Are crashtests allowed to access chrome (e.g. set preferences)?
Hi all, I want to start with crashtests for webrtc crashes which have been fixed recently. Sadly this feature is disabled on mozilla-central and mozilla-aurora. So I would have to set two preferences to get access to all the features. Now I see that crashtests are getting run through the reftest framework and wonder if there is a way to modify preferences before the test, or is that forbidden? In either way, what would be the best way to get those tests into the tree? I assume a place like /dom/media/tests/crashtests/ is a good location? Thanks! Henrik ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
Re: nsresult is now a strongly typed enum
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Ted Mielczarek t...@mielczarek.org wrote: On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Ehsan Akhgari ehsan.akhg...@gmail.com wrote: This is currently enabled on all compilers which support strongly typed enums (recent clang, gcc = 4.4, and Visual C++ 2012). So this is all of our official builds except for Windows right now? Seems so, yes. ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
Re: Are crashtests allowed to access chrome (e.g. set preferences)?
Now that bug 792029 has landed, you should be able to use SpecialPowers in crashtests. On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Henrik Skupin hsku...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, I want to start with crashtests for webrtc crashes which have been fixed recently. Sadly this feature is disabled on mozilla-central and mozilla-aurora. So I would have to set two preferences to get access to all the features. Now I see that crashtests are getting run through the reftest framework and wonder if there is a way to modify preferences before the test, or is that forbidden? In either way, what would be the best way to get those tests into the tree? I assume a place like /dom/media/tests/crashtests/ is a good location? Thanks! Henrik ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
Re: Call for help landing b2g patches on aurora
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 10:18 AM, Justin Lebar justin.le...@gmail.com wrote: Landing on Aurora should be a simple matter of $ hg transplant -se /path/to/your/m-i/repo rev-to-land # edit the commit message to include a=whoever $ hg push Just wanted to point out that I have a little script you can configure to make this even easier: https://blog.mozilla.org/ted/2009/12/02/easy-branch-landing-of-patches/ -Ted ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
Re: Are crashtests allowed to access chrome (e.g. set preferences)?
Bobby Holley wrote on 10/15/12 2:12 PM: Now that bug 792029 has landed, you should be able to use SpecialPowers in crashtests. Wow, great response time and great answer! Thank you a lot Bobby! -- Henrik ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
Re: nsresult is now a strongly typed enum
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 8:11 AM, Aryeh Gregor a...@aryeh.name wrote: On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Ted Mielczarek t...@mielczarek.org wrote: On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Ehsan Akhgari ehsan.akhg...@gmail.com wrote: This is currently enabled on all compilers which support strongly typed enums (recent clang, gcc = 4.4, and Visual C++ 2012). So this is all of our official builds except for Windows right now? Seems so, yes. OK, just wanted to clarify. That's good, since most instances of breakage here should cause compile errors on tinderbox. Great work, btw! -Ted ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
Re: Are crashtests allowed to access chrome (e.g. set preferences)?
