[GitHub] [tinkerpop] spmallette commented on issue #1213: Reverts TINKERPOP-2289 resolve ip address
thanks for testing @olivertowers - i've published fresh snapshots for all release branches. [ Full content available at: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/1213 ] This message was relayed via gitbox.apache.org for dev@tinkerpop.apache.org
[GitHub] [tinkerpop] spmallette commented on issue #1213: Reverts TINKERPOP-2289 resolve ip address
didn't fix it 樂 [ Full content available at: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/1213 ] This message was relayed via gitbox.apache.org for dev@tinkerpop.apache.org
[GitHub] [tinkerpop] spmallette commented on issue #1213: Reverts TINKERPOP-2289 resolve ip address
hmm - passed - tried merging this change forward to `travis-fix` which is based on `tp34`. maybe we get a clean build now: https://travis-ci.org/apache/tinkerpop/builds/609643926 [ Full content available at: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/1213 ] This message was relayed via gitbox.apache.org for dev@tinkerpop.apache.org
[GitHub] [tinkerpop] spmallette commented on issue #1213: Reverts TINKERPOP-2289 resolve ip address
I think revert is a good first step here. Depending upon how the dev list thread goes we can figure out if new JIRA issues are required. Aside from a CHANGELOG entry this looks good to me. @olivertowers if you have a moment to test this branch with CosmosDB to validate that all is good, that would be hugely helpful. if it would be helpful to have a fresh SNAPSHOT published with this change I can do that ..just let me know. cc/ @luisbosquez VOTE +1 [ Full content available at: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/1213 ] This message was relayed via gitbox.apache.org for dev@tinkerpop.apache.org