Re: [Dev] PrivilegedCarbonContext.getThreadLocalCarbonContext().getUsername() returns 'null'

2013-01-09 Thread Dulanja Liyanage
Hi Dimuthu,

Thanks a lot for the explanation and pointing to the mail thread.

Regards,
Dulanja

On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Dimuthu Leelarathne dimut...@wso2.comwrote:

 Hi Dulanja,

 It is correct to use CurrentCarbonContext instead of
 ThreadLocalCarbonContext. You can read the mail titled UserRegistry sends
 null to JDBCAuthorizationManager from archives.  Basically this is the
 code that finds you the correct  CurrentCarbonContext. So correct thing is
 to first get CarbonContext from MessageContext and if it is not available
 try the TreadLocal one.

 public static CarbonContextDataHolder getCurrentCarbonContextHolder() {
 try {
 MessageContext messageContext =
 MessageContext.getCurrentMessageContext();
 if (messageContext != null) {
 return getCurrentCarbonContextHolder(messageContext);
 } else {
 return
 getCurrentCarbonContextHolder((ConfigurationContext) null);
 }
 } catch (NullPointerException ignore) {
 // This is thrown when the message context is not initialized
 // So return the Threadlocal
  return getThreadLocalCarbonContextHolder();
 } catch (NoClassDefFoundError ignore) {
 // There can be situations where the CarbonContext is
 accessed, when there is no Axis2
 // library on the classpath.
 return getThreadLocalCarbonContextHolder();
 }
 }

 thanks,
 dimuthu


 On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 2:15 PM, Dulanja Liyanage dula...@wso2.com wrote:

 Hi,

 Appreciate if you can guide me whether it's safe/appropriate to use
 the CurrentContext rather than the ThreadLocalCarbonContext, to get the
 username and tenant domain.

 I'm not much knowledgeable about the design, but I feel using it will be
 plastering the root cause.

 Thanks,
 Dulanja

 On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Dulanja Liyanage dula...@wso2.comwrote:

 Hi Shariq,

 I did as you suggested and now the username is available.

 What I'm not sure is how appropriate/safe this is.

 Thanks for the help.

 Regards,
 Dulanja


 On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 6:17 PM, Dulanja Liyanage dula...@wso2.comwrote:

 Hi Shariq,

 I will try that. Thanks!

 Dulanja


 On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Muhammed Shariq sha...@wso2.comwrote:

 Hi,

 This looks like an issue I encountered sometime back. We had to revert
 the fixes I did in TomcatValve cz it was causing some other issue .. Can
 you try CarbonContext.getCurrentContext.getUsername() and see what happens
 .. AFAIR its getUsername simple does a return .. we should fix it to check
 if username is null and if so set it properly .. usually that is the
 behavior but there are some  edge cases it seem ...

 On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Dulanja Liyanage dula...@wso2.comwrote:

 Hi,

 I'm testing IS 4.1.0 running on Carbon 4.0.6. While debugging an
 issue, I encountered the $subject.

 I logged in as 'admin', so, the username should return as such. But
 it returns 'null'.

 However the
 PrivilegedCarbonContext.getThreadLocalCarbonContext().getTenantDomain()
 returns 'carbon.super' as expected.

 I'm still debugging this and trying to figure out how CarbonContext
 works in threads. If someone is already aware of a reason/solution for 
 this
 it will save time. :)

 Thanks!
 Dulanja

 ___
 Dev mailing list
 Dev@wso2.org
 http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev




 --
 Thanks,
 Shariq.
 Phone: +94 777 202 225





 ___
 Dev mailing list
 Dev@wso2.org
 http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev



___
Dev mailing list
Dev@wso2.org
http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev


[Dev] [Bamboo-Build] WSO2 Carbon 4.0.x Platform 4.0.6 #29 has FAILED (1 tests failed, no failures were new). Change made by hasithah, reka and thilini.

2013-01-09 Thread Bamboo

---
WSO2 Carbon 4.0.x  Platform 4.0.6  #29 failed.
---
Code has been updated by hasithah, reka, thilini.
1/888 tests failed, no failures were new.

http://wso2.org/bamboo/browse/WCB001-PLA006-29/

-
Currently Responsible
-

No one is responsible for fixing this build.



--
Failing Jobs
--
  - Default Job (Default Stage): 1 of 888 tests failed.



--
Code Changes
--
reka (152927):

caching patch for when defining stream provided by Amani

reka (152931):

updating version

thilini (152933):

APPFAC-215: changing the task status to in_progress upon taks creation



--
Tests
--
Existing Test Failures (1)
   - MultipleDefinitionConversionTest: Multiple defn conversion from j s o n

--
This message is automatically generated by Atlassian Bamboo___
Dev mailing list
Dev@wso2.org
http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev


[Dev] [Bamboo-Build] WSO2 Carbon 4.0.x Products 4.0.6 #29 was SUCCESSFUL (with 18 tests). Change made by hasithah, reka and thilini.

2013-01-09 Thread Bamboo

---
WSO2 Carbon 4.0.x  Products 4.0.6  #29 was successful.
---
Code has been updated by hasithah, reka, thilini.
18 tests in total.

http://wso2.org/bamboo/browse/WCB001-PRO006-29/




--
Code Changes
--
reka (152927):

caching patch for when defining stream provided by Amani

reka (152931):

updating version

thilini (152933):

APPFAC-215: changing the task status to in_progress upon taks creation



--
This message is automatically generated by Atlassian Bamboo___
Dev mailing list
Dev@wso2.org
http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev


[Dev] [Bamboo-Build] WSO2 Carbon 4.0.x Platform 4.0.6 #30 has FAILED (1 tests failed, no failures were new). Change made by hasithah and dushan.

2013-01-09 Thread Bamboo

---
WSO2 Carbon 4.0.x  Platform 4.0.6  #30 failed.
---
Code has been updated by hasithah, dushan.
1/888 tests failed, no failures were new.

http://wso2.org/bamboo/browse/WCB001-PLA006-30/

-
Currently Responsible
-

No one is responsible for fixing this build.



--
Failing Jobs
--
  - Default Job (Default Stage): 1 of 888 tests failed.



--
Code Changes
--
hasithah (152937):

updated pom.xml file to refer carbon core 4.0.6.

hasithah (152936):

updated pom.xml to refer cabon core 4.0.6.

hasithah (152935):

updated pom.xml to refer carbon core 4.0.6.



--
Tests
--
Existing Test Failures (1)
   - MultipleDefinitionConversionTest: Multiple defn conversion from j s o n

--
This message is automatically generated by Atlassian Bamboo___
Dev mailing list
Dev@wso2.org
http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev


Re: [Dev] [Bamboo-Build] WSO2 Carbon 4.0.x Platform 4.0.6 #30 has FAILED (1 tests failed, no failures were new). Change made by hasithah and dushan.

2013-01-09 Thread Amila Maha Arachchi
Hi Suho,

multipleDefnConversionFromJSON test is failing. Please have a look.

On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 9:22 PM, Bamboo cbuil...@wso2.org wrote:

  [image: Failed]  WSO2 Carbon 
 4.0.xhttp://wso2.org/bamboo/browse/WCB001/› Platform
 4.0.6 http://wso2.org/bamboo/browse/WCB001-PLA006/ › 
 #30http://wso2.org/bamboo/browse/WCB001-PLA006-30/
 failed

 Changes by hasithah http://wso2.org/bamboo/browse/author/hasithah and
 dushan http://wso2.org/bamboo/browse/author/dushan

 *1/888* tests failed.
Responsible No one is responsible for this build.
Failing Jobs http://wso2.org/bamboo/browse/WCB001-PLA006-30/ Job
 Duration Tests[image: Failed]  Default 
 Jobhttp://wso2.org/bamboo/browse/WCB001-PLA006-JOB1-30/ (Default
 Stage)  12 minutes  1 of 888 failed  
 Logshttp://wso2.org/bamboo/browse/WCB001-PLA006-JOB1-30/log|
 Artifacts http://wso2.org/bamboo/browse/WCB001-PLA006-JOB1-30/artifact 
 Code
 Changes http://wso2.org/bamboo/browse/WCB001-PLA006-30/commit/  View
 all 4 code changeshttp://wso2.org/bamboo/browse/WCB001-PLA006-30/commit/
 dushan http://wso2.org/bamboo/browse/author/dushan
 added esb patch build profile  152941
 hasithahhttp://wso2.org/bamboo/browse/author/hasithah
 updated pom.xml file to refer carbon core 4.0.6.  152937
 hasithahhttp://wso2.org/bamboo/browse/author/hasithah
 updated pom.xml to refer cabon core 4.0.6.  152936   1 more 
 changes…http://wso2.org/bamboo/browse/WCB001-PLA006-30/commit
 Tests http://wso2.org/bamboo/browse/WCB001-PLA006-30/test  View full
 test details http://wso2.org/bamboo/browse/WCB001-PLA006-30/test   1
 Existing Test Failures   Test Job MultipleDefinitionConversionTest
 multipleDefnConversionFromJSONhttp://wso2.org/bamboo/browse/WCB001-PLA006-JOB1-30/test/case/41485811
   Default
 Job http://wso2.org/bamboo/browse/WCB001-PLA006-JOB1-30/test View
 Online http://wso2.org/bamboo/browse/WCB001-PLA006-30 | Add 
 Commentshttp://wso2.org/bamboo/browse/WCB001-PLA006-30?commentMode=true

 This message was sent by Atlassian Bamboo http://wso2.org/bamboo.

 If you wish to stop receiving these emails edit your user 
 profilehttp://wso2.org/bamboo/profile/userNotifications.actionor notify
 your administrator http://wso2.org/bamboo/viewAdministrators.action.

 ___
 Dev mailing list
 Dev@wso2.org
 http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev




-- 
*Amila Maharachchi*
Technical Lead
Member, Management Committee - Cloud  Platform TG
WSO2, Inc.; http://wso2.com

Blog: http://maharachchi.blogspot.com
Mobile: +94719371446
___
Dev mailing list
Dev@wso2.org
http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev


[Dev] [Bamboo-Build] WSO2 Carbon 4.0.x Products 4.0.6 #30 was SUCCESSFUL (with 18 tests). Change made by hasithah and dushan.

2013-01-09 Thread Bamboo

---
WSO2 Carbon 4.0.x  Products 4.0.6  #30 was successful.
---
Code has been updated by hasithah, dushan.
18 tests in total.

http://wso2.org/bamboo/browse/WCB001-PRO006-30/




--
Code Changes
--
hasithah (152937):

updated pom.xml file to refer carbon core 4.0.6.

hasithah (152936):

updated pom.xml to refer cabon core 4.0.6.

hasithah (152935):

updated pom.xml to refer carbon core 4.0.6.



--
This message is automatically generated by Atlassian Bamboo___
Dev mailing list
Dev@wso2.org
http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev


Re: [Dev] [Bamboo-Build] WSO2 Carbon 4.0.x Platform 4.0.6 #30 has FAILED (1 tests failed, no failures were new). Change made by hasithah and dushan.

2013-01-09 Thread Sriskandarajah Suhothayan
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 9:38 PM, Amila Maha Arachchi ami...@wso2.com wrote:

 Hi Suho,

 multipleDefnConversionFromJSON test is failing. Please have a look.

 Thanks, I have fixed it.

