Re: new year, new version? 6.0.16

2008-01-17 Thread Peter Rossbach

+1
Peter


Am 16.01.2008 um 23:26 schrieb Filip Hanik - Dev Lists:

could we get a target date for this? I believe there is enough  
community interest to push out a new release


Filip


Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
we have a lot of updates added in, I think it may be good to set a  
date for our next release and work towards that


Filip

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]






-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]






Re: new year, new version? 6.0.16

2008-01-17 Thread Remy Maucherat
On Wed, 2008-01-16 at 15:26 -0700, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
 could we get a target date for this? I believe there is enough community 
 interest to push out a new release

There are still a lot of pending patches.

Rémy



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: new year, new version? 6.0.16

2008-01-17 Thread Rainer Jung

Remy Maucherat wrote:

On Wed, 2008-01-16 at 15:26 -0700, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
could we get a target date for this? I believe there is enough community 
interest to push out a new release


There are still a lot of pending patches.

Rémy


All entries in the STATUS file now carry at least three positive votes, 
except for the first entry, which is not critical, because it's only a 
patch to a test case.


If we don't add further entries, it should be possible to get all those 
included. Note: none of the 7 entries seems to be critical.


Regards,

Rainer



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: new year, new version? 6.0.16

2008-01-17 Thread Christophe Pierret
Maybe some patches could be prioritized and planned to different releases 
(6.0.17, ...), the amount of available pending patches should not prevent from 
delivering a much awaited release.
In my case, it is very much awaited, I am currently using unofficial 6.0.15 for 
my product , despite the negative vote, because, for the parts I use, I found 
6.0.15 of better quality than 6.0.14 !

Christophe

-Message d'origine-
De : Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Envoyé : jeudi 17 janvier 2008 11:27
À : Tomcat Developers List
Objet : Re: new year, new version? 6.0.16

On Wed, 2008-01-16 at 15:26 -0700, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
 could we get a target date for this? I believe there is enough community 
 interest to push out a new release

There are still a lot of pending patches.

Rémy



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: new year, new version? 6.0.16

2008-01-17 Thread Rainer Jung

Remy Maucherat wrote:

On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 07:56 -0700, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:

Remy Maucherat wrote:

On Wed, 2008-01-16 at 15:26 -0700, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
  
could we get a target date for this? I believe there is enough community 
interest to push out a new release


There are still a lot of pending patches.
  

that's alright, shouldn't prevent us from setting a date


I could use the same date as the 5.5 release.


+1



Rémy


Rainer

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: new year, new version? 6.0.16

2008-01-17 Thread Remy Maucherat
On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 07:56 -0700, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
 Remy Maucherat wrote:
  On Wed, 2008-01-16 at 15:26 -0700, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:

  could we get a target date for this? I believe there is enough community 
  interest to push out a new release
  
 
  There are still a lot of pending patches.

 that's alright, shouldn't prevent us from setting a date

I could use the same date as the 5.5 release.

Rémy



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: new year, new version? 6.0.16

2008-01-17 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists

Remy Maucherat wrote:

On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 07:56 -0700, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
  

Remy Maucherat wrote:


On Wed, 2008-01-16 at 15:26 -0700, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
  
  
could we get a target date for this? I believe there is enough community 
interest to push out a new release



There are still a lot of pending patches.
  
  

that's alright, shouldn't prevent us from setting a date



I could use the same date as the 5.5 release.
  

+1

Rémy



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



  



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: new year, new version? 6.0.16

2008-01-17 Thread Mark Thomas

Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:

Remy Maucherat wrote:

On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 07:56 -0700, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
 

Remy Maucherat wrote:
   

On Wed, 2008-01-16 at 15:26 -0700, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
   
could we get a target date for this? I believe there is enough 
community interest to push out a new release


There are still a lot of pending patches.


that's alright, shouldn't prevent us from setting a date



I could use the same date as the 5.5 release.
  

+1


+1. The one patch I do want to get into 6.0.16 and 5.5.26 is the update to 
commons-pool 1.4 which will fix 
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43552


I was going to do it last night but the archive hadn't sync'd. It looks 
like it is there now so I'll propose the patch now.


