Re: [VOTE] TomEE 1.6.0 / OpenEJB 4.6.0 (staging-120) -- CANCELLED
There's a -1 on the OpenJPA vote. We would have needed that vote to pass to use those binaries in our release. The -1 wasn't serious and we still have a chance to come through for Alex, Tim, Judah and crew, so I've pulled the OpenJPA tag in so we can make our own binaries from it. Builds are up and TCK us running. If all looks good, I'll put them up for a vote. Thanks to everyone who took the time to review these binaries. We've never had so many +1 votes from non-committers before. Really very awesome. -David On Nov 17, 2013, at 12:04 AM, David Blevins wrote: > Technically its 72 hours is already up and there are no votes from the PMC. > Just 3 non-binding +1s from us. > > Did my best to encourage activity of any kind. If I don't see any by > tomorrow, I might try spinning up some plan B binaries with OpenJPA pulled in. > > -David > > On Nov 16, 2013, at 10:16 PM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote: > >> Of course. >> AFAIR, OpenJPA 2.3.0 is under vote currently, so it should be ok on Monday >> or so. >> >> JLouis >> >> >> 2013/11/16 Romain Manni-Bucau >> >>> @jl: we cant while openjpa vote didnt pass >>> Le 16 nov. 2013 16:17, "Jean-Louis MONTEIRO" a écrit >>> : >>> David has been out the whole week to give talks to Devoxx BE. As far as I know, I gonna get back late on Monday. If needed, I can follow the release process tomorrow or on Monday >>> morning. JLouis 2013/11/16 Matthias Wessendorf > +1 > > updated my test suite - works fine > > -Matthias > > > On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Mark Struberg wrote: > >> >> >> +1 >> >> LieGrue, >> strub >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>> From: David Blevins >>> To: "dev@tomee.apache.org" >>> Sent: Tuesday, 12 November 2013, 2:47 >>> Subject: [VOTE] TomEE 1.6.0 / OpenEJB 4.6.0 (staging-120) >>> >>> >>> Ok! All dependent projects are up for votes or completed voting. >>> >>> I rolled a new set of binaries with Mark's proposed OpenJPA 2.3.0 >> binaries. I ran these through the TCK and all is green. Looks like > we're >> good to go. >>> >>> Maven Repo: >>> >>> - > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-120/ >>> >>> Binaries: >>> >>> - https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-120/tomee-1.6.0/ >>> >>> Tag: >>> >>> - https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee/tomee/tags/tomee-1.6.0/ >>> >>> >>> The vote will go for 72 hours. Any -1s in this time will be seen >>> as a >> positive. The vote will keep going even if a -1 happens so we can > collect >> all possible feedback and surface *all* issues. >>> >>> If we have to reroll and revote, we will fix all -1 issues and push new >> binaries and start a new 72 hour vote. If you didn't look at the >>> first > set >> of binaries and feel compelled to vote -1, this will be seen as a >> negative. Consider offering each voter an hour per vote on a task of > their >> choosing to make up for their lost time. :) >>> >>> >>> -David >>> >>> >>> >> > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > -- Jean-Louis >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Jean-Louis >
[VOTE] TomEE 1.6.0 / OpenEJB 4.6.0 (staging-147)
Ok, TCK clean so far. Maven Repo: - https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-147/ Binaries: - https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-147/tomee-1.6.0/ Tag: - https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee/tomee/tags/tomee-1.6.0/ The vote will go for 72 hours. This one should be fairly easy as the binaries are effectively the same. Will attempt to do a little binary diff work later today to save everyone the trouble of having to re-evaluate the full set of binaries from scratch. -David
Re: [VOTE] TomEE 1.6.0 / OpenEJB 4.6.0 (staging-147)
Thanks David, here is my +1 JLouis 2013/11/17 David Blevins > Ok, TCK clean so far. > > Maven Repo: > > - https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-147/ > > Binaries: > > - https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-147/tomee-1.6.0/ > > Tag: > > - https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee/tomee/tags/tomee-1.6.0/ > > > The vote will go for 72 hours. This one should be fairly easy as the > binaries are effectively the same. Will attempt to do a little binary diff > work later today to save everyone the trouble of having to re-evaluate the > full set of binaries from scratch. > > > -David > > -- Jean-Louis
Re: [VOTE] TomEE 1.6.0 / OpenEJB 4.6.0 (staging-147)
