[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1596: ZEPPELIN-1616. Interpreter open happens in jobRun
Github user zjffdu commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1596 @Leemoonsoo I think putting `open()` in `jobRun` or `hook` is the same. Because hooks are also executed in `jobRun()`. Actually my intention is to pass `AuthenticationInfo` to `open()`, so that livy can create this user's session. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1635: [ZEPPELIN-1690] - ZeppelinHubNotebookRepo multy user h...
Github user khalidhuseynov commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1635 thanks for the fix, LGTM! --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #1672: ZEPPELIN-1701: User impersonation not work with...
GitHub user prabhjyotsingh opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1672
ZEPPELIN-1701: User impersonation not work with SPARK_HOME set.
### What is this PR for?
User impersonation of front end user does not work with SPARK_HOME set.
### What type of PR is it?
[Bug Fix | Hot Fix]
### Todos
* [ ] - Task
### What is the Jira issue?
* [ZEPPELIN-1701](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1701)
### How should this be tested?
set SPARK_HOME zeppelin-env.sh and then try to run
```
%spark
System.getProperty("user.name")
```
### Screenshots (if appropriate)
### Questions:
* Does the licenses files need update? N/A
* Is there breaking changes for older versions? N/A
* Does this needs documentation? N/A
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/prabhjyotsingh/zeppelin ZEPPELIN-1701
Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1672.patch
To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:
This closes #1672
commit 62d4eb8027fdea8e486def849533c4354a2c9d98
Author: Prabhjyot Singh
Date: 2016-11-23T07:35:19Z
ZEPPELIN-1701: User impersonation of front end user does not work with
SPARK_HOME set.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #1635: [ZEPPELIN-1690] - ZeppelinHubNotebookRepo multy...
Github user anthonycorbacho closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1635 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #1635: [ZEPPELIN-1690] - ZeppelinHubNotebookRepo multy...
GitHub user anthonycorbacho reopened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1635 [ZEPPELIN-1690] - ZeppelinHubNotebookRepo multy user handling ### What is this PR for? This PR bring multi user handling to ZeppelinHubNotebookRepo. ### What type of PR is it? [Improvement ] ### What is the Jira issue? * [ZEPPELIN-1690](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1690) ### Questions: * Does the licenses files need update? No * Is there breaking changes for older versions? No * Does this needs documentation? No You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/anthonycorbacho/incubator-zeppelin feat/ZeppelinHubRepoMultiUser Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1635.patch To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch with (at least) the following in the commit message: This closes #1635 commit 0729f5197176515399df7c6bcb81ceb910637ebe Author: Anthony Corbacho Date: 2016-11-14T09:49:54Z Add zeppelinhub session container commit 7a0c9594e0ad7587de8699e4daef8d394af0e612 Author: Anthony Corbacho Date: 2016-11-14T10:39:31Z Add zeppelinhub user session to userSession container after login throght zeppelinhubRealm commit e3e5a15bee6dfdd1bf960cf3ff648ae464612179 Author: Anthony Corbacho Date: 2016-11-14T10:42:37Z Add userTiket in AuthenticationInfo on OnMessage method in notebookServer commit 67051a08d92e6f7e17a2379ba1693c58e89c4223 Author: Anthony Corbacho Date: 2016-11-14T10:47:59Z Add ZeppelinHub instance model commit 5931ab693e3d26546df3f4b4262fe2454ae67fec Author: Anthony Corbacho Date: 2016-11-16T09:47:12Z Fix check style commit a8aeb51899d0c9528d65b447071f9c0ed59ab070 Author: Anthony Corbacho Date: 2016-11-18T16:56:47Z add comment in zeppelinhubRealm about saving user session in a singleton map commit 3fbfcfa4e5343c22e4bb4da0484c23bf5296b3a2 Author: Anthony Corbacho Date: 2016-11-18T17:04:46Z Add new login on how user can get his token at runtime commit 674fb93391d7af548affbccb3199fd470cc3b0dc Author: Anthony Corbacho Date: 2016-11-18T18:16:53Z Refactor ZeppelinHub rest API handler - Now takes a token on every http request commit 25f6215a27a21be787f96f05eaa7e1b512a8d8a1 Author: Anthony Corbacho Date: 2016-11-18T18:18:20Z pass user token to zeppelinhub rest api handler commit dbb8ebd98a0e52770acea2c5be0ce8e22a0a977b Author: Anthony Corbacho Date: 2016-11-18T18:18:35Z Fix test commit e88420319c7902091075283bfdb192b3a805871c Author: Anthony Corbacho Date: 2016-11-18T18:22:25Z Refactor :: remove 'async' on every http call commit edb9e8ce0da8a3de45c947ddb209de15bbd042e2 Author: Anthony Corbacho Date: 2016-11-21T16:27:18Z Desactivate ws :: we will need to refactor this part commit aef6e00f3ff722651b80a246c62a7fd919df5f15 Author: Anthony Corbacho Date: 2016-11-21T20:58:36Z Fix check style commit d8989aa45e2dbfac0c4d8e41798123a4a32a3526 Author: Anthony Corbacho Date: 2016-11-22T14:30:20Z Handle invalid subject commit d9e003612d189300371cd98555e2bb3c1bcbd6d5 Author: Anthony Corbacho Date: 2016-11-23T05:43:59Z Move code location --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1635: [ZEPPELIN-1690] - ZeppelinHubNotebookRepo multy user h...
Github user anthonycorbacho commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1635 CI is green, please review otherwise merging it :) --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1613: ZEPPELIN-1643:Make spark web UI accesible from interpr...
Github user karup1990 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1613 @zjffdu @Leemoonsoo Thanks for letting me know. I will make the changes to handle isolated scope as well and create a PR --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #1671: Clean unnecessary codes
GitHub user astroshim opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1671 Clean unnecessary codes ### What is this PR for? This PR is for cleaning unnecessary codes. ### What type of PR is it? Refactoring ### Questions: * Does the licenses files need update? no * Is there breaking changes for older versions? no * Does this needs documentation? no You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/astroshim/zeppelin clean-codes Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1671.patch To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch with (at least) the following in the commit message: This closes #1671 commit 3b93adc10b75151e5a28b49562b83fa920387852 Author: astroshim Date: 2016-11-23T06:31:36Z clean unnecessary code --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[jira] [Created] (ZEPPELIN-1701) User impersonation of front end user does not work with SPARK_HOME set.
Prabhjyot Singh created ZEPPELIN-1701: - Summary: User impersonation of front end user does not work with SPARK_HOME set. Key: ZEPPELIN-1701 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1701 Project: Zeppelin Issue Type: Bug Reporter: Prabhjyot Singh User impersonation of front end user does not work with SPARK_HOME set. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1647: [ZEPPELIN-1013] Don't run paragraph on selectbox chang...
