[jira] [Commented] (TIKA-3948) Require Java 11 in 3.x

2023-08-24 Thread Tim Allison (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3948?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17758669#comment-17758669
 ] 

Tim Allison commented on TIKA-3948:
---

No apologies at all!

I (re-)started a thread on what do we want in 3.x: 
https://lists.apache.org/thread/c330b12h1fvmq8x1099mgw3tfs0gcp6q

The lazy part of me thinks we should probably create a 2x branch and then 
create a PR against main for 3x development at some point soon.  

Maybe leave a week for discussion on the above thread before we create the new 
branch and open a PR?


> Require Java 11 in 3.x
> --
>
> Key: TIKA-3948
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3948
> Project: Tika
>  Issue Type: Task
>Reporter: Tim Allison
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: tika-3x
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Commented] (TIKA-3948) Require Java 11 in 3.x

2023-08-24 Thread Maxim Solodovnik (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3948?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17758637#comment-17758637
 ] 

Maxim Solodovnik commented on TIKA-3948:


Sorry for delay :(

Did quick check:

check {{javax}} in result of {{mvn dependency:tree}}

Direct dependencies
{{bcmail-jdk18on -> bcjmail-jdk18on}}
{{jaxb-runtime2 -> jaxb-runtime4}}
{{javax.annotation:javax.annotation-api -> 
jakarta.annotation:jakarta.annotation-api}}
{{javax.ws.rs:javax.ws.rs-api -> jakarta.ws.rs:jakarta.ws.rs-api}}
{{javax.inject:javax.inject -> jakarta.inject:jakarta.inject-api}}
{{javax.activation:activation -> jakarta.activation:jakarta.activation-api}}

Transitive dependencies
{{javax.annotation:javax.annotation-api -> 
jakarta.annotation:jakarta.annotation-api}}
{{javax.inject:javax.inject -> jakarta.inject:jakarta.inject-api}}
{{javax.servlet:javax.servlet-api -> jakarta.servlet:jakarta.servlet-api}}
{{javax.ws.rs:javax.ws.rs-api -> jakarta.ws.rs:jakarta.ws.rs-api}}
{{javax.validation:validation-api -> jakarta.validation:jakarta.validation-api}}

Grep sources using: {{find . -name *.java | while read JAVA; do grep -H javax 
$JAVA; done}}

{{javax.xml.transform -> jakarta.xml.transform}}
{{javax.ws.rs -> jakarta.ws.rs}}

Not sure if this list complete or not :)

Shall I create PR with above changes? :)

> Require Java 11 in 3.x
> --
>
> Key: TIKA-3948
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3948
> Project: Tika
>  Issue Type: Task
>Reporter: Tim Allison
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: tika-3x
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Commented] (TIKA-3948) Require Java 11 in 3.x

2023-07-28 Thread Nick Burch (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3948?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17748452#comment-17748452
 ] 

Nick Burch commented on TIKA-3948:
--

[~solomax] I think the first task is to identify any other areas of Tika that 
will be affected by the switch. That may be an explicit dependency, but I fear 
it's more likely to be things a long way down the dependency tree in something 
(probably one of the scientific parsers with more sporadic updates). 

Once we know all the places that'll be affected, then we can come up with a 
plan for any changes needed directly in Tika, and a plan for any dependencies 
which need updates but where upstream haven't/won't do the matching ones. And 
then we can think about a preview release :)

> Require Java 11 in 3.x
> --
>
> Key: TIKA-3948
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3948
> Project: Tika
>  Issue Type: Task
>Reporter: Tim Allison
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: tika-3x
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Commented] (TIKA-3948) Require Java 11 in 3.x

2023-07-27 Thread Maxim Solodovnik (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3948?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17748379#comment-17748379
 ] 

Maxim Solodovnik commented on TIKA-3948:


Understood :(
Maybe you have some sort of plan of what need to be done?
Maybe I'll find time to create PR (not familiar with Tika source code ...)

and maybe this PR will worth to be release as SNAPSHOT :)

> Require Java 11 in 3.x
> --
>
> Key: TIKA-3948
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3948
> Project: Tika
>  Issue Type: Task
>Reporter: Tim Allison
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: tika-3x
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Commented] (TIKA-3948) Require Java 11 in 3.x

2023-07-27 Thread Tim Allison (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3948?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17748179#comment-17748179
 ] 

Tim Allison commented on TIKA-3948:
---

ETA for me to do the work got pushed further out. :(

If anyone else on the team wants to take it, please go forth!

https://lists.apache.org/thread/f63m0cw3kc846vg472ztm33l6ws27583

> Require Java 11 in 3.x
> --
>
> Key: TIKA-3948
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3948
> Project: Tika
>  Issue Type: Task
>Reporter: Tim Allison
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: tika-3x
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Commented] (TIKA-3948) Require Java 11 in 3.x

2023-07-27 Thread Maxim Solodovnik (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3948?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17747903#comment-17747903
 ] 

Maxim Solodovnik commented on TIKA-3948:


[~tallison] any ETA for this? :)

> Require Java 11 in 3.x
> --
>
> Key: TIKA-3948
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3948
> Project: Tika
>  Issue Type: Task
>Reporter: Tim Allison
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: tika-3x
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Commented] (TIKA-3948) Require Java 11 in 3.x

2023-04-13 Thread Tim Allison (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3948?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17711998#comment-17711998
 ] 

Tim Allison commented on TIKA-3948:
---

See thread: https://lists.apache.org/thread/5vg62nxrmhtl8othmobfrmy4p22x7fkm

> Require Java 11 in 3.x
> --
>
> Key: TIKA-3948
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3948
> Project: Tika
>  Issue Type: Task
>Reporter: Tim Allison
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: tika-3x
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Commented] (TIKA-3948) Require Java 11 in 3.x

2023-04-12 Thread Tim Allison (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3948?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17711541#comment-17711541
 ] 

Tim Allison commented on TIKA-3948:
---

As noted on the user list, we should migrate to jakarta over javax as we can.  
Specifically: bcmail-jdk18on:1.72 should be replaced with bcjmail-jdk18on.

 

What other dependencies of this type do we need to change?  For which of our 
dependencies will we have problems?

> Require Java 11 in 3.x
> --
>
> Key: TIKA-3948
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3948
> Project: Tika
>  Issue Type: Task
>Reporter: Tim Allison
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: tika-3x
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)