[GitHub] wicket pull request #234: Dutch translations for paging navigator

2017-09-25 Thread asfgit 
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/234


---

Re: wicket-8 m8

2017-09-25 Thread Sebastien 
Maybe a -M8 in the meantime?

As well as 6.29 so releases cycle stay aligned? (btw, does the page store
issue not applies to wicket-6.x?)

On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 11:03 AM, Andrea Del Bene 
wrote:

> No AFAIK but I'd rather wait for WICKET-6105 to be solved. It's a delicate
> issue and I would like to collect as many user feedback as possible before
> publishing the final 8.0.0
>

Re: wicket-8 m8

2017-09-25 Thread Andrea Del Bene 
No AFAIK but I'd rather wait for WICKET-6105 to be solved. It's a delicate
issue and I would like to collect as many user feedback as possible before
publishing the final 8.0.0

On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 9:40 AM, Maxim Solodovnik 
wrote:

> WICKET-6105  seems to
> be
> blocker for 8.0.0 release
> Do we have any blockers for M8?
>
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 2:24 PM, Korbinian Bachl <
> korbinian.ba...@whiskyworld.de> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > due to the problematic bugs in wicket8 up to m7 (2 x pagestore and
> > filesystemresource-leak), would it be possible to release wicket8-m8
> > anytime soon?
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > Korbinian
> >
>
>
>
> --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax
>

Re: wicket-8 m8

2017-09-25 Thread Maxim Solodovnik 
WICKET-6105  seems to be
blocker for 8.0.0 release
Do we have any blockers for M8?

On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 2:24 PM, Korbinian Bachl <
korbinian.ba...@whiskyworld.de> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> due to the problematic bugs in wicket8 up to m7 (2 x pagestore and
> filesystemresource-leak), would it be possible to release wicket8-m8
> anytime soon?
>
> Best,
>
> Korbinian
>



-- 
WBR
Maxim aka solomax

wicket-8 m8

2017-09-25 Thread Korbinian Bachl 
Hi,

due to the problematic bugs in wicket8 up to m7 (2 x pagestore and 
filesystemresource-leak), would it be possible to release wicket8-m8 anytime 
soon?

Best,

Korbinian

Re: Apache headers checking

2017-09-25 Thread Martin Grigorov 
I don't know what is the reason. I guess RAT was immature at the time
ApacheLicenceHeaderTest
was introduced (~ 2007).
I don't think it is worth it to change something that never led to any
problems.

Martin Grigorov
Wicket Training and Consulting
https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov

On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 9:15 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
tobiassolosche...@googlemail.com> wrote:

> Good point. I just cloned a subproject / did my changes and it came with
> this. +1 to use maven if there is no special use case.
>
> kind regards
>
> Tobias
>
> > Am 24.09.2017 um 19:41 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik :
> >
> > Hello All,
> >
> > I'm wonder why "hand made" tools like ApacheLicenceHeaderTest.java
> > are being used to check file headers?
> >
> > Maybe special maven plugin like
> >org.apache.rat
> >apache-rat-plugin
> >0.12
> > Should be used instead?
> >
> > --
> > WBR
> > Maxim aka solomax
>