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1647 @Mleekko Thanks for contribution. A. CI failure is not related to this PR ``` // https://api.travis-ci.org/jobs/176444213/log.txt?deansi=true 17:44:25,594 ERROR org.apache.zeppelin.search.LuceneSearch:120 - Failed to open index dir RAMDirectory@7e1ec70e lockFactory=org.apache.lucene.store.SingleInstanceLockFactory@169ea8d2, make sure indexing finished OK org.apache.lucene.index.IndexNotFoundException: no segments* file found in RAMDirectory@7e1ec70e lockFactory=org.apache.lucene.store.SingleInstanceLockFactory@169ea8d2: files: [] at org.apache.lucene.index.SegmentInfos$FindSegmentsFile.run(SegmentInfos.java:726) at org.apache.lucene.index.StandardDirectoryReader.open(StandardDirectoryReader.java:50) at org.apache.lucene.index.DirectoryReader.open(DirectoryReader.java:63) at org.apache.zeppelin.search.LuceneSearch.query(LuceneSearch.java:104) at org.apache.zeppelin.search.LuceneSearchTest.canNotSearchBeforeIndexing(LuceneSearchTest.java:147) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606) at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:47) at org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:12) at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:44) at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:17) at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:26) at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(RunAfters.java:27) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:271) at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:70) at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:50) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:238) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:63) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:236) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:53) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:229) at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:26) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:309) at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute(JUnit4Provider.java:264) at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:153) at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:124) at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.invokeProviderInSameClassLoader(ForkedBooter.java:200) at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:153) at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:103) 17:44:25,606 INFO org.apache.zeppelin.search.LuceneSearch:305 - Indexing 2 notebooks took 7ms 17:44:25,653 INFO org.apache.zeppelin.search.LuceneSearch:305 - Indexing 2 notebooks took 5ms 17:44:25,704 INFO org.apache.zeppelin.search.LuceneSearch:305 - Indexing 2 notebooks took 5ms ``` B. However, making CI green is good usually. Since reviews may not see a failed PR because of many PRs There are 2 ways to trigger CI again - (clean way) commit --amend and push HEAD --force - (easy, but not clean way) close PR and reopen C. Let me review and return some feedbacks. Thanks again :) --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1663: ZEPPELIN-1692: Ability to access Spark jobs UI from th...
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1663 Let me review this PR and then give you some feedbacks. Thanks @karup1990 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1613: ZEPPELIN-1643:Make spark web UI accesible from interpr...
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1613 Make sense. @karup1990 what do you think? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1322: [ZEPPELIN-1320] Run zeppelin interpreter process as we...
Github user zjffdu commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1322 Then I think we should either revert this PR or fix it for spark interpreter as well. Because spark interpreter is the most important interpreter of zeppelin IMO. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1322: [ZEPPELIN-1320] Run zeppelin interpreter process as we...
Github user prabhjyotsingh commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1322 @zjffdu Yes, you are right, with SPARK_HOME/SPARK_SUBMIT it doesn't work. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1613: ZEPPELIN-1643:Make spark web UI accesible from interpr...
Github user zjffdu commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1613 I think the right place to put spark ui link is in note page instead of interpreter setting page. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1654: [ZEPPELIN-1683] Run python process in docker container
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1654 Thanks @felixcheung for the review. Merge to mater if there is no more comment! --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1613: ZEPPELIN-1643:Make spark web UI accesible from interpr...
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1613 @zjffdu Right. Isolated mode can create multiple spark applications. @karup1990 @zjffdu how can we handle multiple spark applications? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1638: [ZEPPELIN-1666] DON'T share mutable deps, options betw...
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1638 ``` 05:33:43,422 INFO alluxio.logger.type:202 - Connecting to local worker @ testing-docker-d2b67f49-f525-4c23-a9ab-36aafddcf032/172.17.0.12:42241 05:33:43,422 ERROR alluxio.logger.type:212 - java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused org.apache.thrift.transport.TTransportException: java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused at org.apache.thrift.transport.TSocket.open(TSocket.java:187) at org.apache.thrift.transport.TFramedTransport.open(TFramedTransport.java:81) at alluxio.client.block.BlockWorkerClient.connectOperation(BlockWorkerClient.java:210) at alluxio.client.block.BlockWorkerClient.connect(BlockWorkerClient.java:304) at alluxio.AbstractClient.retryRPC(AbstractClient.java:291) at alluxio.client.block.BlockWorkerClient.sessionHeartbeat(BlockWorkerClient.java:408) at alluxio.client.block.BlockWorkerClient.periodicHeartbeat(BlockWorkerClient.java:424) at alluxio.client.block.BlockWorkerClientHeartbeatExecutor.heartbeat(BlockWorkerClientHeartbeatExecutor.java:34) at alluxio.heartbeat.HeartbeatThread.run(HeartbeatThread.java:67) at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:262) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745) Caused by: java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.socketConnect(Native Method) at java.net.AbstractPlainSocketImpl.doConnect(AbstractPlainSocketImpl.java:339) at java.net.AbstractPlainSocketImpl.connectToAddress(AbstractPlainSocketImpl.java:200) at java.net.AbstractPlainSocketImpl.connect(AbstractPlainSocketImpl.java:182) at java.net.SocksSocketImpl.connect(SocksSocketImpl.java:392) at java.net.Socket.connect(Socket.java:579) at org.apache.thrift.transport.TSocket.open(TSocket.java:182) ... 13 more ``` ``` 05:33:43,416 INFO alluxio.logger.type:151 - Folder /tmp/Alluxio871779581980018644U1479706421593/ramdisk/datastore/2965139340539231725 was created! 05:33:43,417 INFO alluxio.logger.type:65 - LocalBlockOutStream created new file block, block path: /tmp/Alluxio871779581980018644U1479706421593/ramdisk/datastore/2965139340539231725/16777389 05:33:43,421 ERROR alluxio.logger.type:297 - org.apache.thrift.transport.TTransportException at org.apache.thrift.transport.TIOStreamTransport.read(TIOStreamTransport.java:132) at org.apache.thrift.transport.TTransport.readAll(TTransport.java:86) at org.apache.thrift.transport.TFramedTransport.readFrame(TFramedTransport.java:129) at org.apache.thrift.transport.TFramedTransport.read(TFramedTransport.java:101) at org.apache.thrift.transport.TTransport.readAll(TTransport.java:86) at org.apache.thrift.protocol.TBinaryProtocol.readAll(TBinaryProtocol.java:429) at org.apache.thrift.protocol.TBinaryProtocol.readI32(TBinaryProtocol.java:318) at org.apache.thrift.protocol.TBinaryProtocol.readMessageBegin(TBinaryProtocol.java:219) at org.apache.thrift.protocol.TProtocolDecorator.readMessageBegin(TProtocolDecorator.java:135) at org.apache.thrift.TServiceClient.receiveBase(TServiceClient.java:69) at alluxio.thrift.BlockWorkerClientService$Client.recv_sessionHeartbeat(BlockWorkerClientService.java:424) at alluxio.thrift.BlockWorkerClientService$Client.sessionHeartbeat(BlockWorkerClientService.java:410) at alluxio.client.block.BlockWorkerClient$10.call(BlockWorkerClient.java:411) at alluxio.client.block.BlockWorkerClient$10.call(BlockWorkerClient.java:408) at alluxio.AbstractClient.retryRPC(AbstractClient.java:293) at alluxio.client.block.BlockWorkerClient.sessionHeartbeat(BlockWorkerClient.java:408) at alluxio.client.block.BlockWorkerClient.periodicHeartbeat(BlockWorkerClient.java:424) at alluxio.client.block.BlockWorkerClientHeartbeatExecutor.heartbeat(BlockWorkerClientHeartbeatExecutor.java:34) at alluxio.heartbeat.HeartbeatThread.run(HeartbeatThread.java:67) at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:262) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745) ``` ``` ERROR [04:32:57,995][] org.apache.zeppelin.cassandra.InterpreterLogic@:interpret All host(s) tried for query failed (tri
[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1613: ZEPPELIN-1643:Make spark web UI accesible from interpr...
Github user zjffdu commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1613 If I read it correctly, this PR assume each interpreter setting has one spark ui url ? But I think this is wrong assumption, as we may have multiple spark applications for single interpreter setting. @karup1990 @Leemoonsoo --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #1670: [ZEPPELIN-1700] ConnectException between Zeppel...
Github user astroshim closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1670 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1670: [ZEPPELIN-1700] ConnectException between ZeppelinServe...
Github user astroshim commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1670 @Leemoonsoo Oh sorry, I didn't know that the value is configurable. If modification is possible, It's better to close this PR because 30s is okay in normal case. Thank you! --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1322: [ZEPPELIN-1320] Run zeppelin interpreter process as we...
Github user zjffdu commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1322 Sorry for late comment. I was in vacation in the last 2 weeks. I found this didn't work for spark interpreter. @prabhjyotsingh Did you try it for spark interpreter and other interpreters ? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
Re: [DISCUSS] Zeppelin 0.7 Roadmap
Hi I updated the wiki. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ZEPPELIN/Zeppelin+Roadmap Please feel free to give more suggestions about the roadmap any time. I think roadmap doesn't mean the community will reject items not on the roadmap, it's more like showing where the primary focus of the community goes. Although there were a lot of progresses since 0.6.x, not all the issues planned 0.7 are resolved yet. So let's see how much we can get close to the roadmap at the end of Nov. Thanks, moon On Sun, Oct 9, 2016 at 7:35 PM Jeff Zhang wrote: > +1 for adding impersonation. Consider most of subtasks of ZEPPELIN-1337 > (multiple user support) will involve large changes, I am afraid it may be a > little risky to release 0.7 in Nov, and I expect we would introduce new > bugs since the changes are big. > > On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 10:30 AM, Corneau Damien > wrote: > > > We don't have many routes, and so far no need for subroutes, so > > angular-ui-router isn't really needed. > > However lazy loading could be nice > > > > On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 10:53 AM, Dennis Jung > wrote: > > > > > Hi~ > > > In fronted part, how about update router to ui-router with lazy load > > > module? > > > ui-router is 3rd party module, but it is more powerful than ngRoute. > And > > > using lazy-loading will help resource loading performance. > > > > > > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/21023763/angularjs- > > > difference-between-angular-route-and-angular-ui-router > > > > > > How do you think? If it seems okay, I could help on this. > > > Thanks. > > > > > > 2016-10-10 0:22 GMT+09:00 DuyHai Doan : > > > > > > > I'd also add in the Enterprise section a topic about monitoring (e.g. > > at > > > > least exposing JMX metrics as a 1st step). I guess we cannot pretend > to > > > be > > > > enterprise ready without at least some means to monitor the Zeppelin > > > server > > > > state. > > > > > > > > Hopefully the monitoring topic will be covered by the big refactoring > > > JIRA > > > > epic: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1525 > > > > > > > > On Sun, Oct 9, 2016 at 4:53 PM, Jongyoul Lee > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Thanks for the sharing this roadmap. > > > > > > > > > > I'd like to add impersonation for Spark/JDBC interpreter. > > > > > > > > > > How do you think of ti? > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > Jongyoul > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 6:46 AM, moon soo Lee > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> Hi, Apache Zeppelin users and developers, > > > > >> > > > > >> We're about to start a release process for 0.6.2 and i think it's > > good > > > > >> time to discuss about future release, 0.7.0. There were great > > > discussion > > > > >> about roadmap [1] and we updated wiki page [2], but 0.7.0 section > on > > > the > > > > >> roadmap wiki is empty at the moment. Having a 0.7.0 section on a > > wiki > > > > page, > > > > >> i think, doesn't mean neither rejecting other subjects nor 100% > > > > guarantee > > > > >> of them. However it's more for helping Zeppelin users and > developers > > > > have > > > > >> reasonable expectations for the next release and helps community > > focus > > > > on > > > > >> main theme. > > > > >> > > > > >> Multi-tenancy related feature (interpreter authorization, > > > impersonation, > > > > >> per user interpreter, and so on) are the most active subject in > the > > > > >> community at the moment i think. And we have a new menu, "Job" in > > the > > > > >> master branch is another big change. I think "Enterprise ready" > > > section > > > > on > > > > >> [2] can be main topic for 0.7 release. > > > > >> > > > > >> And there're many improvements around generic JDBC interpreter and > > > > Python > > > > >> support (matplotlib integration and so on). They can be another > > > > important > > > > >> subject with new Interpreters. > > > > >> > > > > >> Besides that, I've seen people struggle with front-end performance > > and > > > > we > > > > >> can address that on 0.7, that would be great. > > > > >> Also i'd like to keep working on pluggability for visualization, > > which > > > > >> was subject from 0.6 release. > > > > >> Therefore, i would suggest following draft as a roadmap for 0.7.0 > > > > >> > > > > >> * Enterprise support > > > > >> - Multi user support (ZEPPELIN-1337) > > > > >> - Job management > > > > >> * Interpreter > > > > >> - Improve JDBC / Python interpreter > > > > >> - New interpreters > > > > >> * Front end performance improvement > > > > >> * Pluggable visualization > > > > >> > > > > >> Regarding timeline, although we're keep making series of 0.6.x > > > release, > > > > >> it's already been 3 months since 0.6 release. And i think many > items > > > are > > > > >> already been addressed on master branch or patches are available. > > So i > > > > >> think we can target near future, like November. > > > > >> > > > > >> What do you think? And feedback would be appreciated. > > > > >> > > > > >> Thanks, > > > > >> moon > > > > >> > > >
[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1670: [ZEPPELIN-1700] ConnectException between ZeppelinServe...
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1670 @astroshim Thanks for the contribution. Could you edit default value from [here](https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/blob/master/zeppelin-zengine/src/main/java/org/apache/zeppelin/conf/ZeppelinConfiguration.java#L557) instead of multiplying timeout value when reading it? Although it's not configurable through the web, `ZEPPELIN_INTERPRETER_CONNECT_TIMEOUT` is already configurable through conf/zeppelin-env.sh or conf/zeppelin-site.xml. So some unusual case that requires very long process startup time will still able to configure the timeout. So i would suggest some reasonable time for the default timeout. 5min (30s*10) is too large IMO. Maybe a minute? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #1670: [ZEPPELIN-1700] ConnectException between Zeppel...
GitHub user astroshim opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1670 [ZEPPELIN-1700] ConnectException between ZeppelinServer and RemoteInterpreterProcess. ### What is this PR for? The default value of interpreter connection timeout is 30s but sometimes 30 seconds may be insufficient to connect to RemoteInterpreterProcess. I think to increase the timeout value doesn't effect of performance so it's okay to give large value. and in the later, It's better give users to be able to edit Zeppelin Configurations on the web. ### What type of PR is it? Bug Fix | Improvement ### What is the Jira issue? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1700 ### Screenshots (if appropriate) - before  ### Questions: * Does the licenses files need update? no * Is there breaking changes for older versions? no * Does this needs documentation? no You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/astroshim/zeppelin ZEPPELIN-1700 Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1670.patch To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch with (at least) the following in the commit message: This closes #1670 commit 9ea612d7b2909074043ae0a577b687a09ea35260 Author: astroshim Date: 2016-11-23T02:16:12Z increase the interpreter connection timeout --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[jira] [Created] (ZEPPELIN-1700) org.apache.thrift.transport.TTransportException: java.net.ConnectException
Shim HyungSung created ZEPPELIN-1700:
Summary: org.apache.thrift.transport.TTransportException:
java.net.ConnectException
Key: ZEPPELIN-1700
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1700
Project: Zeppelin
Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Shim HyungSung
Sometimes I am getting a {code}java.net.ConnectException: Connection
refused{code} error on EMR environments.
zeppelin log --
ERROR [2016-11-16 06:52:39,737] ({Thread-36}
RemoteScheduler.java[getStatus]:256) - Can't get status information
org.apache.zeppelin.interpreter.InterpreterException:
org.apache.thrift.transport.TTransportException: java.net.ConnectException:
Connection refused
at
org.apache.zeppelin.interpreter.remote.ClientFactory.create(ClientFactory.java:53)
at
org.apache.zeppelin.interpreter.remote.ClientFactory.create(ClientFactory.java:37)
at
org.apache.commons.pool2.BasePooledObjectFactory.makeObject(BasePooledObjectFactory.java:60)
at
org.apache.commons.pool2.impl.GenericObjectPool.create(GenericObjectPool.java:861)
at
org.apache.commons.pool2.impl.GenericObjectPool.borrowObject(GenericObjectPool.java:435)
at
org.apache.commons.pool2.impl.GenericObjectPool.borrowObject(GenericObjectPool.java:363)
at
org.apache.zeppelin.interpreter.remote.RemoteInterpreterProcess.getClient(RemoteInterpreterProcess.java:96)
at
org.apache.zeppelin.scheduler.RemoteScheduler$JobStatusPoller.getStatus(RemoteScheduler.java:254)
at
org.apache.zeppelin.scheduler.RemoteScheduler$JobStatusPoller.run(RemoteScheduler.java:212)
Caused by: org.apache.thrift.transport.TTransportException:
java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused
at org.apache.thrift.transport.TSocket.open(TSocket.java:187)
at
org.apache.zeppelin.interpreter.remote.ClientFactory.create(ClientFactory.java:51)
... 8 more
Caused by: java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused
at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.socketConnect(Native Method)
at
java.net.AbstractPlainSocketImpl.doConnect(AbstractPlainSocketImpl.java:339)
at
java.net.AbstractPlainSocketImpl.connectToAddress(AbstractPlainSocketImpl.java:200)
at
java.net.AbstractPlainSocketImpl.connect(AbstractPlainSocketImpl.java:182)
at java.net.SocksSocketImpl.connect(SocksSocketImpl.java:392)
at java.net.Socket.connect(Socket.java:579)
at org.apache.thrift.transport.TSocket.open(TSocket.java:182)
... 9 more
ERROR [2016-11-16 06:52:39,737] ({pool-2-thread-2} Job.java[run]:189) - Job
failed
org.apache.zeppelin.interpreter.InterpreterException:
org.apache.zeppelin.interpreter.InterpreterException:
org.apache.thrift.transport.TTransportException: java.net.ConnectException:
Connection refused
at
org.apache.zeppelin.interpreter.remote.RemoteInterpreter.init(RemoteInterpreter.java:218)
at
org.apache.zeppelin.interpreter.remote.RemoteInterpreter.getFormType(RemoteInterpreter.java:386)
at
org.apache.zeppelin.interpreter.LazyOpenInterpreter.getFormType(LazyOpenInterpreter.java:105)
at org.apache.zeppelin.notebook.Paragraph.jobRun(Paragraph.java:313)
at org.apache.zeppelin.scheduler.Job.run(Job.java:176)
at
org.apache.zeppelin.scheduler.RemoteScheduler$JobRunner.run(RemoteScheduler.java:329)
at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471)
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:262)
at
java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$201(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:178)
at
java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:292)
at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145)
at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
Caused by: org.apache.zeppelin.interpreter.InterpreterException:
org.apache.thrift.transport.TTransportException: java.net.ConnectException:
Connection refused
at
org.apache.zeppelin.interpreter.remote.ClientFactory.create(ClientFactory.java:53)
at
org.apache.zeppelin.interpreter.remote.ClientFactory.create(ClientFactory.java:37)
at
org.apache.commons.pool2.BasePooledObjectFactory.makeObject(BasePooledObjectFactory.java:60)
at
org.apache.commons.pool2.impl.GenericObjectPool.create(GenericObjectPool.java:861)
at
org.apache.commons.pool2.impl.GenericObjectPool.borrowObject(GenericObjectPool.java:435)
at
org.apache.commons.pool2.impl.GenericObjectPool.borrowObject(GenericObjectPool.java:363)
at
org.apache.zeppelin.interpreter.remote.RemoteInterpreterProcess.getClient(RemoteInterpreterProcess.java:96)
at
org.apache.zeppelin.interpreter.remote.RemoteInterpreter.init(RemoteInterpreter.java:216)
... 12 more
Caused by: org.apache.thrift.transport.TTransportException:
[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1663: ZEPPELIN-1692: Ability to access Spark jobs UI from th...
Github user karup1990 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1663 Ready for review @Leemoonsoo --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1665: [ZEPPELIN-1694] Show result when editor language chang...
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1665 LGTM --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1654: [ZEPPELIN-1683] Run python process in docker container
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1654 LGTM. Looking forward to see more interesting use cases for this! --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #1026: [ZEPPELIN-1021] delete reduplicate dependency a...
Github user shijinkui closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1026 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #1026: [ZEPPELIN-1021] delete reduplicate dependency a...
GitHub user shijinkui reopened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1026 [ZEPPELIN-1021] delete reduplicate dependency and add scala version properties ### What is this PR for? 1. reduplicate dependency 2. scala version properties ### What type of PR is it? Improvement ### Todos ### What is the Jira issue? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1021 ### How should this be tested? ### Screenshots (if appropriate) ### Questions: You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/shijinkui/incubator-zeppelin reduplicate_deps Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1026.patch To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch with (at least) the following in the commit message: This closes #1026 commit 362b23d9c9bdb7aafc7b134860fe11b1123bccfa Author: shijinkui Date: 2016-06-16T11:00:12Z 1. reduplicate dependency 2. scala version properties --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #924: [ZEPPELIN-874] enable scala check style and refa...
Github user shijinkui closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/924 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1538: [ZEPPELIN-1386] Docker images for running Apache Zeppe...
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1538 @mfelgamal Hi :) ping --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1539: [ZEPPELIN-1567] Let JDBC interpreter use user credenti...
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1539 Tested and LGTM. Merge to master if there're no further discussions. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1669: HOT FIX: Fix NPE while getting default interpreter set...
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1669 LGTM and merge to master as a hotfix. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1654: [ZEPPELIN-1683] Run python process in docker container
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1654 CI Green now. please review this. Once it's merged, i'd like to add some tutorials that leverage this feature. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #1669: HOT FIX: Fix NPE while getting default interpre...
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1669 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1660: [WIP][ZEPPELIN-1594] Personalized mode
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1660 @jongyoul Could you describe more about the personalized mode? I don't think current implementation is anywhere close to personalized mode discussed in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1236. I think Personalized mode should be * Keep boardcast every changes to every users who open the same note * Zeppelin personalize parts of the Note, which is - paragraph.result (output) - paragraph.config.graph (graph selections) - paragraph.settings (dynamic form) So, every changes, like paragraph addition, deletion, change the code, change width, everything is broadcasted, but only result / graph selection / dynamic form is personalized. Current implementation will have following limitations - Once user refresh the page, user will see the other result. - Once two users changes note at the same time (i.e. update paragraph code, change paragraph order, etc), the result is undefined. - Chart selection, dynamic form value is not personalized, which is major pain point that personalized mode try to resolve, i think. What do you think? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] zeppelin issue #923: [ZEPPELIN 894] add new hadoop/spark profile and default...
Github user dennishuo commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/923 @shijinkui was it intentional to specify jets3t.version=0.9.0 in the hadoop-2.7 profile even though all the other profiles (including hadoop-2.6) already specify jets3t.version=0.9.3? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[jira] [Created] (ZEPPELIN-1699) Unify AngularObjectRegistry and ResourcePool with AccessControl
Lee moon soo created ZEPPELIN-1699: -- Summary: Unify AngularObjectRegistry and ResourcePool with AccessControl Key: ZEPPELIN-1699 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1699 Project: Zeppelin Issue Type: Improvement Reporter: Lee moon soo AngularObjectRegistry provides mechanisms that interpreter and front-end communicate. It's main features are - Pass object from back-end to front end, vise versa - Provide listener for object update - Persist into note.json and restore - Location where it belongs to (paragraph or note) ResourcePool provides mechanisms to different interpreter share the object. It's main features are - Location where it belongs to (note, paragraph) - Search all objects in all interpreter processes - Read object from the other process. I think ResourcePool and AngularObjectRegistry can be merged while they share the same key concept. Share the object between different processes (interpreter<-> interpreter, or interpreter <-> front-end). Let's call new unified facility as 'ResourceRegistry', which will provides following features - Each object provides where it belongs - which interpreter creates, in which note, in which paragraph - Access control of each object. - accessible from other paragraphs - accessible from other notes - accessible from other users - accessible from other interpreters - accessible from front-end - Persist the object into note.json or not - Search objects by name, type, noteId, paragraphId - ResourceRegistry creates proxy object when accessing object placed in the other interpreter process, instead of serialize and transfer entire object. And the proxy object take are of remote method invocation. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Created] (ZEPPELIN-1698) Restrict of interpreter setting on GUI for each interpreter.
Lee moon soo created ZEPPELIN-1698:
--
Summary: Restrict of interpreter setting on GUI for each
interpreter.
Key: ZEPPELIN-1698
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1698
Project: Zeppelin
Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter: Lee moon soo
Zeppelin interpreter setting page has options.
* Interpreter mode : {{Globally|Per Note|Per User}} in {{Scoped|Isolated}}
process
* User Impersonate
But not all interpreter necessarily require those options.
For example, markdown interpreter will need only {{Globally}}, JDBC interpreter
might need {{Globally|Per Note}} while Spark interpreter require all options
including "User Impersonate".
However, unless user fully read documentation or source code, it's very
difficult to know which 1) combination of options to use, 2) in which
circumstance.
So it'll be great each interpreter setting displays restricted options
supported by the interpreter, with description about the combination.
Information about the restriction can be provided by interpreter-setting.json
of each interpreter. Here's example
{code}
{
"options" : {
"globally" : {
"description" : "all notebook shares a single spark context"
},
"per user" : {
"description": "each user has it's own REPL session",
"mode" : {
"scoped" : { description: "Spark context is being shared by all
users"},
"isolated" : {
"description": "Each user will have it's own SparkContext",
"impersonate" : "Process will run as a logged in user"
}
},
},
"per note" : {
"description": "each note has it's own REPL session",
"mode" : {
"scoped" : { description: "Spark context is being shared by all
notes"},
"isolated" : {
"description": "Each note will have it's own SparkContext",
"impersonate" : "Process will run as a logged in user"
}
},
}
}
}
{code}
another example for md, which restrict to 'globally'
{code}
{
"options" : {
"globally" : {
"description" : "all notebook shares a single spark context"
}
}
}
{code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1669: HOT FIX: Fix NPE while getting default interpreter set...
