Re: [DISCUSS] What should we handle editor.weex.io ?

2019-12-23 Thread 申远
The JIRA issue is here[1], according to which we need to configure the new
domain name in our server, i.g. 47.56.99.112

@Dan  @Hanks Zhang  Could you
have a look? I remembered the nginx server is in some of your hands.

[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-19577

Best Regards,
YorkShen

申远


Willem Jiang  于2019年12月23日周一 上午9:15写道:

> Hi I just found
> editor.weex.apache.org  and editor.weex.io are point to the same
> machine 47.56.99.112.
> But there is no service for the editor.
>
> We may need to setup the nginx to send the redirect URI of
> editor.weex.apache.org for the request of editor.weex.io.
> We also need to setup the https service endpoint to do the same redirect.
>
> Willem Jiang
>
> Twitter: willemjiang
> Weibo: 姜宁willem
>
> On Sat, Dec 21, 2019 at 11:54 PM 任 跃兵  wrote:
> >
> > The url [1] now shows 'Welcome to nginx!'
> > The url [2] is not found.
> > Looks like some configuration needs to be done on the server 47.56.99.112
> >
> > [1]http://editor.weex.apache.org/
> > [2]https://editor.weex.apache.org/
> > 
> > 发件人: 申远 
> > 发送时间: 2019年12月16日 16:14
> > 收件人: dev 
> > 主题: Re: [DISCUSS] What should we handle editor.weex.io ?
> >
> > Hi, all.
> >
> > 1. The server of Weex Editor will be host on the IP address of
> 47.56.99.112
> > > (Alibaba Cloud Server)
> > > 2. Establish the following DNS record.
> > > 47.56.99.112 A editor.weex.io
> > > editor.weex.apache.org   CNAME  editor.weex.io
> > > 3. Keep the disclaimer [1] as it is(Maybe reword it later), and use
> > > editor.weex.apache.org in our document, discussion and any other
> secnario
> > > we coud have.
> > >
> > > With approach above, the existing Weex user could still use
> editor.weex.io
> > > without interruption. And for ASF's concern, only one DNS change
> records is
> > > needed.
> > >
> > > If this is not enough for protecting ASF's trademark, maybe we could
> > > convince our committer to donate the domain name to ASF and let ASF
> paid
> > > for it. But that's another story, and I'd like to implement the
> approach I
> > > mentioned above first if there is no objection.
> > >
> > > [1] "Disclaimer | 免责声明Apache Weex, Weex and Apache are either
> registered
> > > trademarks or trademarks of the Apache Software Foundation in the
> United
> > > States and/or other countries, and are used with permission as of
> 2014. The
> > > Apache Software Foundation has no affiliation with and does not
> endorse or
> > > review the materials provided at this website, which is managed by
> Alibaba."
> > >
> >
> > I am forwarding the conclusion we have in private mailing list to this
> > mailing list for your information.
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > YorkShen
> >
> > 申远
> >
> >
> > 申远  于2019年12月5日周四 下午5:24写道:
> >
> > > Technically speaking, DNS CNAME doesn't equal to HTTP redirect. No
> matter
> > > whether there is a CNAME for editor.weex.io, the browser always shows
> > > editor.weex.io in its URL bar if you type in editor.weex.io.
> > >
> > > But yes, we could solve the problem by redirecting editor.weex.io to
> > > editor.weex.apache.org by HTTP 301.
> > >
> > > Best Regards,
> > > YorkShen
> > >
> > > 申远
> > >
> > >
> > > Jan Piotrowski  于2019年12月5日周四 上午2:54写道:
> > >
> > >> The domain is not used to host any content, it just redirects to other
> > >> URLs
> > >> that host the actual content: ASF servers for Apache Weex things,
> random
> > >> other server for random other content.
> > >>
> > >> But do what you think best, I will disengage from this topic after
> this
> > >> message.
> > >>
> > >> J
> > >>
> > >> Am Mi., 4. Dez. 2019 um 07:55 Uhr schrieb 申远 :
> > >>
> > >> > Based on the conservation with ASF, Brand Management, I don't think
> it
> > >> will
> > >> > satiffy ASF's requirement if we keep it in our hands. From my
> > >> > understanding, we either take it down or give it to ASF.
> > >> >
> > >> > *As said by several people several times, Weex is a trademark of
> ASF and
> > >> > using weex in domain domain name also violate the legal right of
> ASF.*
> > >> >
> > >> > Best Regards,
> > >> > YorkShen
> > >> >
> > >> > 申远
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > Jan Piotrowski  于2019年12月4日周三 上午4:29写道:
> > >> >
> > >> > > I already sent somthing similar in the other thread, so repeating:
> > >> > > If the editor code is not part of Apache Weex, it should live on
> its
> > >> own
> > >> > > domain.
> > >> > > Keep the weex.io domain around so old links continue to work, but
> > >> > redirect
> > >> > > the main domain to the Apache Weex site and the editor subdomain
> to
> > >> the
> > >> > new
> > >> > > external subdomain.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > I am happy to sponsor the cost for weex.io for the first year to
> > >> whoever
> > >> > > takes over the domain: https://www.domcomp.com/tld/io
> > >> > >
> > >> > > ASF does not have to be involved here at all if this is just a
> user
> > >> > project
> > >> > > for Weex in my opinion, which clearly states this via e.g.
> "Editor for
> > >> > > Apache Weex". Agree M

