[Bug 40993] add session_cookie to lb worker to support customed SESSION_IDENTIFIER

2020-03-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40993

--- Comment #5 from fmwa  ---
MovieCorn Apk is a leading movie app for Android devices.
https://www.moviecornapk.xyz/

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org



[Bug 40993] add session_cookie to lb worker to support customed SESSION_IDENTIFIER

2014-12-31 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40993

Rainer Jung  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|LATER   |FIXED

--- Comment #4 from Rainer Jung  ---
This was added in mod_jk 1.2.27.
See "session_cookie" and "session_path" on
http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/reference/workers.html.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40993] - add session_cookie to lb worker to support customed SESSION_IDENTIFIER

2007-11-14 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40993


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||LATER




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-11-14 00:47 ---
Like Rainer said. This is for post 1.2 feature

The proper solution would be to use rewriting as well as configurable
session identifier, because configurable session identifier would require
additional changes in Tomcat as well, and that won't happen because it
breaks the spec.

The only solution is to rewrite the JSESSIONID cookie or ;jsessionid path
on the fly on each request/response.
I'm almost sure you can already do that with Apache's mod_rewrite, but anyhow,
it's a JK3 material

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40993] - add session_cookie to lb worker to support customed SESSION_IDENTIFIER

2006-11-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40993





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-11-22 02:05 ---
We should discuss this for a post 1.2.20 release.

If I read it right, the spec mandates the use of ;jsessionid (path param) resp.
JSESSIONID (cookie). On the other hand, mod_jk doesn't want to read a session
value, it only needs a routing information, which the spec doesn't talk about.
So it would make sense to allow other models of passing the routing info.

If we make this configurable, we would need to discuss:

- do we want to make path param and cookie configurable? Any relation between 
them?
  Suggestion: make both configurable, independently

- should it be possible to decide which of the two are used? What about the 
order?
  Suggestion: one should be able to choose. Not sure about preferences.

- cookie: how do we describe, what part of the cookie needs to be extracted as a
routing id from the value of the cookie? Seperator? Regexp? Position?

- path param: would we also allow query attributes (think about POST requests)
or only real path params? Would it be necessary to choose a seperator? How to
describe the part of the param, that's the routing id (Separator? Regexp?
Position?).



-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40993] - add session_cookie to lb worker to support customed SESSION_IDENTIFIER

2006-11-17 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40993





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-11-17 07:17 ---
Created an attachment (id=19134)
 --> (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19134&action=view)
A patch use tomcat's connector/jk as base dir


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]