[jira] [Commented] (TIKA-3178) Tika 2.0.0 -- Add back OSGi bundles for Tika parsers
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3178?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17251934#comment-17251934 ] Tim Allison commented on TIKA-3178: --- Thank you, [~bob]! Does the handling of osgi now look responsible enough for a 2.0.0-ALPHA release in early January? Or, do we need to do more? Again, many thanks! > Tika 2.0.0 -- Add back OSGi bundles for Tika parsers > > > Key: TIKA-3178 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3178 > Project: Tika > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Tim Allison >Priority: Blocker > Labels: 2.0.0 > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Commented] (TIKA-3178) Tika 2.0.0 -- Add back OSGi bundles for Tika parsers
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3178?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17251528#comment-17251528 ] Hudson commented on TIKA-3178: -- UNSTABLE: Integrated in Jenkins build Tika » tika-main-jdk8 #94 (See [https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Tika/job/tika-main-jdk8/94/]) TIKA-3178: Remove xerces from classpath for failsafe osgi test. (bob: [https://github.com/apache/tika/commit/e65059906562e36a41c4305e6e4a92c030ab5878]) * (edit) tika-bundles/tika-bundle-classic/pom.xml > Tika 2.0.0 -- Add back OSGi bundles for Tika parsers > > > Key: TIKA-3178 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3178 > Project: Tika > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Tim Allison >Priority: Blocker > Labels: 2.0.0 > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Commented] (TIKA-3178) Tika 2.0.0 -- Add back OSGi bundles for Tika parsers
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3178?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17251496#comment-17251496 ] Bob Paulin commented on TIKA-3178: -- It looks like the xerces issue is caused by the test harness. I added a classpath exclusion that appears to remove the error. The other changes looks like a sure improvement as the embedding is only in the osgi bundle now. > Tika 2.0.0 -- Add back OSGi bundles for Tika parsers > > > Key: TIKA-3178 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3178 > Project: Tika > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Tim Allison >Priority: Blocker > Labels: 2.0.0 > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Commented] (TIKA-3178) Tika 2.0.0 -- Add back OSGi bundles for Tika parsers
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3178?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17245986#comment-17245986 ] Hudson commented on TIKA-3178: -- SUCCESS: Integrated in Jenkins build Tika » tika-main-jdk8 #72 (See [https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Tika/job/tika-main-jdk8/72/]) TIKA-3178 -- do not bundle commons-io with tika-core (tallison: [https://github.com/apache/tika/commit/555706b80e2fa27737d5aa1668e778bb02321e33]) * (edit) tika-bundles/tika-bundle-classic/pom.xml * (edit) tika-parsers/pom.xml * (edit) tika-core/pom.xml > Tika 2.0.0 -- Add back OSGi bundles for Tika parsers > > > Key: TIKA-3178 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3178 > Project: Tika > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Tim Allison >Priority: Blocker > Labels: 2.0.0 > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Commented] (TIKA-3178) Tika 2.0.0 -- Add back OSGi bundles for Tika parsers
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3178?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17245948#comment-17245948
]
Tim Allison commented on TIKA-3178:
---
Thank you, [~bob]! I made a few changes, I think, in the right direction. The
cleaner we can make the dependencies, the better. Please do edit as you see
fit!
{{xerces}} is another area for concern. We made the decision in the 1.x branch
to include it with tika-parsers so that we would have more consistency for
general users but advanced users could configure the xml parser as they wished.
{{tika-core}} tries to access xerces' SecurityManager via class.forName().
I'm not sure how best to handle this in the bundle. You'll see from the log
messages during the bundle tests, that tika-core isn't able to get the
SecurityManager in the current configuration.