Re: Podling Weex Report Reminder - January 2020

2019-12-23 Thread 申远
Just have a look and edited a few things below:

   1. There is a trademark section in the new template report [1] from
   Incubator. I replied the question according the situation of Apache Weex.
   2. We should start a Poddling Name Search [2], through which we will
   know whether we can continue use the name of Apache Weex legally.

I am fine with other parts. Thanks for your contribution @任 跃兵
 .

Feel free to make a comment if any contributor in this mailing list has an
opinion.

Considering the fact that the deadline is 1st, Jan, 2020, a national
holiday, we will submit the report officially by the end of this week.

[1]
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/January2020#is-the-ppmc-managing-the-podlings-brand--trademarks-17
[2] https://incubator.apache.org/guides/names.html

Best Regards,
YorkShen

申远


任 跃兵  于2019年12月21日周六 下午6:34写道:

> @申远 
>
> Please review the draft of Podding report[2].
>
>
>
> Three most important unfinished issues and How has the community developed
> since, I'm not sure. I just wrote down the information I was sure.
>
> The pull request, issue in github and mailing list are calculated from
> 2019-10-01.
>
>
>
> [2] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WEEX/January%2C+2020
>
>
>
> *发件人**: *申远 
> *日期**: *2019年12月19日 星期四 下午4:53
> *收件人**: *dev , 任 跃兵 
> *主题**: *Re: Podling Weex Report Reminder - January 2020
>
>
>
> @cnryb
>
>
>
> Best Regards,
> YorkShen
>
> 申远
>
>
>
>
>
> 申远  于2019年12月19日周四 下午4:51写道:
>
> @cnryb
>
>
>
> Could you please do the honour for Weex wrting the draft of Podding report?
>
>
>
> You can take our previous report [1] as an example, thanks.
>
>
>
> [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WEEX/Poddling+report
>
>
>
> Best Regards,
> YorkShen
>
> 申远
>
>
>
>
>
>  于2019年12月19日周四 下午1:15写道:
>
> Dear podling,
>
> This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache
> Incubator PMC. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to
> prepare your quarterly board report.
>
> The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 15 January 2020, 10:30 am PDT.
> The report for your podling will form a part of the Incubator PMC
> report. The Incubator PMC requires your report to be submitted 2 weeks
> before the board meeting, to allow sufficient time for review and
> submission (Wed, January 01).
>
> Please submit your report with sufficient time to allow the Incubator
> PMC, and subsequently board members to review and digest. Again, the
> very latest you should submit your report is 2 weeks prior to the board
> meeting.
>
> Candidate names should not be made public before people are actually
> elected, so please do not include the names of potential committers or
> PPMC members in your report.
>
> Thanks,
>
> The Apache Incubator PMC
>
> Submitting your Report
>
> --
>
> Your report should contain the following:
>
> *   Your project name
> *   A brief description of your project, which assumes no knowledge of
> the project or necessarily of its field
> *   A list of the three most important issues to address in the move
> towards graduation.
> *   Any issues that the Incubator PMC or ASF Board might wish/need to be
> aware of
> *   How has the community developed since the last report
> *   How has the project developed since the last report.
> *   How does the podling rate their own maturity.
>
> This should be appended to the Incubator Wiki page at:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/January2020
>
> Note: This is manually populated. You may need to wait a little before
> this page is created from a template.
>
> Note: The format of the report has changed to use markdown.
>
> Mentors
> ---
>
> Mentors should review reports for their project(s) and sign them off on
> the Incubator wiki page. Signing off reports shows that you are
> following the project - projects that are not signed may raise alarms
> for the Incubator PMC.
>
> Incubator PMC
>
>