[Bug 53411] NullPointerException in org.apache.tomcat.util.buf.CharChunk

2018-06-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53411

Mark Thomas  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|--- |FIXED
 Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED

--- Comment #11 from Mark Thomas  ---
The improvements suggested in comment #5 have been implemented on 9.0.x and
will be included in 9.0.11 onwards.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org



[Bug 53411] NullPointerException in org.apache.tomcat.util.buf.CharChunk

2018-05-01 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53411

--- Comment #10 from VERISHAL  ---
Hello Last 3 day's i'm facing ths issue in Apache server  . I can see in my log
file a regular exception throwed by AbstractHttp11Processor, with this stack
trace: i need help how can resolve this error . please suggest me
*NullPointerException in org.apache.tomcat.util.buf.CharChunk*
org.apache.coyote.http11.AbstractHttp11Processor process
Error processing request
java.lang.NullPointerException
  at org.apache.tomcat.util.buf.CharChunk.append(CharChunk.java:355)
  at org.apache.tomcat.util.http.mapper.Mapper.map(Mapper.java:667)
  at
org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.postParseRequest(CoyoteAdapter.java:646)
  at
org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:402)
  at
org.apache.coyote.http11.AbstractHttp11Processor.process(AbstractHttp11Processor.java:999)
  at
org.apache.coyote.AbstractProtocol$AbstractConnectionHandler.process(AbstractProtocol.java:565)
  at
org.apache.tomcat.util.net.AprEndpoint$SocketWithOptionsProcessor.run(AprEndpoint.java:1770)
  at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1110)
  at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:603)
  at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:722)

   Any one please help me

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org



[Bug 53411] NullPointerException in org.apache.tomcat.util.buf.CharChunk

2018-05-01 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53411

--- Comment #9 from VERISHAL  ---
Hello Last 3 day's i'm facing ths issue in Apache server  . I can see in my log
file a regular exception throwed by AbstractHttp11Processor, with this stack
trace: i need help how can resolve this error . please suggest me
*NullPointerException in org.apache.tomcat.util.buf.CharChunk*
org.apache.coyote.http11.AbstractHttp11Processor process
Error processing request
java.lang.NullPointerException
  at org.apache.tomcat.util.buf.CharChunk.append(CharChunk.java:355)
  at org.apache.tomcat.util.http.mapper.Mapper.map(Mapper.java:667)
  at
org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.postParseRequest(CoyoteAdapter.java:646)
  at
org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:402)
  at
org.apache.coyote.http11.AbstractHttp11Processor.process(AbstractHttp11Processor.java:999)
  at
org.apache.coyote.AbstractProtocol$AbstractConnectionHandler.process(AbstractProtocol.java:565)
  at
org.apache.tomcat.util.net.AprEndpoint$SocketWithOptionsProcessor.run(AprEndpoint.java:1770)
  at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1110)
  at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:603)
  at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:722)

   Any one please help me

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org



[Bug 53411] NullPointerException in org.apache.tomcat.util.buf.CharChunk

2014-10-22 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53411

Hariharan, R cloakcaval...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||cloakcaval...@gmail.com

--- Comment #7 from Hariharan, R cloakcaval...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 32138
  -- https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32138action=edit
Patch for the enhancements mentioned above

I have incorporated the changes mentioned above, with this patch.

P.S. This is my first patch submission. Let me know if I could do anything to
help better.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org



[Bug 53411] NullPointerException in org.apache.tomcat.util.buf.CharChunk

2014-10-22 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53411

--- Comment #8 from Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org ---
Thanks for the patch. Don't be concerned about how much of the patch I am
suggesting you change (most of it). The first patch I proposed was torn apart
beyond recognition before it got anywhere near the Tomcat code base.

The view expressed by Kubak that Tomcat should not start if the default host is
not valid is not the consensus opinion of the Tomcat developers. It is safe to
assume that Konstatin's comments (as a committer) does represent the consensus
opinion unless another committer comments otherwise (in which case expect a
discussion on the dev list to reach a consensus).

I suggest you go through Konstantin's comments in comment #5 one by one and
address each of them in your patch.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org



[Bug 53411] NullPointerException in org.apache.tomcat.util.buf.CharChunk

2012-06-14 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53411

--- Comment #6 from kubak ja...@pakamera.com.pl ---
(In reply to comment #5)
 Reopening this as enhancement.
 
 Looking at AbstractHttp11Processor#process() this error is correctly written
 to access log, etc, so I do not see much concern.
 
 Still I think there is a room for improvement, and I noted several minor
 issues from my code review.
 
 
 1) in MapperListener#findDefaultHost()
 
 First, maybe 
 s/log.warn(sm.getString(mapperListener.unknownDefaultHost,/log.error/ 
 
 Second, maybe mention something like  Tomcat will not be able to process
 HTTP/1.0 requests that do not specify a Host header in the message.
 
 Third, I am a bit wondering why not to call mapper.setDefaultHost()
 unconditionally. What is wrong with passing a name there?
 
 Hosts can be added and removed through JMX calls on
 StandardEngine#addChild()/removeChild() and it seems that MapperListener
 fails to update defaultHost setting on the Mapper when it happens.
 
 So why not to pass the defaultHost name to the Mapper as is and let it
 handle missing matches (like it already does)?
 
 
 2) in Mapper#map(MB,MB,S,MD)
 
 Fourth,
 Maybe just return without mapping here, as if the Host is not found. We
 already do if(defaultHostName==null){ return; } in its
 #internalMap(CC,CC,S,MD) method.
 