Suho


 On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 9:22 PM, Bamboo cbuil...@wso2.org wrote:

  [image: Failed]  WSO2 Carbon 
 4.0.xhttp://wso2.org/bamboo/browse/WCB001/› Platform
 4.0.6 http://wso2.org/bamboo/browse/WCB001-PLA006/ › 
 #30http://wso2.org/bamboo/browse/WCB001-PLA006-30/
 failed

 Changes by hasithah http://wso2.org/bamboo/browse/author/hasithah and
 dushan http://wso2.org/bamboo/browse/author/dushan

 *1/888* tests failed.
Responsible No one is responsible for this build.
Failing Jobs http://wso2.org/bamboo/browse/WCB001-PLA006-30/ Job
 Duration Tests[image: Failed]  Default 
 Jobhttp://wso2.org/bamboo/browse/WCB001-PLA006-JOB1-30/ (Default
 Stage)  12 minutes  1 of 888 failed  
 Logshttp://wso2.org/bamboo/browse/WCB001-PLA006-JOB1-30/log|
 Artifacts http://wso2.org/bamboo/browse/WCB001-PLA006-JOB1-30/artifact 
 Code
 Changes http://wso2.org/bamboo/browse/WCB001-PLA006-30/commit/  View
 all 4 code changeshttp://wso2.org/bamboo/browse/WCB001-PLA006-30/commit/
 dushan http://wso2.org/bamboo/browse/author/dushan
 added esb patch build profile  152941
 hasithahhttp://wso2.org/bamboo/browse/author/hasithah
 updated pom.xml file to refer carbon core 4.0.6.  152937
 hasithahhttp://wso2.org/bamboo/browse/author/hasithah
 updated pom.xml to refer cabon core 4.0.6.  152936   1 more 
 changes…http://wso2.org/bamboo/browse/WCB001-PLA006-30/commit
 Tests http://wso2.org/bamboo/browse/WCB001-PLA006-30/test  View full
 test details http://wso2.org/bamboo/browse/WCB001-PLA006-30/test   1
 Existing Test Failures   Test Job MultipleDefinitionConversionTest
 multipleDefnConversionFromJSONhttp://wso2.org/bamboo/browse/WCB001-PLA006-JOB1-30/test/case/41485811
   Default
 Job http://wso2.org/bamboo/browse/WCB001-PLA006-JOB1-30/test View
 Online http://wso2.org/bamboo/browse/WCB001-PLA006-30 | Add 
 Commentshttp://wso2.org/bamboo/browse/WCB001-PLA006-30?commentMode=true

 This message was sent by Atlassian Bamboo http://wso2.org/bamboo.

 If you wish to stop receiving these emails edit your user 
 profilehttp://wso2.org/bamboo/profile/userNotifications.actionor notify
 your administrator http://wso2.org/bamboo/viewAdministrators.action.

 ___
 Dev mailing list
 Dev@wso2.org
 http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev




 --
 *Amila Maharachchi*
 Technical Lead
 Member, Management Committee - Cloud  Platform TG
 WSO2, Inc.; http://wso2.com

 Blog: http://maharachchi.blogspot.com
 Mobile: +94719371446




-- 
*S. Suhothayan
*
Software Engineer,
Data Technologies Team,
 *WSO2, Inc. **http://wso2.com
 http://wso2.com/*
*lean.enterprise.middleware.*

*email: **s...@wso2.com* s...@wso2.com* cell: (+94) 779 756 757
blog: **http://suhothayan.blogspot.com/* http://suhothayan.blogspot.com/*
twitter: **http://twitter.com/suhothayan* http://twitter.com/suhothayan*
linked-in: **http://lk.linkedin.com/in/suhothayan*
*
*
___
Dev mailing list
Dev@wso2.org
http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev


[Dev] [Bamboo-Build] WSO2 Carbon 4.0.x Products 4.0.6 #31 was SUCCESSFUL (with 18 tests). Change made by suho.

2013-01-09 Thread Bamboo

---
WSO2 Carbon 4.0.x  Products 4.0.6  #31 was successful.
---
Code has been updated by suho.
18 tests in total.

http://wso2.org/bamboo/browse/WCB001-PRO006-31/




--
Code Changes
--
suho (152946):

fixing multipleDefnConversionFromJSON test



--
This message is automatically generated by Atlassian Bamboo___
Dev mailing list
Dev@wso2.org
http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev


[Dev] [Bamboo-Build] WSO2 Carbon 4.0.x Platform 4.0.6 #31 was SUCCESSFUL (with 888 tests). Change made by suho.

2013-01-09 Thread Bamboo

---
WSO2 Carbon 4.0.x  Platform 4.0.6  #31 was successful.
---
Code has been updated by suho.
888 tests in total.

http://wso2.org/bamboo/browse/WCB001-PLA006-31/




--
Code Changes
--
suho (152946):

fixing multipleDefnConversionFromJSON test



--
Tests
--
Fixed Tests (1)
   - MultipleDefinitionConversionTest: Multiple defn conversion from j s o n

--
This message is automatically generated by Atlassian Bamboo___
Dev mailing list
Dev@wso2.org
http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev


Re: [Dev] PrivilegedCarbonContext.getThreadLocalCarbonContext().getUsername() returns 'null'

2013-01-09 Thread Afkham Azeez
However, in cases where you are sure that the ThreadLocal CC is available,
you must use getThreadLocalCarbonContext because that method is much more
efficient than getCarbonContext. What I feel is, we should ensure that
every thread contains the ThreadLocal CC, which means we will no longer
need the getCurrentContext method. At that point, from getCurrentContext,
we will just call getThreadLocalCarbonContext.

Azeez

On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Dimuthu Leelarathne dimut...@wso2.comwrote:

 Hi Dulanja,

 It is correct to use CurrentCarbonContext instead of
 ThreadLocalCarbonContext. You can read the mail titled UserRegistry sends
 null to JDBCAuthorizationManager from archives.  Basically this is the
 code that finds you the correct  CurrentCarbonContext. So correct thing is
 to first get CarbonContext from MessageContext and if it is not available
 try the TreadLocal one.

 public static CarbonContextDataHolder getCurrentCarbonContextHolder() {
 try {
 MessageContext messageContext =
 MessageContext.getCurrentMessageContext();
 if (messageContext != null) {
 return getCurrentCarbonContextHolder(messageContext);
 } else {
 return
 getCurrentCarbonContextHolder((ConfigurationContext) null);
 }
 } catch (NullPointerException ignore) {
 // This is thrown when the message context is not initialized
 // So return the Threadlocal
  return getThreadLocalCarbonContextHolder();
 } catch (NoClassDefFoundError ignore) {
 // There can be situations where the CarbonContext is
 accessed, when there is no Axis2
 // library on the classpath.
 return getThreadLocalCarbonContextHolder();
 }
 }

 thanks,
 dimuthu


 On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 2:15 PM, Dulanja Liyanage dula...@wso2.com wrote:

 Hi,

 Appreciate if you can guide me whether it's safe/appropriate to use
 the CurrentContext rather than the ThreadLocalCarbonContext, to get the
 username and tenant domain.