Mark


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: new year, new version? 6.0.16

2008-01-17 Thread David Jencks
Would this be from trunk or from a previous 6.0.x branch?  I seem to  
recall some concerns about including the annotation processing  
changes that are now in trunk in a 6.0.x release and some thought  
that a version number more like 6.1 would be more appropriate.


thanks
david jencks

On Jan 4, 2008, at 10:20 AM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:

we have a lot of updates added in, I think it may be good to set a  
date for our next release and work towards that


Filip

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: new year, new version? 6.0.16

2008-01-17 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists

David Jencks wrote:
Would this be from trunk or from a previous 6.0.x branch?  I seem to 
recall some concerns about including the annotation processing changes 
that are now in trunk in a 6.0.x release and some thought that a 
version number more like 6.1 would be more appropriate.
no release date set on trunk yet, there wont be until trunk moves to a 
6.x branch, and then we do releases from there.
I don't see this one in a while, 6.0 is still gaining momentum and is 
getting bugfixes done.

Filip



thanks
david jencks

On Jan 4, 2008, at 10:20 AM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:

we have a lot of updates added in, I think it may be good to set a 
date for our next release and work towards that


Filip

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]






-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: new year, new version? 6.0.16

2008-01-16 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
could we get a target date for this? I believe there is enough community 
interest to push out a new release


Filip


Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
we have a lot of updates added in, I think it may be good to set a 
date for our next release and work towards that


Filip

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]






-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: new year, new version? 6.0.16

2008-01-08 Thread Remy Maucherat
On Fri, 2008-01-04 at 11:20 -0700, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
 we have a lot of updates added in, I think it may be good to set a date 
 for our next release and work towards that

r297710 is a hack, and reintroduces a data corruption bug that was fixed
a long time ago.

Rémy



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: new year, new version? 6.0.16

2008-01-08 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists

ok, I'll take a look at this before we move on

Filip

Remy Maucherat wrote:

On Fri, 2008-01-04 at 11:20 -0700, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
  
we have a lot of updates added in, I think it may be good to set a date 
for our next release and work towards that



r297710 is a hack, and reintroduces a data corruption bug that was fixed
a long time ago.

Rémy



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



  



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: new year, new version? 6.0.16

2008-01-08 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists

Remy Maucherat wrote:

On Fri, 2008-01-04 at 11:20 -0700, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
  
we have a lot of updates added in, I think it may be good to set a date 
for our next release and work towards that



r297710 is a hack, and reintroduces a data corruption bug that was fixed
a long time ago.
  
I've addressed the issue, and at the same time, solved the comet block 
problem to 95%, since the ratio of times when parseCRLF needs to fill up 
new bytes is relatively low.

If there are bytes left, then we parseCRLF directly, otherwise we defer it.
In order to this, I had to correct CRLF parsing to be stricter, since 
previously it allows CRCRLF, CRCRCRLF and even just LF as CRLF delimiters.


http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/patches/fix-bz7-alt-1.patch

Filip

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: new year, new version? 6.0.16

2008-01-04 Thread Yoav Shapira
On Jan 4, 2008 1:34 PM, Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
  we have a lot of updates added in, I think it may be good to set a date
  for our next release and work towards that

 +1.

 There are a stack of changes (both committed and proposed) for 5.5.x as
 well. It would be good to plan a 5.5.x release as well.

 I'll also do a 4.1.x release and wrap up the few remaining patches for that.

+1

Yoav

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: new year, new version? 6.0.16

2008-01-04 Thread Mark Thomas
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
 we have a lot of updates added in, I think it may be good to set a date
 for our next release and work towards that

+1.

There are a stack of changes (both committed and proposed) for 5.5.x as
well. It would be good to plan a 5.5.x release as well.

I'll also do a 4.1.x release and wrap up the few remaining patches for that.

Mark

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: new year, new version? 6.0.16

2008-01-04 Thread Rainer Jung
Mark Thomas schrieb:
 Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
 we have a lot of updates added in, I think it may be good to set a date
 for our next release and work towards that
 
 +1.
 
 There are a stack of changes (both committed and proposed) for 5.5.x as
 well. It would be good to plan a 5.5.x release as well.
 
 I'll also do a 4.1.x release and wrap up the few remaining patches for that.
 
 Mark

+1

We need a some more votes for the long patch list in 5.5 STATUS.txt.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: new year, new version? 6.0.16

2008-01-04 Thread Henri Gomez
+1

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]