Re: tcnative documentation is broken on tomcat.apache.org

2012-06-11 Thread Christopher Schultz
Konstantin,

On 6/7/12 5:49 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
 2012/6/8 Konstantin Kolinko knst.koli...@gmail.com:
 2012/6/8 Christopher Schultz ch...@christopherschultz.net:
 All,

 http://tomcat.apache.org/native-doc/

 It says that tcnative 2.0.0 has been released, has no date, and links to
 non-existent files.

 Same thing with http://tomcat.apache.org/native-doc/news/2010.html

 Can someone take a look?


 Apparently it was built from native/trunk, instead of native/branches/1.1.x

 
 Fixed.

Thanks. I noticed when I recently updated the website (security pages),
svn pulled-in tcnative documentation at the same time.  I don't grok svn
module resolution but is it possible that it is misconfigured, and that
I broke the tcnative portion of the docs by running 'svn up' according
to the documentation?

-chris



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: tcnative documentation is broken on tomcat.apache.org

2012-06-11 Thread Konstantin Kolinko
2012/6/11 Christopher Schultz ch...@christopherschultz.net:
 Konstantin,

 On 6/7/12 5:49 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
 2012/6/8 Konstantin Kolinko knst.koli...@gmail.com:
 2012/6/8 Christopher Schultz ch...@christopherschultz.net:
 All,

 http://tomcat.apache.org/native-doc/

 It says that tcnative 2.0.0 has been released, has no date, and links to
 non-existent files.

 Same thing with http://tomcat.apache.org/native-doc/news/2010.html

 Can someone take a look?


 Apparently it was built from native/trunk, instead of native/branches/1.1.x


 Fixed.

 Thanks. I noticed when I recently updated the website (security pages),
 svn pulled-in tcnative documentation at the same time.  I don't grok svn
 module resolution but is it possible that it is misconfigured, and that
 I broke the tcnative portion of the docs by running 'svn up' according
 to the documentation?


The last change to native-doc was my setting svn:eol-style on some files
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=1347816

I might have forgotten to run svn up after that, as this operation
is essentially a noop.

You are not able to break anything by svn up. What is in svn is
considered the correct version.  You can use svn st (status) to
check that there are none locally modified files on the server.

We are going to move to svnpubsub one day and those svn ups will
become a history... The only pending question that prevents us from
switching now is with tomcat-taglibs and tomcat-maven websites which
are not in svn.

Best regards,
Konstantin Kolinko

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org



tcnative documentation is broken on tomcat.apache.org

2012-06-07 Thread Christopher Schultz
All,

http://tomcat.apache.org/native-doc/

It says that tcnative 2.0.0 has been released, has no date, and links to
non-existent files.

Same thing with http://tomcat.apache.org/native-doc/news/2010.html

Can someone take a look?

-chris



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: tcnative documentation is broken on tomcat.apache.org

2012-06-07 Thread Konstantin Kolinko
2012/6/8 Christopher Schultz ch...@christopherschultz.net:
 All,

 http://tomcat.apache.org/native-doc/

 It says that tcnative 2.0.0 has been released, has no date, and links to
 non-existent files.

 Same thing with http://tomcat.apache.org/native-doc/news/2010.html

 Can someone take a look?


Apparently it was built from native/trunk, instead of native/branches/1.1.x

I'll take care of it.

Best regards,
Konstantin Kolinko

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org



Re: tcnative documentation is broken on tomcat.apache.org

2012-06-07 Thread Konstantin Kolinko
2012/6/8 Konstantin Kolinko knst.koli...@gmail.com:
 2012/6/8 Christopher Schultz ch...@christopherschultz.net:
 All,

 http://tomcat.apache.org/native-doc/

 It says that tcnative 2.0.0 has been released, has no date, and links to
 non-existent files.

 Same thing with http://tomcat.apache.org/native-doc/news/2010.html

 Can someone take a look?


 Apparently it was built from native/trunk, instead of native/branches/1.1.x


Fixed.

Best regards,
Konstantin Kolinko

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org