 I'm not much knowledgeable about the design, but I feel using it will be
 plastering the root cause.

 Thanks,
 Dulanja

 On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Dulanja Liyanage dula...@wso2.comwrote:

 Hi Shariq,

 I did as you suggested and now the username is available.

 What I'm not sure is how appropriate/safe this is.

 Thanks for the help.

 Regards,
 Dulanja


 On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 6:17 PM, Dulanja Liyanage dula...@wso2.comwrote:

 Hi Shariq,

 I will try that. Thanks!

 Dulanja


 On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Muhammed Shariq sha...@wso2.comwrote:

 Hi,

 This looks like an issue I encountered sometime back. We had to revert
 the fixes I did in TomcatValve cz it was causing some other issue .. Can
 you try CarbonContext.getCurrentContext.getUsername() and see what happens
 .. AFAIR its getUsername simple does a return .. we should fix it to check
 if username is null and if so set it properly .. usually that is the
 behavior but there are some  edge cases it seem ...

 On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Dulanja Liyanage dula...@wso2.comwrote:

 Hi,

 I'm testing IS 4.1.0 running on Carbon 4.0.6. While debugging an
 issue, I encountered the $subject.

 I logged in as 'admin', so, the username should return as such. But
 it returns 'null'.

 However the
 PrivilegedCarbonContext.getThreadLocalCarbonContext().getTenantDomain()
 returns 'carbon.super' as expected.

 I'm still debugging this and trying to figure out how CarbonContext
 works in threads. If someone is already aware of a reason/solution for 
 this
 it will save time. :)

 Thanks!
 Dulanja

 ___
 Dev mailing list
 Dev@wso2.org
 http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev




 --
 Thanks,
 Shariq.
 Phone: +94 777 202 225





 ___
 Dev mailing list
 Dev@wso2.org
 http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev



 ___
 Dev mailing list
 Dev@wso2.org
 http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev




-- 
*Afkham Azeez*
Director of Architecture; WSO2, Inc.; http://wso2.com
Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://www.apache.org/
* http://www.apache.org/**
email: **az...@wso2.com* az...@wso2.com* cell: +94 77 3320919
blog: **http://blog.afkham.org* http://blog.afkham.org*
twitter: **http://twitter.com/afkham_azeez*http://twitter.com/afkham_azeez
*
linked-in: **http://lk.linkedin.com/in/afkhamazeez*
*
*
*Lean . Enterprise . Middleware*
___
Dev mailing list
Dev@wso2.org
http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev


Re: [Dev] P2 Category re-factoring by introducing sub-categories

2013-01-09 Thread Subash Chaturanga
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 9:42 PM, Dileepa Jayakody dile...@wso2.com wrote:

 Hi All,

 Continuing the previous discussions we had on re-factoring P2-feature
 categories to achieve fine-grained sub-level groupings of features under
 products, we decided to introduce new composite-features corresponding to
 sub-categories under each product in the p2-repository.
 This has been already done for Application Server (see the attached
 screen-shot on how AS category is now listed down in the p2-repo). The set
 of AS composite-features defined for this purpose can be found at [1].
 Similarly composite features for all other products can be created at above
 location (eg: composite-features/esb, composite-features/greg etc.)

 It'll be great if all product categories in our p2-repo can be cleaned and
 re-factored by including sub-categories. Product teams can decide how they
 want to organize their product category into sub-categories based on the
 expected functionality of features.

 @Product teams, please create relevant composite-features and re-factor
 your p2-category by including sub-categories in the p2-repo.


Hi Vijitha,
Please note, since G-Reg 4.5.6 will release before mid Feb, we need to add
the composite feature layer quite sooner before the release so that we have
time to make sure everything works properly with this change before the
release.



 If you need more insight on p2 sub-category concept please refer the
 blog-post here [2].
 For step-by-step instructions on how to create composite-features and add
 them to the p2-repository please follow the blog-post here [3].
 I hope above blog-posts can help you to get an understanding of what needs
 to be done. Further, if a member of each product team can own this task, I
 can help them in-person as well.

 Thanks,
 Dileepa

 [1]
 https://svn.wso2.org/repos/wso2/carbon/platform/branches/4.0.0/features/composite-features/as/
 [2]
 http://dileepajayakody.blogspot.com/2012/12/how-to-achieve-sub-categorization-in.html
 [3]
 http://dileepajayakody.blogspot.com/2012/12/how-to-generate-sub-categories-for-wso2.html
 --
 Dileepa Jayakody,
 Software Engineer, WSO2 Inc.
 Lean . Enterprise . Middleware

 Mobile : +94777-857616




-- 

Subash Chaturanga
Software Engineer
WSO2 Inc. http://wso2.com

email - sub...@wso2.com
phone - 077 2225922
___
Dev mailing list
Dev@wso2.org
http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev


[Dev] Implementation of the REST API on G-Reg

2013-01-09 Thread Sriragu Arudsothy
Hai All,


  The REST API currently implemented as a web - application. The
web application get an remote registry instance to access the registry
components. The current implementation does the necessary resource related
operations  using the instance of the remote registry. eg( adding
comments/rating/tags ..etc on the resource).

After I had the offline chat with G-Reg team, we now plan to move the REST
api into the platform/registry components as a separate OSGI bundle. I did
the necessary changes to the current app and moved to the above location
and checked whether the REST api bundle is active/enabled when the G-Reg
instance is started. Yes, it was enabled.

I would like to know your opinion on how the REST API implementation need
to be adapted to G-Reg. or How Do I need to implement this REST API by
means some other products also can access?

Thanks!
Regards,
Sriragu
___
Dev mailing list
Dev@wso2.org
http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev


Re: [Dev] PrivilegedCarbonContext.getThreadLocalCarbonContext().getUsername() returns 'null'

2013-01-09 Thread Muhammed Shariq
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Afkham Azeez az...@wso2.com wrote:

 However, in cases where you are sure that the ThreadLocal CC is available,
 you must use getThreadLocalCarbonContext because that method is much more
 efficient than getCarbonContext. What I feel is, we should ensure that
 every thread contains the ThreadLocal CC, which means we will no longer
 need the getCurrentContext method. At that point, from getCurrentContext,
 we will just call getThreadLocalCarbonContext.


This is what SInthuja did sometime ago (giving priority to the ThreadLocal
CC), but the caused some issue as Senaka explained in his detailed mail ..
Also I was trying to recall why I did some  changes in CarbonTomcatValve,
and that too was fixing the same issue (username being null!), I fixed it
by setting the username to the CC from the session, this also was causing a
perf issue cz of the getSession() gets called for every request ..! Guess
we need to look into the use of CC api in a bit more detail ..


 Azeez

 On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Dimuthu Leelarathne dimut...@wso2.comwrote:

 Hi Dulanja,

 It is correct to use CurrentCarbonContext instead of
 ThreadLocalCarbonContext. You can read the mail titled UserRegistry sends
 null to JDBCAuthorizationManager from archives.  Basically this is the
 code that finds you the correct  CurrentCarbonContext. So correct thing is
 to first get CarbonContext from MessageContext and if it is not available
 try the TreadLocal one.

 public static CarbonContextDataHolder getCurrentCarbonContextHolder() {
 try {
 MessageContext messageContext =
 MessageContext.getCurrentMessageContext();
 if (messageContext != null) {
 return getCurrentCarbonContextHolder(messageContext);
 } else {
 return
 getCurrentCarbonContextHolder((ConfigurationContext) null);
 }
 } catch (NullPointerException ignore) {
 // This is thrown when the message context is not initialized
 // So return the Threadlocal
  return getThreadLocalCarbonContextHolder();
 } catch (NoClassDefFoundError ignore) {
 // There can be situations where the CarbonContext is
 accessed, when there is no Axis2
 // library on the classpath.
 return getThreadLocalCarbonContextHolder();
 }
 }

 thanks,
 dimuthu


 On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 2:15 PM, Dulanja Liyanage dula...@wso2.comwrote:

 Hi,

 Appreciate if you can guide me whether it's safe/appropriate to use
 the CurrentContext rather than the ThreadLocalCarbonContext, to get the
 username and tenant domain.

 I'm not much knowledgeable about the design, but I feel using it will be
 plastering the root cause.

 Thanks,
 Dulanja

 On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Dulanja Liyanage dula...@wso2.comwrote:

 Hi Shariq,

 I did as you suggested and now the username is available.

 What I'm not sure is how appropriate/safe this is.

 Thanks for the help.

 Regards,
 Dulanja


 On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 6:17 PM, Dulanja Liyanage dula...@wso2.comwrote:

 Hi Shariq,

 I will try that. Thanks!

 Dulanja


 On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Muhammed Shariq sha...@wso2.comwrote:

 Hi,

 This looks like an issue I encountered sometime back. We had to
 revert the fixes I did in TomcatValve cz it was causing some other issue 
 ..
 Can you try CarbonContext.getCurrentContext.getUsername() and see what
 happens .. AFAIR its getUsername simple does a return .. we should fix it
 to check if username is null and if so set it properly .. usually that is
 the behavior but there are some  edge cases it seem ...

 On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Dulanja Liyanage dula...@wso2.comwrote:

 Hi,

 I'm testing IS 4.1.0 running on Carbon 4.0.6. While debugging an
 issue, I encountered the $subject.

 I logged in as 'admin', so, the username should return as such. But
 it returns 'null'.

 However the
 PrivilegedCarbonContext.getThreadLocalCarbonContext().getTenantDomain()
 returns 'carbon.super' as expected.

 I'm still debugging this and trying to figure out how CarbonContext
 works in threads. If someone is already aware of a reason/solution for 
 this
 it will save time. :)

 Thanks!
 Dulanja

 ___
 Dev mailing list
 Dev@wso2.org
 http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev




 --
 Thanks,
 Shariq.
 Phone: +94 777 202 225





 ___
 Dev mailing list
 Dev@wso2.org
 http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev



 ___
 Dev mailing list
 Dev@wso2.org
 http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev




 --
 *Afkham Azeez*
 Director of Architecture; WSO2, Inc.; http://wso2.com
 Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://www.apache.org/
 * http://www.apache.org/**
 email: **az...@wso2.com* az...@wso2.com* cell: +94 77 3320919
 blog: **http://blog.afkham.org* http://blog.afkham.org*
 twitter: 

Re: [Dev] PrivilegedCarbonContext.getThreadLocalCarbonContext().getUsername() returns 'null'

2013-01-09 Thread Afkham Azeez
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 10:14 AM, Muhammed Shariq sha...@wso2.com wrote:

 On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Afkham Azeez az...@wso2.com wrote:

 However, in cases where you are sure that the ThreadLocal CC is
 available, you must use getThreadLocalCarbonContext because that method is
 much more efficient than getCarbonContext. What I feel is, we should ensure
 that every thread contains the ThreadLocal CC, which means we will no
 longer need the getCurrentContext method. At that point, from
 getCurrentContext, we will just call getThreadLocalCarbonContext.


 This is what SInthuja did sometime ago (giving priority to the ThreadLocal
 CC), but the caused some issue as Senaka explained in his detailed mail ..
 Also I was trying to recall why I did some  changes in CarbonTomcatValve,
 and that too was fixing the same issue (username being null!), I fixed it
 by setting the username to the CC from the session, this also was causing a
 perf issue cz of the getSession() gets called for every request ..! Guess
 we need to look into the use of CC api in a bit more detail ..


You fix was probably the right one. The problem should be unnecessarily
accessing the session. Instead, what you could have done was, when someone
called getUserName, at that point, get the session, and retrieve the
username  set it as an attribute in the CC. In subsequent calls to the the
same CC, you could simply return that attribute.