that repo worked fine for my tests as well +1 -M On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote: > Thanks David, here is my +1 > > JLouis > > > 2013/11/17 David Blevins > > > Ok, TCK clean so far. > > > > Maven Repo: > > > > - https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-147/ > > > > Binaries: > > > > - https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-147/tomee-1.6.0/ > > > > Tag: > > > > - https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee/tomee/tags/tomee-1.6.0/ > > > > > > The vote will go for 72 hours. This one should be fairly easy as the > > binaries are effectively the same. Will attempt to do a little binary > diff > > work later today to save everyone the trouble of having to re-evaluate > the > > full set of binaries from scratch. > > > > > > -David > > > > > > > -- > Jean-Louis > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
Re: [VOTE] TomEE 1.6.0 / OpenEJB 4.6.0 (staging-147)
+1 []s, Thiago. On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 8:09 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > that repo worked fine for my tests as well > > +1 > > -M > > > On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO >wrote: > > > Thanks David, here is my +1 > > > > JLouis > > > > > > 2013/11/17 David Blevins > > > > > Ok, TCK clean so far. > > > > > > Maven Repo: > > > > > > - > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-147/ > > > > > > Binaries: > > > > > > - > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-147/tomee-1.6.0/ > > > > > > Tag: > > > > > > - https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee/tomee/tags/tomee-1.6.0/ > > > > > > > > > The vote will go for 72 hours. This one should be fairly easy as the > > > binaries are effectively the same. Will attempt to do a little binary > > diff > > > work later today to save everyone the trouble of having to re-evaluate > > the > > > full set of binaries from scratch. > > > > > > > > > -David > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Jean-Louis > > > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >
classloading documentation
Hi together, I'm new to mailing list and hope this is the right place to address to. I would like to suggest to improve the documentation on classloading and classloader hierarchy in tomee. The documentation on deployment on http://tomee.apache.org/deploying-in-tomee.html needs one of an explanation of tomee's classloading principles or a link to official java ee resources (in case the mechanisms are exactly the same). What is the TempClassLoader? So far I found on the website and through search engine only one explanation which refers to the temploader.skip property, but this isn't sufficient. Regards, K. Richter signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [VOTE] TomEE 1.6.0 / OpenEJB 4.6.0 (staging-147)
+1 Le 17 nov. 2013 16:15, "Thiago Veronezi" a écrit : > +1 > > []s, > Thiago. > > > On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 8:09 AM, Matthias Wessendorf >wrote: > > > that repo worked fine for my tests as well > > > > +1 > > > > -M > > > > > > On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO < > jeano...@gmail.com > > >wrote: > > > > > Thanks David, here is my +1 > > > > > > JLouis > > > > > > > > > 2013/11/17 David Blevins > > > > > > > Ok, TCK clean so far. > > > > > > > > Maven Repo: > > > > > > > > - > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-147/ > > > > > > > > Binaries: > > > > > > > > - > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-147/tomee-1.6.0/ > > > > > > > > Tag: > > > > > > > > - https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee/tomee/tags/tomee-1.6.0/ > > > > > > > > > > > > The vote will go for 72 hours. This one should be fairly easy as the > > > > binaries are effectively the same. Will attempt to do a little > binary > > > diff > > > > work later today to save everyone the trouble of having to > re-evaluate > > > the > > > > full set of binaries from scratch. > > > > > > > > > > > > -David > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Jean-Louis > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Matthias Wessendorf > > > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > > >
Re: [VOTE] TomEE 1.6.0 / OpenEJB 4.6.0 (staging-147)
+1 Jeff David Blevins November 17, 2013 at 3:16 AM Ok, TCK clean so far.Maven Repo:- https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-147/Binaries:- https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-147/tomee-1.6.0/Tag:- https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee/tomee/tags/tomee-1.6.0/The vote will go for 72 hours. This one should be fairly easy as the binaries are effectively the same. Will attempt to do a little binary diff work later today to save everyone the trouble of having to re-evaluate the full set of binaries from scratch.-David
Re: [VOTE] TomEE 1.6.0 / OpenEJB 4.6.0 (staging-147)
