Re: [Dev] BackwardAssociationHandlerTestCase and WSDLTestCase are failing in G-Reg

2012-04-04 Thread Vijitha Kumara 
Ideally, tests should not worry about any ordering of the run time engine
which invokes them as they should be independent of each other. The tests
involves multiple test methods (if any) need to be combined to form a
single unit of test(s) so that what ever ordering (or any context switching
etc...) would not interfere the result of the test.

Anyway I'm doing another build with the changes from Subash, let's see...

On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 9:48 PM, Subash Chaturanga  wrote:

>
>
> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 8:20 PM, Afkham Azeez  wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 5:23 PM, Senaka Fernando  wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Subash, Vijitha,
>>>
>>> If possible also try to find the ordering of this on Bamboo and when we
>>> build. I have a feeling that Bamboo is running this in some other order.
>>>
>>
> Senaka, I don't think it is a defined order. We can order a set of tests
> by adding dependencies (which we already does in GReg testng stuff), and
> other than those, AFAIK for testng, its a set of 200+ individual pieces to
> run randomly. BTW, is $subject hits in builder machine ?
>
>
>>
>>
>  The order in which tests are executed should not determine the outcome of
>> the test, ideally. However, if you want to order tests, you can use the
>> "dependsOn" attribute of the @Test annotation.
>>
>
> Yes Azeez, we already using that only in necessary places. For instance in
> service test cases the edit service test depends on add service test and
> etc.
>
> Senaka, If order really matters (which is a possible in this case), there
> is only *one way to overcome this issue (which will make sure there will be
> no failures occur based on the ordering in future.), that is to add
> dependencies to each and every methods within each test case (then this
> will be similar to the JUnit test class behavior). Because GReg didn't face
> such random failures in JUnit time. WDYT ?
>
> Thanks
> .
>
>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Senaka.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 2:00 PM, Vijitha Kumara  wrote:
>>>
 > Schema Test has excluded not from the pom but from the test class
 itself by removing annotations.

 wasn't aware of that, will do as suggested.

 On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Senaka Fernando wrote:

>
>
> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Subash Chaturanga wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Senaka Fernando wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Vijitha,
>>>
>>> It should include 233 test cases, IIRC, and you will have to
>>> uncomment the ones that are excluded before you build.
>>>
>>
>> Schema Test has excluded not from the pom but from the test class
>> itself by removing annotations. Seems that is the one missing which has 
>> 3,4
>> test cases.
>>
>
> Oh, that's not done right who ever did that, :(..
>
>
>>  I have refactored it and excluded from the pom.
>>
>
> Great.
>
>>
>> Vijitha, take an up in the integration module, and then remove all
>> excluded stuff locally and build again. Then you'll get #233.
>> BTW, I also able to build all the tests on a full svn up.
>>
>
> +1
>
> Thanks,
> Senaka.
>
>>
>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Senaka.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Vijitha Kumara wrote:
>>>
 > I think you did this on a clean repo ? Can you try running all
 200+ integration tests and check, instead of running only those two ?

 Initial build also contained all the 230 tests in GReg as the
 report indicates.

 But I'm now trying with including all other products as well to see
 whether it makes any difference.

 Regards,

 On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 5:48 PM, Subash Chaturanga 
 wrote:

>
>
> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Vijitha Kumara 
> wrote:
>
>> All,
>>
>> All the tests related to these two classes passed. Attached the
>> surefire report with this.
>>
>
> Hi Vijitha,
>
> I think you did this on a clean repo ? Can you try running all
> 200+ integration tests and check, instead of running only those two ?
>
>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 8:52 AM, Vijitha Kumara 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Had an issue with the build, Mail @Dev "Platform build error".
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 8:49 AM, Subash Chaturanga <
>>> sub...@wso2.com> wrote:
>>>


 On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 3:53 AM, Senaka Fernando <
 sen...@wso2.com> wrote:

> Hi Vijitha/Subash,
>
> Any update on this?
>

 Vijitha was building this on a clean repo. Vijitha , were you
>>

Re: [Dev] BackwardAssociationHandlerTestCase and WSDLTestCase are failing in G-Reg

2012-04-04 Thread Subash Chaturanga 
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 8:20 PM, Afkham Azeez  wrote:

>
>
> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 5:23 PM, Senaka Fernando  wrote:
>
>> Hi Subash, Vijitha,
>>
>> If possible also try to find the ordering of this on Bamboo and when we
>> build. I have a feeling that Bamboo is running this in some other order.
>>
>
Senaka, I don't think it is a defined order. We can order a set of tests by
adding dependencies (which we already does in GReg testng stuff), and other
than those, AFAIK for testng, its a set of 200+ individual pieces to run
randomly. BTW, is $subject hits in builder machine ?


>
>
The order in which tests are executed should not determine the outcome of
> the test, ideally. However, if you want to order tests, you can use the
> "dependsOn" attribute of the @Test annotation.
>

Yes Azeez, we already using that only in necessary places. For instance in
service test cases the edit service test depends on add service test and
etc.

Senaka, If order really matters (which is a possible in this case), there
is only *one way to overcome this issue (which will make sure there will be
no failures occur based on the ordering in future.), that is to add
dependencies to each and every methods within each test case (then this
will be similar to the JUnit test class behavior). Because GReg didn't face
such random failures in JUnit time. WDYT ?

Thanks
.

>
>> Thanks,
>> Senaka.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 2:00 PM, Vijitha Kumara  wrote:
>>
>>> > Schema Test has excluded not from the pom but from the test class
>>> itself by removing annotations.
>>>
>>> wasn't aware of that, will do as suggested.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Senaka Fernando  wrote:
>>>


 On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Subash Chaturanga wrote:

>
>
> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Senaka Fernando wrote:
>
>> Hi Vijitha,
>>
>> It should include 233 test cases, IIRC, and you will have to
>> uncomment the ones that are excluded before you build.
>>
>
> Schema Test has excluded not from the pom but from the test class
> itself by removing annotations. Seems that is the one missing which has 
> 3,4
> test cases.
>

 Oh, that's not done right who ever did that, :(..


>  I have refactored it and excluded from the pom.
>

 Great.

>
> Vijitha, take an up in the integration module, and then remove all
> excluded stuff locally and build again. Then you'll get #233.
> BTW, I also able to build all the tests on a full svn up.
>

 +1

 Thanks,
 Senaka.

>
>
>> Thanks,
>> Senaka.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Vijitha Kumara wrote:
>>
>>> > I think you did this on a clean repo ? Can you try running all
>>> 200+ integration tests and check, instead of running only those two ?
>>>
>>> Initial build also contained all the 230 tests in GReg as the report
>>> indicates.
>>>
>>> But I'm now trying with including all other products as well to see
>>> whether it makes any difference.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 5:48 PM, Subash Chaturanga 
>>> wrote:
>>>


 On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Vijitha Kumara wrote:

> All,
>
> All the tests related to these two classes passed. Attached the
> surefire report with this.
>

 Hi Vijitha,

 I think you did this on a clean repo ? Can you try running all 200+
 integration tests and check, instead of running only those two ?


>
>
> Regards,
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 8:52 AM, Vijitha Kumara 
> wrote:
>
>> Had an issue with the build, Mail @Dev "Platform build error".
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 8:49 AM, Subash Chaturanga <
>> sub...@wso2.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 3:53 AM, Senaka Fernando >> > wrote:
>>>
 Hi Vijitha/Subash,

 Any update on this?

>>>
>>> Vijitha was building this on a clean repo. Vijitha , were you
>>> able to reproduce this ?
>>>
>>>

 Thanks,
 Senaka.


 On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 8:10 PM, Vijitha Kumara <
 viji...@wso2.com> wrote:

> I'm looking into this.
>
> Regards,
>
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 8:33 PM, Senaka Fernando <
> sen...@wso2.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Subash, Vijitha,
>>
>> Please test this on a clean M2 repo, and before you start to
>> compile edit the POM in the integration tests for G-Reg and make 
>> sure y

Re: [Dev] BackwardAssociationHandlerTestCase and WSDLTestCase are failing in G-Reg

2012-04-04 Thread Afkham Azeez 
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 5:23 PM, Senaka Fernando  wrote:

> Hi Subash, Vijitha,
>
> If possible also try to find the ordering of this on Bamboo and when we
> build. I have a feeling that Bamboo is running this in some other order.
>

The order in which tests are executed should not determine the outcome of
the test, ideally. However, if you want to order tests, you can use the
"dependsOn" attribute of the @Test annotation.