 Azeez

 On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Dimuthu Leelarathne dimut...@wso2.comwrote:

 Hi Dulanja,

 It is correct to use CurrentCarbonContext instead of
 ThreadLocalCarbonContext. You can read the mail titled UserRegistry sends
 null to JDBCAuthorizationManager from archives.  Basically this is the
 code that finds you the correct  CurrentCarbonContext. So correct thing is
 to first get CarbonContext from MessageContext and if it is not available
 try the TreadLocal one.

 public static CarbonContextDataHolder getCurrentCarbonContextHolder() {
 try {
 MessageContext messageContext =
 MessageContext.getCurrentMessageContext();
 if (messageContext != null) {
 return getCurrentCarbonContextHolder(messageContext);
 } else {
 return
 getCurrentCarbonContextHolder((ConfigurationContext) null);
 }
 } catch (NullPointerException ignore) {
 // This is thrown when the message context is not
 initialized
 // So return the Threadlocal
  return getThreadLocalCarbonContextHolder();
 } catch (NoClassDefFoundError ignore) {
 // There can be situations where the CarbonContext is
 accessed, when there is no Axis2
 // library on the classpath.
 return getThreadLocalCarbonContextHolder();
 }
 }

 thanks,
 dimuthu


 On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 2:15 PM, Dulanja Liyanage dula...@wso2.comwrote:

 Hi,

 Appreciate if you can guide me whether it's safe/appropriate to use
 the CurrentContext rather than the ThreadLocalCarbonContext, to get the
 username and tenant domain.

 I'm not much knowledgeable about the design, but I feel using it will
 be plastering the root cause.

 Thanks,
 Dulanja

 On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Dulanja Liyanage dula...@wso2.comwrote:

 Hi Shariq,

 I did as you suggested and now the username is available.

 What I'm not sure is how appropriate/safe this is.

 Thanks for the help.

 Regards,
 Dulanja


 On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 6:17 PM, Dulanja Liyanage dula...@wso2.comwrote:

 Hi Shariq,

 I will try that. Thanks!

 Dulanja


 On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Muhammed Shariq sha...@wso2.comwrote:

 Hi,

 This looks like an issue I encountered sometime back. We had to
 revert the fixes I did in TomcatValve cz it was causing some other 
 issue ..
 Can you try CarbonContext.getCurrentContext.getUsername() and see what
 happens .. AFAIR its getUsername simple does a return .. we should fix 
 it
 to check if username is null and if so set it properly .. usually that 
 is
 the behavior but there are some  edge cases it seem ...

 On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Dulanja Liyanage 
 dula...@wso2.comwrote:

 Hi,

 I'm testing IS 4.1.0 running on Carbon 4.0.6. While debugging an
 issue, I encountered the $subject.

 I logged in as 'admin', so, the username should return as such. But
 it returns 'null'.

 However the
 PrivilegedCarbonContext.getThreadLocalCarbonContext().getTenantDomain()
 returns 'carbon.super' as expected.

 I'm still debugging this and trying to figure out how CarbonContext
 works in threads. If someone is already aware of a reason/solution for 
 this
 it will save time. :)

 Thanks!
 Dulanja

 ___
 Dev mailing list
 Dev@wso2.org
 http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev




 --
 Thanks,
 Shariq.
 Phone: +94 777 202 225





 ___
 Dev mailing list
 Dev@wso2.org
 http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev



 

Re: [Dev] PrivilegedCarbonContext.getThreadLocalCarbonContext().getUsername() returns 'null'

2013-01-09 Thread Dulanja Liyanage
Thanks Azeez and Shariq for the inputs :)

On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Afkham Azeez az...@wso2.com wrote:



 On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 10:14 AM, Muhammed Shariq sha...@wso2.com wrote:

 On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Afkham Azeez az...@wso2.com wrote:

 However, in cases where you are sure that the ThreadLocal CC is
 available, you must use getThreadLocalCarbonContext because that method is
 much more efficient than getCarbonContext. What I feel is, we should ensure
 that every thread contains the ThreadLocal CC, which means we will no
 longer need the getCurrentContext method. At that point, from
 getCurrentContext, we will just call getThreadLocalCarbonContext.


 This is what SInthuja did sometime ago (giving priority to the
 ThreadLocal CC), but the caused some issue as Senaka explained in his
 detailed mail .. Also I was trying to recall why I did some  changes in
 CarbonTomcatValve, and that too was fixing the same issue (username being
 null!), I fixed it by setting the username to the CC from the session, this
 also was causing a perf issue cz of the getSession() gets called for every
 request ..! Guess we need to look into the use of CC api in a bit more
 detail ..


 You fix was probably the right one. The problem should be unnecessarily
 accessing the session. Instead, what you could have done was, when someone
 called getUserName, at that point, get the session, and retrieve the
 username  set it as an attribute in the CC. In subsequent calls to the the
 same CC, you could simply return that attribute.



 Azeez

 On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Dimuthu Leelarathne 
 dimut...@wso2.comwrote:

 Hi Dulanja,

 It is correct to use CurrentCarbonContext instead of
 ThreadLocalCarbonContext. You can read the mail titled UserRegistry sends
 null to JDBCAuthorizationManager from archives.  Basically this is the
 code that finds you the correct  CurrentCarbonContext. So correct thing is
 to first get CarbonContext from MessageContext and if it is not available
 try the TreadLocal one.

 public static CarbonContextDataHolder getCurrentCarbonContextHolder() {
 try {
 MessageContext messageContext =
 MessageContext.getCurrentMessageContext();
 if (messageContext != null) {
 return getCurrentCarbonContextHolder(messageContext);
 } else {
 return
 getCurrentCarbonContextHolder((ConfigurationContext) null);
 }
 } catch (NullPointerException ignore) {
 // This is thrown when the message context is not
 initialized
 // So return the Threadlocal
  return getThreadLocalCarbonContextHolder();
 } catch (NoClassDefFoundError ignore) {
 // There can be situations where the CarbonContext is
 accessed, when there is no Axis2
 // library on the classpath.
 return getThreadLocalCarbonContextHolder();
 }
 }

 thanks,
 dimuthu


 On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 2:15 PM, Dulanja Liyanage dula...@wso2.comwrote:

 Hi,

 Appreciate if you can guide me whether it's safe/appropriate to use
 the CurrentContext rather than the ThreadLocalCarbonContext, to get the
 username and tenant domain.

 I'm not much knowledgeable about the design, but I feel using it will
 be plastering the root cause.

 Thanks,
 Dulanja

 On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Dulanja Liyanage dula...@wso2.comwrote:

 Hi Shariq,

 I did as you suggested and now the username is available.

 What I'm not sure is how appropriate/safe this is.

 Thanks for the help.

 Regards,
 Dulanja


 On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 6:17 PM, Dulanja Liyanage dula...@wso2.comwrote:

 Hi Shariq,

 I will try that. Thanks!

 Dulanja


 On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Muhammed Shariq sha...@wso2.comwrote:

 Hi,

 This looks like an issue I encountered sometime back. We had to
 revert the fixes I did in TomcatValve cz it was causing some other 
 issue ..
 Can you try CarbonContext.getCurrentContext.getUsername() and see what
 happens .. AFAIR its getUsername simple does a return .. we should fix 
 it
 to check if username is null and if so set it properly .. usually that 
 is
 the behavior but there are some  edge cases it seem ...

 On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Dulanja Liyanage 
 dula...@wso2.comwrote:

 Hi,

 I'm testing IS 4.1.0 running on Carbon 4.0.6. While debugging an
 issue, I encountered the $subject.

 I logged in as 'admin', so, the username should return as such.
 But it returns 'null'.

 However the
 PrivilegedCarbonContext.getThreadLocalCarbonContext().getTenantDomain()
 returns 'carbon.super' as expected.

 I'm still debugging this and trying to figure out how
 CarbonContext works in threads. If someone is already aware of a
 reason/solution for this it will save time. :)

 Thanks!
 Dulanja

 ___
 Dev mailing list
 Dev@wso2.org
 http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev




 --
 Thanks,
 Shariq.
 Phone: +94 777 202 225





 

Re: [Dev] Implementation of the REST API on G-Reg

2013-01-09 Thread Senaka Fernando
Hi Ragu,

Is OAuth based security implemented for this? If not, lets do that first.
Once done, lets have a review of the design and the code. Next step would
be to document the entire API and provide some sample(s) explaining how
this can be used.

Thanks,
Senaka.

On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 10:13 AM, Sriragu Arudsothy srir...@wso2.comwrote:

 Hai All,


   The REST API currently implemented as a web - application. The
 web application get an remote registry instance to access the registry
 components. The current implementation does the necessary resource related
 operations  using the instance of the remote registry. eg( adding
 comments/rating/tags ..etc on the resource).

 After I had the offline chat with G-Reg team, we now plan to move the REST
 api into the platform/registry components as a separate OSGI bundle. I did
 the necessary changes to the current app and moved to the above location
 and checked whether the REST api bundle is active/enabled when the G-Reg
 instance is started. Yes, it was enabled.

 I would like to know your opinion on how the REST API implementation need
 to be adapted to G-Reg. or How Do I need to implement this REST API by
 means some other products also can access?

 Thanks!
 Regards,
 Sriragu




-- 
* http://wso2con.com/
*
*

Senaka Fernando*
Member - Integration Technologies Management Committee;
Technical Lead; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com*
Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://apache.org

E-mail: senaka AT wso2.com
**P: +1 408 754 7388; ext: 51736*; *M: +94 77 322 1818
Linked-In: http://linkedin.com/in/senakafernando

*Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
___
Dev mailing list
Dev@wso2.org
http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev


Re: [Dev] Carbon Kernal build error any idea?

2013-01-09 Thread Chamara Ariyarathne
This occurred to me too..

On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 4:42 PM, Malaka Silva mal...@wso2.com wrote:

 [DEBUG] Looking up lifecyle mappings for packaging jar from
 ClassRealm[projectorg.wso2.carbon:carbon:4.0.0, parent:
 ClassRealm[maven.api, parent: null]]
 [ERROR] The build could not read 1 project - [Help 1]
 org.apache.maven.project.ProjectBuildingException: Some problems were
 encountered while processing the POMs:
 [FATAL] Non-resolvable parent POM: Failure to find
 org.wso2.carbon:integration:pom:4.0.0 in
 http://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2 was cached in the local repository,
 resolution will not be reattempted until the update interval of central has
 elapsed or updates are forced and 'parent.relativePath' points at wrong
 local POM @ line 22, column 13
 [WARNING] The expression ${pom.version} is deprecated. Please use
 ${project.version} instead. @
 [WARNING] The expression ${pom.version} is deprecated. Please use
 ${project.version} instead. @

 ___
 Dev mailing list
 Dev@wso2.org
 http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev




-- 
*Chamara Ariyarathne*
Senior Software Engineer - QA;
WSO2 Inc; http://www.wso2.com/.
Mobile; *+94772786766*
___
Dev mailing list
Dev@wso2.org
http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev


Re: [Dev] Implementation of the REST API on G-Reg

2013-01-09 Thread Sriragu Arudsothy
Hai Senaka,

 OAuth not yet implemented. I will do that first. I think
OAuth is mainly implemented in IS. I think I have to implement the
integration part of the OAuth to the rest api. Please tell me your ideas
how can I approach this situation?

What else I need to be considered when implement this?

Ragu

On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 11:03 AM, Senaka Fernando sen...@wso2.com wrote:

 Hi Ragu,

 Is OAuth based security implemented for this? If not, lets do that first.
 Once done, lets have a review of the design and the code. Next step would
 be to document the entire API and provide some sample(s) explaining how
 this can be used.

 Thanks,
 Senaka.


 On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 10:13 AM, Sriragu Arudsothy srir...@wso2.comwrote:

 Hai All,


   The REST API currently implemented as a web - application. The
 web application get an remote registry instance to access the registry
 components. The current implementation does the necessary resource related
 operations  using the instance of the remote registry. eg( adding
 comments/rating/tags ..etc on the resource).

