Re: [apache/incubator-teaclave] Can Teaclave resist Multi-query Attack? (Issue #721)
> these threats are orthogonal to Teaclave's design goals yes, I realize this now, and thanks for your suggestion :) -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/incubator-teaclave/issues/721#issuecomment-1837730938 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID:
Re: [apache/incubator-teaclave] Can Teaclave resist Multi-query Attack? (Issue #721)
Closed #721 as completed. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/incubator-teaclave/issues/721#event-11133282452 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID:
Re: [apache/incubator-teaclave] Can Teaclave resist Multi-query Attack? (Issue #721)
I wonder _why_ Teaclave needs to support such attacks because it seems to me that these threats are orthogonal to Teaclave's design goals. The attacks themselves, essentially, fall into the category of side-channel and statistical inferences that can be found in the DB research area. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/incubator-teaclave/issues/721#issuecomment-1837540316 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID:
Re: [apache/incubator-teaclave-sgx-sdk] Next rustc-toolchain update? (Issue #445)
I will focus on maintaining v2.0.0. Since some other projects are still using the master branch (such as [Occlum](https://github.com/occlum/occlum)), the upgrade of the master branch is mainly to adapt to the new version of intel-sgx-sdk. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/incubator-teaclave-sgx-sdk/issues/445#issuecomment-1837485180 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID:
