Re: [Bug 55508] TldLocationsCache not recognising custom TLDs in WEB-INF/lib

2013-09-17 Thread Violeta Georgieva
Hi Jeremy,

2013/9/13 
>
> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55508
>
> Jeremy Boynes  changed:
>
>What|Removed |Added
>

>  Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
>  Resolution|INVALID |---
>
> --- Comment #4 from Jeremy Boynes  ---
> Reopening this for further discussion, and to see whether I need to change
> TldScanner in trunk as I think I introduced a regression here.
>
> I interpreted the spec as saying that all TLDs under /WEB-INF *must* be
> included except for any under /WEB-INF/tags (except for any implicit.tld
found
> there). As a result, although applications *should* not place them in
> /WEB-INF/lib or /WEB-INF/classes, that was a recommendation and if they
were
> there the container would need to include them.
>
> The change to TldScanner in TC8 unintentionally resurrected the behaviour
from
> TC6 that was removed in TC7.

Do we have this change in TC7 or it is only in TC8?

Thanks
Violeta


Re: [Bug 55508] TldLocationsCache not recognising custom TLDs in WEB-INF/lib

2013-09-17 Thread Jeremy Boynes
On Sep 17, 2013, at 11:10 PM, Violeta Georgieva  wrote:

> Hi Jeremy,
> 
> 2013/9/13 
>> 
>> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55508
>> 
>> Jeremy Boynes  changed:
>> 
>>   What|Removed |Added
>> 
> 
>> Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
>> Resolution|INVALID |---
>> 
>> --- Comment #4 from Jeremy Boynes  ---
>> Reopening this for further discussion, and to see whether I need to change
>> TldScanner in trunk as I think I introduced a regression here.
>> 
>> I interpreted the spec as saying that all TLDs under /WEB-INF *must* be
>> included except for any under /WEB-INF/tags (except for any implicit.tld
> found
>> there). As a result, although applications *should* not place them in
>> /WEB-INF/lib or /WEB-INF/classes, that was a recommendation and if they
> were
>> there the container would need to include them.
>> 
>> The change to TldScanner in TC8 unintentionally resurrected the behaviour
> from
>> TC6 that was removed in TC7.
> 
> Do we have this change in TC7 or it is only in TC8?

It is only in TC8.
Cheers
Jeremy



signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail