Re: SDP offer with IP 0.0.0.0 from Firefox 41
On 10/6/15 10:26 AM, ors.szabo...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks Eric. According to: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mmusic-trickle-ice-02, Chapter 5.1: " As mentioned earlier in this section, Offers and Answers can contain any set of candidates, which means that a trickle ICE session description MAY contain no candidates at all. In such cases the agent would still need to place an address in the "c=" line(s). If the use of a host address there is undesirable (e.g. for privacy reasons), the agent MAY set the connection address to IP6 ::. In this case it MUST also set the port number to 9 (Discard). There is no need to include a fictitious candidate for the IP6 :: address when doing so." I interpret this that the browser MAY use IP6 :: in the SDP c-line in case there are no ICE candidates. In my case, host candidates exist, still the c-line contains no IP. Is this correct behavior? ___ dev-media mailing list dev-media@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-media Not exactly, but the only reason the address in the c-line is there is for endpoints that don't support ICE. Webrtc endpoints must support ICE (since the DTLS handshake is not allowed to begin until ICE completes), so they should not be using that address. However, for the sake of interop we're making this change over here: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1192813 Best regards, Byron Campen ___ dev-media mailing list dev-media@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-media
Re: SDP offer with IP 0.0.0.0 from Firefox 41
Thanks Eric. According to: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mmusic-trickle-ice-02, Chapter 5.1: " As mentioned earlier in this section, Offers and Answers can contain any set of candidates, which means that a trickle ICE session description MAY contain no candidates at all. In such cases the agent would still need to place an address in the "c=" line(s). If the use of a host address there is undesirable (e.g. for privacy reasons), the agent MAY set the connection address to IP6 ::. In this case it MUST also set the port number to 9 (Discard). There is no need to include a fictitious candidate for the IP6 :: address when doing so." I interpret this that the browser MAY use IP6 :: in the SDP c-line in case there are no ICE candidates. In my case, host candidates exist, still the c-line contains no IP. Is this correct behavior? ___ dev-media mailing list dev-media@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-media
Re: SDP offer with IP 0.0.0.0 from Firefox 41
It's for Trickle ICE: http://rtcweb-wg.github.io/jsep/#sec.initial-offers On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 9:21 AM, wrote: > Hi, > > Can you tell me what is the reasoning behind this? > Thanks. > ___ > dev-media mailing list > dev-media@lists.mozilla.org > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-media > ___ dev-media mailing list dev-media@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-media
SDP offer with IP 0.0.0.0 from Firefox 41
Hi, Can you tell me what is the reasoning behind this? Thanks. ___ dev-media mailing list dev-media@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-media