 After I had the offline chat with G-Reg team, we now plan to move the
 REST api into the platform/registry components as a separate OSGI bundle. I
 did the necessary changes to the current app and moved to the above
 location and checked whether the REST api bundle is active/enabled when the
 G-Reg instance is started. Yes, it was enabled.

 I would like to know your opinion on how the REST API implementation need
 to be adapted to G-Reg. or How Do I need to implement this REST API by
 means some other products also can access?

 Thanks!
 Regards,
 Sriragu




 --
 * http://wso2con.com/
 *
 *

 Senaka Fernando*
 Member - Integration Technologies Management Committee;
 Technical Lead; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com*
 Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://apache.org

 E-mail: senaka AT wso2.com
 **P: +1 408 754 7388; ext: 51736*; *M: +94 77 322 1818
 Linked-In: http://linkedin.com/in/senakafernando

 *Lean . Enterprise . Middleware

___
Dev mailing list
Dev@wso2.org
http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev


Re: [Dev] Implementation of the REST API on G-Reg

2013-01-09 Thread Senaka Fernando
Hi Ragu,

OAuth is not strictly a part of IS according to my understanding. It is a
reusable component in our platform, and we should be able to make use of it
without much of a hassle.

Thanks,
Senaka.

On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Sriragu Arudsothy srir...@wso2.comwrote:

 Hai Senaka,

  OAuth not yet implemented. I will do that first. I think
 OAuth is mainly implemented in IS. I think I have to implement the
 integration part of the OAuth to the rest api. Please tell me your ideas
 how can I approach this situation?

 What else I need to be considered when implement this?

 Ragu


 On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 11:03 AM, Senaka Fernando sen...@wso2.com wrote:

 Hi Ragu,

 Is OAuth based security implemented for this? If not, lets do that first.
 Once done, lets have a review of the design and the code. Next step would
 be to document the entire API and provide some sample(s) explaining how
 this can be used.

 Thanks,
 Senaka.


 On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 10:13 AM, Sriragu Arudsothy srir...@wso2.comwrote:

 Hai All,


   The REST API currently implemented as a web - application. The
 web application get an remote registry instance to access the registry
 components. The current implementation does the necessary resource related
 operations  using the instance of the remote registry. eg( adding
 comments/rating/tags ..etc on the resource).

 After I had the offline chat with G-Reg team, we now plan to move the
 REST api into the platform/registry components as a separate OSGI bundle. I
 did the necessary changes to the current app and moved to the above
 location and checked whether the REST api bundle is active/enabled when the
 G-Reg instance is started. Yes, it was enabled.

 I would like to know your opinion on how the REST API implementation
 need to be adapted to G-Reg. or How Do I need to implement this REST API by
 means some other products also can access?

 Thanks!
 Regards,
 Sriragu




 --
 * http://wso2con.com/
 *
 *

 Senaka Fernando*
 Member - Integration Technologies Management Committee;
 Technical Lead; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com*
 Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://apache.org

 E-mail: senaka AT wso2.com
 **P: +1 408 754 7388; ext: 51736*; *M: +94 77 322 1818
 Linked-In: http://linkedin.com/in/senakafernando

 *Lean . Enterprise . Middleware





-- 
* http://wso2con.com/
*
*

Senaka Fernando*
Member - Integration Technologies Management Committee;
Technical Lead; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com*
Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://apache.org

E-mail: senaka AT wso2.com
**P: +1 408 754 7388; ext: 51736*; *M: +94 77 322 1818
Linked-In: http://linkedin.com/in/senakafernando

*Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
___
Dev mailing list
Dev@wso2.org
http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev


Re: [Dev] Carbon Kernal build error any idea?

2013-01-09 Thread Malaka Silva
Hi Chamara,

I had this problem earlier.

But it was solved after taking an update from SVN and building the patch
releases 4.0.6 of Orbit, Kernel and Platform

Best Regards,
Malaka


On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Chamara Ariyarathne chama...@wso2.comwrote:

 This occurred to me too..

 On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 4:42 PM, Malaka Silva mal...@wso2.com wrote:

 [DEBUG] Looking up lifecyle mappings for packaging jar from
 ClassRealm[projectorg.wso2.carbon:carbon:4.0.0, parent:
 ClassRealm[maven.api, parent: null]]
 [ERROR] The build could not read 1 project - [Help 1]
 org.apache.maven.project.ProjectBuildingException: Some problems were
 encountered while processing the POMs:
 [FATAL] Non-resolvable parent POM: Failure to find
 org.wso2.carbon:integration:pom:4.0.0 in
 http://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2 was cached in the local repository,
 resolution will not be reattempted until the update interval of central has
 elapsed or updates are forced and 'parent.relativePath' points at wrong
 local POM @ line 22, column 13
 [WARNING] The expression ${pom.version} is deprecated. Please use
 ${project.version} instead. @
 [WARNING] The expression ${pom.version} is deprecated. Please use
 ${project.version} instead. @

 ___
 Dev mailing list
 Dev@wso2.org
 http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev




 --
 *Chamara Ariyarathne*
 Senior Software Engineer - QA;
 WSO2 Inc; http://www.wso2.com/.
 Mobile; *+94772786766*




-- 
Best Regards,
Malaka
___
Dev mailing list
Dev@wso2.org
http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev


[Dev] [Bamboo-Build] WSO2 Carbon 4.0.x Products 4.0.6 #32 was SUCCESSFUL (with 18 tests). Change made by hasithah and dushan.

2013-01-09 Thread Bamboo

---
WSO2 Carbon 4.0.x  Products 4.0.6  #32 was successful.
---
Code has been updated by hasithah, dushan.
18 tests in total.

http://wso2.org/bamboo/browse/WCB001-PRO006-32/




--
Code Changes
--
dushan (152962):

fixed POX security failure on DELETE 

hasithah (152956):

updated pom.xml file.



--
This message is automatically generated by Atlassian Bamboo___
Dev mailing list
Dev@wso2.org
http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev