DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37302] - Custom context loader unable to find Tomcat jar files

2006-04-24 Thread bugzilla 
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37302


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
 Resolution||DUPLICATE




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-04-24 13:52 ---


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 37054 ***

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37302] - Custom context loader unable to find Tomcat jar files

2006-04-24 Thread bugzilla 
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37302





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-04-24 10:53 ---
Sorry, one of the related bugs in my last comment pointed back to this one. The
related bugs are: ASF Bugzilla Bug 37054, ASF Bugzilla Bug 38877.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37302] - Custom context loader unable to find Tomcat jar files

2006-04-24 Thread bugzilla 
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37302





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-04-24 10:46 ---
I also agree that this change should either be reverted (my preference) or the
documentation for the Loader element changed. We had a working Tomcat
application (using a custom classloader) that unexpectedly broke when migrating
from 5.0 to 5.5.16.  It took me several frustrating hours to track it down. 

For anyone else following this issue, there are at least two other related bugs:
ASF Bugzilla Bug 37054, ASF Bugzilla Bug 37302.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37302] - Custom context loader unable to find Tomcat jar files

2006-04-20 Thread bugzilla 
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37302





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-04-20 07:46 ---
We too had this problem and I spent a few days trying to figure it out.  We have
one project using 5.5.9 and it worked fine.  So we used their same environment
but with Tomcat 5.5.16 and was having problems.  I ended up downloading all the
tomcat versions from 5.5.9 to 5.5.17 to find out what was causing the problem.

When going form 5.5.x to 5.5.y, one would expect minor changes and bug fixes
only.  Perhaps it's just a confusion about the versioning system, but I believe
such a minor increment should not have regression issues.

I vote to add the rule back, and to make the change for the next major version,
5.6 or 6.0 or whatever.  I could understand if the rule was removed because it
was causing problems, but to remove it simply because it was thought to be
useless is a bit careless, especially now with evidence to the contrary.

-Michael

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37302] - Custom context loader unable to find Tomcat jar files

2005-10-31 Thread bugzilla 
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37302





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-10-31 20:46 ---
I did some more testings, the problem happens when the context definition is in
server.xml, if the context definition is in its own individual file it works.

So there are two solutions to fix this regression :
- fix the bug by reintroducing the rule or finding another technical solution.
- update the documentation by changing this sentence "Please note that for
tomcat 5, unlike tomcat 4.x, it is NOT recommended to place  elements
directly in the server.xml file" by "Please note that for tomcat 5.5, unlike
tomcat 4.x, it is NOT SUPPORTED to place  elements directly in the
server.xml file"


As written in the changelog this removal was based on the feelings that this
rule was useless and that "maybe it used to be useful", so yes it was very
useful before Tomcat 5, when defining context in server.xml was the recommended 
way.
>
>r303856 | remm | 2005-04-15 01:58:46 -0700 (Fri, 15 Apr 2005) | 4 lines
>- I don't see the purpose of the copy CL rule, as
>ContainerBase.getParentClassLoader will return the parent class loader anyway.
>If a custom parent is set, the rule will dumbly override it, thus it seems it
>never serves a useful purpose. Maybe it used to be useful.

Bruno

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37302] - Custom context loader unable to find Tomcat jar files

2005-10-30 Thread bugzilla 
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37302


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
 Resolution|INVALID |




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-10-30 21:40 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> This rule is useless.

I don't like to reopen a bug, but for me this is a regression issue that needs
some explanations. Maybe this rule is useless, but as I wrote in my previous
description, reintroducing this rule fix the problem.

I did the a test to see if the problem is the same with the default Loader. 
I added these lines in server.xml :




This fails in Tomcat 5.5.12 and works in Tomcat 5.5.9.
Thank you to do this test, it takes only a few minutes. 

Bruno

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37302] - Custom context loader unable to find Tomcat jar files

2005-10-29 Thread bugzilla 
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37302


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||INVALID




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-10-29 23:16 ---
This rule is useless.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]