[Bug 55228] AbstractHttp11Processor overwrites Date header, even when set by application
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55228 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #6 from Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org --- Fixed in 6.0.x and will be included in 6.0.38 onwards. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
[Bug 55228] AbstractHttp11Processor overwrites Date header, even when set by application
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55228 --- Comment #5 from Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org --- Fair enough. This has been fixed for trunk and 7.0.x and will be included in 7.0.43 onwards. The fix has been proposed for 6.0.x. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
[Bug 55228] AbstractHttp11Processor overwrites Date header, even when set by application
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55228 --- Comment #2 from Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org --- If a bug affects multiple versions open an issue (as you have done) against the earliest supported version you want to see the fix in. Fixes are applied to trunk and then back-ported through each supported version until the bug the issue was reported against is reached. So this will be fixed (assuming the bug is valid and it looks like it is at first glance) in trunk, 7.0.x and 6.0.x. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
[Bug 55228] AbstractHttp11Processor overwrites Date header, even when set by application
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55228 --- Comment #3 from Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org --- I'm currently leaning to resolving this as invalid. As an origin server, Tomcat is required by RFc2616 to set the date header (using the current time) on every request. I'd be prepared to implement this change given a valid use case but I currently don't see a valid, RFC 2616 compliant reason for an application to set the date header. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
[Bug 55228] AbstractHttp11Processor overwrites Date header, even when set by application
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55228
--- Comment #1 from f...@alum.mit.edu f...@alum.mit.edu ---
I opened this bug against Tomcat6 since that is what we're using, but this bug
exists on all Tomcat7, as well, and most likely Tomcat8. I'm not sure how to
deal with that.
Looking at tomcat-embed-core-7.0.42.jar:
AbstractHttp11Processor.prepareResponse
line: 1458
// Add date header
headers.setValue(Date).setString(FastHttpDateFormat.getCurrentDate());
You see that it sets the Date header, not checking if it had been already set
by that application. Should be able to easily wrap it with:
if ( headers.getValue(Date) == null ) {
...
}
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
[Bug 55228] AbstractHttp11Processor overwrites Date header, even when set by application
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55228 f...@alum.mit.edu f...@alum.mit.edu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||f...@alum.mit.edu -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
