Re: Tomcat 6 org.apache.catalina.session.ManagerBase issue

2012-04-09 Thread Christopher Schultz
Andras,

On 4/8/12 10:04 PM, Andras Rozsa wrote:
 Tomcat Developers,
 
 I am a UCCS student and the project I have been working on is related
 to session ID generation.
 
 I have checked the source code of Tomcat 6 (6.0.24) and I think I
 have found a mistake.

 Line 567: long update = ((byte) entropy[i])  ((i % 8) * 8);

In trunk (pre-6.0.36), the line of code is o.a.c.session.ManagerBase:583.

 This solution is not perfect.
 
 The update will be a 32-bit integer this way, so only the 32 LSB of
 the seed will be modified by entropy through the XOR. The byte
 casting should be replaced by a long casting.
 
 like this: long update = ((long) entropy[i])  ((i % 8) * 8);

For the record:

entropy is char[32]
i is int

Here is my analysis of the expression. All references are to JLS 7.

First, we have (byte) entropy[i] which is a narrowing conversion (S
5.5) from char to byte, so we have only 8 bits of real data. On the
other side of the , we have all integer operations (32-bit), so we
ultimately have

byte  int

This represents a binary numeric promotion (S 5.6.2) which will result
in an integer (32-bit) operation. The result is subject to an assignment
conversion from 32-bit int to 64-bit long (S 5.2).

The local variable update is then used as an operand in an XOR
operation with a seed value.

Also,

1. The 'entropy' value is an array of 32 characters, so i varies
   from 0 .. 31 (which is actually irrelevant, given #2)

2. 'i' is reduced by the modulus operator to 0..7

3. Thus, the value of entropy[i] is never left-shifted more than 7 bits

4. The 'entropy' array, while a char[] array, only contains
   byte-promoted values (see ManagerBase.getEntropy).

Since ((byte)entropy[i]) is a 32-bit value (due to widening prior to the
 operation) but only has 8-bits of useful information, shifting it up
to 7 bits to the left does not lose any information.

One could argue that the cast from char to byte on line 583 itself
removes some amount of information, since the value is being converted
from 16-bits to 8-bits. However, casting to long would only serve to
turn a 32-bit  operation into a 64-bit one, which doesn't actually help.

If one were to simply remove the (byte) cast, then the full 16-bits of
the entropy character would be shifted and no bit-loss would occur.
Casting to long does not add anything to this expression that removing
the cast to byte would.

Finally, since the entropy data is only significant to 8-bits anyway,
absolutely no information is lost here for any reason.

It may be a good idea to document this method to explain this, as it
does look like a bug on the face of it, until one looks at the actual
data being used in the operation.

-chris



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: Tomcat 6 org.apache.catalina.session.ManagerBase issue

2012-04-09 Thread Christopher Schultz
All,

On 4/9/12 1:18 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
 In trunk (pre-6.0.36), the line of code is o.a.c.session.ManagerBase:583.

Excuse me, I meant to say 6.0.x/trunk, not trunk. This code doesn't
exist at all in current trunk.

-chris



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


RE: Tomcat 6 org.apache.catalina.session.ManagerBase issue

2012-04-09 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
 From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net] 
 Subject: Re: Tomcat 6 org.apache.catalina.session.ManagerBase issue

 Line 567: long update = ((byte) entropy[i])  ((i % 8) * 8);

 2. 'i' is reduced by the modulus operator to 0..7

And then multiplied by 8.

 3. Thus, the value of entropy[i] is never left-shifted more than 7 bits

No, it's left shifted between 0 and 56 bits (maintaining byte alignment).  
Information is lost.

 - Chuck


THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY 
MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you received 
this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and its 
attachments from all computers.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org



Re: Tomcat 6 org.apache.catalina.session.ManagerBase issue

2012-04-09 Thread Christopher Schultz
Chuck,

On 4/9/12 1:23 PM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
 From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net] 
 Subject: Re: Tomcat 6 org.apache.catalina.session.ManagerBase issue
 
 Line 567: long update = ((byte) entropy[i])  ((i % 8) * 8);
 
 2. 'i' is reduced by the modulus operator to 0..7
 
 And then multiplied by 8.
 
