Re: samples - osgi samples
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 3:18 AM, Florian MOGA wrote: > There are a number of samples which are not marked either as contributions > or webapps: maven-osgi-junit, distributed-osgi, implementation-composite > folder. Should these samples have "-contribution" appended at the end? would > that make the names unnecessarily long? > The OSGi ones are a bit tricky as they don't really match the new samples > structure, maybe there should be a separate folder for OSGi in samples. > Probably a OSGi folder seems better. Anyway, as long as I know where they are (which is getting hard to figure out), I'm fine. -- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://twitter.com/lresende1975 http://lresende.blogspot.com/
Re: samples - osgi samples
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 11:18 AM, Florian MOGA wrote: > There are a number of samples which are not marked either as contributions > or webapps: maven-osgi-junit, distributed-osgi, implementation-composite > folder. Should these samples have "-contribution" appended at the end? would > that make the names unnecessarily long? > The OSGi ones are a bit tricky as they don't really match the new samples > structure, maybe there should be a separate folder for OSGi in samples. > I think they are OK where they are at the moment. Simon -- Apache Tuscany committer: tuscany.apache.org Co-author of a book about Tuscany and SCA: tuscanyinaction.com
samples - osgi samples
There are a number of samples which are not marked either as contributions or webapps: maven-osgi-junit, distributed-osgi, implementation-composite folder. Should these samples have "-contribution" appended at the end? would that make the names unnecessarily long? The OSGi ones are a bit tricky as they don't really match the new samples structure, maybe there should be a separate folder for OSGi in samples.
