Re: [Fwd: Re: TC patches as discussed]
Mark Thomas wrote: http://people.apache.org/~markt/patches/2008-10-31-tc4-wininstaller.patch Can you explain a bit the motivation for all the path changes (including the sub directory in the target path and adding *.* to the source)? I might then well be able to vote for the second one too. Regards, Rainer - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Fwd: Re: TC patches as discussed]
Rainer Jung wrote: Mark Thomas wrote: http://people.apache.org/~markt/patches/2008-10-31-tc4-wininstaller.patch Can you explain a bit the motivation for all the path changes (including the sub directory in the target path and adding *.* to the source)? File -r common matches common/*.* and */common/*.* File -r common/*.* matches only common/*.* Because we use common/*.* as a pattern you have to set the directory first to make sure stuff gets expanded to the right place. The problem with the current pattern is we include stuff we shouldn't form other random directories that happen to include the root directory name in their path. Mark - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Fwd: Re: TC patches as discussed]
For the record. I pestered Jean-Frederic to review these at ApacheCon. Mark Original Message Subject: Re: TC patches as discussed Date: Sat, 08 Nov 2008 00:35:07 +0100 From: jean-frederic clere [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mark Thomas wrote: http://people.apache.org/~markt/patches/2008-10-30-bug44494-regression.patch +1 http://people.apache.org/~markt/patches/2008-10-31-tc4-wininstaller.patch +1 Mark - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