 3. Thus, the value of entropy[i] is never left-shifted more than 7 bits
 
 No, it's left shifted between 0 and 56 bits (maintaining byte
 alignment).  Information is lost.

Rrr. Duh. In fact, the upper 3 bytes of the entropy are lost, which is
quite a bit. This definitely should be cast to long at some point before
the  occurs.

Andros, please log a bug report in Bugzilla:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/

-chris



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: Tomcat 6 org.apache.catalina.session.ManagerBase issue

2012-04-09 Thread Andras Rozsa
Dear Chris,

You missed my point.

I've tested that code.

So, the seed itself is a long (first it is System.currentTimeMillis() - that 
means the most significant bits don't change because of its nature.)
The left-shifts with 8 bits and the XOR would achieve to update all the bits 
of the seed variable.
With this code its impossible to update the 32 most significant bits since the 
right side becomes an 32-bit int as you mentioned as well. So the long update 
will be a 32-bit int!

That means even if there would be a 56-bit left shift (when i is 7 for 
example), because of the 32-bit int that's a 24 bit left shift (the shift 
operation is circular) and the XOR will update the seed bits from 24 to 31.
The bits from 32 to 63 of the seed are never changed by update! I think that's 
not the goal there!
There should be a long cast before the shift operation.


Andras




 From: Christopher Schultz ch...@christopherschultz.net
To: Tomcat Developers List dev@tomcat.apache.org 
Cc: Andras Rozsa andras_ro...@yahoo.com 
Sent: Monday, April 9, 2012 11:18 AM
Subject: Re: Tomcat 6  org.apache.catalina.session.ManagerBase issue
 
Andras,

On 4/8/12 10:04 PM, Andras Rozsa wrote:
 Tomcat Developers,
 
 I am a UCCS student and the project I have been working on is related
 to session ID generation.
 
 I have checked the source code of Tomcat 6 (6.0.24) and I think I
 have found a mistake.

 Line 567: long update = ((byte) entropy[i])  ((i % 8) * 8);

In trunk (pre-6.0.36), the line of code is o.a.c.session.ManagerBase:583.

 This solution is not perfect.
 
 The update will be a 32-bit integer this way, so only the 32 LSB of
 the seed will be modified by entropy through the XOR. The byte
 casting should be replaced by a long casting.
 
 like this: long update = ((long) entropy[i])  ((i % 8) * 8);

For the record:

entropy is char[32]
i is int

Here is my analysis of the expression. All references are to JLS 7.

First, we have (byte) entropy[i] which is a narrowing conversion (S
5.5) from char to byte, so we have only 8 bits of real data. On the
other side of the , we have all integer operations (32-bit), so we
ultimately have

byte  int

This represents a binary numeric promotion (S 5.6.2) which will result
in an integer (32-bit) operation. The result is subject to an assignment
conversion from 32-bit int to 64-bit long (S 5.2).

The local variable update is then used as an operand in an XOR
operation with a seed value.

Also,

1. The 'entropy' value is an array of 32 characters, so i varies
   from 0 .. 31 (which is actually irrelevant, given #2)

2. 'i' is reduced by the modulus operator to 0..7

3. Thus, the value of entropy[i] is never left-shifted more than 7 bits

4. The 'entropy' array, while a char[] array, only contains
   byte-promoted values (see ManagerBase.getEntropy).

Since ((byte)entropy[i]) is a 32-bit value (due to widening prior to the
 operation) but only has 8-bits of useful information, shifting it up
to 7 bits to the left does not lose any information.

One could argue that the cast from char to byte on line 583 itself
removes some amount of information, since the value is being converted
from 16-bits to 8-bits. However, casting to long would only serve to
turn a 32-bit  operation into a 64-bit one, which doesn't actually help.

If one were to simply remove the (byte) cast, then the full 16-bits of
the entropy character would be shifted and no bit-loss would occur.
Casting to long does not add anything to this expression that removing
the cast to byte would.

Finally, since the entropy data is only significant to 8-bits anyway,
absolutely no information is lost here for any reason.

It may be a good idea to document this method to explain this, as it
does look like a bug on the face of it, until one looks at the actual
data being used in the operation.

-chris