[Bug 59010] Disabling socketBuffer with "-1" doesn't cause exception on linux
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59010 Remy Maucherat changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |WORKSFORME --- Comment #10 from Remy Maucherat --- Ok, so you now get the "not nice" answer ... You are providing paid support to a third party, and are actively annoying / spamming the community with your customer issue. That is not fine in BZ, please move the discussion to the user list. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
[Bug 59010] Disabling socketBuffer with "-1" doesn't cause exception on linux
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59010 Rashmi changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|WORKSFORME |FIXED --- Comment #9 from Rashmi --- Can you please check it without the breakpoint and with increased sleep time? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
[Bug 59010] Disabling socketBuffer with "-1" doesn't cause exception on linux
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59010 Mark Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED --- Comment #8 from Mark Thomas --- No idea but unless you can provide a reproducible test case that demonstrates a problem, this isn't a Tomcat bug. If you want a "what might be going wrong" discussion then this isn't the place. Please use the users mailing list. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
[Bug 59010] Disabling socketBuffer with "-1" doesn't cause exception on linux
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59010 Rashmi changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|WORKSFORME |--- Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED --- Comment #7 from Rashmi --- Since this code is part of our runtime, we cannot add breakpoint to confirm the behaviour. However I added a very long sleep of 1 minute and disconnected the client as soon as sending the request. But still dont see the broken pipe :( Please suggest what could be wrong with the linux box? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
[Bug 59010] Disabling socketBuffer with "-1" doesn't cause exception on linux
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59010 Mark Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME Status|NEW |RESOLVED --- Comment #6 from Mark Thomas --- When I: - run your test code on linux - add a break point immediately after the sleep in DummyAdapter - kill the client when the break point is reached then I see a broken pipe exception with Linux. There is always going to be an element of timing and buffering at play in experiments such as this. If the client goes away after the server has written the data but before the client has read it then things are going to get lost and there is very little you can do about that. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
[Bug 59010] Disabling socketBuffer with "-1" doesn't cause exception on linux
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59010 --- Comment #5 from Rashmi --- I think the same configuration is used on Linux as well. We are using the same code sample attached in the first comment on both servers and the jre is also the same. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
[Bug 59010] Disabling socketBuffer with "-1" doesn't cause exception on linux
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59010 --- Comment #4 from Christopher Schultz --- Are you positive you have the same endpoint configuration on both servers (Windows/Linux)? You appear to be using the BIO endpoint on Windows (given the stack trace), but you didn't say what you were using on Linux. The handler and the endpoint must agree on I/O strategy, or at least so-says the javadoc for AbstractProtocol.endpoint (starting at line 80 in Tomcat 7.0.x trunk): /** * Endpoint that provides low-level network I/O - must be matched to the * ProtocolHandler implementation (ProtocolHandler using BIO, requires BIO * Endpoint etc.). */ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
[Bug 59010] Disabling socketBuffer with "-1" doesn't cause exception on linux
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59010 --- Comment #3 from Rashmi --- So to clarify further, when we set socketBuffer to "-1" and if the client disconnects before the server responds, what is the expected behaviour? Is it that a socket error exception must be seen like on windows or the server silently attempt to send response and not throw an error if that's not possible like on linux? The socket error thrown on windows is very useful on server side as we know that there was an error sending response as the client disconnected. Is there any other way we can make the server log the error when client disconnects other than setting socketBuffer to "-1" -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
[Bug 59010] Disabling socketBuffer with "-1" doesn't cause exception on linux
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59010 --- Comment #2 from Christopher Schultz --- This looks like a JVM bug to me: error code 0 is usually considered "success". It could also be some other networking component (e.g. software firewall, virus-scanner, etc.) interfering with the channel. Do you have anything like that running that might unexpectedly close a network connection, or otherwise cause data to refuse to write? A similar issue closed INVALID based upon the assumption that it's a problem with the OS (more likely the JVM, but possibly the OS): https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HTTPCLIENT-957 Another similar issue (no JVM involved, I think), claiming that the problem is with a firewall (seems like a sketchy explanation to me): http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21968078 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
[Bug 59010] Disabling socketBuffer with "-1" doesn't cause exception on linux
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59010 --- Comment #1 from Rashmi --- Can you please help me with this? I work for IBM L3 support and customer is looking for an answer. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
[Bug 59010] Disabling socketBuffer with "-1" doesn't cause exception on linux
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59010 Rashmi changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rashmikatag...@in.ibm.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