>
> Thanks,
> Senaka.
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 2:00 PM, Vijitha Kumara  wrote:
>
>> > Schema Test has excluded not from the pom but from the test class
>> itself by removing annotations.
>>
>> wasn't aware of that, will do as suggested.
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Senaka Fernando  wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Subash Chaturanga wrote:
>>>


 On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Senaka Fernando wrote:

> Hi Vijitha,
>
> It should include 233 test cases, IIRC, and you will have to uncomment
> the ones that are excluded before you build.
>

 Schema Test has excluded not from the pom but from the test class
 itself by removing annotations. Seems that is the one missing which has 3,4
 test cases.

>>>
>>> Oh, that's not done right who ever did that, :(..
>>>
>>>
  I have refactored it and excluded from the pom.

>>>
>>> Great.
>>>

 Vijitha, take an up in the integration module, and then remove all
 excluded stuff locally and build again. Then you'll get #233.
 BTW, I also able to build all the tests on a full svn up.

>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Senaka.
>>>


> Thanks,
> Senaka.
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Vijitha Kumara wrote:
>
>> > I think you did this on a clean repo ? Can you try running all 200+
>> integration tests and check, instead of running only those two ?
>>
>> Initial build also contained all the 230 tests in GReg as the report
>> indicates.
>>
>> But I'm now trying with including all other products as well to see
>> whether it makes any difference.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 5:48 PM, Subash Chaturanga wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Vijitha Kumara wrote:
>>>
 All,

 All the tests related to these two classes passed. Attached the
 surefire report with this.

>>>
>>> Hi Vijitha,
>>>
>>> I think you did this on a clean repo ? Can you try running all 200+
>>> integration tests and check, instead of running only those two ?
>>>
>>>


 Regards,


 On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 8:52 AM, Vijitha Kumara wrote:

> Had an issue with the build, Mail @Dev "Platform build error".
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 8:49 AM, Subash Chaturanga  > wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 3:53 AM, Senaka Fernando 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Vijitha/Subash,
>>>
>>> Any update on this?
>>>
>>
>> Vijitha was building this on a clean repo. Vijitha , were you
>> able to reproduce this ?
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Senaka.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 8:10 PM, Vijitha Kumara >> > wrote:
>>>
 I'm looking into this.

 Regards,

 On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 8:33 PM, Senaka Fernando <
 sen...@wso2.com> wrote:

> Hi Subash, Vijitha,
>
> Please test this on a clean M2 repo, and before you start to
> compile edit the POM in the integration tests for G-Reg and make 
> sure you
> enable the excluded tests. If we can reproduce this issue, it 
> shouldn't be
> hard figure out how this broke.
>
> Thanks,
> Senaka.
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 8:12 PM, Senaka Fernando <
> sen...@wso2.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I have moved it. The new issue can be accessed from
>> https://wso2.org/jira/browse/CARBON-12758, and also the old
>> issue ID.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Senaka.
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 7:53 PM, Sameera Jayasoma <
>> same...@wso2.com> wrote:
>>
>>> +1. Senaka, please create these issues under CARBON project
>>> as L1s. Otherwise, its hard to track these stuff.
>>>
>>>  Thanks,
>>> Sameera.
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Charitha Kankanamge <
>>> chari...@wso2.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>

Re: [Dev] BackwardAssociationHandlerTestCase and WSDLTestCase are failing in G-Reg

2012-04-04 Thread Senaka Fernando 
Hi Subash, Vijitha,

If possible also try to find the ordering of this on Bamboo and when we
build. I have a feeling that Bamboo is running this in some other order.

Thanks,
Senaka.

On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 2:00 PM, Vijitha Kumara  wrote:

> > Schema Test has excluded not from the pom but from the test class
> itself by removing annotations.
>
> wasn't aware of that, will do as suggested.
>
> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Senaka Fernando  wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Subash Chaturanga wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Senaka Fernando  wrote:
>>>
 Hi Vijitha,

 It should include 233 test cases, IIRC, and you will have to uncomment
 the ones that are excluded before you build.

>>>
>>> Schema Test has excluded not from the pom but from the test class itself
>>> by removing annotations. Seems that is the one missing which has 3,4 test
>>> cases.
>>>
>>
>> Oh, that's not done right who ever did that, :(..
>>
>>
>>>  I have refactored it and excluded from the pom.
>>>
>>
>> Great.
>>
>>>
>>> Vijitha, take an up in the integration module, and then remove all
>>> excluded stuff locally and build again. Then you'll get #233.
>>> BTW, I also able to build all the tests on a full svn up.
>>>
>>
>> +1
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Senaka.
>>
>>>
>>>
 Thanks,
 Senaka.


 On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Vijitha Kumara wrote:

> > I think you did this on a clean repo ? Can you try running all 200+
> integration tests and check, instead of running only those two ?
>
> Initial build also contained all the 230 tests in GReg as the report
> indicates.
>
> But I'm now trying with including all other products as well to see
> whether it makes any difference.
>
> Regards,
>
> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 5:48 PM, Subash Chaturanga wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Vijitha Kumara wrote:
>>
>>> All,
>>>
>>> All the tests related to these two classes passed. Attached the
>>> surefire report with this.
>>>
>>
>> Hi Vijitha,
>>
>> I think you did this on a clean repo ? Can you try running all 200+
>> integration tests and check, instead of running only those two ?
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 8:52 AM, Vijitha Kumara wrote:
>>>
 Had an issue with the build, Mail @Dev "Platform build error".


 On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 8:49 AM, Subash Chaturanga 
 wrote:

>
>
> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 3:53 AM, Senaka Fernando 
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Vijitha/Subash,
>>
>> Any update on this?
>>
>
> Vijitha was building this on a clean repo. Vijitha , were you able
> to reproduce this ?
>
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Senaka.
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 8:10 PM, Vijitha Kumara 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I'm looking into this.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 8:33 PM, Senaka Fernando <
>>> sen...@wso2.com> wrote:
>>>
 Hi Subash, Vijitha,

 Please test this on a clean M2 repo, and before you start to
 compile edit the POM in the integration tests for G-Reg and make 
 sure you
 enable the excluded tests. If we can reproduce this issue, it 
 shouldn't be
 hard figure out how this broke.

 Thanks,
 Senaka.


 On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 8:12 PM, Senaka Fernando <
 sen...@wso2.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I have moved it. The new issue can be accessed from
> https://wso2.org/jira/browse/CARBON-12758, and also the old
> issue ID.
>
> Thanks,
> Senaka.
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 7:53 PM, Sameera Jayasoma <
> same...@wso2.com> wrote:
>
>> +1. Senaka, please create these issues under CARBON project
>> as L1s. Otherwise, its hard to track these stuff.
>>
>>  Thanks,
>> Sameera.
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Charitha Kankanamge <
>> chari...@wso2.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Senaka,
>>> Should not these failures reported as CARBON jira instead of
>>> product specific JIRA? Have we changed our process of reporting 
>>> JIRAs in C4
>>> release? Or am I missing something?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Charitha
>>>
>>>
>>> On Friday, March 30, 2012, Senaka Fernando wrote:

Re: [Dev] BackwardAssociationHandlerTestCase and WSDLTestCase are failing in G-Reg

2012-04-04 Thread Vijitha Kumara 
> Schema Test has excluded not from the pom but from the test class itself
by removing annotations.

wasn't aware of that, will do as suggested.

On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Senaka Fernando  wrote:

>
>
> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Subash Chaturanga  wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Senaka Fernando  wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Vijitha,
>>>
>>> It should include 233 test cases, IIRC, and you will have to uncomment
>>> the ones that are excluded before you build.
>>>
>>
>> Schema Test has excluded not from the pom but from the test class itself
>> by removing annotations. Seems that is the one missing which has 3,4 test
>> cases.
>>
>
> Oh, that's not done right who ever did that, :(..
>
>
>> I have refactored it and excluded from the pom.
>>
>
> Great.
>
>>
>> Vijitha, take an up in the integration module, and then remove all
>> excluded stuff locally and build again. Then you'll get #233.
>> BTW, I also able to build all the tests on a full svn up.
>>
>
> +1
>
> Thanks,
> Senaka.
>
>>
>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Senaka.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Vijitha Kumara  wrote:
>>>
 > I think you did this on a clean repo ? Can you try running all 200+
 integration tests and check, instead of running only those two ?

 Initial build also contained all the 230 tests in GReg as the report
 indicates.

 But I'm now trying with including all other products as well to see
 whether it makes any difference.

