly) used IRIFactory for RDF/XML parsing. > > https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/342/commits/aecfaac0d6 > > Proper fix: next release. > > Andy > > > On 18/01/18 14:30, Ian Dunlop wrote: >> >> >> Hello, >> >> Is “fluctual” actually a word? >> Anyway, what’s the headline news here? Jena can’t parse app:// URLs >> because they aren’t an approved standard but we need them for the RO bundle. >> Couldn’t we change the Jena code to play nicely and parse app://? I >> appreciate getting standards correct but how long will it take? >> >> Cheers, >> >> Ian >> >> Sent from Mail for Windows 10 >> >> From: Stian Soiland-Reyes >> Sent: 17 January 2018 19:35 >> To: dev@taverna.incubator.apache.org >> Subject: The app URI scheme -> IANA >> >> In TAVERNA-1027 we came across the app URI scheme >> not being IANA registered, and since been abandoned >> by W3C (as the working group collapsed). >> >> Well I'm trying to fix that - at least with a provisional registration >> and an Internet-Draft: >> >> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-soilandreyes-app-00 >> >> Comments welcome - preferably as issues/pull requests >> in https://github.com/stain/I-D >> >> > -- Stian Soiland-Reyes http://orcid.org/-0001-9842-9718
Re: The app URI scheme -> IANA
Jena doesn't enforce IANA registration. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1462 only applied to RDF/XML. Workaround 1: don't use RDF/XML! Workaround 2: Turn off IANA scheme registration checking on: IRIFactory.iriImplementation() which was the (incorrectly) used IRIFactory for RDF/XML parsing. https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/342/commits/aecfaac0d6 Proper fix: next release. Andy On 18/01/18 14:30, Ian Dunlop wrote: Hello, Is “fluctual” actually a word? Anyway, what’s the headline news here? Jena can’t parse app:// URLs because they aren’t an approved standard but we need them for the RO bundle. Couldn’t we change the Jena code to play nicely and parse app://? I appreciate getting standards correct but how long will it take? Cheers, Ian Sent from Mail for Windows 10 From: Stian Soiland-Reyes Sent: 17 January 2018 19:35 To: dev@taverna.incubator.apache.org Subject: The app URI scheme -> IANA In TAVERNA-1027 we came across the app URI scheme not being IANA registered, and since been abandoned by W3C (as the working group collapsed). Well I'm trying to fix that - at least with a provisional registration and an Internet-Draft: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-soilandreyes-app-00 Comments welcome - preferably as issues/pull requests in https://github.com/stain/I-D
RE: The app URI scheme -> IANA
Hello, Is “fluctual” actually a word? Anyway, what’s the headline news here? Jena can’t parse app:// URLs because they aren’t an approved standard but we need them for the RO bundle. Couldn’t we change the Jena code to play nicely and parse app://? I appreciate getting standards correct but how long will it take? Cheers, Ian Sent from Mail for Windows 10 From: Stian Soiland-Reyes Sent: 17 January 2018 19:35 To: dev@taverna.incubator.apache.org Subject: The app URI scheme -> IANA In TAVERNA-1027 we came across the app URI scheme not being IANA registered, and since been abandoned by W3C (as the working group collapsed). Well I'm trying to fix that - at least with a provisional registration and an Internet-Draft: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-soilandreyes-app-00 Comments welcome - preferably as issues/pull requests in https://github.com/stain/I-D -- Stian Soiland-Reyes http://orcid.org/-0001-9842-9718
The app URI scheme -> IANA
In TAVERNA-1027 we came across the app URI scheme not being IANA registered, and since been abandoned by W3C (as the working group collapsed). Well I'm trying to fix that - at least with a provisional registration and an Internet-Draft: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-soilandreyes-app-00 Comments welcome - preferably as issues/pull requests in https://github.com/stain/I-D -- Stian Soiland-Reyes http://orcid.org/-0001-9842-9718