 It will need some update to its caller though, which is
 CoyoteAdapter#postParseRequest()
 
 
 3) In CoyoteAdapter#postParseRequest()
 
 This request could be rejected with error 404, instead of 400 that exception
 handling in AbstractHttp11Processor#process() does. The postParseRequest()
 already has code for handling it as 404, but
 
 Fifth,
 access logging needs to be changed a bit. The current code:
 
 [[[
 // Make sure there is a host (might not be during shutdown)
 if (host != null) {
 host.logAccess(request, response, 0, true);
 }
 ]]]
 
 I think that it should fallback to CoyoteAdapter#log(..) when host is null.



In my opinion if Tomcat cannot process some requests because of wrong
configuration - Tomcat should not start and give an error with clear message at
start up. Current message doesn't say anything about after-effects, is easy to
ignore.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org



[Bug 53411] NullPointerException in org.apache.tomcat.util.buf.CharChunk

2012-06-13 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53411

kubak ja...@pakamera.com.pl changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
 Resolution|INVALID |---

--- Comment #2 from kubak ja...@pakamera.com.pl ---
Well, I think you've changed the status too early.

My Apache Tomcat 7 server is running, all web apps are working and defaultHost
parameter in server.xml is set to localhost:  Engine name=Catalina
defaultHost=localhost

So, this exception doesn't stop tomcat or any context, I don't even noticed if
this exception is visible for any user. From the user point of view everything
works fine.
I've just noticed this strange stack trace in the log file and this is the only
one exception which I can find there - that's why it caught my attention. 


Even if the problem is in the configuration - Tomcat should not start or should
give a clear message during the startup, in my opinion.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org



[Bug 53411] NullPointerException in org.apache.tomcat.util.buf.CharChunk

2012-06-13 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53411

Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |INVALID

--- Comment #1 from Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org ---
The NPE is triggered by the default host name being null. Such a configuration
is invalid. Please follow up on the users list for assistance.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org



[Bug 53411] NullPointerException in org.apache.tomcat.util.buf.CharChunk

2012-06-13 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53411

Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |INVALID

--- Comment #3 from Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org ---
There is insufficient information provided to reproduce the issue. The only
information provided - the stack trace - points to a configuration problem. 

Please do not re-open this issue without providing either:
- sufficient information for it to be produced
- analysis that identifies a code path that code trigger this issue

The users list is the place to seek help with obtaining either of the above.

A warning is already logged if the default host cannot be identified.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org



[Bug 53411] NullPointerException in org.apache.tomcat.util.buf.CharChunk

2012-06-13 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53411

--- Comment #4 from Konstantin Kolinko knst.koli...@gmail.com ---
Just for reference, confirming what Mark already wrote,
in tc7.0.x/tags/TOMCAT_7_0_27

CharChunk.java line 355
[[[
354 public void append(String s) throws IOException {
355 append(s, 0, s.length());
356 }
]]]

So s is null.

Mapper.java line 667
[[[
666 if (host.isNull()) {
667 host.getCharChunk().append(defaultHostName);
668 }
]]]

So defaultHostName is null.

The if(host.isNull()) branch is executed when it is an HTTP/1.0 request that
does not have a Host header. Such requests are rare nowadays.


(In reply to comment #2)
 Engine name=Catalina defaultHost=localhost

There must exist Host name=localhost  for that. If it does not, the
defaultHost value will be ignored.

MapperListener.java
[[[
if(found) {
mapper.setDefaultHostName(defaultHost);
} else {
log.warn(sm.getString(mapperListener.unknownDefaultHost,
defaultHost, connector));
}
]]]

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org



[Bug 53411] NullPointerException in org.apache.tomcat.util.buf.CharChunk

2012-06-13 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53411

Konstantin Kolinko knst.koli...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
 Resolution|INVALID |---
   Severity|normal  |enhancement

--- Comment #5 from Konstantin Kolinko knst.koli...@gmail.com ---
Reopening this as enhancement.

Looking at AbstractHttp11Processor#process() this error is correctly written to
access log, etc, so I do not see much concern.

Still I think there is a room for improvement, and I noted several minor issues
from my code review.


1) in MapperListener#findDefaultHost()

First, maybe 
s/log.warn(sm.getString(mapperListener.unknownDefaultHost,/log.error/ 

Second, maybe mention something like  Tomcat will not be able to process
HTTP/1.0 requests that do not specify a Host header in the message.

Third, I am a bit wondering why not to call mapper.setDefaultHost()
unconditionally. What is wrong with passing a name there?

Hosts can be added and removed through JMX calls on
StandardEngine#addChild()/removeChild() and it seems that MapperListener fails
to update defaultHost setting on the Mapper when it happens.

So why not to pass the defaultHost name to the Mapper as is and let it handle
missing matches (like it already does)?


2) in Mapper#map(MB,MB,S,MD)

Fourth,
Maybe just return without mapping here, as if the Host is not found. We already
do if(defaultHostName==null){ return; } in its #internalMap(CC,CC,S,MD) method.

It will need some update to its caller though, which is
CoyoteAdapter#postParseRequest()


3) In CoyoteAdapter#postParseRequest()

This request could be rejected with error 404, instead of 400 that exception
handling in AbstractHttp11Processor#process() does. The postParseRequest()
already has code for handling it as 404, but

Fifth,
access logging needs to be changed a bit. The current code:

[[[
// Make sure there is a host (might not be during shutdown)
if (host != null) {
host.logAccess(request, response, 0, true);
}
]]]

I think that it should fallback to CoyoteAdapter#log(..) when host is null.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org