[jira] Commented: (ZOOKEEPER-999) Create an package integration project

[Thomas Koch (JIRA)]

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-999?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12997837#comment-12997837
 ] 

Thomas Koch commented on ZOOKEEPER-999:
---

ZooKeeper is already packaged for Debian and available in the current testing 
repository of Debian. I'm the packager.
I'd propose that we coordinate our efforts so that we don't end up with two 
versions of Debian packages. The official(?) "Debian" package in the Debian 
repository and the one created by the ant target.

I don't know, whether there are any efforts to package ZooKeeper for Fedora/Red 
Hat.

> Create an package integration project
> -
>
> Key: ZOOKEEPER-999
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-999
> Project: ZooKeeper
>  Issue Type: New Feature
>  Components: build
> Environment: Java 6, RHEL/Ubuntu
>Reporter: Eric Yang
> Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-999.patch
>
>
> This goal of this ticket is to generate a set of RPM/debian package which 
> integrate well with RPM sets created by HADOOP-6255.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Re: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.3.3 (candidate 0)

[Benjamin Reed]

pat, do you mind updating the building section of
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ZOOKEEPER/HowToRelease
with
these three items. signing the jar files is very unclear in the original
doc. do i untar, sign, and retar? we don't do jarsigning?

i'll do an rc1 this evening.

ben

On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 11:55 PM, Patrick Hunt  wrote:

> -1, in general looks good but I did notice a few things:
>
> * the "zookeeper_version.h" file needs to be updated to version 3.3.3
> * same with configure.ac (
> http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/ZooKeeper/HowToRelease)
> * the toplevel zk jar and all jars in dist-maven have not been signed,
> they need to be
>
> RAT passed so that's good.
>
> Patrick
>
> On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 6:27 AM, Benjamin Reed  wrote:
> > (the previous email had the URL slightly incorrect)
> >
> > after much struggle! i've created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.3.3.
> > this is a bug fix
> > release addressing 13 issues (two of them extremely critical) -- see the
> > release notes for details.
> >
> > *** Please download, test and VOTE before the
> > *** vote closes 11pm pacific time, Tuesday, February 22.***
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~breed/zookeeper-3.3.3-candidate-0/
> >
> > one thing that has not been fixed in this release is that the docs still
> > reference hadoop. this will be fixed in a future release.
> >
> > should we release this?
> >
> > ben
> >
> > ps - give that this is the first release there is more than likely
> something
> > i missed and given the severity of issues addressed it would be nice to
> get
> > it out quickly. please review ASAP.
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.3.3 (candidate 0)

[Benjamin Reed]

can you add this to the how to release wiki as well?

ben

On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Patrick Hunt  wrote:

> FYI: if you make bulk changes (greater than 5 or so, typically this happens
> during release time) to JIRA please do use the bulk change feature, and in
> particular turn OFF email notification. Subsequently send out a single email
> detailing the changes.
>
> Patrick
>
> On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 3:46 AM, Flavio Junqueira wrote:
>
>> Hi again, I'm sorry for raising yet another point. I also wanted to point
>> out that we have a few jiras marked as blocked not included in the current
>> candidate. ZOOKEEPER-880 is one of them, and Vishal asked us to consider it
>> for 3.3.3. I think that either we conclude that it is not a blocker and
>> leave it marked for 3.4.0 as it is currently, or include it in 3.3.3.
>>
>> -Flavio
>>
>> On Feb 19, 2011, at 3:27 PM, Benjamin Reed wrote:
>>
>> (the previous email had the URL slightly incorrect)
>>
>> after much struggle! i've created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.3.3.
>> this is a bug fix
>> release addressing 13 issues (two of them extremely critical) -- see the
>> release notes for details.
>>
>> *** Please download, test and VOTE before the
>> *** vote closes 11pm pacific time, Tuesday, February 22.***
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~breed/zookeeper-3.3.3-candidate-0/
>>
>> one thing that has not been fixed in this release is that the docs still
>> reference hadoop. this will be fixed in a future release.
>>
>> should we release this?
>>
>> ben
>>
>> ps - give that this is the first release there is more than likely
>> something
>> i missed and given the severity of issues addressed it would be nice to
>> get
>> it out quickly. please review ASAP.
>>
>>
>>   *flavio*
>> *junqueira*
>>
>> research scientist
>>
>> f...@yahoo-inc.com
>> direct +34 93-183-8828
>>
>> avinguda diagonal 177, 8th floor, barcelona, 08018, es
>> phone (408) 349 3300fax (408) 349 3301
>>
>>
>>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.3.3 (candidate 0)

[Benjamin Reed]

i don't know why build-contrib.xml is missing. pat do you have any ideas?
ant tar should grab it right?

ben

On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 2:02 AM, Flavio Junqueira  wrote:

> Ben, I have a question. Even though the bookkeeper jar is there,
> build-contrib.xml is missing (ZOOKEEPER-956), and compiling fails without
> it. Is it supposed to be this way?
>
> -Flavio
>
>
> On Feb 19, 2011, at 3:27 PM, Benjamin Reed wrote:
>
> (the previous email had the URL slightly incorrect)
>
> after much struggle! i've created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.3.3.
> this is a bug fix
> release addressing 13 issues (two of them extremely critical) -- see the
> release notes for details.
>
> *** Please download, test and VOTE before the
> *** vote closes 11pm pacific time, Tuesday, February 22.***
>
> http://people.apache.org/~breed/zookeeper-3.3.3-candidate-0/
>
> one thing that has not been fixed in this release is that the docs still
> reference hadoop. this will be fixed in a future release.
>
> should we release this?
>
> ben
>
> ps - give that this is the first release there is more than likely
> something
> i missed and given the severity of issues addressed it would be nice to get
> it out quickly. please review ASAP.
>
>
> *flavio*
> *junqueira*
>
> research scientist
>
> f...@yahoo-inc.com
> direct +34 93-183-8828
>
> avinguda diagonal 177, 8th floor, barcelona, 08018, es
> phone (408) 349 3300fax (408) 349 3301
>
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.3.3 (candidate 0)

[Benjamin Reed]

i would like to get 880 in, but it is far from settled. the changes going in
for 880 and related patches could be destabilizing. as vishal points out,
one of the related patches isn't even committed to trunk yet.

ben

On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 3:46 AM, Flavio Junqueira  wrote:

> Hi again, I'm sorry for raising yet another point. I also wanted to point
> out that we have a few jiras marked as blocked not included in the current
> candidate. ZOOKEEPER-880 is one of them, and Vishal asked us to consider it
> for 3.3.3. I think that either we conclude that it is not a blocker and
> leave it marked for 3.4.0 as it is currently, or include it in 3.3.3.
>
> -Flavio
>
> On Feb 19, 2011, at 3:27 PM, Benjamin Reed wrote:
>
> (the previous email had the URL slightly incorrect)
>
> after much struggle! i've created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.3.3.
> this is a bug fix
> release addressing 13 issues (two of them extremely critical) -- see the
> release notes for details.
>
> *** Please download, test and VOTE before the
> *** vote closes 11pm pacific time, Tuesday, February 22.***
>
> http://people.apache.org/~breed/zookeeper-3.3.3-candidate-0/
>
> one thing that has not been fixed in this release is that the docs still
> reference hadoop. this will be fixed in a future release.
>
> should we release this?
>
> ben
>
> ps - give that this is the first release there is more than likely
> something
> i missed and given the severity of issues addressed it would be nice to get
> it out quickly. please review ASAP.
>
>
> *flavio*
> *junqueira*
>
> research scientist
>
> f...@yahoo-inc.com
> direct +34 93-183-8828
>
> avinguda diagonal 177, 8th floor, barcelona, 08018, es
> phone (408) 349 3300fax (408) 349 3301
>
>
>

[jira] Commented: (ZOOKEEPER-999) Create an package integration project

[Eric Yang (JIRA)]

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-999?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12997883#comment-12997883
 ] 

Eric Yang commented on ZOOKEEPER-999:
-

Hi Thomas,

Thank you for bringing my attention to the official Debian builds.  The 
packages are divided in smaller components.  It would be good to use Debian 
package naming scheme.  What else would you recommend to coordinate our efforts?

> Create an package integration project
> -
>
> Key: ZOOKEEPER-999
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-999
> Project: ZooKeeper
>  Issue Type: New Feature
>  Components: build
> Environment: Java 6, RHEL/Ubuntu
>Reporter: Eric Yang
> Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-999.patch
>
>
> This goal of this ticket is to generate a set of RPM/debian package which 
> integrate well with RPM sets created by HADOOP-6255.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Re: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.3.3 (candidate 0)

[Patrick Hunt]

Done. (hopefully this gives you some insight into why I've been
pushing for maven, not perfect but it does alot of this for you).

Patrick

On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 7:58 AM, Benjamin Reed  wrote:
> pat, do you mind updating the building section of
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ZOOKEEPER/HowToRelease
> with
> these three items. signing the jar files is very unclear in the original
> doc. do i untar, sign, and retar? we don't do jarsigning?
>
> i'll do an rc1 this evening.
>
> ben
>
> On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 11:55 PM, Patrick Hunt  wrote:
>
>> -1, in general looks good but I did notice a few things:
>>
>> * the "zookeeper_version.h" file needs to be updated to version 3.3.3
>> * same with configure.ac (
>> http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/ZooKeeper/HowToRelease)
>> * the toplevel zk jar and all jars in dist-maven have not been signed,
>> they need to be
>>
>> RAT passed so that's good.
>>
>> Patrick
>>
>> On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 6:27 AM, Benjamin Reed  wrote:
>> > (the previous email had the URL slightly incorrect)
>> >
>> > after much struggle! i've created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.3.3.
>> > this is a bug fix
>> > release addressing 13 issues (two of them extremely critical) -- see the
>> > release notes for details.
>> >
>> > *** Please download, test and VOTE before the
>> > *** vote closes 11pm pacific time, Tuesday, February 22.***
>> >
>> > http://people.apache.org/~breed/zookeeper-3.3.3-candidate-0/
>> >
>> > one thing that has not been fixed in this release is that the docs still
>> > reference hadoop. this will be fixed in a future release.
>> >
>> > should we release this?
>> >
>> > ben
>> >
>> > ps - give that this is the first release there is more than likely
>> something
>> > i missed and given the severity of issues addressed it would be nice to
>> get
>> > it out quickly. please review ASAP.
>> >
>>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.3.3 (candidate 0)

[Patrick Hunt]

done

On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 7:59 AM, Benjamin Reed  wrote:
> can you add this to the how to release wiki as well?
>
> ben
>
> On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Patrick Hunt  wrote:
>
>> FYI: if you make bulk changes (greater than 5 or so, typically this happens
>> during release time) to JIRA please do use the bulk change feature, and in
>> particular turn OFF email notification. Subsequently send out a single email
>> detailing the changes.
>>
>> Patrick
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 3:46 AM, Flavio Junqueira wrote:
>>
>>> Hi again, I'm sorry for raising yet another point. I also wanted to point
>>> out that we have a few jiras marked as blocked not included in the current
>>> candidate. ZOOKEEPER-880 is one of them, and Vishal asked us to consider it
>>> for 3.3.3. I think that either we conclude that it is not a blocker and
>>> leave it marked for 3.4.0 as it is currently, or include it in 3.3.3.
>>>
>>> -Flavio
>>>
>>> On Feb 19, 2011, at 3:27 PM, Benjamin Reed wrote:
>>>
>>> (the previous email had the URL slightly incorrect)
>>>
>>> after much struggle! i've created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.3.3.
>>> this is a bug fix
>>> release addressing 13 issues (two of them extremely critical) -- see the
>>> release notes for details.
>>>
>>> *** Please download, test and VOTE before the
>>> *** vote closes 11pm pacific time, Tuesday, February 22.***
>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~breed/zookeeper-3.3.3-candidate-0/
>>>
>>> one thing that has not been fixed in this release is that the docs still
>>> reference hadoop. this will be fixed in a future release.
>>>
>>> should we release this?
>>>
>>> ben
>>>
>>> ps - give that this is the first release there is more than likely
>>> something
>>> i missed and given the severity of issues addressed it would be nice to
>>> get
>>> it out quickly. please review ASAP.
>>>
>>>
>>>   *flavio*
>>> *junqueira*
>>>
>>> research scientist
>>>
>>> f...@yahoo-inc.com
>>> direct +34 93-183-8828
>>>
>>> avinguda diagonal 177, 8th floor, barcelona, 08018, es
>>> phone (408) 349 3300    fax (408) 349 3301
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.3.3 (candidate 0)

[Patrick Hunt]

I think it's fine - it's in src/contrib not contrib.

On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 8:00 AM, Benjamin Reed  wrote:

> i don't know why build-contrib.xml is missing. pat do you have any ideas?
> ant tar should grab it right?
>
> ben
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 2:02 AM, Flavio Junqueira wrote:
>
>> Ben, I have a question. Even though the bookkeeper jar is there,
>> build-contrib.xml is missing (ZOOKEEPER-956), and compiling fails without
>> it. Is it supposed to be this way?
>>
>> -Flavio
>>
>>
>> On Feb 19, 2011, at 3:27 PM, Benjamin Reed wrote:
>>
>> (the previous email had the URL slightly incorrect)
>>
>> after much struggle! i've created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.3.3.
>> this is a bug fix
>> release addressing 13 issues (two of them extremely critical) -- see the
>> release notes for details.
>>
>> *** Please download, test and VOTE before the
>> *** vote closes 11pm pacific time, Tuesday, February 22.***
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~breed/zookeeper-3.3.3-candidate-0/
>>
>> one thing that has not been fixed in this release is that the docs still
>> reference hadoop. this will be fixed in a future release.
>>
>> should we release this?
>>
>> ben
>>
>> ps - give that this is the first release there is more than likely
>> something
>> i missed and given the severity of issues addressed it would be nice to
>> get
>> it out quickly. please review ASAP.
>>
>>
>>   *flavio*
>> *junqueira*
>>
>> research scientist
>>
>> f...@yahoo-inc.com
>> direct +34 93-183-8828
>>
>> avinguda diagonal 177, 8th floor, barcelona, 08018, es
>> phone (408) 349 3300fax (408) 349 3301
>>
>>
>>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.3.3 (candidate 0)

[Flavio Junqueira]

I'm not sure why you say it is fine, Pat. If I try to compile with the candidate release, ant complains that build-contrib.xml is missing (and it is not where it is supposed to be). Compiling from trunk or one of the branches works fine, though.-FlavioOn Feb 22, 2011, at 6:04 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote:I think it's fine - it's in src/contrib not contrib.On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 8:00 AM, Benjamin Reed  wrote:i don't know why build-contrib.xml is missing. pat do you have any ideas?ant tar should grab it right?benOn Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 2:02 AM, Flavio Junqueira wrote:Ben, I have a question. Even though the bookkeeper jar is there,build-contrib.xml is missing (ZOOKEEPER-956), and compiling fails withoutit. Is it supposed to be this way?-FlavioOn Feb 19, 2011, at 3:27 PM, Benjamin Reed wrote:(the previous email had the URL slightly incorrect)after much struggle! i've created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.3.3.this is a bug fixrelease addressing 13 issues (two of them extremely critical) -- see therelease notes for details.*** Please download, test and VOTE before the*** vote closes 11pm pacific time, Tuesday, February 22.***http://people.apache.org/~breed/zookeeper-3.3.3-candidate-0/one thing that has not been fixed in this release is that the docs stillreference hadoop. this will be fixed in a future release.should we release this?benps - give that this is the first release there is more than likelysomethingi missed and given the severity of issues addressed it would be nice togetit out quickly. please review ASAP.  *flavio**junqueira*research scientistf...@yahoo-inc.comdirect +34 93-183-8828avinguda diagonal 177, 8th floor, barcelona, 08018, esphone (408) 349 3300    fax (408) 349 3301 flaviojunqueira research scientist f...@yahoo-inc.comdirect +34 93-183-8828 avinguda diagonal 177, 8th floor, barcelona, 08018, esphone (408) 349 3300fax (408) 349 3301 

[jira] Commented: (ZOOKEEPER-880) QuorumCnxManager$SendWorker grows without bounds

[Mahadev konar (JIRA)]

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-880?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12997947#comment-12997947
 ] 

Mahadev konar commented on ZOOKEEPER-880:
-

vishal, 
  for 3.3 is it possible to have a patch for this issue? (Just 880)? I think we 
can move ZOOKEEPER-932, ZOOKEEPER-900 to trunk. 


> QuorumCnxManager$SendWorker grows without bounds
> 
>
> Key: ZOOKEEPER-880
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-880
> Project: ZooKeeper
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Affects Versions: 3.2.2
>Reporter: Jean-Daniel Cryans
>Assignee: Vishal K
>Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 3.4.0
>
> Attachments: TRACE-hbase-hadoop-zookeeper-sv4borg9.log.gz, 
> ZOOKEEPER-880.patch, ZOOKEEPER-880.patch, ZOOKEEPER-880.patch, 
> hbase-hadoop-zookeeper-sv4borg12.log.gz, 
> hbase-hadoop-zookeeper-sv4borg9.log.gz, jstack
>
>
> We're seeing an issue where one server in the ensemble has a steady growing 
> number of QuorumCnxManager$SendWorker threads up to a point where the OS runs 
> out of native threads, and at the same time we see a lot of exceptions in the 
> logs.  This is on 3.2.2 and our config looks like:
> {noformat}
> tickTime=3000
> dataDir=/somewhere_thats_not_tmp
> clientPort=2181
> initLimit=10
> syncLimit=5
> server.0=sv4borg9:2888:3888
> server.1=sv4borg10:2888:3888
> server.2=sv4borg11:2888:3888
> server.3=sv4borg12:2888:3888
> server.4=sv4borg13:2888:3888
> {noformat}
> The issue is on the first server. I'm going to attach threads dumps and logs 
> in moment.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Re: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.3.3 (candidate 0)

[Mahadev Konar]

Ben/Vishal,
  Is there any possibility of getting ZOOKEEPER-880 in 3.3.3 release? The
Hbase guys had been asking for it.

thanks
mahadev

On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Flavio Junqueira  wrote:

> I'm not sure why you say it is fine, Pat. If I try to compile with the
> candidate release, ant complains that build-contrib.xml is missing (and it
> is not where it is supposed to be). Compiling from trunk or one of the
> branches works fine, though.
>
> -Flavio
>
> On Feb 22, 2011, at 6:04 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
>
> I think it's fine - it's in src/contrib not contrib.
>
> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 8:00 AM, Benjamin Reed  wrote:
>
> i don't know why build-contrib.xml is missing. pat do you have any ideas?
>
> ant tar should grab it right?
>
>
> ben
>
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 2:02 AM, Flavio Junqueira  >wrote:
>
>
> Ben, I have a question. Even though the bookkeeper jar is there,
>
> build-contrib.xml is missing (ZOOKEEPER-956), and compiling fails without
>
> it. Is it supposed to be this way?
>
>
> -Flavio
>
>
>
> On Feb 19, 2011, at 3:27 PM, Benjamin Reed wrote:
>
>
> (the previous email had the URL slightly incorrect)
>
>
> after much struggle! i've created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.3.3.
>
> this is a bug fix
>
> release addressing 13 issues (two of them extremely critical) -- see the
>
> release notes for details.
>
>
> *** Please download, test and VOTE before the
>
> *** vote closes 11pm pacific time, Tuesday, February 22.***
>
>
> http://people.apache.org/~breed/zookeeper-3.3.3-candidate-0/
>
>
> one thing that has not been fixed in this release is that the docs still
>
> reference hadoop. this will be fixed in a future release.
>
>
> should we release this?
>
>
> ben
>
>
> ps - give that this is the first release there is more than likely
>
> something
>
> i missed and given the severity of issues addressed it would be nice to
>
> get
>
> it out quickly. please review ASAP.
>
>
>
>  *flavio*
>
> *junqueira*
>
>
> research scientist
>
>
> f...@yahoo-inc.com
>
> direct +34 93-183-8828
>
>
> avinguda diagonal 177, 8th floor, barcelona, 08018, es
>
> phone (408) 349 3300fax (408) 349 3301
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *flavio*
> *junqueira*
>
> research scientist
>
> f...@yahoo-inc.com
> direct +34 93-183-8828
>
> avinguda diagonal 177, 8th floor, barcelona, 08018, es
> phone (408) 349 3300fax (408) 349 3301
>
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.3.3 (candidate 0)

[Vishal Kher]

Hi Mahadev,

I can certainly work on getting 880 in the release. I would like to know if
900 needs to go in 3.3.3 or not. If I remember correctly, merging patch for
880  failed when I tired last time because the fix for 900 was not committed
to 3.3.If 900 is not needed, then I can do the fix only for 880. Shouldn't
take that long. Note - without the fix for 900, QCM can block indefinitely.
This can cause serious problems during leader election (especially in a 3
node setup). Let me know.

-Vishal

btw, will there be another release before 3.4.0? We would like to have
patches to ZOOKEEPER-932and
ZOOKEEPER-975  released
soon as well.

On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Mahadev Konar  wrote:

> Ben/Vishal,
>   Is there any possibility of getting ZOOKEEPER-880 in 3.3.3 release? The
> Hbase guys had been asking for it.
>
> thanks
> mahadev
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Flavio Junqueira wrote:
>
>> I'm not sure why you say it is fine, Pat. If I try to compile with the
>> candidate release, ant complains that build-contrib.xml is missing (and it
>> is not where it is supposed to be). Compiling from trunk or one of the
>> branches works fine, though.
>>
>> -Flavio
>>
>> On Feb 22, 2011, at 6:04 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
>>
>> I think it's fine - it's in src/contrib not contrib.
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 8:00 AM, Benjamin Reed 
>> wrote:
>>
>> i don't know why build-contrib.xml is missing. pat do you have any ideas?
>>
>> ant tar should grab it right?
>>
>>
>> ben
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 2:02 AM, Flavio Junqueira > >wrote:
>>
>>
>> Ben, I have a question. Even though the bookkeeper jar is there,
>>
>> build-contrib.xml is missing (ZOOKEEPER-956), and compiling fails without
>>
>> it. Is it supposed to be this way?
>>
>>
>> -Flavio
>>
>>
>>
>> On Feb 19, 2011, at 3:27 PM, Benjamin Reed wrote:
>>
>>
>> (the previous email had the URL slightly incorrect)
>>
>>
>> after much struggle! i've created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.3.3.
>>
>> this is a bug fix
>>
>> release addressing 13 issues (two of them extremely critical) -- see the
>>
>> release notes for details.
>>
>>
>> *** Please download, test and VOTE before the
>>
>> *** vote closes 11pm pacific time, Tuesday, February 22.***
>>
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~breed/zookeeper-3.3.3-candidate-0/
>>
>>
>> one thing that has not been fixed in this release is that the docs still
>>
>> reference hadoop. this will be fixed in a future release.
>>
>>
>> should we release this?
>>
>>
>> ben
>>
>>
>> ps - give that this is the first release there is more than likely
>>
>> something
>>
>> i missed and given the severity of issues addressed it would be nice to
>>
>> get
>>
>> it out quickly. please review ASAP.
>>
>>
>>
>>  *flavio*
>>
>> *junqueira*
>>
>>
>> research scientist
>>
>>
>> f...@yahoo-inc.com
>>
>> direct +34 93-183-8828
>>
>>
>> avinguda diagonal 177, 8th floor, barcelona, 08018, es
>>
>> phone (408) 349 3300fax (408) 349 3301
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>   *flavio*
>> *junqueira*
>>
>> research scientist
>>
>> f...@yahoo-inc.com
>> direct +34 93-183-8828
>>
>> avinguda diagonal 177, 8th floor, barcelona, 08018, es
>> phone (408) 349 3300fax (408) 349 3301
>>
>>
>>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.3.3 (candidate 0)

[Flavio Junqueira]

Hi Vishal, ZOOKEEPER-900 has been committed to trunk, but not to branch 3.3, correct? You have not uploaded a patch for ZOOKEEPER-900 branch 3.3, right?-FlavioOn Feb 22, 2011, at 10:09 PM, Vishal Kher wrote:Hi Mahadev,I can certainly work on getting 880 in the release. I would like to know if 900 needs to go in 3.3.3 or not. If I remember correctly, merging patch for 880  failed when I tired last time because the fix for 900 was not committed to 3.3.If 900 is not needed, then I can do the fix only for 880. Shouldn't take that long. Note - without the fix for 900, QCM can block indefinitely. This can cause serious problems during leader election (especially in a 3 node setup). Let me know. -Vishalbtw, will there be another release before 3.4.0? We would like to have patches to ZOOKEEPER-932 and ZOOKEEPER-975 released soon as well. On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Mahadev Konar  wrote: Ben/Vishal,  Is there any possibility of getting ZOOKEEPER-880 in 3.3.3 release? The Hbase guys had been asking for it.thanksmahadev On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Flavio Junqueira  wrote: I'm not sure why you say it is fine, Pat. If I try to compile with the candidate release, ant complains that build-contrib.xml is missing (and it is not where it is supposed to be). Compiling from trunk or one of the branches works fine, though. -FlavioOn Feb 22, 2011, at 6:04 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote:I think it's fine - it's in src/contrib not contrib. On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 8:00 AM, Benjamin Reed  wrote:i don't know why build-contrib.xml is missing. pat do you have any ideas? ant tar should grab it right?ben On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 2:02 AM, Flavio Junqueira wrote: Ben, I have a question. Even though the bookkeeper jar is there,build-contrib.xml is missing (ZOOKEEPER-956), and compiling fails without it. Is it supposed to be this way? -Flavio On Feb 19, 2011, at 3:27 PM, Benjamin Reed wrote: (the previous email had the URL slightly incorrect)after much struggle! i've created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.3.3. this is a bug fixrelease addressing 13 issues (two of them extremely critical) -- see the release notes for details. *** Please download, test and VOTE before the*** vote closes 11pm pacific time, Tuesday, February 22.*** http://people.apache.org/~breed/zookeeper-3.3.3-candidate-0/ one thing that has not been fixed in this release is that the docs still reference hadoop. this will be fixed in a future release. should we release this? benps - give that this is the first release there is more than likely somethingi missed and given the severity of issues addressed it would be nice to getit out quickly. please review ASAP.    *flavio*  *junqueira*research scientist f...@yahoo-inc.com direct +34 93-183-8828 avinguda diagonal 177, 8th floor, barcelona, 08018, esphone (408) 349 3300    fax (408) 349 3301  flaviojunqueira  research scientist f...@yahoo-inc.com direct +34 93-183-8828 avinguda diagonal 177, 8th floor, barcelona, 08018, es phone (408) 349 3300fax (408) 349 3301flaviojunqueira research scientist f...@yahoo-inc.comdirect +34 93-183-8828 avinguda diagonal 177, 8th floor, barcelona, 08018, esphone (408) 349 3300fax (408) 349 3301 

Re: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.3.3 (candidate 0)

[Vishal Kher]

Hi Flavio,

I haven't posted a patch for for ZOOKEEPER-900 branch 3.3. I think the bug
was originally marked for 3.4.0.

On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Flavio Junqueira  wrote:

> Hi Vishal, ZOOKEEPER-900 has been committed to trunk, but not to branch
> 3.3, correct? You have not uploaded a patch for ZOOKEEPER-900 branch 3.3,
> right?
>
> -Flavio
>
> On Feb 22, 2011, at 10:09 PM, Vishal Kher wrote:
>
> Hi Mahadev,
>
> I can certainly work on getting 880 in the release. I would like to know if
> 900 needs to go in 3.3.3 or not. If I remember correctly, merging patch for
> 880  failed when I tired last time because the fix for 900 was not committed
> to 3.3.If 900 is not needed, then I can do the fix only for 880. Shouldn't
> take that long. Note - without the fix for 900, QCM can block indefinitely.
> This can cause serious problems during leader election (especially in a 3
> node setup). Let me know.
>
> -Vishal
>
> btw, will there be another release before 3.4.0? We would like to have
> patches to 
> ZOOKEEPER-932and
> ZOOKEEPER-975 released 
> soon as well.
>
> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Mahadev Konar  wrote:
>
>> Ben/Vishal,
>>   Is there any possibility of getting ZOOKEEPER-880 in 3.3.3 release? The
>> Hbase guys had been asking for it.
>>
>> thanks
>> mahadev
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Flavio Junqueira wrote:
>>
>>> I'm not sure why you say it is fine, Pat. If I try to compile with the
>>> candidate release, ant complains that build-contrib.xml is missing (and it
>>> is not where it is supposed to be). Compiling from trunk or one of the
>>> branches works fine, though.
>>>
>>> -Flavio
>>>
>>> On Feb 22, 2011, at 6:04 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
>>>
>>> I think it's fine - it's in src/contrib not contrib.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 8:00 AM, Benjamin Reed 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> i don't know why build-contrib.xml is missing. pat do you have any ideas?
>>>
>>> ant tar should grab it right?
>>>
>>>
>>> ben
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 2:02 AM, Flavio Junqueira >> >wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Ben, I have a question. Even though the bookkeeper jar is there,
>>>
>>> build-contrib.xml is missing (ZOOKEEPER-956), and compiling fails without
>>>
>>> it. Is it supposed to be this way?
>>>
>>>
>>> -Flavio
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Feb 19, 2011, at 3:27 PM, Benjamin Reed wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> (the previous email had the URL slightly incorrect)
>>>
>>>
>>> after much struggle! i've created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.3.3.
>>>
>>> this is a bug fix
>>>
>>> release addressing 13 issues (two of them extremely critical) -- see the
>>>
>>> release notes for details.
>>>
>>>
>>> *** Please download, test and VOTE before the
>>>
>>> *** vote closes 11pm pacific time, Tuesday, February 22.***
>>>
>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~breed/zookeeper-3.3.3-candidate-0/
>>>
>>>
>>> one thing that has not been fixed in this release is that the docs still
>>>
>>> reference hadoop. this will be fixed in a future release.
>>>
>>>
>>> should we release this?
>>>
>>>
>>> ben
>>>
>>>
>>> ps - give that this is the first release there is more than likely
>>>
>>> something
>>>
>>> i missed and given the severity of issues addressed it would be nice to
>>>
>>> get
>>>
>>> it out quickly. please review ASAP.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>  *flavio*
>>>
>>>  *junqueira*
>>>
>>>
>>> research scientist
>>>
>>>
>>> f...@yahoo-inc.com
>>>
>>> direct +34 93-183-8828
>>>
>>>
>>> avinguda diagonal 177, 8th floor, barcelona, 08018, es
>>>
>>> phone (408) 349 3300fax (408) 349 3301
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>   *flavio*
>>> *junqueira*
>>>
>>> research scientist
>>>
>>> f...@yahoo-inc.com
>>> direct +34 93-183-8828
>>>
>>> avinguda diagonal 177, 8th floor, barcelona, 08018, es
>>> phone (408) 349 3300fax (408) 349 3301
>>>
>>> 
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> *flavio*
> *junqueira*
>
> research scientist
>
> f...@yahoo-inc.com
> direct +34 93-183-8828
>
> avinguda diagonal 177, 8th floor, barcelona, 08018, es
> phone (408) 349 3300fax (408) 349 3301
>
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.3.3 (candidate 0)

[Patrick Hunt]

On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Flavio Junqueira  wrote:

> I'm not sure why you say it is fine, Pat. If I try to compile with the
> candidate release, ant complains that build-contrib.xml is missing (and it
> is not where it is supposed to be). Compiling from trunk or one of the
> branches works fine, though.
>

Hi Flavio, can you be more specific? Because it's working fine for me:

cd zookeeper-3.3.3/src/contrib/bookkeeper
ant jar
...
jar:
 [echo] contrib: bookkeeper

BUILD SUCCESSFUL
Total time: 2 seconds



> -Flavio
>
> On Feb 22, 2011, at 6:04 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
>
> I think it's fine - it's in src/contrib not contrib.
>
> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 8:00 AM, Benjamin Reed  wrote:
>
> i don't know why build-contrib.xml is missing. pat do you have any ideas?
>
> ant tar should grab it right?
>
>
> ben
>
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 2:02 AM, Flavio Junqueira  >wrote:
>
>
> Ben, I have a question. Even though the bookkeeper jar is there,
>
> build-contrib.xml is missing (ZOOKEEPER-956), and compiling fails without
>
> it. Is it supposed to be this way?
>
>
> -Flavio
>
>
>
> On Feb 19, 2011, at 3:27 PM, Benjamin Reed wrote:
>
>
> (the previous email had the URL slightly incorrect)
>
>
> after much struggle! i've created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.3.3.
>
> this is a bug fix
>
> release addressing 13 issues (two of them extremely critical) -- see the
>
> release notes for details.
>
>
> *** Please download, test and VOTE before the
>
> *** vote closes 11pm pacific time, Tuesday, February 22.***
>
>
> http://people.apache.org/~breed/zookeeper-3.3.3-candidate-0/
>
>
> one thing that has not been fixed in this release is that the docs still
>
> reference hadoop. this will be fixed in a future release.
>
>
> should we release this?
>
>
> ben
>
>
> ps - give that this is the first release there is more than likely
>
> something
>
> i missed and given the severity of issues addressed it would be nice to
>
> get
>
> it out quickly. please review ASAP.
>
>
>
>  *flavio*
>
> *junqueira*
>
>
> research scientist
>
>
> f...@yahoo-inc.com
>
> direct +34 93-183-8828
>
>
> avinguda diagonal 177, 8th floor, barcelona, 08018, es
>
> phone (408) 349 3300fax (408) 349 3301
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *flavio*
> *junqueira*
>
> research scientist
>
> f...@yahoo-inc.com
> direct +34 93-183-8828
>
> avinguda diagonal 177, 8th floor, barcelona, 08018, es
> phone (408) 349 3300fax (408) 349 3301
>
>
>

[jira] Commented: (ZOOKEEPER-880) QuorumCnxManager$SendWorker grows without bounds

[Vishal K (JIRA)]

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-880?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12998068#comment-12998068
 ] 

Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-880:


Hi Mahadev,

Sure. I will send out the patch for 3.3. asap.

> QuorumCnxManager$SendWorker grows without bounds
> 
>
> Key: ZOOKEEPER-880
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-880
> Project: ZooKeeper
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Affects Versions: 3.2.2
>Reporter: Jean-Daniel Cryans
>Assignee: Vishal K
>Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 3.4.0
>
> Attachments: TRACE-hbase-hadoop-zookeeper-sv4borg9.log.gz, 
> ZOOKEEPER-880.patch, ZOOKEEPER-880.patch, ZOOKEEPER-880.patch, 
> hbase-hadoop-zookeeper-sv4borg12.log.gz, 
> hbase-hadoop-zookeeper-sv4borg9.log.gz, jstack
>
>
> We're seeing an issue where one server in the ensemble has a steady growing 
> number of QuorumCnxManager$SendWorker threads up to a point where the OS runs 
> out of native threads, and at the same time we see a lot of exceptions in the 
> logs.  This is on 3.2.2 and our config looks like:
> {noformat}
> tickTime=3000
> dataDir=/somewhere_thats_not_tmp
> clientPort=2181
> initLimit=10
> syncLimit=5
> server.0=sv4borg9:2888:3888
> server.1=sv4borg10:2888:3888
> server.2=sv4borg11:2888:3888
> server.3=sv4borg12:2888:3888
> server.4=sv4borg13:2888:3888
> {noformat}
> The issue is on the first server. I'm going to attach threads dumps and logs 
> in moment.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

[jira] Commented: (ZOOKEEPER-880) QuorumCnxManager$SendWorker grows without bounds

[Mahadev konar (JIRA)]

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-880?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12998070#comment-12998070
 ] 

Mahadev konar commented on ZOOKEEPER-880:
-

thanks vishal.

> QuorumCnxManager$SendWorker grows without bounds
> 
>
> Key: ZOOKEEPER-880
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-880
> Project: ZooKeeper
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Affects Versions: 3.2.2
>Reporter: Jean-Daniel Cryans
>Assignee: Vishal K
>Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 3.4.0
>
> Attachments: TRACE-hbase-hadoop-zookeeper-sv4borg9.log.gz, 
> ZOOKEEPER-880.patch, ZOOKEEPER-880.patch, ZOOKEEPER-880.patch, 
> hbase-hadoop-zookeeper-sv4borg12.log.gz, 
> hbase-hadoop-zookeeper-sv4borg9.log.gz, jstack
>
>
> We're seeing an issue where one server in the ensemble has a steady growing 
> number of QuorumCnxManager$SendWorker threads up to a point where the OS runs 
> out of native threads, and at the same time we see a lot of exceptions in the 
> logs.  This is on 3.2.2 and our config looks like:
> {noformat}
> tickTime=3000
> dataDir=/somewhere_thats_not_tmp
> clientPort=2181
> initLimit=10
> syncLimit=5
> server.0=sv4borg9:2888:3888
> server.1=sv4borg10:2888:3888
> server.2=sv4borg11:2888:3888
> server.3=sv4borg12:2888:3888
> server.4=sv4borg13:2888:3888
> {noformat}
> The issue is on the first server. I'm going to attach threads dumps and logs 
> in moment.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Re: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.3.3 (candidate 0)

[Mahadev Konar]

Hi Vishal,
  900 seems like a biigger change. I think just 880 should be fine, so that
folks dont hit the thread blow up issue. BTW, all depends on Ben if he is
willing to get 880 in 3.3.3 release. If not we'll have to wait for 3.4 or
another release  like 3.3.4 (which i personally would like to avoid).

thanks
mahadev

On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 1:09 PM, Vishal Kher  wrote:

> Hi Mahadev,
>
> I can certainly work on getting 880 in the release. I would like to know if
> 900 needs to go in 3.3.3 or not. If I remember correctly, merging patch for
> 880  failed when I tired last time because the fix for 900 was not committed
> to 3.3.If 900 is not needed, then I can do the fix only for 880. Shouldn't
> take that long. Note - without the fix for 900, QCM can block indefinitely.
> This can cause serious problems during leader election (especially in a 3
> node setup). Let me know.
>
> -Vishal
>
> btw, will there be another release before 3.4.0? We would like to have
> patches to 
> ZOOKEEPER-932and
> ZOOKEEPER-975 released 
> soon as well.
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Mahadev Konar  wrote:
>
>> Ben/Vishal,
>>   Is there any possibility of getting ZOOKEEPER-880 in 3.3.3 release? The
>> Hbase guys had been asking for it.
>>
>> thanks
>> mahadev
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Flavio Junqueira wrote:
>>
>>> I'm not sure why you say it is fine, Pat. If I try to compile with the
>>> candidate release, ant complains that build-contrib.xml is missing (and it
>>> is not where it is supposed to be). Compiling from trunk or one of the
>>> branches works fine, though.
>>>
>>> -Flavio
>>>
>>> On Feb 22, 2011, at 6:04 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
>>>
>>> I think it's fine - it's in src/contrib not contrib.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 8:00 AM, Benjamin Reed 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> i don't know why build-contrib.xml is missing. pat do you have any ideas?
>>>
>>> ant tar should grab it right?
>>>
>>>
>>> ben
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 2:02 AM, Flavio Junqueira >> >wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Ben, I have a question. Even though the bookkeeper jar is there,
>>>
>>> build-contrib.xml is missing (ZOOKEEPER-956), and compiling fails without
>>>
>>> it. Is it supposed to be this way?
>>>
>>>
>>> -Flavio
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Feb 19, 2011, at 3:27 PM, Benjamin Reed wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> (the previous email had the URL slightly incorrect)
>>>
>>>
>>> after much struggle! i've created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.3.3.
>>>
>>> this is a bug fix
>>>
>>> release addressing 13 issues (two of them extremely critical) -- see the
>>>
>>> release notes for details.
>>>
>>>
>>> *** Please download, test and VOTE before the
>>>
>>> *** vote closes 11pm pacific time, Tuesday, February 22.***
>>>
>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~breed/zookeeper-3.3.3-candidate-0/
>>>
>>>
>>> one thing that has not been fixed in this release is that the docs still
>>>
>>> reference hadoop. this will be fixed in a future release.
>>>
>>>
>>> should we release this?
>>>
>>>
>>> ben
>>>
>>>
>>> ps - give that this is the first release there is more than likely
>>>
>>> something
>>>
>>> i missed and given the severity of issues addressed it would be nice to
>>>
>>> get
>>>
>>> it out quickly. please review ASAP.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>  *flavio*
>>>
>>>  *junqueira*
>>>
>>>
>>> research scientist
>>>
>>>
>>> f...@yahoo-inc.com
>>>
>>> direct +34 93-183-8828
>>>
>>>
>>> avinguda diagonal 177, 8th floor, barcelona, 08018, es
>>>
>>> phone (408) 349 3300fax (408) 349 3301
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>   *flavio*
>>> *junqueira*
>>>
>>> research scientist
>>>
>>> f...@yahoo-inc.com
>>> direct +34 93-183-8828
>>>
>>> avinguda diagonal 177, 8th floor, barcelona, 08018, es
>>> phone (408) 349 3300fax (408) 349 3301
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>

[jira] Created: (ZOOKEEPER-1001) Read from open ledger

[Flavio Junqueira (JIRA)]

Read from open ledger
-

 Key: ZOOKEEPER-1001
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1001
 Project: ZooKeeper
  Issue Type: New Feature
  Components: contrib-bookkeeper
Reporter: Flavio Junqueira


The BookKeeper client currently does not allow a client to read from an open 
ledger. That is, if the creator of a ledger is still writing to it (and the 
ledger is not closed), then an attempt to open the same ledger for reading will 
execute the code to recover the ledger, assuming that the ledger has not been 
correctly closed.

It seems that there are applications that do require the ability to read from a 
ledger while it is being written to, and the main goal of this jira is to 
discuss possible implementations of this feature.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

[jira] Updated: (ZOOKEEPER-1002) The Barrier sample code should create a EPHEMERAL znode instead of EPHEMERAL_SEQUENTIAL znode

[Ching-Shen Chen (JIRA)]

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1002?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Ching-Shen Chen updated ZOOKEEPER-1002:
---

Attachment: zookeeper-1002.patch

Attached a patch.

> The Barrier sample code should create a EPHEMERAL znode instead of 
> EPHEMERAL_SEQUENTIAL znode
> -
>
> Key: ZOOKEEPER-1002
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1002
> Project: ZooKeeper
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: documentation
>Affects Versions: 3.3.2
>Reporter: Ching-Shen Chen
>Priority: Minor
>  Labels: documentation
> Fix For: 3.3.3
>
> Attachments: zookeeper-1002.patch
>
>
> Please see the Barrier sample code from ZooKeeper 
> Tutorial(http://zookeeper.apache.org/doc/r3.3.1/zookeeperTutorial.html#sc_barriers),
>  that should enable a group of processes to synchronize the beginning and the 
> end of a computation.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

[jira] Created: (ZOOKEEPER-1002) The Barrier sample code should create a EPHEMERAL znode instead of EPHEMERAL_SEQUENTIAL znode

[Ching-Shen Chen (JIRA)]

The Barrier sample code should create a EPHEMERAL znode instead of 
EPHEMERAL_SEQUENTIAL znode
-

 Key: ZOOKEEPER-1002
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1002
 Project: ZooKeeper
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: documentation
Affects Versions: 3.3.2
Reporter: Ching-Shen Chen
Priority: Minor
 Fix For: 3.3.3
 Attachments: zookeeper-1002.patch

Please see the Barrier sample code from ZooKeeper 
Tutorial(http://zookeeper.apache.org/doc/r3.3.1/zookeeperTutorial.html#sc_barriers),
 that should enable a group of processes to synchronize the beginning and the 
end of a computation.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Re: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.3.3 (candidate 0)

[Benjamin Reed]

sorry i didn't respond earlier. i've been off the grid today. (tahoe) since
i have to roll a new release anyway. i'd be glad to put it in. i just don't
want to delay the release any longer.

ben

On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Mahadev Konar  wrote:

> Hi Vishal,
>   900 seems like a biigger change. I think just 880 should be fine, so that
> folks dont hit the thread blow up issue. BTW, all depends on Ben if he is
> willing to get 880 in 3.3.3 release. If not we'll have to wait for 3.4 or
> another release  like 3.3.4 (which i personally would like to avoid).
>
> thanks
> mahadev
>
> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 1:09 PM, Vishal Kher  wrote:
>
>> Hi Mahadev,
>>
>> I can certainly work on getting 880 in the release. I would like to know
>> if 900 needs to go in 3.3.3 or not. If I remember correctly, merging patch
>> for 880  failed when I tired last time because the fix for 900 was not
>> committed to 3.3.If 900 is not needed, then I can do the fix only for 880.
>> Shouldn't take that long. Note - without the fix for 900, QCM can block
>> indefinitely. This can cause serious problems during leader election
>> (especially in a 3 node setup). Let me know.
>>
>> -Vishal
>>
>> btw, will there be another release before 3.4.0? We would like to have
>> patches to 
>> ZOOKEEPER-932and
>> ZOOKEEPER-975 released 
>> soon as well.
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Mahadev Konar wrote:
>>
>>> Ben/Vishal,
>>>   Is there any possibility of getting ZOOKEEPER-880 in 3.3.3 release? The
>>> Hbase guys had been asking for it.
>>>
>>> thanks
>>> mahadev
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Flavio Junqueira wrote:
>>>
 I'm not sure why you say it is fine, Pat. If I try to compile with the
 candidate release, ant complains that build-contrib.xml is missing (and it
 is not where it is supposed to be). Compiling from trunk or one of the
 branches works fine, though.

 -Flavio

 On Feb 22, 2011, at 6:04 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote:

 I think it's fine - it's in src/contrib not contrib.

 On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 8:00 AM, Benjamin Reed 
 wrote:

 i don't know why build-contrib.xml is missing. pat do you have any
 ideas?

 ant tar should grab it right?


 ben



 On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 2:02 AM, Flavio Junqueira >>> >wrote:


 Ben, I have a question. Even though the bookkeeper jar is there,

 build-contrib.xml is missing (ZOOKEEPER-956), and compiling fails
 without

 it. Is it supposed to be this way?


 -Flavio



 On Feb 19, 2011, at 3:27 PM, Benjamin Reed wrote:


 (the previous email had the URL slightly incorrect)


 after much struggle! i've created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.3.3.

 this is a bug fix

 release addressing 13 issues (two of them extremely critical) -- see the

 release notes for details.


 *** Please download, test and VOTE before the

 *** vote closes 11pm pacific time, Tuesday, February 22.***


 http://people.apache.org/~breed/zookeeper-3.3.3-candidate-0/


 one thing that has not been fixed in this release is that the docs still

 reference hadoop. this will be fixed in a future release.


 should we release this?


 ben


 ps - give that this is the first release there is more than likely

 something

 i missed and given the severity of issues addressed it would be nice to

 get

 it out quickly. please review ASAP.



  *flavio*

  *junqueira*


 research scientist


 f...@yahoo-inc.com

 direct +34 93-183-8828


 avinguda diagonal 177, 8th floor, barcelona, 08018, es

 phone (408) 349 3300fax (408) 349 3301






   *flavio*
 *junqueira*

 research scientist

 f...@yahoo-inc.com
 direct +34 93-183-8828

 avinguda diagonal 177, 8th floor, barcelona, 08018, es
 phone (408) 349 3300fax (408) 349 3301



>>>
>>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.3.3 (candidate 0)

[Mahadev Konar]

Thanks Ben. Vishal, would you be able to upload the patch today/tomm?
I can review and commit.

thanks
mahadev

On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 7:38 PM, Benjamin Reed  wrote:
> sorry i didn't respond earlier. i've been off the grid today. (tahoe) since
> i have to roll a new release anyway. i'd be glad to put it in. i just don't
> want to delay the release any longer.
>
> ben
>
> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Mahadev Konar  wrote:
>
>> Hi Vishal,
>>   900 seems like a biigger change. I think just 880 should be fine, so that
>> folks dont hit the thread blow up issue. BTW, all depends on Ben if he is
>> willing to get 880 in 3.3.3 release. If not we'll have to wait for 3.4 or
>> another release  like 3.3.4 (which i personally would like to avoid).
>>
>> thanks
>> mahadev
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 1:09 PM, Vishal Kher  wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Mahadev,
>>>
>>> I can certainly work on getting 880 in the release. I would like to know
>>> if 900 needs to go in 3.3.3 or not. If I remember correctly, merging patch
>>> for 880  failed when I tired last time because the fix for 900 was not
>>> committed to 3.3.If 900 is not needed, then I can do the fix only for 880.
>>> Shouldn't take that long. Note - without the fix for 900, QCM can block
>>> indefinitely. This can cause serious problems during leader election
>>> (especially in a 3 node setup). Let me know.
>>>
>>> -Vishal
>>>
>>> btw, will there be another release before 3.4.0? We would like to have
>>> patches to 
>>> ZOOKEEPER-932and
>>> ZOOKEEPER-975 released 
>>> soon as well.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Mahadev Konar wrote:
>>>
 Ben/Vishal,
   Is there any possibility of getting ZOOKEEPER-880 in 3.3.3 release? The
 Hbase guys had been asking for it.

 thanks
 mahadev


 On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Flavio Junqueira 
 wrote:

> I'm not sure why you say it is fine, Pat. If I try to compile with the
> candidate release, ant complains that build-contrib.xml is missing (and it
> is not where it is supposed to be). Compiling from trunk or one of the
> branches works fine, though.
>
> -Flavio
>
> On Feb 22, 2011, at 6:04 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
>
> I think it's fine - it's in src/contrib not contrib.
>
> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 8:00 AM, Benjamin Reed 
> wrote:
>
> i don't know why build-contrib.xml is missing. pat do you have any
> ideas?
>
> ant tar should grab it right?
>
>
> ben
>
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 2:02 AM, Flavio Junqueira  >wrote:
>
>
> Ben, I have a question. Even though the bookkeeper jar is there,
>
> build-contrib.xml is missing (ZOOKEEPER-956), and compiling fails
> without
>
> it. Is it supposed to be this way?
>
>
> -Flavio
>
>
>
> On Feb 19, 2011, at 3:27 PM, Benjamin Reed wrote:
>
>
> (the previous email had the URL slightly incorrect)
>
>
> after much struggle! i've created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.3.3.
>
> this is a bug fix
>
> release addressing 13 issues (two of them extremely critical) -- see the
>
> release notes for details.
>
>
> *** Please download, test and VOTE before the
>
> *** vote closes 11pm pacific time, Tuesday, February 22.***
>
>
> http://people.apache.org/~breed/zookeeper-3.3.3-candidate-0/
>
>
> one thing that has not been fixed in this release is that the docs still
>
> reference hadoop. this will be fixed in a future release.
>
>
> should we release this?
>
>
> ben
>
>
> ps - give that this is the first release there is more than likely
>
> something
>
> i missed and given the severity of issues addressed it would be nice to
>
> get
>
> it out quickly. please review ASAP.
>
>
>
>  *flavio*
>
>  *junqueira*
>
>
> research scientist
>
>
> f...@yahoo-inc.com
>
> direct +34 93-183-8828
>
>
> avinguda diagonal 177, 8th floor, barcelona, 08018, es
>
> phone (408) 349 3300    fax (408) 349 3301
>
>
>
>
>
>
>   *flavio*
> *junqueira*
>
> research scientist
>
> f...@yahoo-inc.com
> direct +34 93-183-8828
>
> avinguda diagonal 177, 8th floor, barcelona, 08018, es
> phone (408) 349 3300    fax (408) 349 3301
>
>
>

>>>
>>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.3.3 (candidate 0)

[Benjamin Reed]

in step 3 under building you say "Tar/GZ the release directory as
zookeeper-X.Y.Z.tar.gz". the release directory refers the directory you
untared the tar.gz file into in step 2. right?

ben

On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Patrick Hunt  wrote:

> Done. (hopefully this gives you some insight into why I've been
> pushing for maven, not perfect but it does alot of this for you).
>
> Patrick
>
> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 7:58 AM, Benjamin Reed  wrote:
> > pat, do you mind updating the building section of
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ZOOKEEPER/HowToRelease
> > with
> > these three items. signing the jar files is very unclear in the original
> > doc. do i untar, sign, and retar? we don't do jarsigning?
> >
> > i'll do an rc1 this evening.
> >
> > ben
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 11:55 PM, Patrick Hunt  wrote:
> >
> >> -1, in general looks good but I did notice a few things:
> >>
> >> * the "zookeeper_version.h" file needs to be updated to version 3.3.3
> >> * same with configure.ac (
> >> http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/ZooKeeper/HowToRelease)
> >> * the toplevel zk jar and all jars in dist-maven have not been signed,
> >> they need to be
> >>
> >> RAT passed so that's good.
> >>
> >> Patrick
> >>
> >> On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 6:27 AM, Benjamin Reed 
> wrote:
> >> > (the previous email had the URL slightly incorrect)
> >> >
> >> > after much struggle! i've created a candidate build for ZooKeeper
> 3.3.3.
> >> > this is a bug fix
> >> > release addressing 13 issues (two of them extremely critical) -- see
> the
> >> > release notes for details.
> >> >
> >> > *** Please download, test and VOTE before the
> >> > *** vote closes 11pm pacific time, Tuesday, February 22.***
> >> >
> >> > http://people.apache.org/~breed/zookeeper-3.3.3-candidate-0/
> >> >
> >> > one thing that has not been fixed in this release is that the docs
> still
> >> > reference hadoop. this will be fixed in a future release.
> >> >
> >> > should we release this?
> >> >
> >> > ben
> >> >
> >> > ps - give that this is the first release there is more than likely
> >> something
> >> > i missed and given the severity of issues addressed it would be nice
> to
> >> get
> >> > it out quickly. please review ASAP.
> >> >
> >>
> >
>