Re: TOMEE-2958 TOMEE-2959 Tomcat and jackson update
There is even an open PR [1] by Romain to switch to Johnzon and some discussion on a related JIRA with low activity since 2018 [2] Might be worth to jump in the discussion and ask for any news on it? [1] https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/308 [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/AMQ/issues/AMQ-7072?filter=allopenissues Am Dienstag, den 19.01.2021, 12:08 + schrieb Zowalla, Richard: > Yup, ActiveMQ has a compile dependency towards jackson. There was a > discussion in 2019 [1] about it on the mailing list. > > [1] > http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Why-jackson-and-jonhzon-shipped-with-latest-TomEE-td4689451.html > > Am Montag, den 18.01.2021, 22:43 + schrieb Jonathan Gallimore: > > Its a dependency bought in by ActiveMQ. I'm happy to look at what > > it'll > > take to use Johnzon, but if memory serves me correctly, last time I > > looked, > > it wasn't trivial. I agree that we should work towards that goal > > though. > > > > Jon > > > > On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 10:33 PM Alex The Rocker < > > alex.m3...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > Why is Jackson embedded in TomEE, while we have Johnzon providing > > > both > > > JSON-P & JSON-B ? > > > Isn't it making TomEE fatter than needed, not mentioning double > > > maintenance/updating efforts ? > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > Alexandre > > > > > > Le lun. 18 janv. 2021 à 22:55, Cesar Hernandez < > > > cesargu...@gmail.com> a > > > écrit : > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > I created the following JIRAS and also a PR is now available > > > > for > > > > review: > > > > > > > > Update to Tomcat 8.5.61 > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-2958 > > > > > > > > Update to jackson 2.12.0 > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-2959 > > > > > > > > PR: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/728 > > > > -- > > > > Atentamente: > > > > César Hernández. -- Richard Zowalla, M.Sc. Research Associate, PhD Student | Medical Informatics Hochschule Heilbronn – University of Applied Sciences Max-Planck-Str. 39 D-74081 Heilbronn phone: +49 7131 504 6791 mail: richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de web: https://www.mi.hs-heilbronn.de/ smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Re: TOMEE-2958 TOMEE-2959 Tomcat and jackson update
Okay so I already noticed this weird duplication of JSON-P/B implementations in TomEE, and answer was that community has other priorities. So maybe I'll try something with "some other channel" (can't tell you more ATM) to try to get some progress on this topic :) Kind regards, Alexandre Le mar. 19 janv. 2021 à 13:08, Zowalla, Richard a écrit : > > Yup, ActiveMQ has a compile dependency towards jackson. There was a > discussion in 2019 [1] about it on the mailing list. > > [1] > http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Why-jackson-and-jonhzon-shipped-with-latest-TomEE-td4689451.html > > Am Montag, den 18.01.2021, 22:43 + schrieb Jonathan Gallimore: > > Its a dependency bought in by ActiveMQ. I'm happy to look at what > > it'll > > take to use Johnzon, but if memory serves me correctly, last time I > > looked, > > it wasn't trivial. I agree that we should work towards that goal > > though. > > > > Jon > > > > On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 10:33 PM Alex The Rocker < > > alex.m3...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > Why is Jackson embedded in TomEE, while we have Johnzon providing > > > both > > > JSON-P & JSON-B ? > > > Isn't it making TomEE fatter than needed, not mentioning double > > > maintenance/updating efforts ? > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > Alexandre > > > > > > Le lun. 18 janv. 2021 à 22:55, Cesar Hernandez < > > > cesargu...@gmail.com> a > > > écrit : > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > I created the following JIRAS and also a PR is now available for > > > > review: > > > > > > > > Update to Tomcat 8.5.61 > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-2958 > > > > > > > > Update to jackson 2.12.0 > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-2959 > > > > > > > > PR: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/728 > > > > -- > > > > Atentamente: > > > > César Hernández. > -- > Richard Zowalla, M.Sc. > Research Associate, PhD Student | Medical Informatics > > Hochschule Heilbronn – University of Applied Sciences > Max-Planck-Str. 39 > D-74081 Heilbronn > phone: +49 7131 504 6791 > mail: richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de > web: https://www.mi.hs-heilbronn.de/
Re: TOMEE-2958 TOMEE-2959 Tomcat and jackson update
Yup, ActiveMQ has a compile dependency towards jackson. There was a discussion in 2019 [1] about it on the mailing list. [1] http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Why-jackson-and-jonhzon-shipped-with-latest-TomEE-td4689451.html Am Montag, den 18.01.2021, 22:43 + schrieb Jonathan Gallimore: > Its a dependency bought in by ActiveMQ. I'm happy to look at what > it'll > take to use Johnzon, but if memory serves me correctly, last time I > looked, > it wasn't trivial. I agree that we should work towards that goal > though. > > Jon > > On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 10:33 PM Alex The Rocker < > alex.m3...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > Why is Jackson embedded in TomEE, while we have Johnzon providing > > both > > JSON-P & JSON-B ? > > Isn't it making TomEE fatter than needed, not mentioning double > > maintenance/updating efforts ? > > > > Kind regards, > > Alexandre > > > > Le lun. 18 janv. 2021 à 22:55, Cesar Hernandez < > > cesargu...@gmail.com> a > > écrit : > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I created the following JIRAS and also a PR is now available for > > > review: > > > > > > Update to Tomcat 8.5.61 > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-2958 > > > > > > Update to jackson 2.12.0 > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-2959 > > > > > > PR: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/728 > > > -- > > > Atentamente: > > > César Hernández. -- Richard Zowalla, M.Sc. Research Associate, PhD Student | Medical Informatics Hochschule Heilbronn – University of Applied Sciences Max-Planck-Str. 39 D-74081 Heilbronn phone: +49 7131 504 6791 mail: richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de web: https://www.mi.hs-heilbronn.de/ smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Re: TOMEE-2958 TOMEE-2959 Tomcat and jackson update
Its a dependency bought in by ActiveMQ. I'm happy to look at what it'll take to use Johnzon, but if memory serves me correctly, last time I looked, it wasn't trivial. I agree that we should work towards that goal though. Jon On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 10:33 PM Alex The Rocker wrote: > Hello, > > Why is Jackson embedded in TomEE, while we have Johnzon providing both > JSON-P & JSON-B ? > Isn't it making TomEE fatter than needed, not mentioning double > maintenance/updating efforts ? > > Kind regards, > Alexandre > > Le lun. 18 janv. 2021 à 22:55, Cesar Hernandez a > écrit : > > > > Hi all, > > > > I created the following JIRAS and also a PR is now available for review: > > > > Update to Tomcat 8.5.61 > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-2958 > > > > Update to jackson 2.12.0 > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-2959 > > > > PR: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/728 > > -- > > Atentamente: > > César Hernández. >
TOMEE-2958 TOMEE-2959 Tomcat and jackson update
Hi all, I created the following JIRAS and also a PR is now available for review: Update to Tomcat 8.5.61 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-2958 Update to jackson 2.12.0 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-2959 PR: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/728 -- Atentamente: César Hernández.
