Re: [DISCUSS] Zeppelin 0.6.2 release

2016-10-07 Thread Ahyoung Ryu 
+1

On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 1:45 PM, Prabhjyot Singh 
wrote:

> +1
>
> On 8 Oct 2016 5:42 a.m., "Hyung Sung Shim"  wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > 2016년 10월 8일 토요일, Victor Manuel Garcia님이 작성한
> 메시지:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > El 7/10/2016 23:16, "moon soo Lee" >
> > > escribió:
> > >
> > > > Although 0.6.1 supports Spark 2.0, there were some bugs around it.
> > > > Current 0.6 branch resolves many annoying problems and i think it's a
> > lot
> > > > more stable than previous release, 0.6.1. Let's start release process
> > for
> > > > 0.6.2.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > moon
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 3:33 AM DuyHai Doan  > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 4:19 PM, Renjith Kamath <
> > > renjith.kam...@gmail.com 
> > > > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > +1
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks & Regards,
> > > > > > RK
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 4:19 PM, Anthony Corbacho <
> > > > > > anthonycorba...@apache.org 
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > I also +1
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Friday, 7 October 2016, Jeff Zhang  > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > +1 for it.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 5:37 PM, Jongyoul Lee <
> > jongy...@gmail.com
> > > 
> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Great job, Mina.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I think it's enough to release 0.6.2.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 4:39 PM, Mina Lee <
> mina...@apache.org
> > > 
> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Hi devs,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Release process has been delayed longer than we planned
> > > > > > > > > > since several critical issues have been reported
> > > continuously.
> > > > > > > > > > [1] All issues that were blocking 0.6.2 have been
> resolved
> > > > > finally,
> > > > > > > > > > so I want to hear thoughts about 0.6.2 release.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > > > > Mina
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1347
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > 이종열, Jongyoul Lee, 李宗烈
> > > > > > > > > http://madeng.net
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > Best Regards
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Jeff Zhang
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: [DISCUSS] Zeppelin 0.6.2 release

2016-10-07 Thread Prabhjyot Singh 
+1

On 8 Oct 2016 5:42 a.m., "Hyung Sung Shim"  wrote:

> +1
>
> 2016년 10월 8일 토요일, Victor Manuel Garcia님이 작성한 메시지:
>
> > +1
> >
> > El 7/10/2016 23:16, "moon soo Lee" >
> > escribió:
> >
> > > Although 0.6.1 supports Spark 2.0, there were some bugs around it.
> > > Current 0.6 branch resolves many annoying problems and i think it's a
> lot
> > > more stable than previous release, 0.6.1. Let's start release process
> for
> > > 0.6.2.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > moon
> > >
> > > On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 3:33 AM DuyHai Doan  > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 4:19 PM, Renjith Kamath <
> > renjith.kam...@gmail.com 
> > > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks & Regards,
> > > > > RK
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 4:19 PM, Anthony Corbacho <
> > > > > anthonycorba...@apache.org 
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > I also +1
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Friday, 7 October 2016, Jeff Zhang  > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > +1 for it.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 5:37 PM, Jongyoul Lee <
> jongy...@gmail.com
> > 
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Great job, Mina.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I think it's enough to release 0.6.2.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 4:39 PM, Mina Lee  > 
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Hi devs,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Release process has been delayed longer than we planned
> > > > > > > > > since several critical issues have been reported
> > continuously.
> > > > > > > > > [1] All issues that were blocking 0.6.2 have been resolved
> > > > finally,
> > > > > > > > > so I want to hear thoughts about 0.6.2 release.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > > > Mina
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1347
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > 이종열, Jongyoul Lee, 李宗烈
> > > > > > > > http://madeng.net
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > Best Regards
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Jeff Zhang
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1471: Closes [ZEPPELIN-1505] Add Scio interpreter

2016-10-07 Thread ravwojdyla 
Github user ravwojdyla commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1471
  
The tests are failing for:

```
Tests run: 9, Failures: 2, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 119.221 sec 
<<< FAILURE! - in org.apache.zeppelin.integration.ParagraphActionsIT
testWidth(org.apache.zeppelin.integration.ParagraphActionsIT)  Time 
elapsed: 21.445 sec  <<< FAILURE!
java.lang.AssertionError: New Width is : 4
Expected: 
 but: was 
at org.hamcrest.MatcherAssert.assertThat(MatcherAssert.java:20)
at org.junit.Assert.assertThat(Assert.java:865)
at org.junit.rules.ErrorCollector$1.call(ErrorCollector.java:65)
at org.junit.rules.ErrorCollector.checkSucceeds(ErrorCollector.java:78)
at org.junit.rules.ErrorCollector.checkThat(ErrorCollector.java:63)
at 
org.apache.zeppelin.integration.ParagraphActionsIT.testWidth(ParagraphActionsIT.java:314)

testWidth(org.apache.zeppelin.integration.ParagraphActionsIT)  Time 
elapsed: 21.445 sec  <<< FAILURE!
java.lang.AssertionError: New Width is : 8
Expected: 
 but: was 
at org.hamcrest.MatcherAssert.assertThat(MatcherAssert.java:20)
at org.junit.Assert.assertThat(Assert.java:865)
at org.junit.rules.ErrorCollector$1.call(ErrorCollector.java:65)
at org.junit.rules.ErrorCollector.checkSucceeds(ErrorCollector.java:78)
at org.junit.rules.ErrorCollector.checkThat(ErrorCollector.java:63)
at 
org.apache.zeppelin.integration.ParagraphActionsIT.testWidth(ParagraphActionsIT.java:314)
```

I can't see the connection of those with this PR.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1471: Closes [ZEPPELIN-1505] Add Scio interpreter

2016-10-07 Thread AhyoungRyu 
Github user AhyoungRyu commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1471
  
@ravwojdyla Only the owner can re-trigger Travis job by closing & opening 
the PR :)


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1471: Closes [ZEPPELIN-1505] Add Scio interpreter

2016-10-07 Thread ravwojdyla 
Github user ravwojdyla commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1471
  
@AhyoungRyu updated licenses. The travis failures do not seems to be 
related could you please restart the travis jobs?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1476: [WIP] ZEPPELIN-335. Pig Interpreter

2016-10-07 Thread felixcheung 
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1476
  
Could you add documentation?



---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Re: [DISCUSS] Zeppelin 0.6.2 release

2016-10-07 Thread Hyung Sung Shim 
+1

2016년 10월 8일 토요일, Victor Manuel Garcia님이 작성한 메시지:

> +1
>
> El 7/10/2016 23:16, "moon soo Lee" >
> escribió:
>
> > Although 0.6.1 supports Spark 2.0, there were some bugs around it.
> > Current 0.6 branch resolves many annoying problems and i think it's a lot
> > more stable than previous release, 0.6.1. Let's start release process for
> > 0.6.2.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > moon
> >
> > On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 3:33 AM DuyHai Doan  > wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 4:19 PM, Renjith Kamath <
> renjith.kam...@gmail.com 
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > Thanks & Regards,
> > > > RK
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 4:19 PM, Anthony Corbacho <
> > > > anthonycorba...@apache.org 
> > > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I also +1
> > > > >
> > > > > On Friday, 7 October 2016, Jeff Zhang  > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > +1 for it.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 5:37 PM, Jongyoul Lee  
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Great job, Mina.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I think it's enough to release 0.6.2.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 4:39 PM, Mina Lee  
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hi devs,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Release process has been delayed longer than we planned
> > > > > > > > since several critical issues have been reported
> continuously.
> > > > > > > > [1] All issues that were blocking 0.6.2 have been resolved
> > > finally,
> > > > > > > > so I want to hear thoughts about 0.6.2 release.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > > Mina
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1347
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > 이종열, Jongyoul Lee, 李宗烈
> > > > > > > http://madeng.net
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Best Regards
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Jeff Zhang
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1476: [WIP] ZEPPELIN-335. Pig Interpreter

2016-10-07 Thread zjffdu 
Github user zjffdu commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1476
  
Yes, it supports local, mapreduce and tez engine. 


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Re: [DISCUSS] Zeppelin 0.6.2 release

2016-10-07 Thread Victor Manuel Garcia 
+1

El 7/10/2016 23:16, "moon soo Lee"  escribió:

> Although 0.6.1 supports Spark 2.0, there were some bugs around it.
> Current 0.6 branch resolves many annoying problems and i think it's a lot
> more stable than previous release, 0.6.1. Let's start release process for
> 0.6.2.
>
> Thanks,
> moon
>
> On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 3:33 AM DuyHai Doan  wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 4:19 PM, Renjith Kamath  >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > Thanks & Regards,
> > > RK
> > >
> > > On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 4:19 PM, Anthony Corbacho <
> > > anthonycorba...@apache.org
> > > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I also +1
> > > >
> > > > On Friday, 7 October 2016, Jeff Zhang  wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1 for it.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 5:37 PM, Jongyoul Lee  > > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Great job, Mina.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I think it's enough to release 0.6.2.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 4:39 PM, Mina Lee  > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi devs,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Release process has been delayed longer than we planned
> > > > > > > since several critical issues have been reported continuously.
> > > > > > > [1] All issues that were blocking 0.6.2 have been resolved
> > finally,
> > > > > > > so I want to hear thoughts about 0.6.2 release.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > Mina
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1347
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > 이종열, Jongyoul Lee, 李宗烈
> > > > > > http://madeng.net
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Best Regards
> > > > >
> > > > > Jeff Zhang
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1475: [ZEPPELIN-1509] Bug of testcase path in .travis.yml

2016-10-07 Thread felixcheung 
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1475
  
LGTM, would be great to see Spark profiles passing in CI...



---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1476: [WIP] ZEPPELIN-335. Pig Interpreter

2016-10-07 Thread felixcheung 
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1476
  
Is it possible have a non-Tez version of Pig and would it work with this 
interpreter?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1487: [ZEPPELIN-1520] Change test environment to use the loc...

2016-10-07 Thread felixcheung 
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1487
  
LGTM


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[DISCUSS] Zeppelin 0.7 Roadmap

2016-10-07 Thread moon soo Lee 
Hi, Apache Zeppelin users and developers,

We're about to start a release process for 0.6.2 and i think it's good time
to discuss about future release, 0.7.0. There were great discussion about
roadmap [1] and we updated wiki page [2], but 0.7.0 section on the roadmap
wiki is empty at the moment. Having a 0.7.0 section on a wiki page, i
think, doesn't mean neither rejecting other subjects nor 100% guarantee of
them. However it's more for helping Zeppelin users and developers have
reasonable expectations for the next release and helps community focus on
main theme.

Multi-tenancy related feature (interpreter authorization, impersonation,
per user interpreter, and so on) are the most active subject in the
community at the moment i think. And we have a new menu, "Job" in the
master branch is another big change. I think "Enterprise ready" section on
[2] can be main topic for 0.7 release.

And there're many improvements around generic JDBC interpreter and Python
support (matplotlib integration and so on). They can be another important
subject with new Interpreters.

Besides that, I've seen people struggle with front-end performance and we
can address that on 0.7, that would be great.
Also i'd like to keep working on pluggability for visualization, which was
subject from 0.6 release.
Therefore, i would suggest following draft as a roadmap for 0.7.0

* Enterprise support
  - Multi user support (ZEPPELIN-1337)
  - Job management
* Interpreter
  - Improve JDBC / Python interpreter
  - New interpreters
* Front end performance improvement
* Pluggable visualization

Regarding timeline, although we're keep making series of 0.6.x release,
it's already been 3 months since 0.6 release. And i think many items are
already been addressed on master branch or patches are available. So i
think we can target near future, like November.

What do you think? And feedback would be appreciated.

Thanks,
moon

[1] http://apache-zeppelin-users-incubating-mailing-li

st.75479.x6.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Update-Roadmap-tp2452.html

[2] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ZEPPELIN/Zeppelin+Roadmap

Re: [DISCUSS] Zeppelin 0.6.2 release

2016-10-07 Thread moon soo Lee 
Although 0.6.1 supports Spark 2.0, there were some bugs around it.
Current 0.6 branch resolves many annoying problems and i think it's a lot
more stable than previous release, 0.6.1. Let's start release process for
0.6.2.