 Regards,

 On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 5:48 PM, Subash Chaturanga wrote:

>
>
> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Vijitha Kumara wrote:
>
>> All,
>>
>> All the tests related to these two classes passed. Attached the
>> surefire report with this.
>>
>
> Hi Vijitha,
>
> I think you did this on a clean repo ? Can you try running all 200+
> integration tests and check, instead of running only those two ?
>
>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 8:52 AM, Vijitha Kumara wrote:
>>
>>> Had an issue with the build, Mail @Dev "Platform build error".
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 8:49 AM, Subash Chaturanga 
>>> wrote:
>>>


 On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 3:53 AM, Senaka Fernando wrote:

> Hi Vijitha/Subash,
>
> Any update on this?
>

 Vijitha was building this on a clean repo. Vijitha , were you able
 to reproduce this ?


>
> Thanks,
> Senaka.
>
>
> On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 8:10 PM, Vijitha Kumara 
> wrote:
>
>> I'm looking into this.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 8:33 PM, Senaka Fernando > > wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Subash, Vijitha,
>>>
>>> Please test this on a clean M2 repo, and before you start to
>>> compile edit the POM in the integration tests for G-Reg and make 
>>> sure you
>>> enable the excluded tests. If we can reproduce this issue, it 
>>> shouldn't be
>>> hard figure out how this broke.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Senaka.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 8:12 PM, Senaka Fernando <
>>> sen...@wso2.com> wrote:
>>>
 Hi all,

 I have moved it. The new issue can be accessed from
 https://wso2.org/jira/browse/CARBON-12758, and also the old
 issue ID.

 Thanks,
 Senaka.


 On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 7:53 PM, Sameera Jayasoma <
 same...@wso2.com> wrote:

> +1. Senaka, please create these issues under CARBON project as
> L1s. Otherwise, its hard to track these stuff.
>
>  Thanks,
> Sameera.
>
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Charitha Kankanamge <
> chari...@wso2.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Senaka,
>> Should not these failures reported as CARBON jira instead of
>> product specific JIRA? Have we changed our process of reporting 
>> JIRAs in C4
>> release? Or am I missing something?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Charitha
>>
>>
>> On Friday, March 30, 2012, Senaka Fernando wrote:
>>
>>> FYI,  https://wso2.org/jira/browse/REGISTRY-717
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Senaka.
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 5:35 PM, Senaka Fernando <
>>> sen...@wso2.com> wrote:
>>>
 Hi Subash,

 Can you have a look into this? I tried this out with a
 build starting from orbit -> kernel

Re: [Dev] BackwardAssociationHandlerTestCase and WSDLTestCase are failing in G-Reg

2012-04-04 Thread Senaka Fernando 
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Subash Chaturanga  wrote:

>
>
> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Senaka Fernando  wrote:
>
>> Hi Vijitha,
>>
>> It should include 233 test cases, IIRC, and you will have to uncomment
>> the ones that are excluded before you build.
>>
>
> Schema Test has excluded not from the pom but from the test class itself
> by removing annotations. Seems that is the one missing which has 3,4 test
> cases.
>

Oh, that's not done right who ever did that, :(..


> I have refactored it and excluded from the pom.
>

Great.

>
> Vijitha, take an up in the integration module, and then remove all
> excluded stuff locally and build again. Then you'll get #233.
> BTW, I also able to build all the tests on a full svn up.
>

+1

Thanks,
Senaka.

>
>
>> Thanks,
>> Senaka.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Vijitha Kumara  wrote:
>>
>>> > I think you did this on a clean repo ? Can you try running all 200+
>>> integration tests and check, instead of running only those two ?
>>>
>>> Initial build also contained all the 230 tests in GReg as the report
>>> indicates.
>>>
>>> But I'm now trying with including all other products as well to see
>>> whether it makes any difference.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 5:48 PM, Subash Chaturanga wrote:
>>>


 On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Vijitha Kumara wrote:

> All,
>
> All the tests related to these two classes passed. Attached the
> surefire report with this.
>

 Hi Vijitha,

 I think you did this on a clean repo ? Can you try running all 200+
 integration tests and check, instead of running only those two ?


>
>
> Regards,
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 8:52 AM, Vijitha Kumara wrote:
>
>> Had an issue with the build, Mail @Dev "Platform build error".
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 8:49 AM, Subash Chaturanga wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 3:53 AM, Senaka Fernando wrote:
>>>
 Hi Vijitha/Subash,

 Any update on this?

>>>
>>> Vijitha was building this on a clean repo. Vijitha , were you able
>>> to reproduce this ?
>>>
>>>

 Thanks,
 Senaka.


 On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 8:10 PM, Vijitha Kumara wrote:

> I'm looking into this.
>
> Regards,
>
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 8:33 PM, Senaka Fernando 
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Subash, Vijitha,
>>
>> Please test this on a clean M2 repo, and before you start to
>> compile edit the POM in the integration tests for G-Reg and make 
>> sure you
>> enable the excluded tests. If we can reproduce this issue, it 
>> shouldn't be
>> hard figure out how this broke.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Senaka.
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 8:12 PM, Senaka Fernando > > wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I have moved it. The new issue can be accessed from
>>> https://wso2.org/jira/browse/CARBON-12758, and also the old
>>> issue ID.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Senaka.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 7:53 PM, Sameera Jayasoma <
>>> same...@wso2.com> wrote:
>>>
 +1. Senaka, please create these issues under CARBON project as
 L1s. Otherwise, its hard to track these stuff.

  Thanks,
 Sameera.

 On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Charitha Kankanamge <
 chari...@wso2.com> wrote:

> Hi Senaka,
> Should not these failures reported as CARBON jira instead of
> product specific JIRA? Have we changed our process of reporting 
> JIRAs in C4
> release? Or am I missing something?
>
> Thanks,
> Charitha
>
>
> On Friday, March 30, 2012, Senaka Fernando wrote:
>
>> FYI,  https://wso2.org/jira/browse/REGISTRY-717
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Senaka.
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 5:35 PM, Senaka Fernando <
>> sen...@wso2.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Subash,
>>>
>>> Can you have a look into this? I tried this out with a build
>>> starting from orbit -> kernel -> platform, and was unable to 
>>> reproduce.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Senaka.
>>>
>>> --
>>> *Senaka Fernando*
>>> Product Manager - WSO2 Governance Registry;
>>> Associate Technical Lead; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com*
>>> Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://apache.org
>>>
>>> E

Re: [Dev] BackwardAssociationHandlerTestCase and WSDLTestCase are failing in G-Reg

2012-04-04 Thread Subash Chaturanga 
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Senaka Fernando  wrote:

> Hi Vijitha,
>
> It should include 233 test cases, IIRC, and you will have to uncomment the
> ones that are excluded before you build.
>

Schema Test has excluded not from the pom but from the test class itself by
removing annotations. Seems that is the one missing which has 3,4 test
cases.
I have refactored it and excluded from the pom.

Vijitha, take an up in the integration module, and then remove all excluded
stuff locally and build again. Then you'll get #233.
BTW, I also able to build all the tests on a full svn up.


> Thanks,
> Senaka.
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Vijitha Kumara  wrote:
>
>> > I think you did this on a clean repo ? Can you try running all 200+
>> integration tests and check, instead of running only those two ?
>>
>> Initial build also contained all the 230 tests in GReg as the report
>> indicates.
>>
>> But I'm now trying with including all other products as well to see
>> whether it makes any difference.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 5:48 PM, Subash Chaturanga wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Vijitha Kumara  wrote:
>>>
 All,

 All the tests related to these two classes passed. Attached the
 surefire report with this.

>>>
>>> Hi Vijitha,
>>>
>>> I think you did this on a clean repo ? Can you try running all 200+
>>> integration tests and check, instead of running only those two ?
>>>
>>>


 Regards,


 On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 8:52 AM, Vijitha Kumara wrote:

> Had an issue with the build, Mail @Dev "Platform build error".
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 8:49 AM, Subash Chaturanga wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 3:53 AM, Senaka Fernando wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Vijitha/Subash,
>>>
>>> Any update on this?
>>>
>>
>> Vijitha was building this on a clean repo. Vijitha , were you able to
>> reproduce this ?
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Senaka.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 8:10 PM, Vijitha Kumara wrote:
>>>
 I'm looking into this.

 Regards,

 On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 8:33 PM, Senaka Fernando 
 wrote:

> Hi Subash, Vijitha,
>
> Please test this on a clean M2 repo, and before you start to
> compile edit the POM in the integration tests for G-Reg and make sure 
> you
> enable the excluded tests. If we can reproduce this issue, it 
> shouldn't be
> hard figure out how this broke.
>
> Thanks,
> Senaka.
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 8:12 PM, Senaka Fernando 
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I have moved it. The new issue can be accessed from
>> https://wso2.org/jira/browse/CARBON-12758, and also the old
>> issue ID.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Senaka.
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 7:53 PM, Sameera Jayasoma <
>> same...@wso2.com> wrote:
>>
>>> +1. Senaka, please create these issues under CARBON project as
>>> L1s. Otherwise, its hard to track these stuff.
>>>
>>>  Thanks,
>>> Sameera.
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Charitha Kankanamge <
>>> chari...@wso2.com> wrote:
>>>
 Hi Senaka,
 Should not these failures reported as CARBON jira instead of
 product specific JIRA? Have we changed our process of reporting 
 JIRAs in C4
 release? Or am I missing something?

 Thanks,
 Charitha


 On Friday, March 30, 2012, Senaka Fernando wrote:

> FYI,  https://wso2.org/jira/browse/REGISTRY-717
>
> Thanks,
> Senaka.
>
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 5:35 PM, Senaka Fernando <
> sen...@wso2.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Subash,
>>
>> Can you have a look into this? I tried this out with a build
>> starting from orbit -> kernel -> platform, and was unable to 
>> reproduce.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Senaka.
>>
>> --
>> *Senaka Fernando*
>> Product Manager - WSO2 Governance Registry;
>> Associate Technical Lead; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com*
>> Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://apache.org
>>
>> E-mail: senaka AT wso2.com
>> **P: +1 408 754 7388; ext: 51736*; *M: +94 77 322 1818
>> Linked-In: http://linkedin.com/in/senakafernando
>>
>> *Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> *Senaka Fernand

Re: [Dev] BackwardAssociationHandlerTestCase and WSDLTestCase are failing in G-Reg

2012-04-04 Thread Senaka Fernando 
Hi Vijitha,

It should include 233 test cases, IIRC, and you will have to uncomment the
ones that are excluded before you build.

Thanks,
Senaka.

On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Vijitha Kumara  wrote:

> > I think you did this on a clean repo ? Can you try running all 200+
> integration tests and check, instead of running only those two ?
>
> Initial build also contained all the 230 tests in GReg as the report
> indicates.
>
> But I'm now trying with including all other products as well to see
> whether it makes any difference.
>
> Regards,
>
> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 5:48 PM, Subash Chaturanga  wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Vijitha Kumara  wrote:
>>
>>> All,
>>>
>>> All the tests related to these two classes passed. Attached the surefire
>>> report with this.
>>>
>>
>> Hi Vijitha,
>>
>> I think you did this on a clean repo ? Can you try running all 200+
>> integration tests and check, instead of running only those two ?
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 8:52 AM, Vijitha Kumara  wrote:
>>>
 Had an issue with the build, Mail @Dev "Platform build error".


 On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 8:49 AM, Subash Chaturanga wrote:

>
>
> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 3:53 AM, Senaka Fernando wrote:
>
>> Hi Vijitha/Subash,
>>
>> Any update on this?
>>
>
> Vijitha was building this on a clean repo. Vijitha , were you able to
> reproduce this ?
>
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Senaka.
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 8:10 PM, Vijitha Kumara wrote:
>>
>>> I'm looking into this.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 8:33 PM, Senaka Fernando wrote:
>>>
 Hi Subash, Vijitha,

 Please test this on a clean M2 repo, and before you start to
 compile edit the POM in the integration tests for G-Reg and make sure 
 you
 enable the excluded tests. If we can reproduce this issue, it 
 shouldn't be
 hard figure out how this broke.

 Thanks,
 Senaka.


 On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 8:12 PM, Senaka Fernando 
 wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I have moved it. The new issue can be accessed from
> https://wso2.org/jira/browse/CARBON-12758, and also the old issue
> ID.
>
> Thanks,
> Senaka.
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 7:53 PM, Sameera Jayasoma <
> same...@wso2.com> wrote:
>
>> +1. Senaka, please create these issues under CARBON project as
>> L1s. Otherwise, its hard to track these stuff.
>>
>>  Thanks,
>> Sameera.
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Charitha Kankanamge <
>> chari...@wso2.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Senaka,
>>> Should not these failures reported as CARBON jira instead of
>>> product specific JIRA? Have we changed our process of reporting 
>>> JIRAs in C4
>>> release? Or am I missing something?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Charitha
>>>
>>>
>>> On Friday, March 30, 2012, Senaka Fernando wrote:
>>>
 FYI,  https://wso2.org/jira/browse/REGISTRY-717

 Thanks,
 Senaka.

 On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 5:35 PM, Senaka Fernando <
 sen...@wso2.com> wrote:

> Hi Subash,
>
> Can you have a look into this? I tried this out with a build
> starting from orbit -> kernel -> platform, and was unable to 
> reproduce.
>
> Thanks,
> Senaka.
>
> --
> *Senaka Fernando*
> Product Manager - WSO2 Governance Registry;
> Associate Technical Lead; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com*
> Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://apache.org
>
> E-mail: senaka AT wso2.com
> **P: +1 408 754 7388; ext: 51736*; *M: +94 77 322 1818
> Linked-In: http://linkedin.com/in/senakafernando
>
> *Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
>
>


 --
 *Senaka Fernando*
 Product Manager - WSO2 Governance Registry;
 Associate Technical Lead; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com*
 Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://apache.org

 E-mail: senaka AT wso2.com
 **P: +1 408 754 7388; ext: 51736*; *M: +94 77 322 1818
 Linked-In: http://linkedin.com/in/senakafernando

 *Lean . Enterprise . Middleware


>>>
>>> --
>>> Charitha Kankanamge
>>> cell: +94 718 359 265
>>> blog: http://charithaka.blogspot.com 
>>

Re: [Dev] BackwardAssociationHandlerTestCase and WSDLTestCase are failing in G-Reg

2012-04-04 Thread Vijitha Kumara 
> I think you did this on a clean repo ? Can you try running all 200+
integration tests and check, instead of running only those two ?

Initial build also contained all the 230 tests in GReg as the report
indicates.

But I'm now trying with including all other products as well to see whether
it makes any difference.

Regards,

On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 5:48 PM, Subash Chaturanga  wrote:

>
>
> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Vijitha Kumara  wrote:
>
>> All,
>>
>> All the tests related to these two classes passed. Attached the surefire
>> report with this.
>>
>
> Hi Vijitha,
>
> I think you did this on a clean repo ? Can you try running all 200+
> integration tests and check, instead of running only those two ?
>
>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 8:52 AM, Vijitha Kumara  wrote:
>>
>>> Had an issue with the build, Mail @Dev "Platform build error".
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 8:49 AM, Subash Chaturanga wrote:
>>>


 On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 3:53 AM, Senaka Fernando wrote:

> Hi Vijitha/Subash,
>
> Any update on this?
>

 Vijitha was building this on a clean repo. Vijitha , were you able to
 reproduce this ?


>
> Thanks,
> Senaka.
>
>
> On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 8:10 PM, Vijitha Kumara wrote:
>
>> I'm looking into this.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 8:33 PM, Senaka Fernando wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Subash, Vijitha,
>>>
>>> Please test this on a clean M2 repo, and before you start to compile
>>> edit the POM in the integration tests for G-Reg and make sure you enable
>>> the excluded tests. If we can reproduce this issue, it shouldn't be hard
>>> figure out how this broke.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Senaka.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 8:12 PM, Senaka Fernando wrote:
>>>
 Hi all,

 I have moved it. The new issue can be accessed from
 https://wso2.org/jira/browse/CARBON-12758, and also the old issue
 ID.

 Thanks,
 Senaka.


 On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 7:53 PM, Sameera Jayasoma >>> > wrote:

> +1. Senaka, please create these issues under CARBON project as
> L1s. Otherwise, its hard to track these stuff.
>
>  Thanks,
> Sameera.
>
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Charitha Kankanamge <
> chari...@wso2.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Senaka,
>> Should not these failures reported as CARBON jira instead of
>> product specific JIRA? Have we changed our process of reporting 
>> JIRAs in C4
>> release? Or am I missing something?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Charitha
>>
>>
>> On Friday, March 30, 2012, Senaka Fernando wrote:
>>
>>> FYI,  https://wso2.org/jira/browse/REGISTRY-717
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Senaka.
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 5:35 PM, Senaka Fernando <
>>> sen...@wso2.com> wrote:
>>>
 Hi Subash,

 Can you have a look into this? I tried this out with a build
 starting from orbit -> kernel -> platform, and was unable to 
 reproduce.

 Thanks,
 Senaka.

 --
 *Senaka Fernando*
 Product Manager - WSO2 Governance Registry;
 Associate Technical Lead; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com*
 Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://apache.org

 E-mail: senaka AT wso2.com
 **P: +1 408 754 7388; ext: 51736*; *M: +94 77 322 1818
 Linked-In: http://linkedin.com/in/senakafernando

 *Lean . Enterprise . Middleware


>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> *Senaka Fernando*
>>> Product Manager - WSO2 Governance Registry;
>>> Associate Technical Lead; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com*
>>> Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://apache.org
>>>
>>> E-mail: senaka AT wso2.com
>>> **P: +1 408 754 7388; ext: 51736*; *M: +94 77 322 1818
>>> Linked-In: http://linkedin.com/in/senakafernando
>>>
>>> *Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Charitha Kankanamge
>> cell: +94 718 359 265
>> blog: http://charithaka.blogspot.com 
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Dev mailing list
>> Dev@wso2.org
>> http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Sameera Jayasoma
> Technical Lead and Product Manager, WSO2 Carbon
>
> WSO2, Inc. (http://wso2.com)
> email: same...@wso2.com
> blog: ht

Re: [Dev] BackwardAssociationHandlerTestCase and WSDLTestCase are failing in G-Reg

2012-04-03 Thread Subash Chaturanga 
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Vijitha Kumara  wrote:

> All,
>
> All the tests related to these two classes passed. Attached the surefire
> report with this.
>

Hi Vijitha,

I think you did this on a clean repo ? Can you try running all 200+
integration tests and check, instead of running only those two ?


>
>
> Regards,
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 8:52 AM, Vijitha Kumara  wrote:
>
>> Had an issue with the build, Mail @Dev "Platform build error".
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 8:49 AM, Subash Chaturanga wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 3:53 AM, Senaka Fernando  wrote:
>>>
 Hi Vijitha/Subash,

 Any update on this?

>>>
>>> Vijitha was building this on a clean repo. Vijitha , were you able to
>>> reproduce this ?
>>>
>>>

 Thanks,
 Senaka.


 On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 8:10 PM, Vijitha Kumara wrote:

> I'm looking into this.
>
> Regards,
>
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 8:33 PM, Senaka Fernando wrote:
>
>> Hi Subash, Vijitha,
>>
>> Please test this on a clean M2 repo, and before you start to compile
>> edit the POM in the integration tests for G-Reg and make sure you enable
>> the excluded tests. If we can reproduce this issue, it shouldn't be hard
>> figure out how this broke.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Senaka.
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 8:12 PM, Senaka Fernando wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I have moved it. The new issue can be accessed from
>>> https://wso2.org/jira/browse/CARBON-12758, and also the old issue
>>> ID.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Senaka.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 7:53 PM, Sameera Jayasoma 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 +1. Senaka, please create these issues under CARBON project as L1s.
 Otherwise, its hard to track these stuff.

  Thanks,
 Sameera.

 On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Charitha Kankanamge <
 chari...@wso2.com> wrote:

> Hi Senaka,
> Should not these failures reported as CARBON jira instead of
> product specific JIRA? Have we changed our process of reporting JIRAs 
> in C4
> release? Or am I missing something?
>
> Thanks,
> Charitha
>
>
> On Friday, March 30, 2012, Senaka Fernando wrote:
>
>> FYI,  https://wso2.org/jira/browse/REGISTRY-717
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Senaka.
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 5:35 PM, Senaka Fernando > > wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Subash,
>>>
>>> Can you have a look into this? I tried this out with a build
>>> starting from orbit -> kernel -> platform, and was unable to 
>>> reproduce.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Senaka.
>>>
>>> --
>>> *Senaka Fernando*
>>> Product Manager - WSO2 Governance Registry;
>>> Associate Technical Lead; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com*
>>> Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://apache.org
>>>
>>> E-mail: senaka AT wso2.com
>>> **P: +1 408 754 7388; ext: 51736*; *M: +94 77 322 1818
>>> Linked-In: http://linkedin.com/in/senakafernando
>>>
>>> *Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> *Senaka Fernando*
>> Product Manager - WSO2 Governance Registry;
>> Associate Technical Lead; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com*
>> Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://apache.org
>>
>> E-mail: senaka AT wso2.com
>> **P: +1 408 754 7388; ext: 51736*; *M: +94 77 322 1818
>> Linked-In: http://linkedin.com/in/senakafernando
>>
>> *Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
>>
>>
>
> --
> Charitha Kankanamge
> cell: +94 718 359 265
> blog: http://charithaka.blogspot.com 
>
>
> ___
> Dev mailing list
> Dev@wso2.org
> http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
>
>


 --
 Sameera Jayasoma
 Technical Lead and Product Manager, WSO2 Carbon

 WSO2, Inc. (http://wso2.com)
 email: same...@wso2.com
 blog: http://tech.jayasoma.org


 Lean . Enterprise . Middleware

>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> *Senaka Fernando*
>>> Product Manager - WSO2 Governance Registry;
>>> Associate Technical Lead; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com*
>>> Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://apache.org
>>>
>>> E-mail: senaka AT wso2.com
>>> **P: +1 408 754 7388; ext: 51736*; *M: +94 77 322 1818
>>> Linked-In: http://linkedin.com/in/senakafernando
>>>
>>> *Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>

Re: [Dev] BackwardAssociationHandlerTestCase and WSDLTestCase are failing in G-Reg

2012-04-02 Thread Vijitha Kumara 
Had an issue with the build, Mail @Dev "Platform build error".

On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 8:49 AM, Subash Chaturanga  wrote:

>
>
> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 3:53 AM, Senaka Fernando  wrote:
>
>> Hi Vijitha/Subash,
>>
>> Any update on this?
>>
>
> Vijitha was building this on a clean repo. Vijitha , were you able to
> reproduce this ?
>
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Senaka.
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 8:10 PM, Vijitha Kumara  wrote:
>>
>>> I'm looking into this.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 8:33 PM, Senaka Fernando wrote:
>>>
 Hi Subash, Vijitha,

 Please test this on a clean M2 repo, and before you start to compile
 edit the POM in the integration tests for G-Reg and make sure you enable
 the excluded tests. If we can reproduce this issue, it shouldn't be hard
 figure out how this broke.

 Thanks,
 Senaka.


 On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 8:12 PM, Senaka Fernando wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I have moved it. The new issue can be accessed from
> https://wso2.org/jira/browse/CARBON-12758, and also the old issue ID.
>
> Thanks,
> Senaka.
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 7:53 PM, Sameera Jayasoma wrote:
>
>> +1. Senaka, please create these issues under CARBON project as L1s.
>> Otherwise, its hard to track these stuff.
>>
>>  Thanks,
>> Sameera.
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Charitha Kankanamge <
>> chari...@wso2.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Senaka,
>>> Should not these failures reported as CARBON jira instead of product
>>> specific JIRA? Have we changed our process of reporting JIRAs in C4
>>> release? Or am I missing something?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Charitha
>>>
>>>
>>> On Friday, March 30, 2012, Senaka Fernando wrote:
>>>
 FYI,  https://wso2.org/jira/browse/REGISTRY-717

 Thanks,
 Senaka.

 On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 5:35 PM, Senaka Fernando 
 wrote:

> Hi Subash,
>
> Can you have a look into this? I tried this out with a build
> starting from orbit -> kernel -> platform, and was unable to 
> reproduce.
>
> Thanks,
> Senaka.
>
> --
> *Senaka Fernando*
> Product Manager - WSO2 Governance Registry;
> Associate Technical Lead; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com*
> Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://apache.org
>
> E-mail: senaka AT wso2.com
> **P: +1 408 754 7388; ext: 51736*; *M: +94 77 322 1818
> Linked-In: http://linkedin.com/in/senakafernando
>
> *Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
>
>


 --
 *Senaka Fernando*
 Product Manager - WSO2 Governance Registry;
 Associate Technical Lead; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com*
 Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://apache.org

 E-mail: senaka AT wso2.com
 **P: +1 408 754 7388; ext: 51736*; *M: +94 77 322 1818
 Linked-In: http://linkedin.com/in/senakafernando

 *Lean . Enterprise . Middleware


>>>
>>> --
>>> Charitha Kankanamge
>>> cell: +94 718 359 265
>>> blog: http://charithaka.blogspot.com 
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Dev mailing list
>>> Dev@wso2.org
>>> http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sameera Jayasoma
>> Technical Lead and Product Manager, WSO2 Carbon
>>
>> WSO2, Inc. (http://wso2.com)
>> email: same...@wso2.com
>> blog: http://tech.jayasoma.org
>>
>>
>> Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
>>
>
>
>
> --
> *Senaka Fernando*
> Product Manager - WSO2 Governance Registry;
> Associate Technical Lead; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com*
> Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://apache.org
>
> E-mail: senaka AT wso2.com
> **P: +1 408 754 7388; ext: 51736*; *M: +94 77 322 1818
> Linked-In: http://linkedin.com/in/senakafernando
>
> *Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
>
>


 --
 *Senaka Fernando*
 Product Manager - WSO2 Governance Registry;
 Associate Technical Lead; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com*
 Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://apache.org

 E-mail: senaka AT wso2.com
 **P: +1 408 754 7388; ext: 51736*; *M: +94 77 322 1818
 Linked-In: http://linkedin.com/in/senakafernando

 *Lean . Enterprise . Middleware


>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Vijitha Kumara
>>> Senior Software Engineer; WSO2, Inc.;  http://wso2.com/
>>> email: viji...@wso2.com
>>>
>>> Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> *Senaka Fernando*
>> Product Manager - WSO2 Governance Registry;
>> Associate Technical Lead; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com*
>> Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://apac

Re: [Dev] BackwardAssociationHandlerTestCase and WSDLTestCase are failing in G-Reg

2012-04-02 Thread Subash Chaturanga 
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 3:53 AM, Senaka Fernando  wrote:

> Hi Vijitha/Subash,
>
> Any update on this?
>

Vijitha was building this on a clean repo. Vijitha , were you able to
reproduce this ?


>
> Thanks,
> Senaka.
>
>
> On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 8:10 PM, Vijitha Kumara  wrote:
>
>> I'm looking into this.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 8:33 PM, Senaka Fernando  wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Subash, Vijitha,
>>>
>>> Please test this on a clean M2 repo, and before you start to compile
>>> edit the POM in the integration tests for G-Reg and make sure you enable
>>> the excluded tests. If we can reproduce this issue, it shouldn't be hard
>>> figure out how this broke.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Senaka.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 8:12 PM, Senaka Fernando wrote:
>>>
 Hi all,

 I have moved it. The new issue can be accessed from
 https://wso2.org/jira/browse/CARBON-12758, and also the old issue ID.

 Thanks,
 Senaka.


 On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 7:53 PM, Sameera Jayasoma wrote:

> +1. Senaka, please create these issues under CARBON project as L1s.
> Otherwise, its hard to track these stuff.
>
>  Thanks,
> Sameera.
>
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Charitha Kankanamge <
> chari...@wso2.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Senaka,
>> Should not these failures reported as CARBON jira instead of product
>> specific JIRA? Have we changed our process of reporting JIRAs in C4
>> release? Or am I missing something?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Charitha
>>
>>
>> On Friday, March 30, 2012, Senaka Fernando wrote:
>>
>>> FYI,  https://wso2.org/jira/browse/REGISTRY-717
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Senaka.
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 5:35 PM, Senaka Fernando wrote:
>>>
 Hi Subash,

 Can you have a look into this? I tried this out with a build
 starting from orbit -> kernel -> platform, and was unable to reproduce.

 Thanks,
 Senaka.

 --
 *Senaka Fernando*
 Product Manager - WSO2 Governance Registry;
 Associate Technical Lead; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com*
 Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://apache.org

 E-mail: senaka AT wso2.com
 **P: +1 408 754 7388; ext: 51736*; *M: +94 77 322 1818
 Linked-In: http://linkedin.com/in/senakafernando

 *Lean . Enterprise . Middleware


>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> *Senaka Fernando*
>>> Product Manager - WSO2 Governance Registry;
>>> Associate Technical Lead; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com*
>>> Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://apache.org
>>>
>>> E-mail: senaka AT wso2.com
>>> **P: +1 408 754 7388; ext: 51736*; *M: +94 77 322 1818
>>> Linked-In: http://linkedin.com/in/senakafernando
>>>
>>> *Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Charitha Kankanamge
>> cell: +94 718 359 265
>> blog: http://charithaka.blogspot.com 
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Dev mailing list
>> Dev@wso2.org
>> http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Sameera Jayasoma
> Technical Lead and Product Manager, WSO2 Carbon
>
> WSO2, Inc. (http://wso2.com)
> email: same...@wso2.com
> blog: http://tech.jayasoma.org
>
>
> Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
>



 --
 *Senaka Fernando*
 Product Manager - WSO2 Governance Registry;
 Associate Technical Lead; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com*
 Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://apache.org

 E-mail: senaka AT wso2.com
 **P: +1 408 754 7388; ext: 51736*; *M: +94 77 322 1818
 Linked-In: http://linkedin.com/in/senakafernando

 *Lean . Enterprise . Middleware


>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> *Senaka Fernando*
>>> Product Manager - WSO2 Governance Registry;
>>> Associate Technical Lead; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com*
>>> Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://apache.org
>>>
>>> E-mail: senaka AT wso2.com
>>> **P: +1 408 754 7388; ext: 51736*; *M: +94 77 322 1818
>>> Linked-In: http://linkedin.com/in/senakafernando
>>>
>>> *Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Vijitha Kumara
>> Senior Software Engineer; WSO2, Inc.;  http://wso2.com/
>> email: viji...@wso2.com
>>
>> Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> *Senaka Fernando*
> Product Manager - WSO2 Governance Registry;
> Associate Technical Lead; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com*
> Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://apache.org
>
> E-mail: senaka AT wso2.com
> **P: +1 408 754 7388; ext: 51736*; *M: +94 77 322 1818
> Linked-In: http://linkedin.com/in/senakafernando
>
> *Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
>
>


-- 

Subash Chaturanga
Software Engineer
WSO2 Inc. http://wso2.com

email - sub...@wso2.com
phone - 077 2225922
___

Re: [Dev] BackwardAssociationHandlerTestCase and WSDLTestCase are failing in G-Reg

2012-04-02 Thread Senaka Fernando 
Hi Vijitha/Subash,

Any update on this?

Thanks,
Senaka.

On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 8:10 PM, Vijitha Kumara  wrote:

> I'm looking into this.
>
> Regards,
>
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 8:33 PM, Senaka Fernando  wrote:
>
>> Hi Subash, Vijitha,
>>
>> Please test this on a clean M2 repo, and before you start to compile edit
>> the POM in the integration tests for G-Reg and make sure you enable the
>> excluded tests. If we can reproduce this issue, it shouldn't be hard figure
>> out how this broke.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Senaka.
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 8:12 PM, Senaka Fernando  wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I have moved it. The new issue can be accessed from
>>> https://wso2.org/jira/browse/CARBON-12758, and also the old issue ID.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Senaka.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 7:53 PM, Sameera Jayasoma wrote:
>>>
 +1. Senaka, please create these issues under CARBON project as L1s.
 Otherwise, its hard to track these stuff.

  Thanks,
 Sameera.

 On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Charitha Kankanamge >>> > wrote:

> Hi Senaka,
> Should not these failures reported as CARBON jira instead of product
> specific JIRA? Have we changed our process of reporting JIRAs in C4
> release? Or am I missing something?
>
> Thanks,
> Charitha
>
>
> On Friday, March 30, 2012, Senaka Fernando wrote:
>
>> FYI,  https://wso2.org/jira/browse/REGISTRY-717
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Senaka.
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 5:35 PM, Senaka Fernando wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Subash,
>>>
>>> Can you have a look into this? I tried this out with a build
>>> starting from orbit -> kernel -> platform, and was unable to reproduce.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Senaka.
>>>
>>> --
>>> *Senaka Fernando*
>>> Product Manager - WSO2 Governance Registry;
>>> Associate Technical Lead; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com*
>>> Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://apache.org
>>>
>>> E-mail: senaka AT wso2.com
>>> **P: +1 408 754 7388; ext: 51736*; *M: +94 77 322 1818
>>> Linked-In: http://linkedin.com/in/senakafernando
>>>
>>> *Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> *Senaka Fernando*
>> Product Manager - WSO2 Governance Registry;
>> Associate Technical Lead; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com*
>> Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://apache.org
>>
>> E-mail: senaka AT wso2.com
>> **P: +1 408 754 7388; ext: 51736*; *M: +94 77 322 1818
>> Linked-In: http://linkedin.com/in/senakafernando
>>
>> *Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
>>
>>
>
> --
> Charitha Kankanamge
> cell: +94 718 359 265
> blog: http://charithaka.blogspot.com 
>
>
> ___
> Dev mailing list
> Dev@wso2.org
> http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
>
>


 --
 Sameera Jayasoma
 Technical Lead and Product Manager, WSO2 Carbon

 WSO2, Inc. (http://wso2.com)
 email: same...@wso2.com
 blog: http://tech.jayasoma.org


 Lean . Enterprise . Middleware

>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> *Senaka Fernando*
>>> Product Manager - WSO2 Governance Registry;
>>> Associate Technical Lead; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com*
>>> Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://apache.org
>>>
>>> E-mail: senaka AT wso2.com
>>> **P: +1 408 754 7388; ext: 51736*; *M: +94 77 322 1818
>>> Linked-In: http://linkedin.com/in/senakafernando
>>>
>>> *Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> *Senaka Fernando*
>> Product Manager - WSO2 Governance Registry;
>> Associate Technical Lead; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com*
>> Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://apache.org
>>
>> E-mail: senaka AT wso2.com
>> **P: +1 408 754 7388; ext: 51736*; *M: +94 77 322 1818
>> Linked-In: http://linkedin.com/in/senakafernando
>>
>> *Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Vijitha Kumara
> Senior Software Engineer; WSO2, Inc.;  http://wso2.com/
> email: viji...@wso2.com
>
> Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
>
>


-- 
*Senaka Fernando*
Product Manager - WSO2 Governance Registry;
Associate Technical Lead; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com*
Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://apache.org

E-mail: senaka AT wso2.com
**P: +1 408 754 7388; ext: 51736*; *M: +94 77 322 1818
Linked-In: http://linkedin.com/in/senakafernando

*Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
___
Dev mailing list
Dev@wso2.org
http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev

Re: [Dev] BackwardAssociationHandlerTestCase and WSDLTestCase are failing in G-Reg

2012-04-01 Thread Vijitha Kumara 
I'm looking into this.

Regards,

On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 8:33 PM, Senaka Fernando  wrote:

> Hi Subash, Vijitha,
>
> Please test this on a clean M2 repo, and before you start to compile edit
> the POM in the integration tests for G-Reg and make sure you enable the
> excluded tests. If we can reproduce this issue, it shouldn't be hard figure
> out how this broke.
>
> Thanks,
> Senaka.
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 8:12 PM, Senaka Fernando  wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I have moved it. The new issue can be accessed from
>> https://wso2.org/jira/browse/CARBON-12758, and also the old issue ID.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Senaka.
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 7:53 PM, Sameera Jayasoma wrote:
>>
>>> +1. Senaka, please create these issues under CARBON project as L1s.
>>> Otherwise, its hard to track these stuff.
>>>
>>>  Thanks,
>>> Sameera.
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Charitha Kankanamge 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 Hi Senaka,
 Should not these failures reported as CARBON jira instead of product
 specific JIRA? Have we changed our process of reporting JIRAs in C4
 release? Or am I missing something?

 Thanks,
 Charitha


 On Friday, March 30, 2012, Senaka Fernando wrote:

> FYI,  https://wso2.org/jira/browse/REGISTRY-717
>
> Thanks,
> Senaka.
>
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 5:35 PM, Senaka Fernando wrote:
>
>> Hi Subash,
>>
>> Can you have a look into this? I tried this out with a build starting
>> from orbit -> kernel -> platform, and was unable to reproduce.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Senaka.
>>
>> --
>> *Senaka Fernando*
>> Product Manager - WSO2 Governance Registry;
>> Associate Technical Lead; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com*
>> Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://apache.org
>>
>> E-mail: senaka AT wso2.com
>> **P: +1 408 754 7388; ext: 51736*; *M: +94 77 322 1818
>> Linked-In: http://linkedin.com/in/senakafernando
>>
>> *Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> *Senaka Fernando*
> Product Manager - WSO2 Governance Registry;
> Associate Technical Lead; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com*
> Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://apache.org
>
> E-mail: senaka AT wso2.com
> **P: +1 408 754 7388; ext: 51736*; *M: +94 77 322 1818
> Linked-In: http://linkedin.com/in/senakafernando
>
> *Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
>
>

 --
 Charitha Kankanamge
 cell: +94 718 359 265
 blog: http://charithaka.blogspot.com 


 ___
 Dev mailing list
 Dev@wso2.org
 http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev


>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Sameera Jayasoma
>>> Technical Lead and Product Manager, WSO2 Carbon
>>>
>>> WSO2, Inc. (http://wso2.com)
>>> email: same...@wso2.com
>>> blog: http://tech.jayasoma.org
>>>
>>>
>>> Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> *Senaka Fernando*
>> Product Manager - WSO2 Governance Registry;
>> Associate Technical Lead; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com*
>> Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://apache.org
>>
>> E-mail: senaka AT wso2.com
>> **P: +1 408 754 7388; ext: 51736*; *M: +94 77 322 1818
>> Linked-In: http://linkedin.com/in/senakafernando
>>
>> *Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> *Senaka Fernando*
> Product Manager - WSO2 Governance Registry;
> Associate Technical Lead; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com*
> Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://apache.org
>
> E-mail: senaka AT wso2.com
> **P: +1 408 754 7388; ext: 51736*; *M: +94 77 322 1818
> Linked-In: http://linkedin.com/in/senakafernando
>
> *Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
>
>


-- 
Vijitha Kumara
Senior Software Engineer; WSO2, Inc.;  http://wso2.com/
email: viji...@wso2.com

Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
___
Dev mailing list
Dev@wso2.org
http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev

Re: [Dev] BackwardAssociationHandlerTestCase and WSDLTestCase are failing in G-Reg

2012-03-30 Thread Senaka Fernando 
Hi Subash, Vijitha,

Please test this on a clean M2 repo, and before you start to compile edit
the POM in the integration tests for G-Reg and make sure you enable the
excluded tests. If we can reproduce this issue, it shouldn't be hard figure
out how this broke.

Thanks,
Senaka.

On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 8:12 PM, Senaka Fernando  wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I have moved it. The new issue can be accessed from
> https://wso2.org/jira/browse/CARBON-12758, and also the old issue ID.
>
> Thanks,
> Senaka.
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 7:53 PM, Sameera Jayasoma wrote:
>
>> +1. Senaka, please create these issues under CARBON project as L1s.
>> Otherwise, its hard to track these stuff.
>>
>>  Thanks,
>> Sameera.
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Charitha Kankanamge 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Senaka,
>>> Should not these failures reported as CARBON jira instead of product
>>> specific JIRA? Have we changed our process of reporting JIRAs in C4
>>> release? Or am I missing something?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Charitha
>>>
>>>
>>> On Friday, March 30, 2012, Senaka Fernando wrote:
>>>
 FYI,  https://wso2.org/jira/browse/REGISTRY-717

 Thanks,
 Senaka.

 On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 5:35 PM, Senaka Fernando wrote:

> Hi Subash,
>
> Can you have a look into this? I tried this out with a build starting
> from orbit -> kernel -> platform, and was unable to reproduce.
>
> Thanks,
> Senaka.
>
> --
> *Senaka Fernando*
> Product Manager - WSO2 Governance Registry;
> Associate Technical Lead; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com*
> Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://apache.org
>
> E-mail: senaka AT wso2.com
> **P: +1 408 754 7388; ext: 51736*; *M: +94 77 322 1818
> Linked-In: http://linkedin.com/in/senakafernando
>
> *Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
>
>


 --
 *Senaka Fernando*
 Product Manager - WSO2 Governance Registry;
 Associate Technical Lead; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com*
 Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://apache.org

 E-mail: senaka AT wso2.com
 **P: +1 408 754 7388; ext: 51736*; *M: +94 77 322 1818
 Linked-In: http://linkedin.com/in/senakafernando

 *Lean . Enterprise . Middleware


>>>
>>> --
>>> Charitha Kankanamge
>>> cell: +94 718 359 265
>>> blog: http://charithaka.blogspot.com 
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Dev mailing list
>>> Dev@wso2.org
>>> http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sameera Jayasoma
>> Technical Lead and Product Manager, WSO2 Carbon
>>
>> WSO2, Inc. (http://wso2.com)
>> email: same...@wso2.com
>> blog: http://tech.jayasoma.org
>>
>>
>> Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
>>
>
>
>
> --
> *Senaka Fernando*
> Product Manager - WSO2 Governance Registry;
> Associate Technical Lead; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com*
> Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://apache.org
>
> E-mail: senaka AT wso2.com
> **P: +1 408 754 7388; ext: 51736*; *M: +94 77 322 1818
> Linked-In: http://linkedin.com/in/senakafernando
>
> *Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
>
>


-- 
*Senaka Fernando*
Product Manager - WSO2 Governance Registry;
Associate Technical Lead; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com*
Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://apache.org

E-mail: senaka AT wso2.com
**P: +1 408 754 7388; ext: 51736*; *M: +94 77 322 1818
Linked-In: http://linkedin.com/in/senakafernando

*Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
___
Dev mailing list
Dev@wso2.org
http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev

Re: [Dev] BackwardAssociationHandlerTestCase and WSDLTestCase are failing in G-Reg

2012-03-30 Thread Senaka Fernando 
Hi all,

I have moved it. The new issue can be accessed from
https://wso2.org/jira/browse/CARBON-12758, and also the old issue ID.

Thanks,
Senaka.

On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 7:53 PM, Sameera Jayasoma  wrote:

> +1. Senaka, please create these issues under CARBON project as L1s.
> Otherwise, its hard to track these stuff.
>
> Thanks,
> Sameera.
>
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Charitha Kankanamge wrote:
>
>> Hi Senaka,
>> Should not these failures reported as CARBON jira instead of product
>> specific JIRA? Have we changed our process of reporting JIRAs in C4
>> release? Or am I missing something?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Charitha
>>
>>
>> On Friday, March 30, 2012, Senaka Fernando wrote:
>>
>>> FYI,  https://wso2.org/jira/browse/REGISTRY-717
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Senaka.
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 5:35 PM, Senaka Fernando wrote:
>>>
 Hi Subash,

 Can you have a look into this? I tried this out with a build starting
 from orbit -> kernel -> platform, and was unable to reproduce.

 Thanks,
 Senaka.

 --
 *Senaka Fernando*
 Product Manager - WSO2 Governance Registry;
 Associate Technical Lead; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com*
 Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://apache.org

 E-mail: senaka AT wso2.com
 **P: +1 408 754 7388; ext: 51736*; *M: +94 77 322 1818
 Linked-In: http://linkedin.com/in/senakafernando

 *Lean . Enterprise . Middleware


>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> *Senaka Fernando*
>>> Product Manager - WSO2 Governance Registry;
>>> Associate Technical Lead; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com*
>>> Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://apache.org
>>>
>>> E-mail: senaka AT wso2.com
>>> **P: +1 408 754 7388; ext: 51736*; *M: +94 77 322 1818
>>> Linked-In: http://linkedin.com/in/senakafernando
>>>
>>> *Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Charitha Kankanamge
>> cell: +94 718 359 265
>> blog: http://charithaka.blogspot.com 
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Dev mailing list
>> Dev@wso2.org
>> http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Sameera Jayasoma
> Technical Lead and Product Manager, WSO2 Carbon
>
> WSO2, Inc. (http://wso2.com)
> email: same...@wso2.com
> blog: http://tech.jayasoma.org
>
>
> Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
>



-- 
*Senaka Fernando*
Product Manager - WSO2 Governance Registry;
Associate Technical Lead; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com*
Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://apache.org

E-mail: senaka AT wso2.com
**P: +1 408 754 7388; ext: 51736*; *M: +94 77 322 1818
Linked-In: http://linkedin.com/in/senakafernando

*Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
___
Dev mailing list
Dev@wso2.org
http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev

Re: [Dev] BackwardAssociationHandlerTestCase and WSDLTestCase are failing in G-Reg

2012-03-30 Thread Sameera Jayasoma 
+1. Senaka, please create these issues under CARBON project as L1s.
Otherwise, its hard to track these stuff.

Thanks,
Sameera.

On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Charitha Kankanamge wrote:

> Hi Senaka,
> Should not these failures reported as CARBON jira instead of product
> specific JIRA? Have we changed our process of reporting JIRAs in C4
> release? Or am I missing something?
>
> Thanks,
> Charitha
>
>
> On Friday, March 30, 2012, Senaka Fernando wrote:
>
>> FYI,  https://wso2.org/jira/browse/REGISTRY-717
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Senaka.
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 5:35 PM, Senaka Fernando  wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Subash,
>>>
>>> Can you have a look into this? I tried this out with a build starting
>>> from orbit -> kernel -> platform, and was unable to reproduce.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Senaka.
>>>
>>> --
>>> *Senaka Fernando*
>>> Product Manager - WSO2 Governance Registry;
>>> Associate Technical Lead; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com*
>>> Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://apache.org
>>>
>>> E-mail: senaka AT wso2.com
>>> **P: +1 408 754 7388; ext: 51736*; *M: +94 77 322 1818
>>> Linked-In: http://linkedin.com/in/senakafernando
>>>
>>> *Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> *Senaka Fernando*
>> Product Manager - WSO2 Governance Registry;
>> Associate Technical Lead; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com*
>> Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://apache.org
>>
>> E-mail: senaka AT wso2.com
>> **P: +1 408 754 7388; ext: 51736*; *M: +94 77 322 1818
>> Linked-In: http://linkedin.com/in/senakafernando
>>
>> *Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
>>
>>
>
> --
> Charitha Kankanamge
> cell: +94 718 359 265
> blog: http://charithaka.blogspot.com 
>
>
> ___
> Dev mailing list
> Dev@wso2.org
> http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
>
>


-- 
Sameera Jayasoma
Technical Lead and Product Manager, WSO2 Carbon

WSO2, Inc. (http://wso2.com)
email: same...@wso2.com
blog: http://tech.jayasoma.org

Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
___
Dev mailing list
Dev@wso2.org
http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev

Re: [Dev] BackwardAssociationHandlerTestCase and WSDLTestCase are failing in G-Reg

2012-03-30 Thread Charitha Kankanamge 
Hi Senaka,
Should not these failures reported as CARBON jira instead of product
specific JIRA? Have we changed our process of reporting JIRAs in C4
release? Or am I missing something?

Thanks,
Charitha

On Friday, March 30, 2012, Senaka Fernando wrote:

> FYI,  https://wso2.org/jira/browse/REGISTRY-717
>
> Thanks,
> Senaka.
>
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 5:35 PM, Senaka Fernando 
> 
> > wrote:
>
>> Hi Subash,
>>
>> Can you have a look into this? I tried this out with a build starting
>> from orbit -> kernel -> platform, and was unable to reproduce.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Senaka.
>>
>> --
>> *Senaka Fernando*
>> Product Manager - WSO2 Governance Registry;
>> Associate Technical Lead; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com*
>> Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://apache.org
>>
>> E-mail: senaka AT wso2.com
>> **P: +1 408 754 7388; ext: 51736*; *M: +94 77 322 1818
>> Linked-In: http://linkedin.com/in/senakafernando
>>
>> *Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> *Senaka Fernando*
> Product Manager - WSO2 Governance Registry;
> Associate Technical Lead; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com*
> Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://apache.org
>
> E-mail: senaka AT wso2.com
> **P: +1 408 754 7388; ext: 51736*; *M: +94 77 322 1818
> Linked-In: http://linkedin.com/in/senakafernando
>
> *Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
>
>

-- 
Charitha Kankanamge
cell: +94 718 359 265
blog: http://charithaka.blogspot.com 
___
Dev mailing list
Dev@wso2.org
http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev

Re: [Dev] BackwardAssociationHandlerTestCase and WSDLTestCase are failing in G-Reg

2012-03-30 Thread Senaka Fernando 
FYI,  https://wso2.org/jira/browse/REGISTRY-717

Thanks,
Senaka.

On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 5:35 PM, Senaka Fernando  wrote:

> Hi Subash,
>
> Can you have a look into this? I tried this out with a build starting from
> orbit -> kernel -> platform, and was unable to reproduce.
>
> Thanks,
> Senaka.
>
> --
> *Senaka Fernando*
> Product Manager - WSO2 Governance Registry;
> Associate Technical Lead; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com*
> Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://apache.org
>
> E-mail: senaka AT wso2.com
> **P: +1 408 754 7388; ext: 51736*; *M: +94 77 322 1818
> Linked-In: http://linkedin.com/in/senakafernando
>
> *Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
>
>


-- 
*Senaka Fernando*
Product Manager - WSO2 Governance Registry;
Associate Technical Lead; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com*
Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://apache.org

E-mail: senaka AT wso2.com
**P: +1 408 754 7388; ext: 51736*; *M: +94 77 322 1818
Linked-In: http://linkedin.com/in/senakafernando

*Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
___
Dev mailing list
Dev@wso2.org
http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev

[Dev] BackwardAssociationHandlerTestCase and WSDLTestCase are failing in G-Reg

2012-03-30 Thread Senaka Fernando 
Hi Subash,

Can you have a look into this? I tried this out with a build starting from
orbit -> kernel -> platform, and was unable to reproduce.

Thanks,
Senaka.

-- 
*Senaka Fernando*
Product Manager - WSO2 Governance Registry;
Associate Technical Lead; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com*
Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://apache.org

E-mail: senaka AT wso2.com
**P: +1 408 754 7388; ext: 51736*; *M: +94 77 322 1818
Linked-In: http://linkedin.com/in/senakafernando

*Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
___
Dev mailing list
Dev@wso2.org
http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev