Re: On builds getting slower

2013-08-28 Thread Mark Hammond

On 28/08/2013 3:30 AM, Gregory Szorc wrote:
...
 Does anyone else see this libraries-always-rebuild behavior?

Not me - although I see just a few small ones - relevant parts of the log:

 5:20.54 webapprt.obj
 5:21.01 webapprt.cpp
 5:21.01
 5:21.05 webapprt-stub.exe
 5:21.07 MakeNSIS v2.46-Unicode - Copyright 1995-2009 Contributors
...
 5:21.27 Output: 
o:\src\mozilla-git\central2\obj-i686-pc-mingw32\webapprt\win\instgen\webapp-uninstaller.exe

...
 5:29.50 nsBrowserApp.obj
 5:30.12 nsBrowserApp.cpp
 5:30.12
 5:30.15 firefox.exe
 5:30.32Creating library firefox.lib and object firefox.exp
 5:30.32
 5:30.35 Embedding manifest from 
o:/src/mozilla-git/central2/browser/app/firefox.exe.manifest

 5:31.38 MakeNSIS v2.46-Unicode - Copyright 1995-2009 Contributors
...
 5:32.25 Output: 
o:\src\mozilla-git\central2\obj-i686-pc-mingw32\browser\installer\windows\instgen\helper.exe

...
 5:32.69 MakeNSIS v2.46-Unicode - Copyright 1995-2009 Contributors
...
 5:32.90 Output: 
o:\src\mozilla-git\central2\obj-i686-pc-mingw32\browser\installer\windows\instgen\maintenanceservice_installer.exe


and that's it.

Mark

___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform


How to observe selection range within input element

2013-08-28 Thread Yuan Xulei(袁徐磊)

Hi all,

I'm implementing b2g keyboard/IME api and encounter a problem
with the selection range observing.

We want to monitor the cursor position or selection range changes
in current input element, which is a text input field or a content
editable element receiving user's input. The cursor position or the
selection range can be changed by
1) key events generated by virtual keyboard,
2) js code,
3) mouse events triggered by user.

Currently we listen a pile of events(mousedown, mouseup, input...)
to check if the selection range has been changed. It is inefficient
and error prone.

I wonder if there is a way to monitor the selection range changes
from chrome js.

Could anyone give me a clue?

Thanks.
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform


padding/margin/border/content highlighting (need platform help)

2013-08-28 Thread Paul Rouget
For the devtools, we want to show the box model of the selected node.
Screenshot (chrome): 
https://bug663778.bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=538850

We use the computed style and getBoundClientRect.

- bug 381328 is blocking us (computed style of margin:auto returns 0).
  Can anyone help? (maybe mentor me?)

- is there any better way than using the computed style + getBoundClientRect?
  Maybe we can expose the layout info to nsIDOMWindowUtils, or maybe we can
  highlight these regions directly at the gecko level.

-- Paul
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform


Re: On builds getting slower

2013-08-28 Thread Ted Mielczarek
On 8/28/2013 3:16 AM, Mark Hammond wrote:
 On 28/08/2013 3:30 AM, Gregory Szorc wrote:
 ...
  Does anyone else see this libraries-always-rebuild behavior?

 Not me - although I see just a few small ones - relevant parts of the
 log:

  5:20.54 webapprt.obj
  5:21.01 webapprt.cpp
  5:21.01
  5:21.05 webapprt-stub.exe
  5:21.07 MakeNSIS v2.46-Unicode - Copyright 1995-2009 Contributors
 ...
  5:21.27 Output:
 o:\src\mozilla-git\central2\obj-i686-pc-mingw32\webapprt\win\instgen\webapp-uninstaller.exe
 ...
  5:29.50 nsBrowserApp.obj
  5:30.12 nsBrowserApp.cpp
  5:30.12
  5:30.15 firefox.exe
  5:30.32Creating library firefox.lib and object firefox.exp
  5:30.32
  5:30.35 Embedding manifest from
 o:/src/mozilla-git/central2/browser/app/firefox.exe.manifest
  5:31.38 MakeNSIS v2.46-Unicode - Copyright 1995-2009 Contributors
 ...
  5:32.25 Output:
 o:\src\mozilla-git\central2\obj-i686-pc-mingw32\browser\installer\windows\instgen\helper.exe
 ...
  5:32.69 MakeNSIS v2.46-Unicode - Copyright 1995-2009 Contributors
 ...
  5:32.90 Output:
 o:\src\mozilla-git\central2\obj-i686-pc-mingw32\browser\installer\windows\instgen\maintenanceservice_installer.exe

 and that's it.
FYI these are a known consequence[1] of the Build ID being updated every
build (and then compiled into the application binary).

-Ted

1. https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=740359

___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform


Re: Review of changes to Web compat-sensitive prefs in localizations

2013-08-28 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Wednesday, February 27, 2013 12:28:43 PM UTC, Axel Hecht wrote:
 That's rather orthogonal to what you're currently trying to do, but it's 
 also indicating to me that we should remove all of those settings from 
 intl.properties, and just leave accept-lang, and deduce the rest.

So how about the parser just accepts a locale value and implements the 
locale-to-fallback encoding map? Given the numerous problems discovered[1], 
locale-defaults actually being part of the HTML Standard, and it being 
available as option to change encourages people to tweak it, I think that would 
be a better way forward.

I wonder if there are similar settings that are in a sense too technical to 
leave up to localization teams.


[1]Recent issues discovered by hsivonen:
* https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=910163
* https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=910165
* https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=910169 (bogus value, even)
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform


Re: Review of changes to Web compat-sensitive prefs in localizations

2013-08-28 Thread Henri Sivonen
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Henri Sivonen hsivo...@hsivonen.fi wrote:

  If I were starting such a research project, I'd start by testing
 hypotheses about TLD correlation with legacy encodings. The first thing I'd
 like to test would be whether it would be an improvement to make builds
 that have Traditional Chinese as the UI language use gbk (as opposed to
 big5) as the fallback encoding when browsing content loaded from a .cn
 domain.


To elaborate, we could first have a lookup table from country TLDs to
legacy encodings and then only as a second step would use the lookup from
the UI localization to legacy encodings for TLDs  that don't have a strong
country affiliation. So for example, we'd map .cn to gbk, .tw to big5, .ru
to windows-1251 and .de, .fr, .se, .nl, .fi etc. to windows-1252, but for
.com, .org and such we'd base the guess on the UI locale like today but
using a less brittle way of managing the mapping.

But anyway, that would be improving the guessing instead of just fixing how
the current guessing mechanism is a managed. I don't want better to be a
blocker for good here.

-- 
Henri Sivonen
hsivo...@hsivonen.fi
http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform


Re: Review of changes to Web compat-sensitive prefs in localizations

2013-08-28 Thread Henri Sivonen
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Henri Sivonen hsivo...@hsivonen.fi wrote:

 On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Henri Sivonen hsivo...@hsivonen.fiwrote:

  If I were starting such a research project, I'd start by testing
 hypotheses about TLD correlation with legacy encodings. The first thing I'd
 like to test would be whether it would be an improvement to make builds
 that have Traditional Chinese as the UI language use gbk (as opposed to
 big5) as the fallback encoding when browsing content loaded from a .cn
 domain.


 To elaborate, we could first have a lookup table from country TLDs to
 legacy encodings and then only as a second step would use the lookup from
 the UI localization to legacy encodings for TLDs  that don't have a strong
 country affiliation. So for example, we'd map .cn to gbk, .tw to big5, .ru
 to windows-1251 and .de, .fr, .se, .nl, .fi etc. to windows-1252, but for
 .com, .org and such we'd base the guess on the UI locale like today but
 using a less brittle way of managing the mapping.


Filed as: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=910211

-- 
Henri Sivonen
hsivo...@hsivonen.fi
http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform


Re: How to observe selection range within input element

2013-08-28 Thread Jim Chen
Hi Xulei,

I think you can use
nsISelectionPrivate::addSelectionListener [1]. You can get
nsISelectionPrivate through QueryInterface on nsISelection,
which you can get from nsIEditor.

Cheers,
Jim

[1]
http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/content/base/public/nsISelectionPrivate.idl#52


On 8/28/13 5:24 AM, Yuan Xulei(袁徐磊) wrote:
 Hi all,
 
 I'm implementing b2g keyboard/IME api and encounter a problem
 with the selection range observing.
 
 We want to monitor the cursor position or selection range
 changes
 in current input element, which is a text input field or a
 content
 editable element receiving user's input. The cursor position
 or the
 selection range can be changed by
 1) key events generated by virtual keyboard,
 2) js code,
 3) mouse events triggered by user.
 
 Currently we listen a pile of events(mousedown, mouseup,
 input...)
 to check if the selection range has been changed. It is
 inefficient
 and error prone.
 
 I wonder if there is a way to monitor the selection range
 changes
 from chrome js.
 
 Could anyone give me a clue?
 
 Thanks.
 ___
 dev-platform mailing list
 dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
 https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform


Re: How to observe selection range within input element

2013-08-28 Thread Yuan Xulei(袁徐磊)

Hi Jim and Ehsan,

Thank you. It really helps ;-)

Mark also show me an example about the usage of selectionListeners, 
which covers the case of designMode/contentEditable.


All the information you provided seems enough to solve my issue :-)

Regards,

Yuan

On 08/28/2013 05:31 PM, Mark Capella wrote:
In FF for mobile we use selectionListeners ... won't this work for you?

http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/mobile/android/chrome/content/SelectionHandler.js#225 



On 08/29/2013 03:24 AM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:

On 2013-08-28 12:22 PM, Jim Chen wrote:

Hi Xulei,

I think you can use
nsISelectionPrivate::addSelectionListener [1]. You can get
nsISelectionPrivate through QueryInterface on nsISelection,
which you can get from nsIEditor.


But note that you can only get the nsIEditor for plaintext controls, 
that won't work for designMode/contentEditable.


Cheers,
Ehsan


Cheers,
Jim

[1]
http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/content/base/public/nsISelectionPrivate.idl#52 




On 8/28/13 5:24 AM, Yuan Xulei(袁徐磊) wrote:

Hi all,

I'm implementing b2g keyboard/IME api and encounter a problem
with the selection range observing.

We want to monitor the cursor position or selection range
changes
in current input element, which is a text input field or a
content
editable element receiving user's input. The cursor position
or the
selection range can be changed by
1) key events generated by virtual keyboard,
2) js code,
3) mouse events triggered by user.

Currently we listen a pile of events(mousedown, mouseup,
input...)
to check if the selection range has been changed. It is
inefficient
and error prone.

I wonder if there is a way to monitor the selection range
changes
from chrome js.

Could anyone give me a clue?

Thanks.
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform





___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform