[jira] [Updated] (ZOOKEEPER-679) Offers a node design for interacting with the Java Zookeeper client.

2017-03-13 Thread Michael Han (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-679?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Michael Han updated ZOOKEEPER-679:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 3.5.3)
   3.5.4

> Offers a node design for interacting with the Java Zookeeper client.
> 
>
> Key: ZOOKEEPER-679
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-679
> Project: ZooKeeper
>  Issue Type: New Feature
>  Components: contrib, java client, tests
>Reporter: Aaron Crow
>Assignee: Aaron Crow
> Fix For: 3.5.4, 3.6.0
>
> Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-679.patch, ZOOKEEPER-679.patch, 
> ZOOKEEPER-679.patch, ZOOKEEPER-679.patch
>
>
> Following up on my conversations with Patrick and Mahadev 
> (http://n2.nabble.com/Might-I-contribute-a-Node-design-for-the-Java-API-td4567695.html#a4567695).
> This patch includes the implementation as well as unit tests. The first unit 
> test gives a simple high level demo of using the node API.
> The current implementation is simple and is only what I need withe current 
> project I am working on. However, I am very open to any and all suggestions 
> for improvement.
> This is a proposal to support a simplified node (or File) like API into a 
> Zookeeper tree, by wrapping the Zookeeper Java client. It is similar to 
> Java's File API design.
> Although, I'm trying to make it easier in a few spots. For example, deleting 
> a Node recursively is done by default. I also lean toward resolving 
> Exceptions "under the hood" when it seems appropriate. For example, if you 
> ask a Node if it exists, and its parent doesn't even exist, you just get a 
> false back (rather than a nasty Exception).
> As for watches and ephemeral nodes, my current work does not need these 
> things so I currently have no handling of them. But if potential users of  
> the "Node a.k.a. File" design want these things, I'd be open to supporting 
> them as reasonable.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)


[jira] [Updated] (ZOOKEEPER-679) Offers a node design for interacting with the Java Zookeeper client.

2016-06-21 Thread Chris Nauroth (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-679?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Chris Nauroth updated ZOOKEEPER-679:

Fix Version/s: (was: 3.5.2)
   3.5.3

> Offers a node design for interacting with the Java Zookeeper client.
> 
>
> Key: ZOOKEEPER-679
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-679
> Project: ZooKeeper
>  Issue Type: New Feature
>  Components: contrib, java client, tests
>Reporter: Aaron Crow
>Assignee: Aaron Crow
> Fix For: 3.6.0, 3.5.3
>
> Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-679.patch, ZOOKEEPER-679.patch, 
> ZOOKEEPER-679.patch, ZOOKEEPER-679.patch
>
>
> Following up on my conversations with Patrick and Mahadev 
> (http://n2.nabble.com/Might-I-contribute-a-Node-design-for-the-Java-API-td4567695.html#a4567695).
> This patch includes the implementation as well as unit tests. The first unit 
> test gives a simple high level demo of using the node API.
> The current implementation is simple and is only what I need withe current 
> project I am working on. However, I am very open to any and all suggestions 
> for improvement.
> This is a proposal to support a simplified node (or File) like API into a 
> Zookeeper tree, by wrapping the Zookeeper Java client. It is similar to 
> Java's File API design.
> Although, I'm trying to make it easier in a few spots. For example, deleting 
> a Node recursively is done by default. I also lean toward resolving 
> Exceptions "under the hood" when it seems appropriate. For example, if you 
> ask a Node if it exists, and its parent doesn't even exist, you just get a 
> false back (rather than a nasty Exception).
> As for watches and ephemeral nodes, my current work does not need these 
> things so I currently have no handling of them. But if potential users of  
> the "Node a.k.a. File" design want these things, I'd be open to supporting 
> them as reasonable.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)