Thanks,
moon

On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 3:33 AM DuyHai Doan  wrote:

> +1
>
> On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 4:19 PM, Renjith Kamath 
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Thanks & Regards,
> > RK
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 4:19 PM, Anthony Corbacho <
> > anthonycorba...@apache.org
> > > wrote:
> >
> > > I also +1
> > >
> > > On Friday, 7 October 2016, Jeff Zhang  wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 for it.
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 5:37 PM, Jongyoul Lee  > > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Great job, Mina.
> > > > >
> > > > > I think it's enough to release 0.6.2.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 4:39 PM, Mina Lee  > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi devs,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Release process has been delayed longer than we planned
> > > > > > since several critical issues have been reported continuously.
> > > > > > [1] All issues that were blocking 0.6.2 have been resolved
> finally,
> > > > > > so I want to hear thoughts about 0.6.2 release.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > Mina
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1347
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > 이종열, Jongyoul Lee, 李宗烈
> > > > > http://madeng.net
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Best Regards
> > > >
> > > > Jeff Zhang
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: [DISCUSS] Zeppelin 0.6.2 release

2016-10-07 Thread DuyHai Doan 
+1

On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 4:19 PM, Renjith Kamath 
wrote:

> +1
>
> Thanks & Regards,
> RK
>
> On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 4:19 PM, Anthony Corbacho <
> anthonycorba...@apache.org
> > wrote:
>
> > I also +1
> >
> > On Friday, 7 October 2016, Jeff Zhang  wrote:
> >
> > > +1 for it.
> > >
> > > On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 5:37 PM, Jongyoul Lee  > > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Great job, Mina.
> > > >
> > > > I think it's enough to release 0.6.2.
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 4:39 PM, Mina Lee  > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi devs,
> > > > >
> > > > > Release process has been delayed longer than we planned
> > > > > since several critical issues have been reported continuously.
> > > > > [1] All issues that were blocking 0.6.2 have been resolved finally,
> > > > > so I want to hear thoughts about 0.6.2 release.
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Mina
> > > > >
> > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1347
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > 이종열, Jongyoul Lee, 李宗烈
> > > > http://madeng.net
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Best Regards
> > >
> > > Jeff Zhang
> > >
> >
>

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #928: [ZEPPELIN-116] Add Apache Mahout Interpreter

2016-10-07 Thread rawkintrevo 
Github user rawkintrevo commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/928
  
Hey @bzz, did you get a chance to check this out? Anything I can do to help?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Re: [DISCUSS] Zeppelin 0.6.2 release

2016-10-07 Thread Renjith Kamath 
+1

Thanks & Regards,
RK

On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 4:19 PM, Anthony Corbacho  wrote:

> I also +1
>
> On Friday, 7 October 2016, Jeff Zhang  wrote:
>
> > +1 for it.
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 5:37 PM, Jongyoul Lee  > > wrote:
> >
> > > Great job, Mina.
> > >
> > > I think it's enough to release 0.6.2.
> > >
> > > On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 4:39 PM, Mina Lee  > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi devs,
> > > >
> > > > Release process has been delayed longer than we planned
> > > > since several critical issues have been reported continuously.
> > > > [1] All issues that were blocking 0.6.2 have been resolved finally,
> > > > so I want to hear thoughts about 0.6.2 release.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Mina
> > > >
> > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1347
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > 이종열, Jongyoul Lee, 李宗烈
> > > http://madeng.net
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best Regards
> >
> > Jeff Zhang
> >
>

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1176: [Zeppelin 1165 : improve] Paragraph dynamic relationsh...

2016-10-07 Thread cloverhearts 
Github user cloverhearts commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1176
  
@corneadoug 
Yes, no problem.
:)


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Re: [DISCUSS] Zeppelin 0.6.2 release

2016-10-07 Thread Anthony Corbacho 
I also +1

On Friday, 7 October 2016, Jeff Zhang  wrote:

> +1 for it.
>
> On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 5:37 PM, Jongyoul Lee  > wrote:
>
> > Great job, Mina.
> >
> > I think it's enough to release 0.6.2.
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 4:39 PM, Mina Lee  > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi devs,
> > >
> > > Release process has been delayed longer than we planned
> > > since several critical issues have been reported continuously.
> > > [1] All issues that were blocking 0.6.2 have been resolved finally,
> > > so I want to hear thoughts about 0.6.2 release.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Mina
> > >
> > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1347
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > 이종열, Jongyoul Lee, 李宗烈
> > http://madeng.net
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards
>
> Jeff Zhang
>

Re: [DISCUSS] Zeppelin 0.6.2 release

2016-10-07 Thread Jeff Zhang 
+1 for it.