> Tika 2.0.0 -- Add back OSGi bundles for Tika parsers
>
>
> Key: TIKA-3178
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3178
> Project: Tika
> Issue Type: Improvement
>Reporter: Tim Allison
>Priority: Blocker
> Labels: 2.0.0
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Commented] (TIKA-3178) Tika 2.0.0 -- Add back OSGi bundles for Tika parsers
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3178?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17245495#comment-17245495 ] Bob Paulin commented on TIKA-3178: -- Hey [~tallison] just found some time to review this. While the approach works there are some disadvantages to statically including commons-io in these JARs. The first and largest is that we're inlining and shipping commons-io with all the jar files. This will increase the size and couple commons-io in a way that may create classloader issues in non-osgi environments. For example if another dependency used with tika requires commons-io you'll have more than 1 version of the class and the behavior will be determined by which class loads first. This is not ideal. At a minimum we need to make sure we keep tika-core clean while we work through this. I can take a look at it over the next few days but the biggest issue I see is the inlining in the tika-core for the reason above. > Tika 2.0.0 -- Add back OSGi bundles for Tika parsers > > > Key: TIKA-3178 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3178 > Project: Tika > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Tim Allison >Priority: Blocker > Labels: 2.0.0 > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Commented] (TIKA-3178) Tika 2.0.0 -- Add back OSGi bundles for Tika parsers
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3178?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17244288#comment-17244288 ] Hudson commented on TIKA-3178: -- SUCCESS: Integrated in Jenkins build Tika » tika-main-jdk8 #67 (See [https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Tika/job/tika-main-jdk8/67/]) TIKA-3178 -- allow for other bundles in the future (tallison: [https://github.com/apache/tika/commit/3173e12b40ead8065db6053118af23699c7748d9]) * (delete) tika-bundle/src/test/resources/test-documents.zip * (delete) tika-bundle/src/test/resources/log4j.properties * (delete) tika-bundle/src/test/resources/testOCR.jpg * (add) tika-bundles/tika-bundle-classic/pom.xml * (delete) tika-bundle/src/main/resources/META-INF/MANIFEST.MF * (delete) tika-bundle/src/test/java/org/apache/tika/bundle/BundleIT.java * (add) tika-bundles/tika-bundle-classic/src/main/resources/META-INF/MANIFEST.MF * (add) tika-bundles/tika-bundle-classic/src/test/resources/testOCR.jpg * (delete) tika-parsers/src/main/java/org/apache/tika/parser/internal/Activator.java * (delete) tika-bundle/src/test/resources/testPPT.pptx * (edit) tika-parsers/pom.xml * (add) tika-bundles/pom.xml * (add) tika-bundles/tika-bundle-classic/src/main/appended-resources/META-INF/LICENSE * (delete) tika-bundle/test-bundles.xml * (delete) tika-bundle/src/main/appended-resources/META-INF/LICENSE * (delete) tika-bundle/pom.xml * (add) tika-bundles/tika-bundle-classic/src/test/resources/log4j.properties * (add) tika-bundles/tika-bundle-classic/test-bundles.xml * (add) tika-bundles/tika-bundle-classic/src/test/resources/testPPT.pptx * (edit) pom.xml * (add) tika-bundles/tika-bundle-classic/src/test/java/org/apache/tika/bundle/BundleIT.java * (add) tika-bundles/tika-bundle-classic/src/test/resources/test-documents.zip > Tika 2.0.0 -- Add back OSGi bundles for Tika parsers > > > Key: TIKA-3178 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3178 > Project: Tika > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Tim Allison >Priority: Blocker > Labels: 2.0.0 > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Commented] (TIKA-3178) Tika 2.0.0 -- Add back OSGi bundles for Tika parsers
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3178?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17243611#comment-17243611 ] Hudson commented on TIKA-3178: -- SUCCESS: Integrated in Jenkins build Tika » tika-main-jdk8 #63 (See [https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Tika/job/tika-main-jdk8/63/]) TIKA-3178 -- WIP -- does not build. do not merge (tallison: [https://github.com/apache/tika/commit/2892ad5454f7cd006d879a2883a5f55926d884c5]) * (edit) tika-core/pom.xml * (edit) tika-parsers/pom.xml * (edit) pom.xml * (edit) tika-bundle/pom.xml * (add) tika-parsers/src/main/java/org/apache/tika/parser/internal/Activator.java TIKA-3178 -- passes all tests but one. See @Ignore message in BundleIT (tallison: [https://github.com/apache/tika/commit/1bda1ac4c0b0a43f1e8284d3cdf930f8d2ecd254]) * (edit) tika-parsers/pom.xml * (edit) tika-bundle/src/test/java/org/apache/tika/bundle/BundleIT.java * (edit) tika-core/pom.xml TIKA-3178 -- add back tika-bundle...left in one todo to figure out how to load detector from tika-core via spi (tallison: [https://github.com/apache/tika/commit/e3e6c87ba963e5bf9eba211c2795d6f743830def]) * (edit) tika-parsers/tika-parsers-classic/tika-parsers-classic-package/pom.xml * (add) tika-parsers/tika-parsers-classic/tika-parsers-classic-package/src/main/java/org/apache/tika/parser/internal/Activator.java * (edit) tika-bundle/src/test/java/org/apache/tika/bundle/BundleIT.java * (edit) tika-core/pom.xml * (edit) tika-bundle/pom.xml * (edit) tika-parsers/pom.xml > Tika 2.0.0 -- Add back OSGi bundles for Tika parsers > > > Key: TIKA-3178 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3178 > Project: Tika > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Tim Allison >Priority: Blocker > Labels: 2.0.0 > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Commented] (TIKA-3178) Tika 2.0.0 -- Add back OSGi bundles for Tika parsers
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3178?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17243566#comment-17243566
]
Tim Allison commented on TIKA-3178:
---
I've modified the test a bit and left in a todo. We need to figure out how to
include the SPI loaded detector from tika-core.
