[Bug 63943] Add possibility to overwrite remote port with information from header value
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63943 --- Comment #8 from Mark Thomas --- A little research suggests that this is usually included in the X-Forwarded-For header rather than as a separate header. RFC 7239 uses that format as does Azure. I haven't found any references to a dedicated header. Any reason to to address this by adding support for port as well as address in X-Forwarded-For ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
[Bug 63943] Add possibility to overwrite remote port with information from header value
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63943 --- Comment #7 from Mark Thomas --- Because users want to write applications that "just work" irrespective of whether there is a reverse proxy in front of Tomcat and/or how that reverse proxy is configured. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
[Bug 63943] Add possibility to overwrite remote port with information from header value
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63943 --- Comment #6 from Nicolò Boschi --- Why can't you just read the header value? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
[Bug 63943] Add possibility to overwrite remote port with information from header value
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63943 --- Comment #5 from Mark Thomas --- (In reply to George Stanchev from comment #4) > According to [1] it is "x-forwarded-port" No, that is the port on the proxy that the client connected to (already supported). The enhancement request is for the port that the client connected from. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
[Bug 63943] Add possibility to overwrite remote port with information from header value
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63943 --- Comment #4 from George Stanchev --- According to [1] it is "x-forwarded-port" https://docs.aws.amazon.com/elasticloadbalancing/latest/classic/x-forwarded-headers.html#x-forwarded-port -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
[Bug 63943] Add possibility to overwrite remote port with information from header value
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63943 Mark Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|INVALID |--- Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED --- Comment #3 from Mark Thomas --- Sorry, now I understand. You want to be able to set the value returned from ServletRequest.getRemotePort() based on a header. Is there a standard, OK typical, name for this header (we can make it configurable anyway). Note there is also bug 63080. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
[Bug 63943] Add possibility to overwrite remote port with information from header value
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63943 --- Comment #2 from Peter Gierl --- It's not implemented in RemoteIpValve, only the server port information may be transported, not the remote port. So where is it present? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
[Bug 63943] Add possibility to overwrite remote port with information from header value
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63943 Mark Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|NEW |RESOLVED --- Comment #1 from Mark Thomas --- This feature has been present since May 2011. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