On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 5:37 PM, Jongyoul Lee  wrote:

> Great job, Mina.
>
> I think it's enough to release 0.6.2.
>
> On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 4:39 PM, Mina Lee  wrote:
>
> > Hi devs,
> >
> > Release process has been delayed longer than we planned
> > since several critical issues have been reported continuously.
> > [1] All issues that were blocking 0.6.2 have been resolved finally,
> > so I want to hear thoughts about 0.6.2 release.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Mina
> >
> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1347
> >
>
>
>
> --
> 이종열, Jongyoul Lee, 李宗烈
> http://madeng.net
>



-- 
Best Regards

Jeff Zhang

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #1476: [WIP] ZEPPELIN-335. Pig Interpreter

2016-10-07 Thread zjffdu 
GitHub user zjffdu reopened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1476

[WIP] ZEPPELIN-335. Pig Interpreter

### What is this PR for?
Based on #338 , I refactor most of pig interpreter. As I don't think the 
approach in #338 is the best approach. In #338, we use script `bin/pig` to 
launch pig script, it is different to control that job (hard to kill and get 
progress and stats info).  In this PR, I use pig api to launch pig script. 
Besides that I implement another interpreter type `%pig.query` to leverage the 
display system of zeppelin. For the details you can check `pig.md`


### What type of PR is it?
[Feature]

### Todos
* Syntax Highlight
* new interpreter type `%pig.udf`, so that user can write pig udf in 
zeppelin directly and don't need to build udf jar manually.


### What is the Jira issue?
* https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-335

### How should this be tested?
Unit test is added and also manual test is done

### Screenshots (if appropriate)


![image](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/164491/18986649/54217b4c-8730-11e6-9e33-25f98a98a9b6.png)

### Questions:
* Does the licenses files need update? No
* Is there breaking changes for older versions? No
* Does this needs documentation? No


You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/zjffdu/zeppelin ZEPPELIN-335

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1476.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #1476


commit ef2223abab92a452b48372ac0b4c50b70646f984
Author: Ali Bajwa 
Date:   2015-10-06T05:40:06Z

initial commit of pig interpreter

commit 656329d00a766570b25970506aa9e7a95edd8f8a
Author: Ali Bajwa 
Date:   2015-10-06T06:25:47Z

exposed timeout and pig executable via interpreter and added comments

commit 9c88100ee920b3caaccffc0da6771880fc7f15d9
Author: Ali Bajwa 
Date:   2015-10-07T05:02:18Z

Updated based on comments:
1. Documentation: added pig.md with interpreter documentation and added pig 
entry to index.md
2. Added test junit test based on passwd file parsing example here 
https://pig.apache.org/docs/r0.10.0/start.html#run
3. Removed author tag from comment (this was copied from shell interpreter 
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/blob/master/shell/src/main/java/org/apache/zeppelin/shell/ShellInterpreter.java#L42)
4. Implemented cancel functionality
5. Display output stream in case of error

commit 1b36809359beb045727b4d7abaac9d1785401d5b
Author: Jeff Zhang 
Date:   2016-09-27T09:25:56Z

Merge branch 'pr/338' into ZEPPELIN-335

commit b98eff1697b40e467d444655b9a201e4d3dbee56
Author: Jeff Zhang 
Date:   2016-09-28T11:41:24Z

refactor pig Interpreter




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #1476: [WIP] ZEPPELIN-335. Pig Interpreter

2016-10-07 Thread zjffdu 
Github user zjffdu closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1476


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #1462: ZEPPELIN-1477. Add Integration Test for LivyInt...

2016-10-07 Thread zjffdu 
Github user zjffdu closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1462


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #1462: ZEPPELIN-1477. Add Integration Test for LivyInt...

2016-10-07 Thread zjffdu 
GitHub user zjffdu reopened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1462

ZEPPELIN-1477. Add Integration Test for LivyInterpreter

### What is this PR for?
This PR fix several issues of LivyInterpeter test. 
* Livy interpreter's test code is not in the right place, so it never runs.
* LivyHelperTest would fail.
* No Integration test for LivyInterpreter so any following change is not 
easy to be tested.

This PR would fix the above issues. Regarding the integration test, some of 
livy's artifact is not available in repository, so I have to copy them to 
livy/local-maven-repo as local repository.  And LivyInterperter's integration 
test require spark and livy to be installed. For now you have to download spark 
and livy manually. Please use spark 1.5.x and livy 0.2 which is currently 
supported. Download livy 0.2.0 from here 
[https://github.com/cloudera/livy/releases](https://github.com/cloudera/livy/releases)

And use the following command to execute the LivyIntegrationTest.
```
export SPARK_HOME=
export LIVY_HOME=
mvn clean package -pl 'livy' -Dtest=LivyIntegrationTest
```
If you hit any issues, you can check logs under `livy/target/tmp`.

### What type of PR is it?
[Bug Fix | Improvement]

### Todos
* [ ] - Task

### What is the Jira issue?
* https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1477

### Screenshots (if appropriate)

![image](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/164491/18861677/b1389622-84b9-11e6-8b0a-424457ded975.png)

### Questions:
* Does the licenses files need update? No
* Is there breaking changes for older versions? No
* Does this needs documentation? No



You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/zjffdu/zeppelin ZEPPELIN-1477

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1462.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #1462


commit 7e1cf6c003693d5a06826884ceccfc0affb9aaa7
Author: Jeff Zhang 
Date:   2016-09-22T08:42:14Z

ZEPPELIN-1477. Add Integration Test for LivyInterpreter

commit e2f1115f0e0b0adafb628363cb8ea5bca769bf36
Author: Jeff Zhang 
Date:   2016-09-27T06:35:15Z

fix rat check

commit 6a7caac18431cc149f4bc2e34d2d5cd78ac5559f
Author: Jeff Zhang 
Date:   2016-09-27T06:50:45Z

add missing livy jars

commit b9abcc5822fe416feabf6f6cc619f070002bb322
Author: Jeff Zhang 
Date:   2016-09-27T08:04:24Z

add missing dependencies

commit 0b350c0b388d3f48d5504acb5ef67f38d6d877c1
Author: Jeff Zhang 
Date:   2016-10-07T06:18:11Z

add more test




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Re: [DISCUSS] Zeppelin 0.6.2 release

2016-10-07 Thread Jongyoul Lee 
Great job, Mina.

I think it's enough to release 0.6.2.

On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 4:39 PM, Mina Lee  wrote:

> Hi devs,
>
> Release process has been delayed longer than we planned
> since several critical issues have been reported continuously.
> [1] All issues that were blocking 0.6.2 have been resolved finally,
> so I want to hear thoughts about 0.6.2 release.
>
> Regards,
> Mina
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1347
>



-- 
이종열, Jongyoul Lee, 李宗烈
http://madeng.net

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1487: [ZEPPELIN-1520] Change test environment to use the loc...

2016-10-07 Thread jongyoul 
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1487
  
Merging if there's no more discussion.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[jira] [Created] (ZEPPELIN-1524) User defined functions in Scala cannot be applied

2016-10-07 Thread Valentin Ursu (JIRA) 
Valentin Ursu created ZEPPELIN-1524:
---

 Summary: User defined functions in Scala cannot be applied
 Key: ZEPPELIN-1524
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1524
 Project: Zeppelin
  Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 0.6.0
Reporter: Valentin Ursu


Related to stackoverflow question 
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/39857803/class-not-found-when-applying-udf-in-apache-zeppelin
and issue ZEPPELIN-150

Applying an UDF in the scala interpreter generates a class not found exception.

The following code works as expected in spark-shell (both 1.6.0 and 2.0.0) and 
can be used to reproduce the issue in Zeppelin 0.6.0:

import org.apache.spark.sql.functions._
val data = sqlContext.read.json(sc.parallelize(Seq("{'location' : 'london'}", 
"{'location': 'tokyo'}")))
val cities = Seq("london", "paris")
val urbf = udf { city: String => if (cities.contains(city)) 1 else 0 }
sqlc.udf.register("sentiment", sentiment _)
data.select($"location", urbf($"location")).show

The error is:
java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: 
$iwC$$iwC$$iwC$$iwC$$iwCcd8ca64e19a07f9732e2b3de5fd5fc88$iwC$$iwC$$iwC$$iwC$$anonfun$1



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1472: Add message of localhost:port on script

2016-10-07 Thread AhyoungRyu 
Github user AhyoungRyu commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1472
  
@djKooks Sorry for my late response. I didn't notice, but seems there is 
already similar feature merged few days ago. Could you please take a look at 
#1399? 