I've merged this into {{main}}. Let me know if there are ways to improve this.
This bundle is currently only for tika-parsers-classic-package. Do we want to
leave space for the extended/advanced parsers?
> Tika 2.0.0 -- Add back OSGi bundles for Tika parsers
>
>
> Key: TIKA-3178
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3178
> Project: Tika
> Issue Type: Improvement
>Reporter: Tim Allison
>Priority: Blocker
> Labels: 2.0.0
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Commented] (TIKA-3178) Tika 2.0.0 -- Add back OSGi bundles for Tika parsers
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3178?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17241780#comment-17241780 ] Tim Allison commented on TIKA-3178: --- The TIKA-3178 branch now passes all tests but one. The OverrideDetector which should be loaded via SPI in tika-core is not loading in osgi. I've \@Ignored that unit test in BundleIT for now. [~bob] and other fellow devs, if you can take a look at what I've done and make sure I didn't botch it too much, that'd be great. Thank you! > Tika 2.0.0 -- Add back OSGi bundles for Tika parsers > > > Key: TIKA-3178 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3178 > Project: Tika > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Tim Allison >Priority: Blocker > Labels: 2.0.0 > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Commented] (TIKA-3178) Tika 2.0.0 -- Add back OSGi bundles for Tika parsers
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3178?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17241654#comment-17241654
]
Tim Allison commented on TIKA-3178:
---
{noformat}*;scope=compile|runtime{noformat}
in tika-core seems to work for {{branch_1x}}, but same exception in TIKA-3178
branch.
> Tika 2.0.0 -- Add back OSGi bundles for Tika parsers
>
>
> Key: TIKA-3178
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3178
> Project: Tika
> Issue Type: Improvement
>Reporter: Tim Allison
>Priority: Blocker
> Labels: 2.0.0
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Commented] (TIKA-3178) Tika 2.0.0 -- Add back OSGi bundles for Tika parsers
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3178?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17241613#comment-17241613
]
Tim Allison commented on TIKA-3178:
---
For now, I thought we could start with a tika-bundle module that includes all
the parsers in {{tika-parsers}}.
If this is the wrong overall design, let me know. You can stop reading here
and recommend a better approach!
I created and pushed a TIKA-3178 branch for this work.
I'm having problems getting commons-io from tika-core through to the bundle
module, and I'm having similar problems with the simpler branch_1x when I add
commons-io as a dependency in tika-core.
The immediate issue is that the bundle fails to build on:
{noformat}
(&(osgi.wiring.package=org.apache.commons.io)(version>=1.4.0)(!(version>=2.0.0))
{noformat}
I have no idea how osgi is getting the version wrong. If I try to manually set
commons.io version to 2.8.0 in tika-core as I currently do on the TIKA-3178
branch, I get different errors.
Help!
> Tika 2.0.0 -- Add back OSGi bundles for Tika parsers
>
>
> Key: TIKA-3178
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3178
> Project: Tika
> Issue Type: Improvement
>Reporter: Tim Allison
>Priority: Blocker
> Labels: 2.0.0
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Commented] (TIKA-3178) Tika 2.0.0 -- Add back OSGi bundles for Tika parsers
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3178?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17192468#comment-17192468 ] Hudson commented on TIKA-3178: -- SUCCESS: Integrated in Jenkins build Tika » tika-main-jdk8 #21 (See [https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Tika/job/tika-main-jdk8/21/]) TIKA-3178: Adding OSGi headers to tika modules (bob: [https://github.com/apache/tika/commit/6c70e4a8413b37ccd91941f0be6a7bfcf7ff8403]) * (edit) tika-advanced-parser-modules/pom.xml * (edit) tika-parser-modules/pom.xml TIKA-3178: Adding OSGi package import require tika, rest is optional. (bob: [https://github.com/apache/tika/commit/fc3736a44216cb142f7f4a0721e5caff5e42c6f8]) * (edit) tika-advanced-parser-modules/pom.xml * (edit) tika-parser-modules/pom.xml > Tika 2.0.0 -- Add back OSGi bundles for Tika parsers > > > Key: TIKA-3178 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3178 > Project: Tika > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Tim Allison >Priority: Blocker > Labels: 2.0.0 > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Commented] (TIKA-3178) Tika 2.0.0 -- Add back OSGi bundles for Tika parsers
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3178?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17192409#comment-17192409
]
Tim Allison commented on TIKA-3178:
---
Thank you, [~bob]! I think I fixed the merge conflicts after my last batch of
changes. How does this look?
Should we start with a single bundle for
{{tika-parser-modules}}/{{tika-parsers}} and then add as people request
{{tika-parsers-extended}} and {{tika-parsers-advanced}}?
