[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-1882) Apply range and limit steps as early as possible

2019-02-04 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1882?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16759868#comment-16759868
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1882:
---

dkuppitz commented on pull request #1040: TINKERPOP-1882 Apply range and limit 
steps as early as possible
URL: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/1040
 
 
   
 

This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


> Apply range and limit steps as early as possible
> 
>
> Key: TINKERPOP-1882
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1882
> Project: TinkerPop
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: process
>Affects Versions: 3.2.7, 3.3.1
>Reporter: Florian Hockmann
>Assignee: Daniel Kuppitz
>Priority: Minor
>
> For a traversal like
> {{g.V(a).out().valueMap().limit(123)}}
> we can simply move the {{limit()}} to the left so we get:
> {{g.V(a).out().limit(123).valueMap()}}
> This avoids unnecessary database lookups.
> We should create a strategy that moves the {{limit}} and the {{range}} step 
> like this to _the left_  for all {{map}} steps.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-1882) Apply range and limit steps as early as possible

2019-01-15 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1882?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16743224#comment-16743224
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1882:
---

dkuppitz commented on pull request #1040: TINKERPOP-1882 Apply range and limit 
steps as early as possible
URL: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/1040
 
 
   https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1882
   
   `docker/build.sh -t -i -n` passed.
   
   VOTE +1
 

This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


> Apply range and limit steps as early as possible
> 
>
> Key: TINKERPOP-1882
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1882
> Project: TinkerPop
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: process
>Affects Versions: 3.2.7, 3.3.1
>Reporter: Florian Hockmann
>Assignee: Daniel Kuppitz
>Priority: Minor
>
> For a traversal like
> {{g.V(a).out().valueMap().limit(123)}}
> we can simply move the {{limit()}} to the left so we get:
> {{g.V(a).out().limit(123).valueMap()}}
> This avoids unnecessary database lookups.
> We should create a strategy that moves the {{limit}} and the {{range}} step 
> like this to _the left_  for all {{map}} steps.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-1882) Apply range and limit steps as early as possible

2018-02-08 Thread stephen mallette (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1882?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16357176#comment-16357176
 ] 

stephen mallette commented on TINKERPOP-1882:
-

Strategies are really tricky. They need a lot of thought. Perhaps rather than 
{{g.V(a).out().limit(123).barrier(2500).valueMap()}} we could alter the barrier 
size to be like: {{g.V(a).out().barrier(123).limit(123).valueMap()}} - seems 
less invasive in my mind.

> Apply range and limit steps as early as possible
> 
>
> Key: TINKERPOP-1882
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1882
> Project: TinkerPop
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: process
>Affects Versions: 3.2.7, 3.3.1
>Reporter: Florian Hockmann
>Priority: Minor
>
> For a traversal like
> {{g.V(a).out().valueMap().limit(123)}}
> we can simply move the {{limit()}} to the left so we get:
> {{g.V(a).out().limit(123).valueMap()}}
> This avoids unnecessary database lookups.
> We should create a strategy that moves the {{limit}} and the {{range}} step 
> like this to _the left_  for all {{map}} steps.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-1882) Apply range and limit steps as early as possible

2018-02-08 Thread Florian Hockmann (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1882?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16357159#comment-16357159
 ] 

Florian Hockmann commented on TINKERPOP-1882:
-

To be honest, I didn't think about the {{LazyBarrierStrategy}} but that makes 
queries like {{g.V(a).out().valueMap().limit(123)}} of course a much smaller 
problem.

 
{quote}Without the {{barrier(2500)}} the traversal wouldn't add any extra 
processing that wasn't necessary, correct?
{quote}
Yes, that was exactly my intention with this ticket.

However, shouldn't the end result be 
{{g.V(a).out().limit(123).barrier(2500).valueMap()}}? So, I guess this new 
strategy should ideally be applied prior to the {{LazyBarrierStrategy}}.

> Apply range and limit steps as early as possible
> 
>
> Key: TINKERPOP-1882
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1882
> Project: TinkerPop
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: process
>Affects Versions: 3.2.7, 3.3.1
>Reporter: Florian Hockmann
>Priority: Minor
>
> For a traversal like
> {{g.V(a).out().valueMap().limit(123)}}
> we can simply move the {{limit()}} to the left so we get:
> {{g.V(a).out().limit(123).valueMap()}}
> This avoids unnecessary database lookups.
> We should create a strategy that moves the {{limit}} and the {{range}} step 
> like this to _the left_  for all {{map}} steps.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-1882) Apply range and limit steps as early as possible

2018-02-02 Thread stephen mallette (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1882?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16350187#comment-16350187
 ] 

stephen mallette commented on TINKERPOP-1882:
-

I've often thought about a strategy like that. I guess 
{{g.V(a).out().valueMap().limit(123)}} will include a {{barrier(2500)}} after 
{{out()}} only to have it {{limit(123)}} later. Without the {{barrier(2500)}} 
the traversal wouldn't add any extra processing that wasn't necessary, correct?

> Apply range and limit steps as early as possible
> 
>
> Key: TINKERPOP-1882
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1882
> Project: TinkerPop
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: process
>Affects Versions: 3.2.7, 3.3.1
>Reporter: Florian Hockmann
>Priority: Minor
>
> For a traversal like
> {{g.V(a).out().valueMap().limit(123)}}
> we can simply move the {{limit()}} to the left so we get:
> {{g.V(a).out().limit(123).valueMap()}}
> This avoids unnecessary database lookups.
> We should create a strategy that moves the {{limit}} and the {{range}} step 
> like this to _the left_  for all {{map}} steps.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)