Re: Potential release vote for 8.0.7 and 9.0.0-M7
Skip my previous question. Regards. Gurkan On Sat, May 1, 2021 at 8:57 AM Gurkan Erdogdu wrote: > AFAIK, (please correct me if I am wrong), ASF is not a member of the > Jakarta EE working group and is not able to get certified. How will TomEE > get certified? > Because of this, Tomcat is not able to be listed in certification pages of > Servlet specification. > > Regards. > Gurkan > > On Sat, May 1, 2021 at 4:32 AM David Blevins > wrote: > >> Heads up that we are narrowing in in the last few TCK issues and there is >> still some chance we can be Jakarta EE 9.1 Web Profile certified in time >> for the Jakarta EE 9.1 release vote Monday. >> >> It would be super super and I mean *super* tight >> >> However, if we can get it done we'll need to do a release vote by no >> later than Sunday afternoon and file our certification request. We don't >> need to have concluded our vote to make the Jakarta EE 9.1 release ballot, >> we just need final binaries of our own to be at least in staging and in the >> process of our own vote. >> >> We do need that vote pass, however, so that would require some pragmatism >> on all our parts. >> >> For that reason I recommend we do not try to push out a 9.0.0 final, but >> go ahead with 9.0.0-M7. If there are some issues with the binaries we put >> up for vote, unless they are legal issues, we can still release them and >> immediately fix the issues next week in a subsequent 8.0.8 and 9.0.0-M8. >> There's no reason to "wait", we can simply release twice. Version numbers >> are free. >> >> The Jakarta EE 9.1 release vote lasts for two weeks and an announcement >> would happen some days after that. Ff we did want to push out a 9.0.0 for >> the announcement, we'd have at least till May 17th to do that, perhaps even >> the 20th. >> >> The reason we want to get certified in time for the ballot is recently >> there was a change that implementations listed on the ballot get a special >> place at the top of the specification page. Any implementations that come >> even one day later cannot be included and will not be accepted or given >> special designation. This lasts forever and is a permanent advantage to >> those in the list. It's also a permanent *disadvantage* to those not on >> the list. It's eat or be eaten. >> >> So that's what we're going for: A staged binary up for a vote here, >> passing the TCK, in time to be listed on the Jakarta EE 9.1 release ballot >> Monday. >> >> >> -David >> >>
Re: Potential release vote for 8.0.7 and 9.0.0-M7
AFAIK, (please correct me if I am wrong), ASF is not a member of the Jakarta EE working group and is not able to get certified. How will TomEE get certified? Because of this, Tomcat is not able to be listed in certification pages of Servlet specification. Regards. Gurkan On Sat, May 1, 2021 at 4:32 AM David Blevins wrote: > Heads up that we are narrowing in in the last few TCK issues and there is > still some chance we can be Jakarta EE 9.1 Web Profile certified in time > for the Jakarta EE 9.1 release vote Monday. > > It would be super super and I mean *super* tight > > However, if we can get it done we'll need to do a release vote by no later > than Sunday afternoon and file our certification request. We don't need to > have concluded our vote to make the Jakarta EE 9.1 release ballot, we just > need final binaries of our own to be at least in staging and in the process > of our own vote. > > We do need that vote pass, however, so that would require some pragmatism > on all our parts. > > For that reason I recommend we do not try to push out a 9.0.0 final, but > go ahead with 9.0.0-M7. If there are some issues with the binaries we put > up for vote, unless they are legal issues, we can still release them and > immediately fix the issues next week in a subsequent 8.0.8 and 9.0.0-M8. > There's no reason to "wait", we can simply release twice. Version numbers > are free. > > The Jakarta EE 9.1 release vote lasts for two weeks and an announcement > would happen some days after that. Ff we did want to push out a 9.0.0 for > the announcement, we'd have at least till May 17th to do that, perhaps even > the 20th. > > The reason we want to get certified in time for the ballot is recently > there was a change that implementations listed on the ballot get a special > place at the top of the specification page. Any implementations that come > even one day later cannot be included and will not be accepted or given > special designation. This lasts forever and is a permanent advantage to > those in the list. It's also a permanent *disadvantage* to those not on > the list. It's eat or be eaten. > > So that's what we're going for: A staged binary up for a vote here, > passing the TCK, in time to be listed on the Jakarta EE 9.1 release ballot > Monday. > > > -David > >
Potential release vote for 8.0.7 and 9.0.0-M7
Heads up that we are narrowing in in the last few TCK issues and there is still some chance we can be Jakarta EE 9.1 Web Profile certified in time for the Jakarta EE 9.1 release vote Monday. It would be super super and I mean *super* tight However, if we can get it done we'll need to do a release vote by no later than Sunday afternoon and file our certification request. We don't need to have concluded our vote to make the Jakarta EE 9.1 release ballot, we just need final binaries of our own to be at least in staging and in the process of our own vote. We do need that vote pass, however, so that would require some pragmatism on all our parts. For that reason I recommend we do not try to push out a 9.0.0 final, but go ahead with 9.0.0-M7. If there are some issues with the binaries we put up for vote, unless they are legal issues, we can still release them and immediately fix the issues next week in a subsequent 8.0.8 and 9.0.0-M8. There's no reason to "wait", we can simply release twice. Version numbers are free. The Jakarta EE 9.1 release vote lasts for two weeks and an announcement would happen some days after that. Ff we did want to push out a 9.0.0 for the announcement, we'd have at least till May 17th to do that, perhaps even the 20th. The reason we want to get certified in time for the ballot is recently there was a change that implementations listed on the ballot get a special place at the top of the specification page. Any implementations that come even one day later cannot be included and will not be accepted or given special designation. This lasts forever and is a permanent advantage to those in the list. It's also a permanent *disadvantage* to those not on the list. It's eat or be eaten. So that's what we're going for: A staged binary up for a vote here, passing the TCK, in time to be listed on the Jakarta EE 9.1 release ballot Monday. -David smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
[GitHub] [tomee-site-generator] cesarhernandezgt commented on a change in pull request #22: TOMEE-3733 Jakarta EE TCK summary page
cesarhernandezgt commented on a change in pull request #22: URL: https://github.com/apache/tomee-site-generator/pull/22#discussion_r624007146 ## File path: pom.xml ## @@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ org.apache.tika tika-parsers - 1.25 + 1.17 Review comment: Hi Richard, thanks for the review. Yes, I sent the why on the email, maybe I should added here too :P I marked the PR as draft since a couple of Jakarta EE links needs to be updated along with dates and sha's -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [tomee-site-generator] rzo1 commented on a change in pull request #22: TOMEE-3733 Jakarta EE TCK summary page
rzo1 commented on a change in pull request #22: URL: https://github.com/apache/tomee-site-generator/pull/22#discussion_r623996220 ## File path: pom.xml ## @@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ org.apache.tika tika-parsers - 1.25 + 1.17 Review comment: ~~Any reason for the downgrade? :)~~ Mailing list thread explains it :) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
TOMEE-3733 - Results page for website
Hi, I started to work on the website to add a new page to display the Jakarta EE TCK summary results base on the information required by Eclipse Foundation Technology Compatibility Kit License [1] I just created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-3733 and PR is also available with the first iteration: https://github.com/apache/tomee-site-generator/pull/22 As a side note, at the beginning I struggle a bit trying to run locally the project https://github.com/apache/tomee-site-generator/ because when I tried to run mvn compile -Djbake.http=true the server failed to start with java.lang.IllegalArgumentException at org.apache.xbean.asm5.ClassReader exception [2] To fix this I had to downgrade the tika-parsers from 1.25 to 1.17 because according to 1.17 release note [3] the project dropped support for Java 7 around that version. I made sure that download-ng.java worked fine before and after the change so no regressions were introduced by downgrading the tika-parsers since the jar is only used when running org.apache.tomee.website.DownloadsNG.java standalone runner. [1] https://www.eclipse.org/legal/tck.php [2] java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException at org.apache.tomee.embedded.Container.deploy(Container.java:272) at org.apache.tomee.embedded.Container.deployPathsAsWebapp(Container.java:228) at org.apache.tomee.embedded.Container.deployClasspathAsWebApp(Container.java:193) at org.apache.tomee.embedded.Container.deployClasspathAsWebApp(Container.java:173) at org.apache.tomee.embedded.Container.deployClasspathAsWebApp(Container.java:164) at org.apache.tomee.website.JBake.main(JBake.java:174) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498) at org.codehaus.mojo.exec.ExecJavaMojo$1.run(ExecJavaMojo.java:282) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748) Caused by: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException at org.apache.xbean.asm5.ClassReader.(Unknown Source) at org.apache.xbean.asm5.ClassReader.(Unknown Source) at org.apache.xbean.asm5.ClassReader.(Unknown Source) at org.apache.xbean.finder.AnnotationFinder.readClassDef(AnnotationFinder.java:1169) at org.apache.xbean.finder.AnnotationFinder.(AnnotationFinder.java:147) at org.apache.xbean.finder.AnnotationFinder.(AnnotationFinder.java:160) at org.apache.openejb.config.FinderFactory$OpenEJBAnnotationFinder.(FinderFactory.java:546) at org.apache.tomee.embedded.Container.deploy(Container.java:268) [3] https://archive.apache.org/dist/tika/CHANGES-1.17.txt -- Atentamente: César Hernández.
[GitHub] [tomee] rzo1 merged pull request #788: TOMEE-3732 - MyFaces 2.3.9
rzo1 merged pull request #788: URL: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/788 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [tomee-site-generator] rzo1 commented on a change in pull request #22: TOMEE-3733 Jakarta EE TCK summary page
rzo1 commented on a change in pull request #22: URL: https://github.com/apache/tomee-site-generator/pull/22#discussion_r623996220 ## File path: pom.xml ## @@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ org.apache.tika tika-parsers - 1.25 + 1.17 Review comment: Any reason for the downgrade? :) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [tomee-site-generator] cesarhernandezgt commented on pull request #22: TOMEE-3733 Jakarta EE TCK summary page
cesarhernandezgt commented on pull request #22: URL: https://github.com/apache/tomee-site-generator/pull/22#issuecomment-830199188 Small section added in the download page:  New TCK summary page:  -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