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1669 Test failed, but not irrelevant with this PR ``` // https://travis-ci.org/apache/zeppelin/jobs/177967999 // https://api.travis-ci.org/jobs/177967999/log.txt?deansi=true 14:40:57,230 INFO org.apache.zeppelin.ZeppelinITUtils:41 - Finished. 14:40:57,230 INFO org.apache.zeppelin.integration.ZeppelinIT:189 - testCreateNotebook Test executed Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 113.057 sec - in org.apache.zeppelin.integration.ZeppelinIT Results : Tests in error: ParagraphActionsIT.testClearOutputButton:278->AbstractZeppelinIT.waitForParagraph:70->AbstractZeppelinIT.pollingWait:96 » Timeout Tests run: 18, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0 ``` --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #1539: [ZEPPELIN-1567] Let JDBC interpreter use user c...
GitHub user astroshim reopened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1539 [ZEPPELIN-1567] Let JDBC interpreter use user credential information. ### What is this PR for? This PR is for the multi-tenant of JDBC Interpreter. User can create a user/password for JDBC account at the [Credential page](http://zeppelin.apache.org/docs/0.7.0-SNAPSHOT/security/datasource_authorization.html). The `Entity` of `Credential` is match with JDBC interpreter group name. If the account for JDBC is not setted in the `Interpreter property` then use `Credential`'s. ### What type of PR is it? Improvement ### What is the Jira issue? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1567 ### How should this be tested? Please refer to testMultiTenant() of JDBCInterpreterTest/ ### Screenshots (if appropriate) ### Questions: - Does the licenses files need update? no - Is there breaking changes for older versions? no - Does this needs documentation? no You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/astroshim/zeppelin jdbc-impersonation Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1539.patch To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch with (at least) the following in the commit message: This closes #1539 commit 373d5f1018488ab435d817551f2b628258cc42b9 Author: astroshim Date: 2016-10-18T10:53:26Z pass replName to Interpreter and use credential info for jdbc auth. commit 3dafdf017c9b1cdb04565d8132e48a18942ea971 Author: astroshim Date: 2016-10-18T15:14:59Z add testcase commit 91619374be06fadd9608d02a7e13d347ad9e0a07 Author: astroshim Date: 2016-10-18T15:15:40Z clean code commit 722e333fe47c007a0252f744d5a3173613bed50f Author: astroshim Date: 2016-10-18T16:25:59Z change testcase name commit f311f34aa6ac3fc9e3830e1a5ae650cc69e15f84 Author: astroshim Date: 2016-10-19T04:02:23Z fix typo commit 6573c1c68b7281f4792251e89d6e4f54ed7ad966 Author: astroshim Date: 2016-10-19T04:14:05Z change variable name commit 63d6a1c7d945b7edb6b297980e98dc5ca5620cf9 Author: astroshim Date: 2016-10-19T12:09:02Z change thrift version to 0.9.2 commit df1b1dcae81a3e88f007979cae2a6d2c2444eb13 Author: astroshim Date: 2016-10-29T06:26:15Z rebase and entity name convention. commit df80741e460d27f658e182a192464b0efa3f9b6f Author: astroshim Date: 2016-10-30T06:48:21Z documentation for credential. commit a305eca1d0fdd4404079d8fbb0169b1837da996f Author: astroshim Date: 2016-10-30T06:55:55Z Merge branch 'master' into jdbc-impersonation commit fee70862fc8069a91f80dccea94011f2ad2a261a Author: astroshim Date: 2016-10-30T08:41:20Z fix build error. commit 34fe0a67732dfad02d20322f40b0e10e8f2f166f Author: astroshim Date: 2016-10-30T08:47:24Z fix code for more simple. commit 086dfdab58c477790b5a19b1d983191eaeaef5ee Author: astroshim Date: 2016-10-30T14:26:50Z fix testcase commit 24a82260adac1179beec8668df9adc731fff747d Author: astroshim Date: 2016-10-31T05:21:22Z fix doc commit b55aceb8afc26ed8d82b07e4524d40cc899d9528 Author: astroshim Date: 2016-11-05T12:10:21Z Merge branch 'master' into jdbc-impersonation commit 99621818aebdbc5161cbc5d90fac37287dddbda2 Author: astroshim Date: 2016-11-05T13:41:58Z fix InterpreterOutput of PySparkInterpreterTest case commit a2f568707de2b8b86525cf62df8534936f9a3a9c Author: astroshim Date: 2016-11-11T08:15:10Z fix impersonation commit 1f9c2c0aa843fd378dd8d0c6c1cb1beafcf16a23 Author: astroshim Date: 2016-11-11T08:44:46Z clean redundant code commit 79ba25b56dacf051bd74a12fb65f0823be4497f3 Author: astroshim Date: 2016-11-11T10:03:38Z Merge branch 'master' into jdbc-impersonation commit 5c0f5d77aa32045383f0b519d87b002d92af72ef Author: astroshim Date: 2016-11-11T13:21:08Z rebase commit bf61afdf8da3ae481e264f193fcde667b273436b Author: astroshim Date: 2016-11-11T17:30:10Z fix testcase commit 59aa9ff2696942f5c0fdfdf39894c81d432bb0ac Author: astroshim Date: 2016-11-14T04:24:03Z Merge branch 'master' into jdbc-impersonation commit d4eb178ce8532ca25cfa3ff5fbab796f881f3f67 Author: astroshim Date: 2016-11-14T16:21:28Z fix docs commit 47c463f7e42c71cfd08ba8940ce7dea9aaccec72 Author: astroshim Date: 2016-11-15T05:10:24Z update doc and html commit 4387a5b8c73fc055c3870e7429b37f8d3d0693d6 Author: astroshim Date: 2016-11-15T10:54:54Z Merge branch 'master' into jdbc-impersonation commit 872fb49e97bc6f47d48acb3dede6fd4dd638ea28 Author: astroshim Date: 2016-11-15T12:55:35Z fix ScioInterpreterTestCase commit 649ff6e8560838f133bc010d9d75b1e0ae5eba0f Author: astroshim Date: 2016-11-17T22:51:55Z rebase commit 267277ac6a8867a62f1b7462dd1471a9eda2882a Au
[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #1539: [ZEPPELIN-1567] Let JDBC interpreter use user c...
Github user astroshim closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1539 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[jira] [Created] (ZEPPELIN-1697) ZeppelinHub storage layer websocket connection is broken
Khalid Huseynov created ZEPPELIN-1697: - Summary: ZeppelinHub storage layer websocket connection is broken Key: ZEPPELIN-1697 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1697 Project: Zeppelin Issue Type: Bug Components: zeppelin-zengine Reporter: Khalid Huseynov Fix For: 0.7.0 After bringing multitenancy features in Zeppelin, the websocket connections in storage layer of ZeppelinHub is broken because of possibility of different users having different tokens. it should be fixed to allow tokens to be configured on the fly. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #1667: [ZEPPELIN-1623] Fix flaky test - testEditOnDoub...