Ted Mielczarek wrote on 10/15/12 2:16 PM: The reftest manifest format (which crashtest uses, since crashtests run in the reftest harness) has explicit support for setting preferences per-test: http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/layout/tools/reftest/README.txt#160 Sounds good. I will make use of it. Sadly it cannot set the preference globally for all the tests referenced by that crashtests.list file. -- Henrik ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
Concerning to Firefox OS binary on GalaxyS2
Hi. All. I tried to build the binary for GalaxyS2 with latest version of Firefox OS, but it was not working. So I would like to ask the questions to you guys. I got the source of Firefox OS (Version of Oct. 14th) with [1] instruction. Then, I refer the GETTING AND BUILDING BOOT TO GECKO part in [2] for building the Firefox OS on GalaxyS2. After burn the binary to the GalaxyS2, I tried to boot the device. Unfortunately I got the result like black screen with “Mozilla” in right bottom side. It seems Gaia UI is not working. Could anyone comments for this result? Thanks in advance! [1] git clone git://github.com/mozilla-b2g/B2G.git [2] https://developer.mozilla.org/en- US/docs/Mozilla/Boot_to_Gecko/Building_and_installing_Boot_to_Gecko Best regards, Wonsuk. = 이 원 석 (Wonsuk, Lee) / Principal Engineer, Ph.D SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS Co., LTD. (三星電子) Mobile: +82-10-5800-3997 E-mail: mailto:wonsuk11@samsung.com wonsuk11@samsung.com http://www.wonsuk73.com/ http://www.wonsuk73.com/, twitter: @wonsuk73 - Inspire the World, Create the Future !!! = ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
Re: W3C Proposed Recommendation: WOFF File Format 1.0
Any properly licensed TrueType/OpenType/Open Font Format file can be packaged in WOFF format for Web use. anybody else see problems here. W3C its main goal is to open standards right ? i think Mozilla's Jonathan Kew, needs to stick this where it does not shine ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
Re: Are crashtests allowed to access chrome (e.g. set preferences)?
On Monday 2012-10-15 15:00 +0200, Henrik Skupin wrote: Ted Mielczarek wrote on 10/15/12 2:16 PM: The reftest manifest format (which crashtest uses, since crashtests run in the reftest harness) has explicit support for setting preferences per-test: http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/layout/tools/reftest/README.txt#160 Sounds good. I will make use of it. Sadly it cannot set the preference globally for all the tests referenced by that crashtests.list file. There's a reviewed patch in https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=788967 that adds support for this, but apparently it had failures on try. -David -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂 턢 Mozilla http://www.mozilla.org/ 턂 ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
Re: W3C Proposed Recommendation: WOFF File Format 1.0
On 15/10/12 15:28, alexander.alis...@gmail.com wrote: Any properly licensed TrueType/OpenType/Open Font Format file can be packaged in WOFF format for Web use. anybody else see problems here. W3C its main goal is to open standards right ? No, I don't see a problem there. WOFF *is* an open standard. The fact that it's an open standard has nothing to do with the licensing of any content (fonts) delivered in this format, whether extremely free and open or highly restrictive - just as the HTTP protocol, for example, may be used to deliver either free or proprietary content. That sentence, IMO, is merely a reminder that packaging a font file in WOFF format does not in itself magically alter or remove any copyright restrictions or licensing terms that may be applicable; and conversely, that a font delivered as a WOFF file is still subject to whatever terms the font owner chooses (just like any other content, regardless of how it is packaged). ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
Re: W3C Proposed Recommendation: WOFF File Format 1.0
On 10/15/12 10:28 AM, alexander.alis...@gmail.com wrote: Any properly licensed TrueType/OpenType/Open Font Format file can be packaged in WOFF format for Web use. anybody else see problems here. No, explain? i think Mozilla's Jonathan Kew, needs to stick this where it does not shine But no matter what, this is unacceptable. If you can't be civil, please just don't say anything. -Boris ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
Re: Are crashtests allowed to access chrome (e.g. set preferences)?
L. David Baron wrote on 10/15/12 4:31 PM: There's a reviewed patch in https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=788967 that adds support for this, but apparently it had failures on try. Exactly what I need. Will watch when it lands. Thanks! -- Henrik ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
Re: Why we avoid making private modifications to NSPR and NSS (was Re: Imported code)
On 2012-10-15 5:32 PM, Robert O'Callahan wrote: On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 4:18 AM, Ehsan Akhgari ehsan.akhg...@gmail.comwrote: Sure, I was not suggesting that. What I was suggesting was to take our implementation of the TimeStamp class for Windows and use the same ideas in the NSPR implementation of that function, for callers who prefer to use the PRTime API. But are there any such callers in Gecko? I don't know of any. If there aren't any, then I don't think we would want to do this work. Not as far as I know, and I also don't plan on working on that myself. I mostly said that for the sake of other NSPR consumers. Ehsan ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