> Tika 2.0.0 -- Add back OSGi bundles for Tika parsers
>
>
> Key: TIKA-3178
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3178
> Project: Tika
> Issue Type: Improvement
>Reporter: Tim Allison
>Priority: Blocker
> Labels: 2.0.0
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Commented] (TIKA-3178) Tika 2.0.0 -- Add back OSGi bundles for Tika parsers
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3178?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17192407#comment-17192407 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on TIKA-3178: -- tballison merged pull request #344: URL: https://github.com/apache/tika/pull/344 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org > Tika 2.0.0 -- Add back OSGi bundles for Tika parsers > > > Key: TIKA-3178 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3178 > Project: Tika > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Tim Allison >Priority: Blocker > Labels: 2.0.0 > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Commented] (TIKA-3178) Tika 2.0.0 -- Add back OSGi bundles for Tika parsers
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3178?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17183710#comment-17183710 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on TIKA-3178: -- bobpaulin opened a new pull request #344: URL: https://github.com/apache/tika/pull/344 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org > Tika 2.0.0 -- Add back OSGi bundles for Tika parsers > > > Key: TIKA-3178 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3178 > Project: Tika > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Tim Allison >Priority: Blocker > Labels: 2.0.0 > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Commented] (TIKA-3178) Tika 2.0.0 -- Add back OSGi bundles for Tika parsers
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3178?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17182119#comment-17182119 ] Tim Allison commented on TIKA-3178: --- Ah, ok. I trust you and team to guide the OSGi components. I'm more than happy to do the work...with some help and guidance. > Tika 2.0.0 -- Add back OSGi bundles for Tika parsers > > > Key: TIKA-3178 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3178 > Project: Tika > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Tim Allison >Priority: Blocker > Labels: 2.0.0 > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Commented] (TIKA-3178) Tika 2.0.0 -- Add back OSGi bundles for Tika parsers
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3178?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17182112#comment-17182112 ] Bob Paulin commented on TIKA-3178: -- ok I get past that part of the build now. Thanks [~tallison] . It's probably worth revisiting separate OSGi convince bundles per module on the dev list. Having each module built as a bundle packaging was uncontroversial however I recall having a tika-parser-*-bundle for each one was. I also recall tika-bundle being a bit of a experiment as well on 2.0. > Tika 2.0.0 -- Add back OSGi bundles for Tika parsers > > > Key: TIKA-3178 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3178 > Project: Tika > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Tim Allison >Priority: Blocker > Labels: 2.0.0 > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Commented] (TIKA-3178) Tika 2.0.0 -- Add back OSGi bundles for Tika parsers
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3178?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17182097#comment-17182097 ] Tim Allison commented on TIKA-3178: --- I _think_ we'll want to do bundles like you had it...single bundle per module. WDYT? I'll pickup in the first week of September with that. > Tika 2.0.0 -- Add back OSGi bundles for Tika parsers > > > Key: TIKA-3178 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3178 > Project: Tika > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Tim Allison >Priority: Blocker > Labels: 2.0.0 > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Commented] (TIKA-3178) Tika 2.0.0 -- Add back OSGi bundles for Tika parsers
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3178?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17182095#comment-17182095 ] Tim Allison commented on TIKA-3178: --- Oops. Y, just fixed that. Sorry. > Tika 2.0.0 -- Add back OSGi bundles for Tika parsers > > > Key: TIKA-3178 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3178 > Project: Tika > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Tim Allison >Priority: Blocker > Labels: 2.0.0 > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Commented] (TIKA-3178) Tika 2.0.0 -- Add back OSGi bundles for Tika parsers
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3178?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17182090#comment-17182090
]
Bob Paulin commented on TIKA-3178:
--
Also I'm getting the following when building. Seems like the
maven-bundle-plugin needs to be there to use the bundle packaging.
{code:java}
@
[ERROR] The build could not read 1 project -> [Help 1]
[ERROR]
[ERROR] The project org.apache.tika:tika-parsers:2.0.0-SNAPSHOT
(C:\Users\bpaulin\git\tika-2.0\tika-parsers\pom.xml) has 1 error
[ERROR] Unknown packaging: bundle @ line 33, column 14
[ERROR] {code}
> Tika 2.0.0 -- Add back OSGi bundles for Tika parsers
>
>
> Key: TIKA-3178
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3178
> Project: Tika
> Issue Type: Improvement
>Reporter: Tim Allison
>Priority: Blocker
> Labels: 2.0.0
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Commented] (TIKA-3178) Tika 2.0.0 -- Add back OSGi bundles for Tika parsers
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3178?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17182089#comment-17182089 ] Bob Paulin commented on TIKA-3178: -- Is this for recreating tika-bundle? Or are we looking to create individual bundles for each module? > Tika 2.0.0 -- Add back OSGi bundles for Tika parsers > > > Key: TIKA-3178 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3178 > Project: Tika > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Tim Allison >Priority: Blocker > Labels: 2.0.0 > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