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1667 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1669: HOT FIX: Fix NPE while getting default interpreter set...
Github user khalidhuseynov commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1669 I've seen it quite a few times. thanks for the fix, LGTM! --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1667: [ZEPPELIN-1623] Fix flaky test - testEditOnDoubleClick
Github user minahlee commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1667 5 times of CI test passed. Merging it as hotfix. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #1669: HOT FIX: Fix NPE while getting default interpre...
GitHub user r-kamath opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1669
HOT FIX: Fix NPE while getting default interpreter setting
### What is this PR for?
NPE while starting Zeppelin for the first time without interpreter settings
### What type of PR is it?
Hot Fix
### What is the Jira issue?
n/a
### How should this be tested?
remove conf/interpreter.json and start Zeppelin
### Logs
**Before**
`
java.lang.NullPointerException
at
org.apache.zeppelin.interpreter.InterpreterFactory.getEditorSetting(InterpreterFactory.java:1385)
at
org.apache.zeppelin.socket.NotebookServer.getEditorSetting(NotebookServer.java:1796)
at
org.apache.zeppelin.socket.NotebookServer.onMessage(NotebookServer.java:290)
at
org.apache.zeppelin.socket.NotebookSocket.onWebSocketText(NotebookSocket.java:59)
at
org.eclipse.jetty.websocket.common.events.JettyListenerEventDriver.onTextMessage(JettyListenerEventDriver.java:128)
at
org.eclipse.jetty.websocket.common.message.SimpleTextMessage.messageComplete(SimpleTextMessage.java:69)
at
org.eclipse.jetty.websocket.common.events.AbstractEventDriver.appendMessage(AbstractEventDriver.java:65)
at
org.eclipse.jetty.websocket.common.events.JettyListenerEventDriver.onTextFrame(JettyListenerEventDriver.java:122)
at
org.eclipse.jetty.websocket.common.events.AbstractEventDriver.incomingFrame(AbstractEventDriver.java:161)
at
org.eclipse.jetty.websocket.common.WebSocketSession.incomingFrame(WebSocketSession.java:309)
at
org.eclipse.jetty.websocket.common.extensions.ExtensionStack.incomingFrame(ExtensionStack.java:214)
at
org.eclipse.jetty.websocket.common.Parser.notifyFrame(Parser.java:220)
at org.eclipse.jetty.websocket.common.Parser.parse(Parser.java:258)
at
org.eclipse.jetty.websocket.common.io.AbstractWebSocketConnection.readParse(AbstractWebSocketConnection.java:632)
at
org.eclipse.jetty.websocket.common.io.AbstractWebSocketConnection.onFillable(AbstractWebSocketConnection.java:480)
at
org.eclipse.jetty.io.AbstractConnection$2.run(AbstractConnection.java:544)
at
org.eclipse.jetty.util.thread.QueuedThreadPool.runJob(QueuedThreadPool.java:635)
at
org.eclipse.jetty.util.thread.QueuedThreadPool$3.run(QueuedThreadPool.java:555)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
`
**After**
`
WARN [2016-11-22 18:52:16,890] ({qtp1702660825-60}
InterpreterFactory.java[getEditorSetting]:1405) - Couldn't get interpreter
editor setting
`
### Questions:
* Does the licenses files need update? n/a
* Is there breaking changes for older versions? n/a
* Does this needs documentation? n/a
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/r-kamath/zeppelin npe-interpreter-setting
Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1669.patch
To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:
This closes #1669
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
[jira] [Created] (ZEPPELIN-1696) Cassandra interpreter does not have pagination
Christian Luttazi created ZEPPELIN-1696: --- Summary: Cassandra interpreter does not have pagination Key: ZEPPELIN-1696 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1696 Project: Zeppelin Issue Type: Improvement Components: zeppelin-interpreter Affects Versions: 0.7.0 Reporter: Christian Luttazi Fix For: 0.7.0 Hello all, I was looking into https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-463 I am currently facing a similar issue, basically the browser freezes when displaying more than 5k rows. The JS starts saying: Handling of 'wheel' input event was delayed for 1971 ms due to main thread being busy. Consider marking event handler as 'passive' to make the page more responsive. vendor.ad32e609e9466e7a.js:327 Handling of 'wheel' input event was delayed for 2293 ms due to main thread being busy. Consider marking event handler as 'passive' to make the page more responsive. vendor.ad32e609e9466e7a.js:327 Handling of 'wheel' input event was delayed for 2582 ms due to main thread being busy. Consider marking event handler as 'passive' to make the page more responsive. Which makes the UX very unpleasant. This issue would be to address this by simplying adding a LIMIT X (where x is a defined amount) to all queries, only when using the table. Another request could address pagination. What do you say? How should I start? Thanks, regards, -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #1659: [ZEPPELIN-1667] Fix maven options while updatin...
Github user 1ambda closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1659 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #1659: [ZEPPELIN-1667] Fix maven options while updatin...
GitHub user 1ambda reopened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1659 [ZEPPELIN-1667] Fix maven options while updating node, npm packages ### What is this PR for? Update maven plugin, node vesion, npm package and fix tests to make #1639 pass CI ### What is the Jira issue? Sub issue of #1639 ### Questions: Does the licenses files need update? NO Is there breaking changes for older versions? YES (front-end build tool usage changed) Does this needs documentation? YES (front-end build tool usage changed) You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/1ambda/zeppelin pr/1639 Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1659.patch To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch with (at least) the following in the commit message: This closes #1659 commit 314dcd8b45f795fef987650ffc9d6b3cd42378b7 Author: 1ambda <1am...@gmail.com> Date: 2016-11-19T07:47:42Z chore: Update frontend plugin version commit 6568960571a908854f07cc6ad4cd13982ade5e8d Author: 1ambda <1am...@gmail.com> Date: 2016-11-19T08:05:21Z chore: Add test, build task to npm commit 532f1e697ba3f7614e444b9d2e9a28f3bcd17177 Author: 1ambda <1am...@gmail.com> Date: 2016-11-19T12:37:26Z fix(web): npm tasks in pom.xml commit f42531aff8ba5bad601bd40ea91be39f80d5bfa6 Author: 1ambda <1am...@gmail.com> Date: 2016-11-19T13:21:57Z chore: Update assembly plugin version commit 668a68761b1c5f48568bcddc2cffc04527a901f5 Author: 1ambda <1am...@gmail.com> Date: 2016-11-19T13:24:43Z chore: Set maven option using mavenrc commit 488092af94982d3da51cb1132fbab761311cc1ad Author: 1ambda <1am...@gmail.com> Date: 2016-11-19T13:27:53Z chore: fix travis maven option commit e08580983f0b6b4c04f7e2a485510ae7115bc78e Author: 1ambda <1am...@gmail.com> Date: 2016-11-19T13:38:10Z chore: Remove bower install root option commit 4c26211faec7822cc3b25d47dc4b53dc739ac737 Author: 1ambda <1am...@gmail.com> Date: 2016-11-19T13:44:55Z chore: Update node, npm version to avoid proxy error commit ca2359c5226ea25491a898d8f9b3067dbdd0bce3 Author: 1ambda <1am...@gmail.com> Date: 2016-11-19T13:50:53Z fix: Restore bower install option commit 6bb52ccace7617344033c99569464e709cd4da23 Author: 1ambda <1am...@gmail.com> Date: 2016-11-19T14:19:13Z chore: Add slient option to bower (show error only) commit ded1f2c0dc8dfeb8224a71facdc18e9d5f64ad2b Author: 1ambda <1am...@gmail.com> Date: 2016-11-19T14:31:40Z chore: Update karma, phantom related package version commit ac40b5690d755f52914a9cc7d68139ddbec27a71 Author: 1ambda <1am...@gmail.com> Date: 2016-11-19T14:58:43Z test: fix test for jasmine-core 2.x ref - http://stackoverflow.com/questions/27680933/jasmine-have-createspy-return-mock-object commit 5e1e746d5b324189f4e2b9e66dc5d8f8fa074bfd Author: 1ambda <1am...@gmail.com> Date: 2016-11-21T02:42:36Z fix: Caching npm, bower, node directories commit 5cdd813e1570638e290457e7c03ea373741d5c8c Author: 1ambda <1am...@gmail.com> Date: 2016-11-21T03:05:53Z fix: Print warn, error log only while packing commit a2aab1f22b89b6a4a407f5d4cd155bc0a9e1860d Author: 1ambda <1am...@gmail.com> Date: 2016-11-21T03:07:28Z fix: Remove useless script commit f0fcdff352e3fc6be4a6801c40d1de4a2bb99a66 Author: 1ambda <1am...@gmail.com> Date: 2016-11-22T04:37:11Z feat: Add start script to package.json commit d8c9d36e777e278b4e2f8c94ece0ffabfff30d4b Author: 1ambda <1am...@gmail.com> Date: 2016-11-22T04:37:34Z docs: Update zeppelin-web/README.md commit e5b414b91a630fb8ea33ea1a8c59f3666a910dc6 Author: 1ambda <1am...@gmail.com> Date: 2016-11-22T04:49:04Z docs: Add a package installation command --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1659: [ZEPPELIN-1667] Fix maven options while updating node,...
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1659 retrigger CI due to failures of irrelevant tests --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1660: [WIP][ZEPPELIN-1594] Personalized mode
Github user khalidhuseynov commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1660 @jongyoul thanks for starting work on it! one more question. with current implementation in case of refreshing the page, user will get last run note right? so for example, if `user2` runs note and `user1` refreshes, he'll still get results of `user1`. any roadmap on that? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #228: Restart spark interpreter when the spark context...
Github user akhiluanandh closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/228 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] zeppelin issue #228: Restart spark interpreter when the spark context has sh...
Github user akhiluanandh commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/228 @corneadoug No plans to continue it in the near future. I'll close this PR. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #1668: [WIP] chore/centralize maven pom versions
GitHub user 1ambda opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1668 [WIP] chore/centralize maven pom versions I am trying to centralising versions of libraries, plugins in pom.xml. (I need powerful CI to test this PR continuously) You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/1ambda/zeppelin chore/centralize-maven-pom-versions Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1668.patch To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch with (at least) the following in the commit message: This closes #1668 commit 54548b9787c3bb497a05cc7a5bdcd805a4508c9a Author: 1ambda <1am...@gmail.com> Date: 2016-11-22T07:27:38Z chore: Fix pom.xml commit b2e474e739a9cc9a338610fd34a62fc03abecedc Author: 1ambda <1am...@gmail.com> Date: 2016-11-22T07:33:12Z chore: Fix alluxio/pom.xml - we already specified versions of enforcer, dependencies in root pom.xml commit b529a01996981e8a0f745b3e31dec6ce90649bb1 Author: 1ambda <1am...@gmail.com> Date: 2016-11-22T07:36:40Z chore: Fix angular/pom.xml we don't need to specify enforcer, dependency plugin versions in children pom.xml commit ea0928f9200fd1911beccf4b01604e80c346d6fe Author: 1ambda <1am...@gmail.com> Date: 2016-11-22T09:28:13Z fix: Remove plugin versions in beam/pom.xml commit bf3c3e55bcb07d5113d27d0c0e79526b26ff3a33 Author: 1ambda <1am...@gmail.com> Date: 2016-11-22T09:37:35Z fix: library versions in beam/pom.xml --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1659: [ZEPPELIN-1667] Fix maven options while updating node,...
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1659 rebased to resolve conflict with #1666 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1566: [ZEPPELIN-1587] (WIP) Add impersonation routine in Spa...
Github user khalidhuseynov commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1566 @zjffdu i updated description and pushed some changes. as you can see from screenshot it makes usage of current `username` when writing to hdfs. So in the example above, although `out_user1` folder is owned by `user1`, still it contains inside files (e.g. `part`) with different owner `khalidhuseynov`. So my guess is that it affects only driver and not the executors, and executors are the ones writing `part`. let me know what you think on it. also feedback from @Leemoonsoo @prabhjyotsingh @felixcheung would be appreciated on this one as well --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1339: [ZEPPELIN-1332] Remove spark-dependencies & suggest ne...
Github user AhyoungRyu commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1339 ping ð --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1659: [ZEPPELIN-1667] Fix maven options while updating node,...
Github user bzz commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1659 @asanjar node version is bumped to 6.x TLS one, please let us know if that works for you you on Power arch. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #1666: [ZEPPELIN-1689] enable Power architecture
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1666 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1666: [ZEPPELIN-1689] enable Power architecture
Github user bzz commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1666 ð Looks good to me, merging if there is no further discussion --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1666: [ZEPPELIN-1689] enable Power architecture
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1666 I think we can merge this first and then rebase #1659 easily :) This PR looks good to me and is what we want :) --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1666: [ZEPPELIN-1689] enable Power architecture
Github user bzz commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1666 Indeed, if you could check #1659 - AFAIK it does all the same, only the node version is different there. How about we merge this guy as it does not bring major changes and then rebase #1659 on it and see if we want to keep Node 6x there? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1637: [ZEPPELIN-1665] Z.run with external note executable an...
Github user cloverhearts commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1637 All work is done. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
