Re: icla-completed.pdf and icla-completed.pdf.asc renamed in svn
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 7:30 PM, Craig Russellwrote: > I know we discussed this but I’d like to rename the files to > icla.pdf and icla.pdf.asc when secmail copies the files to documents/iclas/. > > I see where the files are added but can’t figure out how to rename them when > committing them to svn. > > # create/add file(s) > dest = message.write_svn("#{dir}/iclas", @filename, @selected, @signature) OK, I modified write_svn to take a hash of attachment names => file names. https://github.com/apache/whimsy/commit/957314eb25de9b290ebddb26da92f6b600c32abb Let me know if I broke anything. :-) - Sam Ruby
icla-completed.pdf and icla-completed.pdf.asc renamed in svn
I know we discussed this but I’d like to rename the files to icla.pdf and icla.pdf.asc when secmail copies the files to documents/iclas/. I see where the files are added but can’t figure out how to rename them when committing them to svn. # create/add file(s) dest = message.write_svn("#{dir}/iclas", @filename, @selected, @signature) # Show files to be added svn 'status', "#{dir}/iclas" # commit changes svn 'commit', "#{dir}/iclas/#{@filename}#{fileext}", '-m', "ICLA from #{@pubname}" Craig L Russell Architect craig.russ...@oracle.com P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
Re: Unprocessed grant in documents/received/sga_ptgoetz_storm_jms.pdf
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 11:51 AM, Craig Russellwrote: > >> On Sep 28, 2016, at 5:19 PM, Craig Russell wrote: >> >> I think it’s time to switch over to secmail. >> >> The only thing we have not tested is new members. As long as you’re willing >> to add the membership application functionality before the next members come >> in, we can disable secretary workbench. > > What I can do is to rough in the form for the member app. But the processing > to update the members.txt file may be too much for my current skilz. Since > the form, processing, and email bits are now more separated it might be > easier. > WDYT? Sure. Take your time, rough in what you like/feel comfortable doing. I'm not overly concerned about membership applications processing of things like members.txt as I have working code I can steal from. While you may not yet feel comfortable writing the action script from scratch, hopefully you will be able to do minor tweaks on the logic once it is in place. The fact that the new logic shows what it is going to do before it does it should make that process easier. And that fact that doing it consists primarily of executing svn commands and actually delivering the mail should also. With the new design, all work is done in temporary directories, so there is no need to worry about locks, no need to clean up, and no possibility of 'wedging'. > Craig - Sam Ruby >> Thanks, >> >> Craig >> >>> On Sep 28, 2016, at 5:15 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 5:04 PM, Craig Russell >>> wrote: Any idea why this document does not show up in secretary workbench? >>> >>> Um, perhaps because it was deleted? >>> >>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/60704b7e60e99f150d7f1ea33bdfb03e805e4d46296b242a61bf37ec@%3Cfoundation-commits.apache.org%3E >>> >>> Perhaps the real question should be: what functionality is missing >>> from the new secmail tool that would enable you to switch over >>> completely? >>> >>> One thing I have noticed is that when you have a document that you >>> have received out of band you want to process you commit it to >>> document/received and process it with the old workbench tool. The new >>> process would be to email it to secretary@ and process it with the >>> secmail tool. >>> >>> Is there anything else that needs to be addressed? >>> >>> - Sam Ruby >>> Thanks, Craig Craig L Russell Secretary, Apache Software Foundation c...@apache.org http://db.apache.org/jdo >> >> Craig L Russell >> Architect >> craig.russ...@oracle.com >> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! >> >> >> >> >> > > Craig L Russell > Architect > craig.russ...@oracle.com > P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! > > > > >
Re: Unprocessed grant in documents/received/sga_ptgoetz_storm_jms.pdf
> On Sep 28, 2016, at 5:19 PM, Craig Russellwrote: > > I think it’s time to switch over to secmail. > > The only thing we have not tested is new members. As long as you’re willing > to add the membership application functionality before the next members come > in, we can disable secretary workbench. What I can do is to rough in the form for the member app. But the processing to update the members.txt file may be too much for my current skilz. Since the form, processing, and email bits are now more separated it might be easier. WDYT? Craig > > Thanks, > > Craig > >> On Sep 28, 2016, at 5:15 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: >> >> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 5:04 PM, Craig Russell >> wrote: >>> Any idea why this document does not show up in secretary workbench? >> >> Um, perhaps because it was deleted? >> >> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/60704b7e60e99f150d7f1ea33bdfb03e805e4d46296b242a61bf37ec@%3Cfoundation-commits.apache.org%3E >> >> Perhaps the real question should be: what functionality is missing >> from the new secmail tool that would enable you to switch over >> completely? >> >> One thing I have noticed is that when you have a document that you >> have received out of band you want to process you commit it to >> document/received and process it with the old workbench tool. The new >> process would be to email it to secretary@ and process it with the >> secmail tool. >> >> Is there anything else that needs to be addressed? >> >> - Sam Ruby >> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Craig >>> >>> Craig L Russell >>> Secretary, Apache Software Foundation >>> c...@apache.org http://db.apache.org/jdo >>> > > Craig L Russell > Architect > craig.russ...@oracle.com > P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! > > > > > Craig L Russell Architect craig.russ...@oracle.com P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
RECOVERY: whimsy.apache.org (whimsy.apache.org (https)) is back up!
Hello, The https service at whimsy.apache.org (whimsy.apache.org (https)) seems to be back in working order again. With regards, Ping My Box - https://www.pingmybox.com/
ALERT: whimsy.apache.org (whimsy.apache.org (https)) is DOWN!
Hello, The https service at whimsy.apache.org (whimsy.apache.org (https)) has been reported as down by our monitoring system: Component: response Error code: Internal Server Error or equivalent bad message received: HTTP/1.1 400 svn officers_historic ["svn: E175002: Unexpected HTTP status 400 'Bad Request' on '/repos/private/!svn/rvr/71839/foundation/officers/historic'", "", "svn: E175009: Additional errors:", "svn: E175009: XML parsing failed: (400 Bad Request)"] Debug output: -- [Thu Sep 29 12:57:30 2016]: Initialising socket [Thu Sep 29 12:57:30 2016]: Looking up hostname whimsy.apache.org... [Thu Sep 29 12:57:30 2016]: Connecting to 207.244.88.137:443 [Thu Sep 29 12:57:31 2016]: Connected, sending HTTPS payload. [Thu Sep 29 12:57:31 2016]: Reading response header from server [Thu Sep 29 12:57:32 2016]: Caught exception: Internal Server Error or equivalent bad message received: HTTP/1.1 400 svn officers_historic ["svn: E175002: Unexpected HTTP status 400 'Bad Request' on '/repos/private/!svn/rvr/71839/foundation/officers/historic'", "", "svn: E175009: Additional errors:", "svn: E175009: XML parsing failed: (400 Bad Request)"] -- With regards, Ping My Box - https://www.pingmybox.com/
RECOVERY: whimsy.apache.org (whimsy.apache.org (https)) is back up!
Hello, The https service at whimsy.apache.org (whimsy.apache.org (https)) seems to be back in working order again. With regards, Ping My Box - https://www.pingmybox.com/
ALERT: whimsy.apache.org (whimsy.apache.org (https)) is DOWN!
Hello, The https service at whimsy.apache.org (whimsy.apache.org (https)) has been reported as down by our monitoring system: Component: response Error code: Internal Server Error or equivalent bad message received: HTTP/1.1 400 svn Meetings ["svn: E175002: Unexpected HTTP status 400 'Bad Request' on '/repos/private/!svn/rvr/71839/foundation/Meetings'", "", "svn: E175009: Additional errors:", "svn: E175009: XML parsing failed: (400 Bad Request)"] Debug output: -- [Thu Sep 29 11:35:39 2016]: Initialising socket [Thu Sep 29 11:35:39 2016]: Looking up hostname whimsy.apache.org... [Thu Sep 29 11:35:39 2016]: Connecting to 207.244.88.137:443 [Thu Sep 29 11:35:39 2016]: Connected, sending HTTPS payload. [Thu Sep 29 11:35:39 2016]: Reading response header from server [Thu Sep 29 11:35:48 2016]: Caught exception: Internal Server Error or equivalent bad message received: HTTP/1.1 400 svn Meetings ["svn: E175002: Unexpected HTTP status 400 'Bad Request' on '/repos/private/!svn/rvr/71839/foundation/Meetings'", "", "svn: E175009: Additional errors:", "svn: E175009: XML parsing failed: (400 Bad Request)"] -- With regards, Ping My Box - https://www.pingmybox.com/