There seems to be a number of license failures after I run ant -f rat.xml scan On Nov 17, 2013, at 2:16 AM, David Blevins wrote: > Ok, TCK clean so far. > > Maven Repo: > > - https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-147/ > > Binaries: > > - https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-147/tomee-1.6.0/ > > Tag: > > - https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee/tomee/tags/tomee-1.6.0/ > > > The vote will go for 72 hours. This one should be fairly easy as the > binaries are effectively the same. Will attempt to do a little binary diff > work later today to save everyone the trouble of having to re-evaluate the > full set of binaries from scratch. > > > -David >
Re: [VOTE] TomEE 1.6.0 / OpenEJB 4.6.0 (staging-147)
Digging in. A gentle note to late feedback like this; we're 2 weeks and several all-nighters into this release :) This is a very big part of our long release cycles. The feedback is excellent, the timing could be improved :) -David On Nov 17, 2013, at 7:35 PM, "Alan D. Cabrera" wrote: > There seems to be a number of license failures after I run > > ant -f rat.xml scan > > > On Nov 17, 2013, at 2:16 AM, David Blevins wrote: > >> Ok, TCK clean so far. >> >> Maven Repo: >> >> - https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-147/ >> >> Binaries: >> >> - https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-147/tomee-1.6.0/ >> >> Tag: >> >> - https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee/tomee/tags/tomee-1.6.0/ >> >> >> The vote will go for 72 hours. This one should be fairly easy as the >> binaries are effectively the same. Will attempt to do a little binary diff >> work later today to save everyone the trouble of having to re-evaluate the >> full set of binaries from scratch. >> >> >> -David >> >
Re: [VOTE] TomEE 1.6.0 / OpenEJB 4.6.0 (staging-147)
We were simply missing a lot of excludes in the rat.xml, which I've added in trunk with some small comments. There were 5 trivial java files missing headers. No IP in any of them. Fixed in trunk anyway, but not worth the 18+ community hours to reroll and review new binaries. -David On Nov 17, 2013, at 8:17 PM, David Blevins wrote: > Digging in. A gentle note to late feedback like this; we're 2 weeks and > several all-nighters into this release :) > > This is a very big part of our long release cycles. > > The feedback is excellent, the timing could be improved :) > > > -David > > On Nov 17, 2013, at 7:35 PM, "Alan D. Cabrera" wrote: > >> There seems to be a number of license failures after I run >> >> ant -f rat.xml scan >> >> >> On Nov 17, 2013, at 2:16 AM, David Blevins wrote: >> >>> Ok, TCK clean so far. >>> >>> Maven Repo: >>> >>> - https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-147/ >>> >>> Binaries: >>> >>> - https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-147/tomee-1.6.0/ >>> >>> Tag: >>> >>> - https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee/tomee/tags/tomee-1.6.0/ >>> >>> >>> The vote will go for 72 hours. This one should be fairly easy as the >>> binaries are effectively the same. Will attempt to do a little binary diff >>> work later today to save everyone the trouble of having to re-evaluate the >>> full set of binaries from scratch. >>> >>> >>> -David >>> >> >
Re: classloading documentation
Thanks for the note, Karl! Adding to your point, I suspect it's a good time to start publishing JavaDoc as well. -David On Nov 17, 2013, at 4:35 PM, Karl-Philipp Richter wrote: > Hi together, > I'm new to mailing list and hope this is the right place to address to. > > I would like to suggest to improve the documentation on classloading and > classloader hierarchy in tomee. The documentation on deployment on > http://tomee.apache.org/deploying-in-tomee.html needs one of an > explanation of tomee's classloading principles or a link to official > java ee resources (in case the mechanisms are exactly the same). > What is the TempClassLoader? So far I found on the website and through > search engine only one explanation which refers to the temploader.skip > property, but this isn't sufficient. > > Regards, > K. Richter >
Re: Would like to contribute
Thanks Abhijit! Everyone is more than welcome. There is no small help. Feel free to have a look to examples, validation controls, documentation, or anything else you want. Let us know if you need some guidance and welcome. Jean-Louis 2013/11/17 Abhijit Sarkar > Hi,I mentioned to David Blevins on Twitter that I'd love to make some > contribution. He offered to work with Ivan Stefanov to start with. I'm new > to the community based project model (have been and am working in a > corporation) and would appreciate some pointers. > Currently I'm working hard for the Oracle Web services certification but > can find time for small changes. As this says, start small ( > http://tomee.apache.org/dev/contribution-tips.html). > Looking forward to working with the awesome folks here. > --Abhijit -- Jean-Louis
