DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40356] - expressions in XML attributes evaluated in wrong order
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40356. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40356 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||INVALID --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-21 07:25 --- There is nothing in the spec that specifies the evaluation order of the attributes. The container is free to evaluate them in any order that it sees fit. This means that the bug is in your application code, not Tomcat. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
5.5.21?
I would assume that by this time there is a sufficient collection of fixes to 5.5.20 that may well argue for a 5.5.21 release. I know the Tomcat development community has been largely focused on 6.0 releases, but as one who will have to freeze upon a 5.5.x release in the near future, I'm searching for some visibility into the likelihood of a 5.5.21 in the near future. One fix of interest that I am aware of in 5.5.21 is the AJP flush packets fix. We can certainly patch that into our Tomcat, but I'd rather be able to move to a 5.5.21 with any other collected fixes as well -- and avoid discrepancies between our Tomcat and standard releases except where necessary. -- Jess Holle - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 5.5.21?
+1 to build a release 5.5.21 Regards Peter Am 21.01.2007 um 17:43 schrieb Jess Holle: I would assume that by this time there is a sufficient collection of fixes to 5.5.20 that may well argue for a 5.5.21 release. I know the Tomcat development community has been largely focused on 6.0 releases, but as one who will have to freeze upon a 5.5.x release in the near future, I'm searching for some visibility into the likelihood of a 5.5.21 in the near future. One fix of interest that I am aware of in 5.5.21 is the AJP flush packets fix. We can certainly patch that into our Tomcat, but I'd rather be able to move to a 5.5.21 with any other collected fixes as well -- and avoid discrepancies between our Tomcat and standard releases except where necessary. -- Jess Holle - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 5.5.21?
On 1/21/07, Jess Holle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: One fix of interest that I am aware of in 5.5.21 is the AJP flush packets fix. We can certainly patch that into our Tomcat, but I'd rather be able to move to a 5.5.21 with any other collected fixes as well -- and avoid discrepancies between our Tomcat and standard releases except where necessary. I'd like to see a 5.5.21 for the 'missing MailSessionFactory class' fix. -- Wendy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Fix for old SAX issue causing bug 40356
Remy Maucherat wrote: Mark Thomas wrote: Hi, Can anyone remember anything about the SAX bug referred to in this commit? http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=tomcat-devm=105096762802715w=2 No, but there's nothing in the spec which says the attributes have to be called in order. People should avoid crazy hacks, I think :) Indeed. I looked in the spec but couldn't see anything about order either. I'll resolve it as won't fix. Mark - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41428] New: - org.apache.tomcat.dbcp.dbcp.BasicDataSourceFactory URL Parsing Bug
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41428. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41428 Summary: org.apache.tomcat.dbcp.dbcp.BasicDataSourceFactory URL Parsing Bug Product: Tomcat 5 Version: 5.5.20 Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Catalina:Modules AssignedTo: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hello, I think there's a bug at the org.apache.tomcat.dbcp.dbcp.BasicDataSourceFactory at the time of parsing a certain MySQL url. When the connection url contains the sessionVariables property alone, everything works ok. However, when other properties are specified in addition to sessionVariables, then an Exception is thrown when trying to establish a new connection. If the same url is specified using a Connection object inside my code, then NO error is thrown. It only happens when that same url is set at the Resource config of the server.xml file. I include some examples to reproduce the error: Everything goes fine when this is the config of the resource (note that the important part is the url): Resource name=jdbc/starnum auth=Container type=javax.sql.DataSource factory=org.apache.tomcat.dbcp.dbcp.BasicDataSourceFactory maxActive=15 maxIdle=5 validationQuery=SELECT 1 testOnBorrow=false testWhileIdle=true timeBetweenEvictionRunsMillis=1 minEvictableIdleTimeMillis=6 username=user password=pass driverClassName=com.mysql.jdbc.Driver url=jdbc:mysql://localhost:3316/db? [EMAIL PROTECTED]'0',@version='1.0'; / However, if we set this other url, an error will be printed on the tomcat's log file: jdbc:mysql://localhost:3316/db? transformedBitIsBoolean=true[EMAIL PROTECTED] te='0',@version='1.0'; It seems to be a bug when sessionVariables is specified in addition to other properties, like transformedBitIsBoolean in the previous example. As I mentioned above, when this same url is set using a Connection object inside my application, no Exception is thrown, so I think the bug is located at the BasicDataSourceFactory class. Thank you! -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37869] - Cannot obtain client certificate with SSL / client certificate authentication using APR components
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37869.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37869
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-21 15:49 ---
(From update of attachment 19425)
Index:
connectors/http11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11/Http11AprProcessor.java
===
--- Http11AprProcessor.java(revision 496746)
+++ Http11AprProcessor.java(working copy)
@@ -1095,16 +1095,29 @@
(AprEndpoint.CIPHER_SUITE_KEY, sslO);
}
// Client certificate chain if present
+//
+// CP: does not include client certificate, only CA
certificates
+// see documentation of SSL_get_peer_cert_chain() in
openssl and sslinfo.c in native APR code
+// SSL_get_peer_cert_chain() returns a pointer to
STACKOF(X509) certificates forming the certificate chain of the peer.
+// If called on the client side, the stack also contains
the peer's certificate;
+// if called on the server side, the peer's certificate
must be obtained separately using SSL_get_peer_certificate(3).
+// If the peer did not present a certificate, NULL is
returned.
+//
int certLength = SSLSocket.getInfoI(socket,
SSL.SSL_INFO_CLIENT_CERT_CHAIN);
+// retrieve client certificate
+byte[] clientCert = SSLSocket.getInfoB(socket,
SSL.SSL_INFO_CLIENT_CERT);
X509Certificate[] certs = null;
-if (certLength 0) {
-certs = new X509Certificate[certLength];
+if (clientCert != null) {
+certs = new X509Certificate[certLength+1]; // add one
for the client certificate
+
+CertificateFactory cf =
+CertificateFactory.getInstance(X.509);
+
+certs[0] = (X509Certificate)
cf.generateCertificate(new ByteArrayInputStream(clientCert));
+
for (int i = 0; i certLength; i++) {
byte[] data = SSLSocket.getInfoB(socket,
SSL.SSL_INFO_CLIENT_CERT_CHAIN + i);
-CertificateFactory cf =
-CertificateFactory.getInstance(X.509);
-ByteArrayInputStream stream = new
ByteArrayInputStream(data);
-certs[i] = (X509Certificate)
cf.generateCertificate(stream);
+certs[i+1] = (X509Certificate)
cf.generateCertificate(new ByteArrayInputStream(data));
}
}
if (certs != null) {
@@ -1142,16 +1155,29 @@
// Renegociate certificates
SSLSocket.renegotiate(socket);
// Client certificate chain if present
+//
+// CP: does not include client certificate, only CA
certificates
+// see documentation of SSL_get_peer_cert_chain() in
openssl and sslinfo.c in native APR code
+// SSL_get_peer_cert_chain() returns a pointer to
STACKOF(X509) certificates forming the certificate chain of the peer.
+// If called on the client side, the stack also contains
the peer's certificate;
+// if called on the server side, the peer's certificate
must be obtained separately using SSL_get_peer_certificate(3).
+// If the peer did not present a certificate, NULL is
returned.
+//
int certLength = SSLSocket.getInfoI(socket,
SSL.SSL_INFO_CLIENT_CERT_CHAIN);
+// retrieve client certificate
+byte[] clientCert = SSLSocket.getInfoB(socket,
SSL.SSL_INFO_CLIENT_CERT);
X509Certificate[] certs = null;
-if (certLength 0) {
-certs = new X509Certificate[certLength];
+if (clientCert != null) {
+certs = new X509Certificate[certLength+1]; // add one
for the client certificate
+
+CertificateFactory cf =
+CertificateFactory.getInstance(X.509);
+
+certs[0] = (X509Certificate)
cf.generateCertificate(new ByteArrayInputStream(clientCert));
+
for (int i = 0; i certLength; i++) {
byte[] data = SSLSocket.getInfoB(socket,
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40220] - Order of jar loading affects packaged resources
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40220. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40220 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||WORKSFORME --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-21 17:16 --- I have spent some time trying to reproduce this based on the description above and I can't. I have also reviewed the Tomcat code I believe to be relevant and I can't see anything that would cause the behaviour described. If you still see this issue please re-open this bug report and provide the simplest possible test war that demonstrates it on a vanilla Tomcat install. Unless a security manager is present and the jars are sealed, it is legal for packages to be split across multiple jars. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Fix for old SAX issue causing bug 40356
Hello Mark, Thank you, and William Remy for looking at this issue. The JSP in question has several expressions. I thought the following in the JSP 2.0 spec (section JSP.1.12.3) would apply: Expressions are evaluated left-to-right in the JSP page. This does not apply when expressions are used in attributes? #In the next sentence it does go as far as implicitly noting the order within a tag that the expressions are evaluated in, but as I have only one expression per attribute, I think it does not apply. If an expression appears in more than one run-time attribute, they are evaluated left-to-right in the tag. Regards, Dies Mark Thomas wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: Mark Thomas wrote: Hi, Can anyone remember anything about the SAX bug referred to in this commit? http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=tomcat-devm=105096762802715w=2 No, but there's nothing in the spec which says the attributes have to be called in order. People should avoid crazy hacks, I think :) Indeed. I looked in the spec but couldn't see anything about order either. I'll resolve it as won't fix. Mark - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38198] - When using context xml definitions standalone file, tomcat wrongly uses the file name instead the context path definition
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38198. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38198 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-21 17:50 --- (From update of attachment 17409) --- container/webapps/docs/config/host.xml 2006-01-03 16:15:14.0 +0100 +++ /home/mkaspar/prac/host.xml2006-01-13 09:16:53.0 +0100 @@ -272,7 +272,9 @@ attribute of this codelt;Contextgt;/code element will typically be the absolute pathname to a web application directory, or the absolute pathname of a web application archive (WAR) file (which -will not be expanded)./li +will not be expanded). The path attribute wil be automatically set to +its filename where slashes (/) are encoded as hashes (#) so +any#path.xml will result in path=/any/path)./li liAny web application archive file within the application base (appBase) directory that does not have a corresponding directory of the same name (without the .war extension) will be -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40214] - web.xml error-page malfunctions for jsf requests
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40214. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40214 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED Resolution||INVALID --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-21 17:56 --- This doesn't happen with a vanilla Tomcat install. Looking at the stack trace it looks like the FacesServlet is getting involved, potentially in an inappropriate manner. This looks like a JSF issue. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Fix for old SAX issue causing bug 40356
Dies Koper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Hello Mark, Thank you, and William Remy for looking at this issue. The JSP in question has several expressions. I thought the following in the JSP 2.0 spec (section JSP.1.12.3) would apply: Expressions are evaluated left-to-right in the JSP page. This does not apply when expressions are used in attributes? well, no. however section 1.14 may apply. spec-quote version=2.0 spec=jsp section=1.14 reason=ambiguous The interpretation of all actions start by evaluating the values given to its attributes left to right, and assigning the values to the attributes. /spec-quote A quick search didn't turn up much, but my recolection is that SAX isn't required to be order-preserving on attributes. #In the next sentence it does go as far as implicitly noting the order within a tag that the expressions are evaluated in, but as I have only one expression per attribute, I think it does not apply. If an expression appears in more than one run-time attribute, they are evaluated left-to-right in the tag. Regards, Dies Mark Thomas wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: Mark Thomas wrote: Hi, Can anyone remember anything about the SAX bug referred to in this commit? http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=tomcat-devm=105096762802715w=2 No, but there's nothing in the spec which says the attributes have to be called in order. People should avoid crazy hacks, I think :) Indeed. I looked in the spec but couldn't see anything about order either. I'll resolve it as won't fix. Mark - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug report for Tomcat 3 [2007/01/21]
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned| | | OPN=ReopenedVER=Verified(Skipped Closed/Resolved) | | | +-+ | | | Severity: BLK=Blocker CRI=CriticalMAJ=Major | | | | MIN=Minor NOR=Normal ENH=Enhancement | | | | +-+ | | | | Date Posted | | | | | +--+ | | | | | Description | | | | | | | | 2350|Ver|Nor|2001-06-27|ServletConfig.getInitParameter() requires url-patt| | 5331|Ass|Nor|2001-12-09|getPathInfo vs URL normalization | | 6027|Inf|Maj|2002-01-25|Tomcat Automatically shuts down as service | | 6488|Ver|Maj|2002-02-15|Error: 304. Apparent bug in default ErrorHandler c| | 7785|Inf|Blk|2002-04-06|tomcat bug in context reloading | | 7863|Inf|Maj|2002-04-09|I have a problem when running Tomcat with IIS | | 8187|Inf|Cri|2002-04-17|Errors when Tomcat used with MS Access database | | 9737|Ver|Nor|2002-06-10|ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException when sending just p| |10047|Ass|Cri|2002-06-20|IllegalStateException | |10406|Ass|Cri|2002-07-02|IllegalStateException | |11087|Inf|Blk|2002-07-23|IllegalStateException | |12156|Inf|Cri|2002-08-29|Apache and Tomcat 3.3.1 Interworking problem | |16363|Ass|Cri|2003-01-23|Stack Overflow accessing compiled JSP - Tomcat 3.2| |39250|Inf|Cri|2006-04-07|Tomcat 3.2.1 + JDK 1.4| +-+---+---+--+--+ | Total 14 bugs | +---+ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug report for Watchdog [2007/01/21]
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned| | | OPN=ReopenedVER=Verified(Skipped Closed/Resolved) | | | +-+ | | | Severity: BLK=Blocker CRI=CriticalMAJ=Major | | | | MIN=Minor NOR=Normal ENH=Enhancement | | | | +-+ | | | | Date Posted | | | | | +--+ | | | | | Description | | | | | | | | 278|Unc|Nor|2000-12-04|Bug in GetParameterValuesTestServlet.java file Bug| | 279|Unc|Nor|2000-12-04|Logical Error in GetParameterValuesTestServlet Bug| | 469|Unc|Nor|2001-01-17|in example-taglib.tld urn should be uri BugRat| | 470|Unc|Nor|2001-01-17|FAIL positiveForward.jsp and positiveInclude.jsp B| | 9634|New|Enh|2002-06-05|No tests exist for ServletContext.getResourcePaths| |10703|New|Enh|2002-07-11|Need to test getRequestURI after RequestDispatcher| |11336|New|Enh|2002-07-31|Test wrapped path methods with RD.foward()| |11663|New|Maj|2002-08-13|JSP precompile tests rely on Jasper specific behav| |11664|New|Maj|2002-08-13|A sweep is needed of all Watchdog 4.0 tag librarie| |11665|New|Maj|2002-08-13|ServletToJSPErrorPageTest and ServletToServletErro| |11666|New|Maj|2002-08-13|SetBufferSize_1TestServlet is invalid.| |14004|New|Maj|2002-10-28|Incorrent behaviour of all attribute-related lifec| |15504|New|Nor|2002-12-18|JSP positiveGetValues test relies on order preserv| |24649|New|Nor|2003-11-12|getRemoteHost fails when agent has uppercase chara| |29398|New|Nor|2004-06-04|Update site and note current status | +-+---+---+--+--+ | Total 15 bugs | +---+ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug report for Tomcat 4 [2007/01/21]
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned| | | OPN=ReopenedVER=Verified(Skipped Closed/Resolved) | | | +-+ | | | Severity: BLK=Blocker CRI=CriticalMAJ=Major | | | | MIN=Minor NOR=Normal ENH=Enhancement | | | | +-+ | | | | Date Posted | | | | | +--+ | | | | | Description | | | | | | | | 3839|Opn|Enh|2001-09-26|Problem bookmarking login page| | 4227|Opn|Enh|2001-10-17|Invalid CGI path | | 5329|New|Enh|2001-12-08|NT Service exits startup before Tomcat is finished| | 5795|New|Enh|2002-01-10|Catalina Shutdown relies on localhost causing prob| | 5829|New|Enh|2002-01-13|StandardManager needs to cope with sessions throwi| | 5985|New|Enh|2002-01-23|Tomcat should perform a more restrictive validatio| | 6600|Opn|Enh|2002-02-20|enodeURL adds 'jsession' when 'isRequestedSessionI| | 6614|New|Enh|2002-02-21|Have Bootstrap and StandardClassLoader use the sam| | 6671|New|Enh|2002-02-25|Simple custom tag example uses old declaration sty| | 7043|New|Enh|2002-03-12|database user and password for JDBC Based Store | | 7374|New|Enh|2002-03-22|Apache Tomcat/4.0.1 message on standard output| | 7676|New|Enh|2002-04-02|Allow name property to use match experssions in h| | 7723|New|Enh|2002-04-03|[patch] additional factory for org.apache.naming.f| | 8026|New|Enh|2002-04-12|Exceptions in StandardHostDeployer.addChild are lo| | 8323|New|Enh|2002-04-20|No support for running the 64 bit JVM | | 8343|New|Enh|2002-04-21|adding a absorber logger class to org.apache.ca| | 8441|New|Enh|2002-04-23|Command line files for NetWare| | 8705|New|Enh|2002-05-01|SessionListener should extend EventListener | | 8744|New|Enh|2002-05-02|No way to configure/extend runtime classloaders. | | 8776|New|Enh|2002-05-03|The session url encoding under somce circumstances| | 9227|New|Enh|2002-05-19|Allow an empty value of a pathname in the Standard| | 9456|New|Enh|2002-05-28|Problem saving server.xml file: invalid XML markup| | 9511|New|Enh|2002-05-30|Object instantiation optimization in StandardSessi| | 9629|New|Enh|2002-06-05|Fix ServletContext.getResourcePaths to match spec | | 9745|New|Enh|2002-06-10|extern cache mgt bug for conditionally dynamic pag| | 9852|New|Enh|2002-06-13|Odd Digest and Realm Behaviour| |10021|New|Enh|2002-06-19|Include upgrade option in installer | |10060|New|Enh|2002-06-20|Make the common and shared class loaders look in c| |10120|New|Enh|2002-06-21|Custom realm and shared instalation. | |10225|New|Enh|2002-06-25|ANT Tasks Error Situation | |10335|New|Enh|2002-06-28|[RFE,patch] Make JAASRealm more flexible | |10457|New|Enh|2002-07-03|Patch submission for DefaultServlet/WebdavServlet | |10526|New|Enh|2002-07-06|Authenticators do not always cache the Principal | |10565|Opn|Enh|2002-07-08|shutdown hook problem: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundE| |10691|Ass|Enh|2002-07-11|staring tomcat gives indication that tomcat is sta| |10699|New|Enh|2002-07-11|Apache SOAP 2.3 will not operate properly | |10972|New|Enh|2002-07-19|Realm without className in server.xml produces N| |11069|Opn|Enh|2002-07-23|Tomcat not flag error if tld is outside of /WEB-IN| |11129|New|Enh|2002-07-24|New valve for putting the sessionIDs in the reques| |11248|New|Enh|2002-07-29|DefaultServlet doesn't send expires header| |11754|Opn|Enh|2002-08-15|Synchronous shutdown script - shutdown.sh should w| |12069|New|Enh|2002-08-27|Creation of more HttpSession objects for one previ| |12658|New|Enh|2002-09-15|a proxy host and port at the Host element level | |12766|New|Enh|2002-09-18|Tomcat should use tld files in /WEB-INF/ over vers| |13309|Opn|Enh|2002-10-04|Catalina calls System.exit() | |13634|New|Enh|2002-10-15|Allowing system properties to be substituted in co| |13689|Opn|Enh|2002-10-16|Classloader paths for 'Common' classes and librari| |13731|New|Enh|2002-10-17|Final request, response, session and other variabl| |13941|New|Enh|2002-10-24|reload is VERY slow | |13965|New|Enh|2002-10-25|Catalina.sh correction request for Tru64 Unix | |14097|New|Enh|2002-10-30|hardcoded registry value for vm lets tomcat servic|
Bug report for Tomcat 5 [2007/01/21]
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned| | | OPN=ReopenedVER=Verified(Skipped Closed/Resolved) | | | +-+ | | | Severity: BLK=Blocker CRI=CriticalMAJ=Major | | | | MIN=Minor NOR=Normal ENH=Enhancement | | | | +-+ | | | | Date Posted | | | | | +--+ | | | | | Description | | | | | | | |22679|Ver|Enh|2003-08-24|how to access ssl session ID out of tomcat to prev| |28039|New|Enh|2004-03-30|Cluster Support for SingleSignOn | |28634|Ass|Enh|2004-04-27|Extend StandardManager/StandardSession for DeltaMa| |29160|Ver|Enh|2004-05-23|precompile problem: _jspx_meth_* (javax.servlet.js| |29494|Inf|Enh|2004-06-10|No way to set PATH when running as a service on Wi| |30241|Ver|Enh|2004-07-21|Enhance build script to use branch argument when c| |33262|Inf|Enh|2005-01-27|Service Manager autostart should check for adminis| |33453|Opn|Enh|2005-02-08|Jasper should recompile JSP files whose datestamps| |33650|Inf|Enh|2005-02-19|Jasper performance for multiple files processing | |33671|Opn|Enh|2005-02-21|Manual Windows service installation with custom na| |34801|New|Enh|2005-05-08|PATCH: CGIServlet does not terminate child after a| |34805|Ass|Enh|2005-05-08|warn about invalid security constraint url pattern| |34868|Ass|Enh|2005-05-11|allow to register a trust store for a session that| |35054|Inf|Enh|2005-05-25|warn if appBase is not existing as a File or direc| |35079|Inf|Enh|2005-05-26|Should be able to specify DNS lookup timeout | |35229|Opn|Enh|2005-06-05|alert user about expired certificates in client ce| |35552|Inf|Enh|2005-06-29|JMS destination under Context | |35746|Inf|Enh|2005-07-14|session manager should be immune to system clock t| |35765|New|Enh|2005-07-16|make the SSL cipher config in server.xml fail safe| |35869|Inf|Enh|2005-07-26|Can't run as a service on Windows Server 2003 64-B| |36133|Inf|Enh|2005-08-10|Support JSS SSL implementation| |36169|New|Enh|2005-08-12|[PATCH] Enable chunked encoding for IIS JK connect| |36362|New|Enh|2005-08-25|missing check for Java reserved keywords in tag fi| |36365|Opn|Nor|2005-08-26|IIS5.1-isapi_redirector.dll (1.2.14) plugin issue | |36540|Inf|Enh|2005-09-07|pooled cluster replication does not seem ensure sy| |36569|Inf|Enh|2005-09-09|Redirects produce illegal URL's | |36630|Opn|Maj|2005-09-13|Error instantiating servlet class | |36837|Inf|Enh|2005-09-28|Looking for ProxyHandler implementation of Http re| |36922|Inf|Enh|2005-10-04|setup.sh file mis-advertised and missing | |36923|New|Nor|2005-10-05|Deactivated EL expressions are not parsed for jsp | |37018|Ass|Enh|2005-10-11|Document how to use tomcat-SSL with a pkcs11 token| |37072|New|Nor|2005-10-13|Encoding mismatch in error condition | |37084|Opn| |2005-10-14|JspC from ant fails on JSPs that use custom taglib| |37138|New|Enh|2005-10-18|Allow to specify a security provider (priority lis| |37326|Ass|Nor|2005-11-01|No error reported when jsp:include has non-exist| |37334|Inf|Enh|2005-11-02|Realm digest property not aligned with the adminis| |37449|Opn|Enh|2005-11-10|Two UserDatabaseRealm break manager user | |37485|Inf|Enh|2005-11-14|I'd like to run init SQL after JDBC Connection cre| |37498|Inf|Nor|2005-11-14|[PATCH] NPE in org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerB| |37515|Inf|Nor|2005-11-15|smap not generated by JspC when used from Ant for | |37627|Opn|Nor|2005-11-24|Slow and incomplete dynamic content generation aft| |37674|New|Nor|2005-11-29|Windows EXE fails to pass spaces in JVMTI -javaage| |37785|Inf|Nor|2005-12-05|Changing startup type via Tomcat Monitor does not | |37797|Inf|Maj|2005-12-05|Configure Tomcat utility truncates classpath to 96| |37822|Opn|Nor|2005-12-07|WebappClassLoader interfering with Catalina core c| |37834|Ass|Nor|2005-12-08|compressableMimeTypes not working properly| |37847|Ass|Enh|2005-12-09|Allow User To Optionally Specify Catalina Output F| |37869|Opn|Nor|2005-12-12|Cannot obtain client certificate with SSL / client| |37918|Ass|Nor|2005-12-15|EL cannot find valid getter from object when using| |37956|Opn|Enh|2005-12-18|Make 'set static fields to null' ClassLoader leak | |37984|New|Nor|2005-12-21|JNDIRealm.java not able to handle MD5 password|
