Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Standard Taglib 1.2.1
On Dec 1, 2013, at 3:00 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote: > Build the source release: ok > Rat check give those files > > CHANGES.txt > > DEPENDENCIES > > README_bin.txt > > README_src.txt > > > standard-test/src/test/resources/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/el/core/TestOutTag.txt > > Not a big problem (at least for me) Those should have been excluded by the plugin configuration in the root module. > +1 (binding) > > (BTW I don't understand why you build those manually and not used the > maven release plugin?) I did build using the release plugin, are you seeing a different result? Thanks Jeremy signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Standard Taglib 1.2.1
Build the source release: ok Rat check give those files CHANGES.txt DEPENDENCIES README_bin.txt README_src.txt standard-test/src/test/resources/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/el/core/TestOutTag.txt Not a big problem (at least for me) +1 (binding) (BTW I don't understand why you build those manually and not used the maven release plugin?) On 1 December 2013 05:33, Jeremy Boynes wrote: > On Nov 19, 2013, at 9:10 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote: > >> On Nov 16, 2013, at 8:29 AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote: >> >>> On Nov 13, 2013, at 6:58 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote: >>> >>> Nudge - please could a couple of PMC members vote on this release (there >>> are no PMC votes at the moment). >> >> Another gentle nudge - we currently have one binding +1 from rjung@ and one >> non-binding +1 from jboynes@ > > Nudge. > > Thanks > Jeremy > -- Olivier Lamy Ecetera: http://ecetera.com.au http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Any ETA on 7.0.48 vote?
+1 Few regressions in 7.0.47 (fixed now) are not that nice in dev Le 1 déc. 2013 21:16, "Jean-Louis MONTEIRO" a écrit : > +1 > Would be great if we could get a 7.0.48. > > Thanks > Jean-Louis > > > 2013/12/1 Bob DeRemer > > > Is a vote on 7.0.48 expected anytime in the near future? > > > > Thanks, > > Bob > > > > > > -- > Jean-Louis >
Re: Any ETA on 7.0.48 vote?
+1 Would be great if we could get a 7.0.48. Thanks Jean-Louis 2013/12/1 Bob DeRemer > Is a vote on 7.0.48 expected anytime in the near future? > > Thanks, > Bob > -- Jean-Louis
Any ETA on 7.0.48 vote?
Is a vote on 7.0.48 expected anytime in the near future? Thanks, Bob
[Bug 55383] Improve markup and design of Tomcat's HTML pages
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55383 --- Comment #53 from Konstantin Preißer --- Hi Konstantin, thank you for the review. (In reply to Konstantin Kolinko from comment #52) > (In reply to Konstantin Preißer from comment #49) > > > > [1] http://www.google.com/fonts/specimen/Open+Sans > > The *.woff that you committed in r1546663 - where do they come from? > > I am worried whether we need to add some attribution if we are > redistributing them, > and how do we get updates for them if there are any. I took the .woff files by going to [3], selecting the needed fonts, and then opening the generated CSS link [4]. This is a Google-generated CSS that contains links to .ttf, .woff and other formats depending on the browser. I then downloaded the .woff ones. If there's a problem with taking these .woff files directly, I think it should be possible to use some tool to convert the .ttf to .woff files (but then one needs to take care not include only specific characters of the font, to reduce the file size). > Thus far I have two trails > a) Google Code repository for Google Fonts project, [2]. > > There are *.ttf files. > > b) I went to [1] clicked on "Open Open Sans in Google Fonts" which navigated > to [3]. > > At [3] I click "download" button (a small "down arrow" button at the > top-right part of the page). It downloads a 1.2Mb zip that contains 10 *.ttf > files and LICENSE.txt (a copy of Apache License 2.0). > > [2] > https://code.google.com/p/googlefontdirectory/source/browse/apache/opensans/ > [3] https://www.google.com/fonts#UsePlace:use/Collection:Open+Sans > > So thus far > 1. It is clear that the files are covered by Apache License 2.0 > 2. There is no NOTICE file > 3. These are *.ttf files, not *.woff ones. [4] http://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Open+Sans:400,400italic,600,600italic,700,700italic -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org