DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41539] - NullPointerException during Embedded tomcat restart

2007-02-06 Thread bugzilla 
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41539





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-02-06 23:44 ---
It's difficult to pull out an isolated test case, an I know this makes it
difficult to diagnose, however I do have some additional info:

When debugging, I noticed that after the stop command is issued, not all
connectors die. It seems that internally tomcat establishes an HTTP connection,
which causes the HTTP connector to "re-initialise".  Because the connector had
previously been stopped, it is in an uninitialised state but the "initialised"
boolean value within the Connector is still set to true.  Hence Embedded thinks
the Connector is initialised (and I get a "Connector already initialised" INFO
log) and so the subsequent intialisation issued by the "start" command is
ignored.  The end result is that the connector is in a misaligned state
(destroyed, but marked as initialised).

Even though I am creating a "new" Embedded, somehow the "old" connector is being
reused (I have verified this during debug).. perhaps some static references
being held somewhere?

I haven't tried altering the source for testing, and am not sure if this
initialisation confusion is the problem, but it seems to me the "initialised"
boolean should be reset when the Connector is destroyed.  Alternatively (and
preferrably), perhaps there should not be any static references held after the
Embedded instance is stopped?

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41535] - IIS 6+JK 1.2.0+Tomcat 5.5.20 web app FORM based auth hangs

2007-02-06 Thread bugzilla 
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41535





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-02-06 23:24 ---
It appears to be working now at least on W2K3 servers.  I tried it initially on 
W2K3 server "A" with the new debug .dll and it failed.

I then tried another W2K3 server "B" which IIS had clean config+redirector and 
it worked.   I compared configs, and the only difference was that on the  
server "A" HTTP compression had been turned on at one point (supposedly it was 
turned off again - was off in IISAdmin, but metabase still had some 
differences).  So I re-turned it off to be sure.  And that's when POST started 
working again on both A and B.

Or it could just be late (past midnight MST) or phase of moon.

However, POST still hangs on Windows XP.   If that's the only environment, then 
I can probably work around as it is only used for developer testing and not 
production.  XP doesn't do HTTP compression.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41535] - IIS 6+JK 1.2.0+Tomcat 5.5.20 web app FORM based auth hangs

2007-02-06 Thread bugzilla 
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41535





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-02-06 22:43 ---
Created an attachment (id=19534)
 --> (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19534&action=view)
isapi_redirect.log with debug version of .dll


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41535] - IIS 6+JK 1.2.0+Tomcat 5.5.20 web app FORM based auth hangs

2007-02-06 Thread bugzilla 
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41535





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-02-06 22:23 ---
Created an attachment (id=19533)
 --> (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19533&action=view)
ISAPI Redirector 1.2.20 with extended debugging

My reading of the pcap trace is that the HTTP is well formed, and that the 44
bytes of form POST data are in the original request packet - i.e. they should
already be available to IIS and be accessible from the ECB without a ReadClient
call.

There's some strangeness in the logs (namely the "() receiving data from client
failed..."), which may point to something bad as the worker name isn't being
printed, although the code looks fine and the worker name is printed
successfully in the error handler later.

I've attached a build of 1.2.20 that has extended debug statements around the
ISAPI ReadClient. This should give us an idea of whether this is a JK problem
or an IIS problem.
Basically if the ECB reports anything other than 44 total or < 44 available,
then it's an IIS issue.
Otherwise something is broken in JK.

Can you replicate the issue with this build and reattach the isapi_redirect.log

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41538] - Unable to run Tomcat as a Windows service under JDK 1.6

2007-02-06 Thread bugzilla 
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41538


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||WORKSFORME




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-02-06 17:43 ---
This works for me on XP Home SP2.

That it fails for you on some machines and works on others points to a
configuration issue with those machines (maybe the Java 6 install?) rather than
a Tomcat issue or an issue with the service wrapper.

The tomcat users list is the best place to get further help with this issue.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41539] - NullPointerException during Embedded tomcat restart

2007-02-06 Thread bugzilla 
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41539


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Severity|blocker |major
 Status|NEW |NEEDINFO




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-02-06 17:39 ---
Can you provide the source for a simple test case that exhibits this issue?

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

svn commit: r504402 - /tomcat/container/branches/tc4.1.x/webapps/manager/build.xml

2007-02-06 Thread markt 
Author: markt
Date: Tue Feb  6 17:15:01 2007
New Revision: 504402

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=504402
Log:
Add images back to the manager app. Last commit was a little too keen in what 
was tidied up.

Modified:
tomcat/container/branches/tc4.1.x/webapps/manager/build.xml

Modified: tomcat/container/branches/tc4.1.x/webapps/manager/build.xml
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/container/branches/tc4.1.x/webapps/manager/build.xml?view=diff&rev=504402&r1=504401&r2=504402
==
--- tomcat/container/branches/tc4.1.x/webapps/manager/build.xml (original)
+++ tomcat/container/branches/tc4.1.x/webapps/manager/build.xml Tue Feb  6 
17:15:01 2007
@@ -37,6 +37,12 @@
 
   
   
+
+
+  
+
+  
+

Re: 5.5.21 build failed

2007-02-06 Thread Mark Thomas 
Mark Thomas wrote:
> Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
>> oops, wasn't clear enough.
>> I don't have the bandwidth to track down this issue right now, if
>> someone wants to go in and fix the build dependencies so that the
>> AprEndpoint class indeed is in the classpath when the AJP connector gets
>> compiled
> 
> Looks like it could be my patch for TC4 to enable it to build with JDK
> 1.3 although I would have expected Gump to have started to complain by
> now. I'll take a look.

This was indeed the problem. My bad - sorry. This should now be fixed.

Mark

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

svn commit: r504390 - /tomcat/connectors/trunk/http11/build.xml

2007-02-06 Thread markt 
Author: markt
Date: Tue Feb  6 16:47:18 2007
New Revision: 504390

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=504390
Log:
One tweak so the TC5 build doesn't exclude some APR classes

Modified:
tomcat/connectors/trunk/http11/build.xml

Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/http11/build.xml
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/connectors/trunk/http11/build.xml?view=diff&rev=504390&r1=504389&r2=504390
==
--- tomcat/connectors/trunk/http11/build.xml (original)
+++ tomcat/connectors/trunk/http11/build.xml Tue Feb  6 16:47:18 2007
@@ -161,6 +161,7 @@
 
   
+
 
 
 
 
-
\ No newline at end of file
+



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

svn commit: r504386 - in /tomcat/connectors/trunk: http11/build.xml jk/build.xml util/build.xml

2007-02-06 Thread markt 
Author: markt
Date: Tue Feb  6 16:28:00 2007
New Revision: 504386

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=504386
Log:
Switch to a straight JDK 1.4 test to determine which components to exclude when 
building TC4 on JDK 1.3. This should sit better along side the TC5 build 
process.

Modified:
tomcat/connectors/trunk/http11/build.xml
tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/build.xml
tomcat/connectors/trunk/util/build.xml

Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/http11/build.xml
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/connectors/trunk/http11/build.xml?view=diff&rev=504386&r1=504385&r2=504386
==
--- tomcat/connectors/trunk/http11/build.xml (original)
+++ tomcat/connectors/trunk/http11/build.xml Tue Feb  6 16:28:00 2007
@@ -119,7 +119,6 @@
 
 
 
-
   
 
 
@@ -168,7 +167,7 @@
  debug="${compile.debug}"
deprecation="${compile.deprecation}"
   optimize="${compile.optimize}">
-  
+  
   
 
 

Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/build.xml
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/build.xml?view=diff&rev=504386&r1=504385&r2=504386
==
--- tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/build.xml (original)
+++ tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/build.xml Tue Feb  6 16:28:00 2007
@@ -102,7 +102,6 @@
 
 
 
-
 
 
 
@@ -145,7 +144,6 @@

 -->
 
-
 
 
 
@@ -206,7 +204,7 @@
verbose="off" >
 
 
-
+




Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/util/build.xml
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/connectors/trunk/util/build.xml?view=diff&rev=504386&r1=504385&r2=504386
==
--- tomcat/connectors/trunk/util/build.xml (original)
+++ tomcat/connectors/trunk/util/build.xml Tue Feb  6 16:28:00 2007
@@ -43,7 +43,6 @@
 
 
 
-

 
 
@@ -63,7 +62,6 @@
 
 
 
-
 
 
 
@@ -86,7 +84,7 @@
 
 
 
-
+
 
 




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: 5.5.21 build failed

2007-02-06 Thread Mark Thomas 
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> oops, wasn't clear enough.
> I don't have the bandwidth to track down this issue right now, if
> someone wants to go in and fix the build dependencies so that the
> AprEndpoint class indeed is in the classpath when the AJP connector gets
> compiled

Looks like it could be my patch for TC4 to enable it to build with JDK
1.3 although I would have expected Gump to have started to complain by
now. I'll take a look.

Mark


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: 5.5.21 build failed

2007-02-06 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists 

oops, wasn't clear enough.
I don't have the bandwidth to track down this issue right now, if 
someone wants to go in and fix the build dependencies so that the 
AprEndpoint class indeed is in the classpath when the AJP connector gets 
compiled


Filip

Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:

Once fixed, I'll retag and rerun the build.

jkjava-tc5:
   [javac] org\apache\coyote\ajp\AjpAprProcessor.java added as 
org/apache/coyote/ajp/AjpAprProcessor.class doesn't exist.
   [javac] org\apache\coyote\ajp\AjpAprProtocol.java added as 
org/apache/coyote/ajp/AjpAprProtocol.class doesn't exist.
   [javac] org\apache\coyote\ajp\AjpMessage.java omitted as 
org/apache/coyote/ajp/AjpMessage.class is up to date.
   [javac] org\apache\coyote\ajp\Constants.java omitted as 
org/apache/coyote/ajp/Constants.class is up to date.
   [javac] org\apache\coyote\ajp\LocalStrings.properties skipped - 
don't know how to handle it
   [javac] org\apache\jk\config\ApacheConfig.java added as 
org/apache/jk/config/ApacheConfig.class doesn't exist.
   [javac] org\apache\jk\config\BaseJkConfig.java added as 
org/apache/jk/config/BaseJkConfig.class doesn't exist.
   [javac] org\apache\jk\config\GeneratorApache2.java omitted as 
org/apache/jk/config/GeneratorApache2.class is up to date.
   [javac] org\apache\jk\config\GeneratorJk1.java omitted as 
org/apache/jk/config/GeneratorJk1.class is up to date.
   [javac] org\apache\jk\config\GeneratorJk2.java omitted as 
org/apache/jk/config/GeneratorJk2.class is up to date.
   [javac] org\apache\jk\config\IISConfig.java added as 
org/apache/jk/config/IISConfig.class doesn't exist.
   [javac] org\apache\jk\config\NSConfig.java added as 
org/apache/jk/config/NSConfig.class doesn't exist.
   [javac] org\apache\jk\config\WebXml2Jk.java omitted as 
org/apache/jk/config/WebXml2Jk.class is up to date.
   [javac] Compiling 6 source files to 
C:\development\tomcat\tc5build\tc5.5.x\build\build\classes

   [javac] Using modern compiler
dropping 
C:\development\tomcat\tc5build\tc5.5.x\connectors\jk\${jaxp.home}\jaxp.jar 
from path as it doesn't exist
dropping 
C:\development\tomcat\tc5build\tc5.5.x\connectors\jk\${jaxp.home}\crimson.jar 
from path as it doesn't exist
dropping 
C:\development\tomcat\tc5build\tc5.5.x\connectors\jk\${xerces2.home}\xml-apis.jar 
from path as it doesn't exist
dropping 
C:\development\tomcat\tc5build\tc5.5.x\connectors\jk\${xml-parser-apis.jar} 
from path as it doesn't exist
dropping 
C:\development\tomcat\tc5build\tc5.5.x\connectors\util\build\classes 
from path as it doesn't exist
dropping 
C:\development\tomcat\tc5build\tc5.5.x\connectors\util\build\lib\tomcat-util.jar 
from path as it doesn't exist
dropping 
C:\development\tomcat\tc5build\tc5.5.x\container\build\server\lib\catalina.jar 
from path as it doesn't exist

   [javac] Compilation arguments:
   [javac] '-d'
   [javac] 'C:\development\tomcat\tc5build\tc5.5.x\build\build\classes'
   [javac] '-classpath'
   [javac] 
'C:\development\tomcat\tc5build\tc5.5.x\build\build\classes;C:\development\tomcat\tc5build\includes\servlet-api-2.4\lib\servlet-api.jar;C:\development\tomcat\tc5build\includes\commons-logging-1.0.4\commons-logging.jar;C:\development\tomcat\tc5build\includes\commons-modeler-2.0\commons-modeler-2.0.jar;C:\development\tomcat\tc5build\includes\mx4j-3.0.1\lib\mx4j.jar;C:\development\tomcat\tc5build\tc5.5.x\build\build\server\lib\tomcat-coyote.jar;C:\development\java\apache-ant-1.6.5\lib\ant-launcher.jar;C:\development\tomcat\tc5build\tc5.5.x\build;C:\Program 
Files\Java\j2re1.4.2_11\lib\ext\QTJava.zip;C:\development\java\apache-ant-1.6.5\lib\ant-antlr.jar;C:\development\java\apache-ant-1.6.5\lib\ant-apache-bcel.jar;C:\development\java\apache-ant-1.6.5\lib\ant-apache-bsf.jar;C:\development\java\apache-ant-1.6.5\lib\ant-apache-log4j.jar;C:\development\java\apache-ant-1.6.5\lib\ant-apache-oro.jar;C:\development\java\apache-ant-1.6.5\lib\ant-apache-regexp.jar;C:\development\java\apache-ant-1.6.5\lib\ant-apache-resolver.jar;C:\development\java\apache-ant-1.6.5\lib\ant-commons-logging.jar;C:\development\java\apache-ant-1.6.5\lib\ant-commons-net.jar;C:\development\java\apache-ant-1.6.5\lib\ant-icontract.jar;C:\development\java\apache-ant-1.6.5\lib\ant-jai.jar;C:\development\java\apache-ant-1.6.5\lib\ant-javamail.jar;C:\development\java\apache-ant-1.6.5\lib\ant-jdepend.jar;C:\development\java\apache-ant-1.6.5\lib\ant-jmf.jar;C:\development\java\apache-ant-1.6.5\lib\ant-jsch.jar;C:\development\java\apache-ant-1.6.5\lib\ant-junit.jar;C:\development\java\apache-ant-1.6.5\lib\ant-netrexx.jar;C:\development\java\apache-ant-1.6.5\lib\ant-nodeps.jar;C:\development\java\apache-ant-1.6.5\lib\ant-starteam.jar;C:\development\java\apache-ant-1.6.5\lib\ant-stylebook.jar;C:\development\java\apache-ant-1.6.5\lib\ant-swing.jar;C:\development\java\apache-ant-1.6.5\lib\ant-trax.jar;C:\development\java\apache-ant-1.6.5\lib\ant-vaj.jar;C:\development\java\apache-ant-1.6.5\lib\ant-weblogic.jar;C:\development\java\apache-ant-1.6.5\lib\ant-xalan1.jar;C:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41535] - IIS 6+JK 1.2.0+Tomcat 5.5.20 web app FORM based auth hangs

2007-02-06 Thread bugzilla 
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41535





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-02-06 12:14 ---
The conversations between browser (10.1.1.120) to IIS (10.1.1.103) to JK 
(10.1.1.10) are all in the same pcap. 



-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41535] - IIS 6+JK 1.2.0+Tomcat 5.5.20 web app FORM based auth hangs

2007-02-06 Thread bugzilla 
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41535





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-02-06 12:08 ---
Can you also attach a pcap file concerning the connection browser to IIS?

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

5.5.21 build failed

2007-02-06 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists 

Once fixed, I'll retag and rerun the build.

jkjava-tc5:
   [javac] org\apache\coyote\ajp\AjpAprProcessor.java added as 
org/apache/coyote/ajp/AjpAprProcessor.class doesn't exist.
   [javac] org\apache\coyote\ajp\AjpAprProtocol.java added as 
org/apache/coyote/ajp/AjpAprProtocol.class doesn't exist.
   [javac] org\apache\coyote\ajp\AjpMessage.java omitted as 
org/apache/coyote/ajp/AjpMessage.class is up to date.
   [javac] org\apache\coyote\ajp\Constants.java omitted as 
org/apache/coyote/ajp/Constants.class is up to date.
   [javac] org\apache\coyote\ajp\LocalStrings.properties skipped - 
don't know how to handle it
   [javac] org\apache\jk\config\ApacheConfig.java added as 
org/apache/jk/config/ApacheConfig.class doesn't exist.
   [javac] org\apache\jk\config\BaseJkConfig.java added as 
org/apache/jk/config/BaseJkConfig.class doesn't exist.
   [javac] org\apache\jk\config\GeneratorApache2.java omitted as 
org/apache/jk/config/GeneratorApache2.class is up to date.
   [javac] org\apache\jk\config\GeneratorJk1.java omitted as 
org/apache/jk/config/GeneratorJk1.class is up to date.
   [javac] org\apache\jk\config\GeneratorJk2.java omitted as 
org/apache/jk/config/GeneratorJk2.class is up to date.
   [javac] org\apache\jk\config\IISConfig.java added as 
org/apache/jk/config/IISConfig.class doesn't exist.
   [javac] org\apache\jk\config\NSConfig.java added as 
org/apache/jk/config/NSConfig.class doesn't exist.
   [javac] org\apache\jk\config\WebXml2Jk.java omitted as 
org/apache/jk/config/WebXml2Jk.class is up to date.
   [javac] Compiling 6 source files to 
C:\development\tomcat\tc5build\tc5.5.x\build\build\classes

   [javac] Using modern compiler
dropping 
C:\development\tomcat\tc5build\tc5.5.x\connectors\jk\${jaxp.home}\jaxp.jar 
from path as it doesn't exist
dropping 
C:\development\tomcat\tc5build\tc5.5.x\connectors\jk\${jaxp.home}\crimson.jar 
from path as it doesn't exist
dropping 
C:\development\tomcat\tc5build\tc5.5.x\connectors\jk\${xerces2.home}\xml-apis.jar 
from path as it doesn't exist
dropping 
C:\development\tomcat\tc5build\tc5.5.x\connectors\jk\${xml-parser-apis.jar} 
from path as it doesn't exist
dropping 
C:\development\tomcat\tc5build\tc5.5.x\connectors\util\build\classes 
from path as it doesn't exist
dropping 
C:\development\tomcat\tc5build\tc5.5.x\connectors\util\build\lib\tomcat-util.jar 
from path as it doesn't exist
dropping 
C:\development\tomcat\tc5build\tc5.5.x\container\build\server\lib\catalina.jar 
from path as it doesn't exist

   [javac] Compilation arguments:
   [javac] '-d'
   [javac] 'C:\development\tomcat\tc5build\tc5.5.x\build\build\classes'
   [javac] '-classpath'
   [javac] 
'C:\development\tomcat\tc5build\tc5.5.x\build\build\classes;C:\development\tomcat\tc5build\includes\servlet-api-2.4\lib\servlet-api.jar;C:\development\tomcat\tc5build\includes\commons-logging-1.0.4\commons-logging.jar;C:\development\tomcat\tc5build\includes\commons-modeler-2.0\commons-modeler-2.0.jar;C:\development\tomcat\tc5build\includes\mx4j-3.0.1\lib\mx4j.jar;C:\development\tomcat\tc5build\tc5.5.x\build\build\server\lib\tomcat-coyote.jar;C:\development\java\apache-ant-1.6.5\lib\ant-launcher.jar;C:\development\tomcat\tc5build\tc5.5.x\build;C:\Program 
Files\Java\j2re1.4.2_11\lib\ext\QTJava.zip;C:\development\java\apache-ant-1.6.5\lib\ant-antlr.jar;C:\development\java\apache-ant-1.6.5\lib\ant-apache-bcel.jar;C:\development\java\apache-ant-1.6.5\lib\ant-apache-bsf.jar;C:\development\java\apache-ant-1.6.5\lib\ant-apache-log4j.jar;C:\development\java\apache-ant-1.6.5\lib\ant-apache-oro.jar;C:\development\java\apache-ant-1.6.5\lib\ant-apache-regexp.jar;C:\development\java\apache-ant-1.6.5\lib\ant-apache-resolver.jar;C:\development\java\apache-ant-1.6.5\lib\ant-commons-logging.jar;C:\development\java\apache-ant-1.6.5\lib\ant-commons-net.jar;C:\development\java\apache-ant-1.6.5\lib\ant-icontract.jar;C:\development\java\apache-ant-1.6.5\lib\ant-jai.jar;C:\development\java\apache-ant-1.6.5\lib\ant-javamail.jar;C:\development\java\apache-ant-1.6.5\lib\ant-jdepend.jar;C:\development\java\apache-ant-1.6.5\lib\ant-jmf.jar;C:\development\java\apache-ant-1.6.5\lib\ant-jsch.jar;C:\development\java\apache-ant-1.6.5\lib\ant-junit.jar;C:\development\java\apache-ant-1.6.5\lib\ant-netrexx.jar;C:\development\java\apache-ant-1.6.5\lib\ant-nodeps.jar;C:\development\java\apache-ant-1.6.5\lib\ant-starteam.jar;C:\development\java\apache-ant-1.6.5\lib\ant-stylebook.jar;C:\development\java\apache-ant-1.6.5\lib\ant-swing.jar;C:\development\java\apache-ant-1.6.5\lib\ant-trax.jar;C:\development\java\apache-ant-1.6.5\lib\ant-vaj.jar;C:\development\java\apache-ant-1.6.5\lib\ant-weblogic.jar;C:\development\java\apache-ant-1.6.5\lib\ant-xalan1.jar;C:\development\java\apache-ant-1.6.5\lib\ant-xslp.jar;C:\development\java\apache-ant-1.6.5\lib\ant.jar;C:\development\java\apache-ant-1.6.5\lib\xercesImpl.jar;C:\development\java\apache-ant-1.6.5\lib\xml-apis.jar;C:\development\java\jdk1.4.2_12\lib\tools.jar'

   [javac] '-sourcepath'

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41535] - IIS 6+JK 1.2.0+Tomcat 5.5.20 web app FORM based auth hangs

2007-02-06 Thread bugzilla 
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41535


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEEDINFO|NEW




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-02-06 09:52 ---
I should note that POST via IIS -> redirect -> JK is now failing for *some* 
other forms.  One is another JSP login form and another is a standard 
submit/post form.

It doesn't seem that HTTP POST via the director is stable [in my environment].

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41535] - IIS 6+JK 1.2.0+Tomcat 5.5.20 web app FORM based auth hangs

2007-02-06 Thread bugzilla 
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41535


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Attachment #19505|0   |1
is obsolete||
  Attachment #19509|0   |1
is obsolete||
  Attachment #19510|0   |1
is obsolete||
  Attachment #19511|0   |1
is obsolete||




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-02-06 09:48 ---
Created an attachment (id=19531)
 --> (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19531&action=view)
New set of logs with WireShark PCAP file


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

svn commit: r504190 - /tomcat/site/tags/TOMCAT_5_5_21/

2007-02-06 Thread fhanik 
Author: fhanik
Date: Tue Feb  6 08:10:51 2007
New Revision: 504190

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=504190
Log:
Tagging Tomcat version TOMCAT_5_5_21.

Added:
tomcat/site/tags/TOMCAT_5_5_21/
  - copied from r504189, tomcat/site/trunk/


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

svn commit: r504189 - /tomcat/servletapi/tags/servlet2.4-jsp2.0-tc5.x/TOMCAT_5_5_21/

2007-02-06 Thread fhanik 
Author: fhanik
Date: Tue Feb  6 08:10:35 2007
New Revision: 504189

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=504189
Log:
Tagging Tomcat version TOMCAT_5_5_21.

Added:
tomcat/servletapi/tags/servlet2.4-jsp2.0-tc5.x/TOMCAT_5_5_21/
  - copied from r504188, tomcat/servletapi/servlet2.4-jsp2.0-tc5.x/


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

svn commit: r504188 - /tomcat/jasper/tags/tc5.5.x/TOMCAT_5_5_21/

2007-02-06 Thread fhanik 
Author: fhanik
Date: Tue Feb  6 08:10:12 2007
New Revision: 504188

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=504188
Log:
Tagging Tomcat version TOMCAT_5_5_21.

Added:
tomcat/jasper/tags/tc5.5.x/TOMCAT_5_5_21/
  - copied from r504187, tomcat/jasper/tc5.5.x/


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

svn commit: r504187 - /tomcat/container/tags/tc5.5.x/TOMCAT_5_5_21/

2007-02-06 Thread fhanik 
Author: fhanik
Date: Tue Feb  6 08:09:48 2007
New Revision: 504187

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=504187
Log:
Tagging Tomcat version TOMCAT_5_5_21.

Added:
tomcat/container/tags/tc5.5.x/TOMCAT_5_5_21/
  - copied from r504186, tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

svn commit: r504186 - /tomcat/connectors/tags/tc5.5.x/TOMCAT_5_5_21/

2007-02-06 Thread fhanik 
Author: fhanik
Date: Tue Feb  6 08:09:21 2007
New Revision: 504186

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=504186
Log:
Tagging Tomcat version TOMCAT_5_5_21.

Added:
tomcat/connectors/tags/tc5.5.x/TOMCAT_5_5_21/
  - copied from r504185, tomcat/connectors/trunk/


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

svn commit: r504185 - /tomcat/build/tags/tc5.5.x/TOMCAT_5_5_21/

2007-02-06 Thread fhanik 
Author: fhanik
Date: Tue Feb  6 08:09:07 2007
New Revision: 504185

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=504185
Log:
Tagging Tomcat version TOMCAT_5_5_21.

Added:
tomcat/build/tags/tc5.5.x/TOMCAT_5_5_21/
  - copied from r504184, tomcat/build/tc5.5.x/


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.9 as alpha

2007-02-06 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists 

Remy Maucherat wrote:

Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:

Remy Maucherat wrote:

Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
can we add in apache-tomcat-6.0.9-extras as an package as well to 
each release.

That way I can publish to the maven repo directly from each build.


As far as I am concerned, this was not the purpose of -extras. I 
don't know if I posted about it earlier, but I intended it as a 
bundle of either specific tools, or components that can't be 
redistributed directly by the ASF (due to licensing or legal reasons).


(of course, at the moment, there's only one component)

If Geronimo needs commons-logging from extras, I could also include 
the extras.xml script as part of its build process.

yes, that would be great!


There's a problem with the sentence, and a contradiction. It was 
supposed to be:

>> If Geronimo needs commons-logging from extras, it could also include
>> the extras.xml script [or, preferably, only the portion which deals 
with compiling commons-logging] as part of its build process.
got it. I would prefer apache-tomcat-6.0.9-extras.jar as a package 
generated as it is today.
but any other way will also work. The requirements is just that I can 
publish a JAR that allows for commons-logging to be plugged in.

Filip

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.9

2007-02-06 Thread Martin Dubuc 

On 2/5/07, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Candidate binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.9/

According to the (slightly) updated release process, the 6.0.9 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[X] Beta
[ ] Stable


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.9 as alpha

2007-02-06 Thread Remy Maucherat 

Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:

Remy Maucherat wrote:

Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
can we add in apache-tomcat-6.0.9-extras as an package as well to 
each release.

That way I can publish to the maven repo directly from each build.


As far as I am concerned, this was not the purpose of -extras. I don't 
know if I posted about it earlier, but I intended it as a bundle of 
either specific tools, or components that can't be redistributed 
directly by the ASF (due to licensing or legal reasons).


(of course, at the moment, there's only one component)

If Geronimo needs commons-logging from extras, I could also include 
the extras.xml script as part of its build process.

yes, that would be great!


There's a problem with the sentence, and a contradiction. It was 
supposed to be:

>> If Geronimo needs commons-logging from extras, it could also include
>> the extras.xml script [or, preferably, only the portion which deals 
with compiling commons-logging] as part of its build process.


Rémy


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.9 as alpha

2007-02-06 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists 

Remy Maucherat wrote:

Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
can we add in apache-tomcat-6.0.9-extras as an package as well to 
each release.

That way I can publish to the maven repo directly from each build.


As far as I am concerned, this was not the purpose of -extras. I don't 
know if I posted about it earlier, but I intended it as a bundle of 
either specific tools, or components that can't be redistributed 
directly by the ASF (due to licensing or legal reasons).


(of course, at the moment, there's only one component)

If Geronimo needs commons-logging from extras, I could also include 
the extras.xml script as part of its build process.

yes, that would be great!


Rémy

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]






-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Tagging 5.5.21

2007-02-06 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists 

tagging in approx 1 hour

Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:

Tuesday Feb 6th, 10am CST

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]






-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.9

2007-02-06 Thread Christophe Pierret 
I am not a committer, but for the purpose of a quite big web application (more 
than 15 man-years of dev effort) tested on 6.0.9 code level, both with APR and 
NIO  HTTPS connectors, some parts using Comet API, I found that 6.0.9 was at 
least as good as 5.5.20 in terms of stability, performance and functions.
There are even two critical patches that I don't need to install anymore with 
6.0.9, e.g.: timeout handling with APR and X509 certificate handling with APR.
My web app does not make use of some features of tomcat though, so it will not 
reflect quality status of JK connector and EL for example.
The tests have been run on W2K Server using JDK 1.5 update 9 and a custom-built 
tcnative-1.dll (using Visual Studio 2005) based on openssl 0.97g.

Christophe

-Message d'origine-
De : Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Envoyé : mardi 6 février 2007 00:26
À : Tomcat Developers List
Objet : [VOTE] Release build 6.0.9

Candidate binaries are available here: 
http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.9/

According to the (slightly) updated release process, the 6.0.9 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] Stable

Rémy

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] 6.0.x release process update

2007-02-06 Thread Peter Rossbach 

+1

Am 04.02.2007 um 21:41 schrieb Remy Maucherat:


Hi,

I propose the following release process for Tomcat 6.0.x:

1. create tarball and unofficial binaries, put them on  
people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6

2. announce candidate binaries are available for testing
3. wait 2-3 days for testing
4. call for alpha/beta/stable vote on build
5. 3 +1's later publish previously created tarball and binaries to  
www.apache.org/dist/tomcat/tomcat-6

6. wait 2-3 days for voting to complete and/or for more testing
7. announce release after sync of the website

Votes ?

Rémy

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]