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[DISCUSS] Zeppelin 0.6.2 release

2016-10-07 Thread Mina Lee 
Hi devs,

Release process has been delayed longer than we planned
since several critical issues have been reported continuously.
[1] All issues that were blocking 0.6.2 have been resolved finally,
so I want to hear thoughts about 0.6.2 release.

Regards,
Mina

[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1347

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1475: [ZEPPELIN-1509] Bug of testcase path in .travis.yml

2016-10-07 Thread minahlee 
Github user minahlee commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1475
  
CI failures looks irrelevant, merging it into master.
profile 2
```
[32m- should able to create AngularObject
AngularModel
- should able to update AngularObject
AngularModel
- should able to remove AngularObject
AngularModelTest:
AngularModel
- should able to create AngularObject
AngularModel
- should able to update AngularObject
AngularModel
- should able to remove AngularObject
AngularElemTest:
AngularElem
- should provide onclick method *** FAILED ***
  The code passed to eventually never returned normally. Attempted 1 
times over 530.370455 milliseconds. Last failure message: 0 was not equal to 1. 
(AbstractAngularElemTest.scala:72)
AngularElem
- should print angular display directive only once in a paragraph
AngularElem
- should bind angularObject to ng-model directive
AngularElem
- should able to disassociate AngularObjects
AngularElem
- should allow access to InterpreterContext inside of callback 
function
AngularElem
- should able to be created from implicit conversion
AngularElemTest:
AngularElem
- should provide onclick method
AngularElem
- should print angular display directive only once in a paragraph
AngularElem
- should bind angularObject to ng-model directive
AngularElem
- should able to disassociate AngularObjects
AngularElem
- should allow access to InterpreterContext inside of callback 
function
AngularElem
- should able to be created from implicit conversion
Run completed in 2 seconds, 415 milliseconds.
Total number of tests run: 18
Suites: completed 5, aborted 0
Tests: succeeded 17, failed 1, canceled 0, ignored 0, pending 0
*** 1 TEST FAILED ***
```

Profile 10
```
Tests run: 9, Failures: 2, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 108.789 sec 
<<< FAILURE! - in org.apache.zeppelin.integration.ParagraphActionsIT
testWidth(org.apache.zeppelin.integration.ParagraphActionsIT)  Time 
elapsed: 19.995 sec  <<< FAILURE!
java.lang.AssertionError: New Width is : 4
Expected: 
 but: was 
at org.hamcrest.MatcherAssert.assertThat(MatcherAssert.java:20)
at org.junit.Assert.assertThat(Assert.java:865)
at org.junit.rules.ErrorCollector$1.call(ErrorCollector.java:65)
at org.junit.rules.ErrorCollector.checkSucceeds(ErrorCollector.java:78)
at org.junit.rules.ErrorCollector.checkThat(ErrorCollector.java:63)
at 
org.apache.zeppelin.integration.ParagraphActionsIT.testWidth(ParagraphActionsIT.java:314)

testWidth(org.apache.zeppelin.integration.ParagraphActionsIT)  Time 
elapsed: 19.995 sec  <<< FAILURE!
java.lang.AssertionError: New Width is : 8
Expected: 
 but: was 
at org.hamcrest.MatcherAssert.assertThat(MatcherAssert.java:20)
at org.junit.Assert.assertThat(Assert.java:865)
at org.junit.rules.ErrorCollector$1.call(ErrorCollector.java:65)
at org.junit.rules.ErrorCollector.checkSucceeds(ErrorCollector.java:78)
at org.junit.rules.ErrorCollector.checkThat(ErrorCollector.java:63)
at 
org.apache.zeppelin.integration.ParagraphActionsIT.testWidth(ParagraphActionsIT.java:314)
```


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---